Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Anyone curious about the wisdom of calling someone a pedophile on the internet can check out the Montagraph v. Rekeita lawsuit thread. Risk that shit on your own dime and platform.
That's probably not the worst people here called him. After all he's being called a murderer and a cannibal quite regularly.
But just calling someone a pedophile without evidence or some humorous twist is Ralph or Vordrak-tier humor.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Heckler1
That's probably not the worst people here called him. After all he's being called a murderer and a cannibal quite regularly.
But just calling someone a pedophile without evidence or some humorous twist is Ralph or Vordrak-tier humor.
The pepperoni thing is pretty obviously so outlandish as to be a joke
People also joke that he killed Bernell Trammell. That thing isn't as obviously satirical. It seems like its more likely to be libel but i dont know.
 
This seems like pretty conclusive proof that it was actually Pat right? At least once he tweeted that he had been SWATted and OnA couldn't find anything in the emergency services call logs. I remember people speculating that he had just seen a cop drive by or something, only to have the call show up half an hour or so after he tweeted.
View attachment 5059074
Only Patrick would be stupid enough to out himself by posting about the call before it actually happened. If I read a book with Patrick as a character I wouldn't buy it, no one could be this stupid and fat but yet here we are.
only thing from this guy that isn't circumstantial. def could be probable cause if times don't line up.
 
On a different note I browsed Ona while we were down and someone there posted a short video about pat and the Bernard Trammell case that was actually kinda compelling. It analyzed the selfie he took the day of the murder with his usually poofy hair flattened and disheveled, and the 23 degree angle of his bent back that seemed to match the killers on the bike. It also included the picture of Bernard pat took and posted to Twitter before he was killed. I couldn’t find it to link to when I went back to look for it, does anyone have that link? No shit I think pat seriously could have done it. Odd how his gun was “stolen” isn’t it?
Here's the video for anyone interested.
 
I think we all agree that:
Fatrick is not a murderer because he barely manages to keep his day-to-day life together and he wouldn't be able to plan and execute something as difficult and complicated as murdering someone and getting away with it.
Fatrick is not a pedophile because he's morbidly obese and:
An increased body weight can lead to an increase in sex hormone-binding globulin, which causes testosterone to fail. That can cause the libido to decrease. It can also narrow down the blood vessels, which makes it harder to climax. Sex positions tend to be more limited.
sauce
With his obesity he probably made himself asexual: no testosterone, no libido, possible erectile dysfunction.
 
One thing to keep in mind is an old axiom: 'Once all reasonable potentials have been fairly well eliminated, all unreasonable potentials must be considered, regardless of how improbable they may seem'

Many posts have been made saying "Okay, coming up on 30 calls to harass, what does someone get out of this?... etc..."

People have been asking this because there isn't a reasonable answer that can be used to answer that question because there were no external parties that would benefit in any reasonable way from Fatrick being harassed that many times.

As such, the unreasonable answers must be considered. One of those is that Pat was swatting himself. Also, the fact that TORSWATS said specifically that Fatrick was doing it in order to build a case against the MPD, to me, is rather confirmatory that it is indeed Fatrick himself that paid for the SWATs. It makes perfect sense in the context of him building a case for suing the MPD. Who would think of that as a motive for doing so other than Fatrick? It would be a very strange thing for someone to think that up by themselves to assign to Fatrick. Why would anyone bother to assign a motive to Fatrick for doing it unless they were told by Fatrick that it was their motive? It's not like assigning a motive would achieve any particular goal. Plus, you have to admit, Fatrick would have a hard time not telling someone he thinks could never tell anyone his reason for doing so because he thought it was such a genius idea.

I would say the fact that the motive was provided, and was so specific, is a fairly good indicator that Fatrick himself is responsible for hiring the SWATings.
 
Last edited:
One thing to keep in mind is an old axiom: 'Once all reasonable potentials have been fairly well eliminated, all unreasonable potentials must be considered, regardless of how improbably they may seem'

Many posts have been made saying "Okay, coming up on 30 calls to harass, what does someone get out of this?... etc..."

People have been ask this because there isn't a reasonable answer that can be used to answer that question because there were no external parties that would benefit in any reasonable way from Fatrick being harassed that many times.

