Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

Very simple lesson for InBev. Don't rebrand Budweiser as Queer Beer. How many troons go to NASCAR? None. And when NASCAR is your optimum market, don't do anything to piss them off
I don't think they will listen their audience since Blackrock pays them to do this kiked degeneracy.

I'm skeptical of the meme of "Go Woke, Go Broke", since most corporations are too big to fail and/or are payed by Blackrock.
 
Last edited:
"Roll up Roll Up Folks, pay your two bits and come marvel at the man with no penis fucking multiple businesses stockholders into the dirt, Gasp in horror as this ghoulish parody of the female form meets current presidents and makes real women grovel on national television for his acceptance, Bring your kids, give them a horrifying insight into what being a tiktok star might cost them"

(Just remember to not take your eyes off them or leave them unsupervised, Management is not liable for the 60/75% chance of them getting molested/groomed around one of these brunning and stave individuals)
 
I can't reply to Lowercase I internet, but it isn't about getting people to accept trannies. It is about demoralizing people and atomizing the family unit, the bedrock of a society. You think you are doing well? Then you turn on the TV and now beer is also pro-tranny and another part of you dies. Enough of that happens to enough people and they'll more easily accept whatever WEF 'new normal' shit they have planned.
 
There's troons and there's AGP troons. If they had used one of the (few) troons who just wants to be left alone to Twitchstream speedruns, then I don't think many would care. Hell, use Blair White or "Woman of the Year" Caitlyn Jenner.

But Mulvaney is a certified creep. Spend 5 minutes watching his repulsive videos and it's clear he shouldn't be around women or children. I gurantee he has rape and murder fantasies about "cis" women prettier than him.

"Troons are sick of being stereotyped as a pornsick AGP'er!" *Makes mascot a pornsick AGP'er*
 
They could have accomplished this much more successfully just launching the booze version of juul pods. Just release crap similar to Mike's Hard except wrap it up in the color of the rainbow and call it some stupid zoomer shit like "Them's hard sodas" and make it taste like cotton candy booze. Hell releasing a cotton candy that has booze in it would have been better.

They already make Bud Light seltzers and other fruity drinks, have for years.
 
Pretty sure people mocked each other for drinking Bud Light (or any light beer) in that manner long before Dylan appeared on the scene.
Still funny though.
Bud Light has always been trash. If it takes Mulvaney to make people realize this fact, then so be it.

Is Nike next?
View attachment 5042136
Archive

As much as we in this thread may enjoy the Daily Mail’s coverage of Dylan, do not for a moment believe it is not supported by CAA and Dylan’s PR team, even if it doesn’t come from them directly (and I suspect some of it does).
Conservatives are the REAL bra burners
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: supremeautismo
But Mulvaney is a certified creep. Spend 5 minutes watching his repulsive videos and it's clear he shouldn't be around women or children.
Came here to say this. Having a tranny represent your brand is one thing, but this Mulvaney is really off-putting, even by tranny standards. It seems like they could have found a better spokesman if they'd tried. Was Tafaj unavailable?
 
Last edited:
Oh this came directly from gheir new Harvard educated VP of Marketing. No question. Whether anyone above her signed off on it is uncertain. But no fucking way it was just some rogue marketing drone like they are implying.
I reckon the higher ups would have to sign off on it, on the expectation Alissa Heinerscheid gets full responsibility, good or bad. She'll probably take the fall for this; won't lose her job because that would be too obvious but it will be a black mark against her favor. Her colleagues will get the message that there's now a defined limit to how much girldick the market will suck.

Even if you switch to another InBev brand it still sends the same message to the marketing executives. Maybe even better since they're all most in competition with each other. If Corona sales go up because of this it just reinforces the message in their eyes.

Dylan adds that during college he had been conforming to an industry that never let him see trannies perform on Broadway ... Dylan brings up his experience with the Book of Mormon, and how he has yet to play a woman role on Broadway.

Many such cases. Very sad. :feels:
 
Last edited:
So this is the 'not so subtle' subliminal messaging that Olay is subjecting it's young and impressionable TikTok audience to.

View attachment 5046722
View attachment 5046730
View attachment 5046742
View attachment 5046758
View attachment 5046766
View attachment 5046770
View attachment 5046774
View attachment 5046782
View attachment 5046786
View attachment 5046794

So it's clear that Dylan is a WOMAN and every other feminine type can be referred to by the some of their parts.... definitely NOT objectifying though.

