UK Rishi Sunak says 100% of women do not have a penis - It comes after Sir Keir Starmer said that ‘99.9 per cent of women’ do not have penises

1681469632078.png

Rishi Sunak has said he believes that 100 per cent of women do not have penises.

The prime minister has put himself at odds with Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer by declaring that 100 per cent of women do not have male genitals.

By contrast, Mr Starmer earlier this month suggested that as many as one in a thousand women have penises.

Asked whether 100 per cent of women do not have penises in an interview with Tory-supporting website Conservative Home, Mr Sunak said: “Yes, of course.”

He added: “We should always have compassion and understanding and tolerance for those who are thinking about changing their gender. Of course, we should.

“But when it comes to these issues of protecting women’s rights, women’s spaces, I think the issue of biological sex is fundamentally important when we think about those questions.

“As a general operating principle for me, biological sex is vitally fundamentally important in these questions. We can’t forget that.”


When Mr Starmer was asked by The Sunday Times whether women can have male genitals, he said: “For 99.9 per cent of women, it is completely biological ... and of course, they haven’t got a penis.”

Mr Sunak is hoping to exploit Labour’s division over transgender rights in the run-up to a general election, which is expected next year. He is pressing ahead with a pledge made during last year’s Conservative party leadership election to reform the legal definition of sex.

A review by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission concluded that amending the Equality Act 2010 to specifically refer to “biological sex” merits further consideration. The government had asked the watchdog to consider the pros and cons of such a change.

The change would mean, for example, that organisers of sporting events could exclude trans women without having to show the move was necessary because of fairness or safety.

Outspoken Conservative deputy chairman Lee Anderson has suggested the party fights the next general election on “a mix of culture wars and trans debate”.

Labour has been split over trans rights, with backbench opposition to Mr Starmer’s suggestion that some women have penises. Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield said the assertion left many “livid”, with women “frightened and furious” about the potential erosion of women’s rights.

Ms Duffield previously said it was “dystopian” that the leader of her party was reluctant to say whether women could have penises.

Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner said on Thursday that considering gender recognition reforms was not at odds with women’s rights.

She argued that protecting women-only spaces does not need to come at the expense of supporting transgender people.

Speaking to broadcasters during a visit to a food store in Derby on Thursday, Ms Rayner said: “I understand people’s concerns on both sides of the argument but I think we were the party of equality. We brought in the equality legislation. We are the best party for LGBT rights – we’ve got a history of doing that.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rishi-sunak-transgender-penis-b2319675.html (Archive)

 
The real end game of the progressive attack on language is to make sure they cannot lose an debate.

For them the ideal language is one that is meaningless in the greater context. Words mean what ever they want them to mean for that exact second and then the next second the word can mean something else. All so that they can twist and shape the discussion to benefit themselves.

They don't understand that by breaking language your destroying peoples ability to communicate effective...or maybe they do understand.

Either way the word "woman" has almost lost all meaning at this point.

What is a woman?

A miserable little pile of secrets?
 
"And if - which I do not for a moment believe - this island, or a large part of it, were subjugated and starving trooned out: our empire, beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Indian fleet, will carry on the struggle until, in God's good time, the NEW WORLD, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."
t. some old drunk retard
Much as you hate our tea-swilling hell hole at least we always ensure there's a good yield of milk for the Farms.
 
>flood your country with minorities
>attacks on gays skyrocket
>attacks on jews skyrocket
>attacks on women skyrocket
>attacks on trannies skyrocket


Anyone with a brain saw this coming years in advance, yet it's still funny enough that it almost makes the ethnocide worth it. Mainly because the people getting hate crimed are the ones who gleefully brought the hate criminals over and derided us for having concerns. Hope those Insta likes were worth it, you dumb, dumb motherfuckers.
 
Rishi Sunak is only saying this because bolts on are not bobs and a rotting axe wound is not a vagene. Not that's he wrong mind you, but the Eternal Shitter's thirst cannot be denied or escaped.
 
Back