As such, the unreasonable answers must be considered. One of those is that Pat was swatting himself. Also, the fact that TORSWATS said specifically that Fatrick was doing it in order to build a case against the MPD, to me, is rather confirmatory that it is indeed Fatrick himself that paid for the SWATs. It makes perfect sense in the context of him building a case for suing the MPD. Who would think of that as a motive for doing so other than Fatrick? It would be a very strange thing for someone to think that up by themselves to assign to Fatrick. Why would anyone bother to assign a motive to Fatrick for doing it unless they were told by Fatrick that it was their motive? It's not like assigning a motive would achieve any particular goal. Plus, you have to admit, Fatrick would have a hard time not telling someone he thinks could never tell anyone his reason for doing so because he thought it was such a genius idea.

I would say the fact that the motive was provided, and was so specific, is a fairly good indicator that Fatrick himself is responsible for hiring the SWATings.
Honestly the part about Pat using the default Telegram profile which openly displays your full name and phone number while asking for this very illegal service is enough to convince it's him, since that is so incredibly ham-fisted and incompetent. He literally could have hid his number and changed his Telegram profile name to "quasi", but doing it this way seems incredibly on-brand for him.
 
People also joke that he killed Bernell Trammell. That thing isn't as obviously satirical. It seems like its more likely to be libel but i dont know.
He lives nearby, took pictures of the victim, has a history of violent threats, fits the build, brags about firearms, and doesn't hide his disdain for Trump supporters. I don't think it's libel to point out someone is suspicious as hell.

That lays it out pretty well. I thought there was also some pictures/video comparing his gun with that of the shooter and the bike he keeps in the hovel?

Also, didn't see this posted. Torswats is claiming Pat called in the bomb-threats too, from the OnaForums:
patBomb.png

Edit: He's really screwed either way. Either, he did it himself and is almost certainly going to get caught with how many people online are looking. Or he has actual career criminals who want to shit on him for fun.
 
Last edited:
fatrick still hasn't suffered the consequences for associating with SFWA so i'm of the very pessimistic opinion that he gets away from this purely on DSP-tier retard luck.
It always seems like the worst scumbags always get off the easiest, but if I was to bet, I'd say this fat cunt is going to get fucked if he really is the one behind these SWATTings. The "30" something swat calls are way worse than anything I've ever heard about what phil has ever done. This shit is actually dangerous.
 
He lives nearby, took pictures of the victim, has a history of violent threats, fits the build, brags about firearms, and doesn't hide his disdain for Trump supporters. I don't think it's libel to point out someone is suspicious as hell.
All of that is purely circumstantial, and doesn't take into account that Pat is a huge coward, very stupid, and anytime he tries to pull a big brain scheme (like race cheating) he gets found out easily. Because not only is her very very stupid, he is also fat.
 
Also, didn't see this posted. Torswats is claiming Pat called in the bomb-threats too, from the OnaForums:
View attachment 5061230
at this point i am certain that torswats is just messing with the brothermen. either that, or he is after fatrick. i wasnt 100% on it, but i was leaning towards him swatting himself through torswat, but now torswat is saying pat swatted mtg and now bomb threats (and will probably come up with somthing else fat has done) im not buying it.

but i am 100% certain that patrick is fat. i also never had any doubt about him grinding up black children into pepperoni.
 
at this point i am certain that torswats is just messing with the brothermen. either that, or he is after fatrick. i wasnt 100% on it, but i was leaning towards him swatting himself through torswat, but now torswat is saying pat swatted mtg and now bomb threats (and will probably come up with somthing else fat has done) im not buying it.

but i am 100% certain that patrick is fat. i also never had any doubt about him grinding up black children into pepperoni.

Ya I take back what I said someone might be paying him to frame Piggy. Which is very funny but also disappointing. The amazing thing is by having so many enemies Fatrick has made finding the real culprit impossible.
 
I was willing to give Fatrick the benefit of the doubt, even though I still believed he was behind his own SWATtings, and not just take a literal criminal terrorist at their word. I considered it about a 75% chance Porky was SWATting himself before all this dropped, and in the initial fallout, didn't consider it any more or less likely, but holy shit, his response to this and his "alibi" makes him look far more guilty than the actual accusation.