Protip: to tease your wife/gf start referring to her as a "bleeder", "chest-feeder", or "person with a cervix". It'll piss her off I promise.

Edit: despite this video making the rounds there are other versions of it without the labels. I don't have a TikTok to search for the original Olay advertisement.
"Birthing Person"
"Chest Feeder"
"Bleeder"

I am not female or 'feminist', but good god even I am offended by this.
These are terms I can imagine the most foul, drunkard wife-basher using in a fit of DV rage.

Absolutely revolting.
 
My two cents on the Bud Lite shitshow:

1. The stock price marginally fluctuating means absolutely nothing and we won't know the actual effects until earnings reports come out for Q2, so please stop your retarded sperging about AB InBev "going broke."

2. That said, hard disagree with any users saying a boycott is useless. Even if everyone boycotting is still retarded and buys other AB InBev products, the huge hit to the Bud Lite product line will still be felt. While a huge loss in profits might not happen, they may have to scale back Bud Lite which will have it's own negative effects for the company.

Either way I'm hoping we get a mention of the tranny menace in the notes to the financial statements in the 10-Q similar to the cloudflare debaucle.
 
So how long do normie corporate boycotts last? I also don't understand why people drink Budweiser brand beers in the first place they all taste like aluminum can. Despite being owned by the same parent company the only palatable mass produced beer for me are Modelo and Dos Equis. They taste like they want you to have a fun time with the bros on a Saturday night.
I'm a Tecate man myself but Modelo is still top tier.
Only people I see drinking Bud Light are old ass Mexican dudes who couldn't find tallboys of Tecate or Modelo at the store.
Of all the brands under the AB-InBev umbrella I'm really confused why they went with Bud Light for this one. It's like, the most stereotypical right wing beer and when it isn't it's because it's being drunk by a Mexican guy who thinks trannies are gross but votes D because his cousin is an illegal. I just looked it up and this campaign would have probably worked much better with one of their smaller brands. Elysian, Blue Moon, their spiked seltzer, Turning Point all struck me as brands they own that would have been a better fit.
 
You are going to tell me that AB, a legacy company that's nearly 200 years old, is so poorly run that any random marketing bossbabe fresh out of woke uni can just circumvent their entire corporate hierarchy and push out anything they want without going through any series of checks and balances?
Yes. It happens all the time.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/why-companies-go-woke

Every box office bomb with ‘diversity’ themes, every time a bank loses a cool few billion, every food company that ‘updates’ their ‘problematic’ mascot, every college professor who writes an article contradicting their own field of study, every government leak and failed policy to widespread public annoyance is more often than not the wrong middleman in the right place making decisions without oversight. This has been a recurring constant in this generation’s dwindling period of laissez faire captialism. As we should all know, it only took a few employees embedded at or even just subcontracted to ISPs who had an agenda and too much access that nearly spelled the end of the Farms.

I’m not saying you’re wrong; it may have been signed off on by executives and now they’re panicking, but my point was it doesn’t make sense. Anheuser-Busch is not political and keeps itself low profile. Executives of old-money corporations are profit people and loath controversy and it’s not like Dylan is universally adored. If they wanted a trans inclusionary campaign to update their image they could have marketed a new product instead of clumsily putting a recognised trade name at risk - it’s alcohol, one way or another, it markets itself. It’s precisely because I’m sure the company is fully aware of who its target consumers are that I believe the Budweiser VP (a college educated white woman, seen here enjoying the very thing she wants her product to avoid associations with, and who is more vulnerable to progressive indoctrination) did this on her own initiative to save a brand that was in decline and likely without any consideration about who actually drinks the thing she’s supposed to be marketing.
 
NY post says it's over 5 billion so far. Hope it was worth it to stick it to those transphobes.
This is why I like business, economy and statistics.
Those pro-trans people can say anything they want, they can bury the numbers, fudge them, downplay them, but they can't change the real numbers, no matter what they do.
 
Who are they trying to appeal to with trannies? Millennials don't drink alcohol at least not much as Boomers did. Millennials are more likely be to dope smokers and heroin addicts than drunks. We don't hang around in bars either. Now I am not saying drug use is high amongst millennials either. Alcohol and drug use is also supposedly low amongst Zoomers as well.

So, who the fuck are they trying to appeal to?
 
Back