So in one post you're both admitting you're referring to what some other person said and yet also continuing to assume I think the same thing as this other person, even though I said nothing like that. OK.
Option 1 obviously. He's gonna keep the money rolling in as long as possible. Even if that means he has to put a mentally ill man in a dress in the forefront of his videos. So what if a few kids decide to ruin their life by trooning out. Jimmy got his and that's all that matters.
You're playing a dumb game of devils advocate for no reason at all other than to either be contrarian or to whiteknight this guy. If I leave a mouse alone with a cat and a guppy and I come back and the mouse is dead it's pretty safe to assume the cat killed it and not the guppy. "BUT YOU DONT KNOW THAT! YOU WERE NOT THERE WHEN IT HAPPENED!". No but I have common sense.
I find it extremely unsettling that The LGBTQ mob and liberals in general want to cancel people for things they said years ago if it has anything to do with race or religion even if that person has obviously changed but will run and trip over each other to try and excuse PDFile shit as being something you can get over or learn from, no that is a fucking mental illness these sickos will never recover from but they want to add those people to their list of protected class of LGBTQ people it's not only completely ridiculous but evil too, were living In Sodom and Gommorah people.People on twitter are using the "it was 6-7 years ago, people can change" excuse with Chris's past tweets. Including the ones about lolicon and children.
View attachment 5050209.View attachment 5050214
It's also going to be #1, because one of his defining characteristics is his lack of territoriality. He's always included everyone in his shit. His brand was built on giving away shit. He's talented in a number of ways and he could have made it in a number of ways. But he most consistently focused on giving away stuff (even while also pursuing making a lot of money from that).
Dumb analogy. The probability of a fish killing a mouse is not equal to the probability that more than one party is responsible for the failure of a marriage - I'm fairly certain the majority of divorces are like that.
Anime, not even once
Oh yes, a lolicon sadist paedophile can just magically "stop being a paedophile", as if this "sexuality" is a choice now.People on twitter are using the "it was 6-7 years ago, people can change
View attachment 5050209.View attachment 5050214
He’s a troon. Only a matter of time
If a marriage ends around the same time a man troons out, I think it's fair to assume there's a connection. Either she left him because he's pornsick, or he left her because she won't handmaiden for him. He's to blame either way. Blame the troon goes double when there are children involved. This is not just deadbeat dad, this is deadbeat groomer dad.
Okay, but even if she was, why does it matter? He's still a degenerate freak who jacks off to loli, and ditched his son so he can chase his fetish, and use him for updoots.
No matter the reason for such an outcome Chris is still a terrible father.
Funny how that “It was years ago people can change” excuse works if the person in question is a pervert but not if they’re a heckin’ wayciss
Chris Trooning out caused his divorce, not the other way around. Fame, a coom brain, and maybe autism got to him. Someone said that Karl, another team beast member, groomed him into being degenerate. I don't have proof of that, but it could make sense.
He won't. He's talked about how he wants to be popular for the next 10 years. So all he can do is smile and drown his tears in private. If he doesn't play ball with this tranny shit, YT and the MSM will go after him like they did Pewds.