This is unironically his "official story" of events:
"Ok, so this group of fans of this now defunct shock jock comedy radio show committed the most sophisticated identity fraud of all time against me, consisting of stealing my social security number, a picture of my passport, spoofed my phone's SIM card, hacked my email and used it to answer the verification email for setting up a crypto wallet in my name and then deleted it before I could notice, all so they could spent $1250+ of their own money to call in police wellness checks to my address with their master plan being to eventually stiff this person on payment in the desperate hope that by doing so, he would retaliate specifically by trying to reveal them, which they had carefully crafted to resemble myself, which they somehow had an almost 6th sense vision of the future to know that this person would react in this exact way somehow. If any very convincing evidence ever comes out that looks like I was actually behind this, it's just part of their lies and deception, please do not believe it."
You just wrote out Patrick's next court document. He'll just copy-paste this as a competent summary of what has happened.
 
Ya I take back what I said someone might be paying him to frame Piggy. Which is very funny but also disappointing. The amazing thing is by having so many enemies Fatrick has made finding the real culprit impossible.
i'll admit this lolcow swaTTing saga has been better than any episode of Law & Order, precisely because there are so many believable outcomes to reach in the case of Patrick S. Tomlinson. 1.2 gpa, hires lawyers to get unbanned, etc - Dick Wolf is reading this thread for inspiration on a movie he wants to make, i bet.

in all seriousness, i don't believe anyone from kiwifarms or onaforums would try to frame Patrick in this manner because what is there to tangibly gain, even if you're an irredeemable psychopath? revenge? sadistic glee? do we even know if he has any actual IRL enemies who would consider this and not just, i dunno, getting personal? and not people who point and laugh at him as he rolls around in shit? anyone who'd hate the greasy hog this much would have to know that he is a harmless, incapable retard whose daily routine can be easily tracked. swatting with intent to harm or kill is, to my understanding, rarely effective, and after the second or third phony call, it's generally useless. 30+ swattings? by an outside party? i can't get over that number, it just makes no sense. technically it's perhaps around 15-20 because he labeled even welfare checks as aggressive responses, but still: fatrick is completely irrelevant and has no impact on anything (except the small patch of earth he walks upon), and the way i see it, he's already paying for his crimes and deadbeat fatherhood by continuing to exist, to live with the shame of it, and to have his only defense be "No, child. You are one of the many thousands of stalkers who are harassing me, whom I always respond to but that isn't important no shut the fuck up shut your FUCKING MOUTH."

why would anyone want to cut that short? however, i'm told i have no idea how severely mentally ill some 'cow alogs can be, as is the case with WingsOfRedemption and DSP, and i guess i can see one very determined asshole out there enjoying the confusion he's causing, and would consider a fatality a cherry on top. that brings us back to the conclusion that he is swatting himself or engaging in a conspiracy to commit such an act by involving other people to give himself a better alibi... yet he appears guiltier every day.
 
The only argument against it being true is that it's too perfect.

It explains the constant Tweeting about him drowning his phone - he must have been hoping this guy was following him on Twitter (why?) and would see why he suddenly fell out of touch and couldn't pay. It's a last desperate move by a narcissist.

And he couldn't figure out any of the Twitter alternatives, of course he would not go directly into Privacy settings or whatever and see if his real name and number are displayed in Telegram, like non-fatheads do when they install anything like that.

And and...he bought in bulk when he didn't need nearly that many instead of paying one at a time as he thought he "needed" them which is such a penny wise/pound foolish 1.7 GPA (look at him, give him the Gym grades, if anything it's a reminder that he wasn't always a blob) move. So of course he would start thinking about other targets when he's drunk, and of course he'd fuck up the payment plan.

If he had a crypto account this past year, does that have to be revealed at the debtor's exam? Is it a snaphot or is there a time range they look at? I know all of these vacations (they can't repossess memories!) were designed to show he has no money, so I'm assuming he's fucking that up somehow.

It would honestly be too perfect and if he gets arrested for this I know we'll lose content but what more could we ask for? Such an ending! Truly powerful is our Norm, see how He torments those who befoul His name!

tl/dr: What a maroon

Piggy sends a Tweet
Will the l33t h4x0r see it?
Only rascals will
 
The only argument against it being true is that it's too perfect.
every time i try to think critically about the situation, this is where i end back up, too. to us gremlins on the internet, the pieces fit together neatly. it's too good to be true... but there's just no compelling-enough evidence to say fatrick didn't swat himself, nor compelling-enough evidence to conclusively say, beyond the shadow of doubt, that he did.
 
Back