Science Newer School Buses Could Cut Student Absences - Diesel buses make kids skip school

Replacing all of the oldest school buses in the nation could lead to 1.3 million fewer daily absences annually, according to a new study.​

APRIL 14TH, 2023
POSTED BY KIM NORTH SHINE-U. MICHIGAN

1681701275489.png
"The average bus is on the road 16 years before it is decommissioned. That means millions of children are still riding older, highly polluting buses to school," says Sara Adar. (Credit: Getty Images)

The suspected cause of these preventable absences is exposure to high levels of diesel exhaust fumes, which can leak into school bus cabins or enter buses through open windows. Over time, exposure can exacerbate respiratory illnesses and other conditions and lead to missed school days, the researchers say.

“Even relatively short commutes on school buses can dominate students’ daily air pollution exposures,” says Meredith Pedde, an environmental epidemiology research fellow at the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health and lead researcher for the study in Nature Sustainability.

Pedde conducted the research with senior author Sara Adar, associate professor and associate chair of epidemiology at the School of Public Health. Their study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of the Environmental Protection Agency’s School Bus Rebate Program, which launched in 2012, Pedde says.

“It is well established that traffic-related pollutants can have harmful effects on the body such as inducing inflammation, reducing lung function. and increasing asthma attacks,” she says. “Given the EPA’s random allotment of its clean bus funding, we believe our research clearly establishes the link between upgrading school buses and student attendance. Moreover, it demonstrates the need for continued and increased support for school districts to replace or upgrade their buses.”

For the study, the researchers analyzed data from nearly 3,000 school districts that applied to the EPA’s school bus replacement funding program between 2012 and 2017 and compared changes in attendance rates in 383 school districts that received funding and 2,400 districts that did not.

On average, they found that districts with upgraded buses had a 0.06 percentage point higher attendance rate compared to districts not selected for the clean bus funding. In a district of 10,000 students, that change means six additional students attended school each day. In total, replacing older school buses with newer models prevented at least 350,000 absences in one year in schools across the country.

In districts with higher levels of estimated ridership on replaced buses and older fleets of buses, the numbers were higher, with 14 more students per day attending school in high ridership districts and 45 more students attending each day in districts that replaced buses built before 1990.

Applying their results nationwide, the researchers extrapolated that replacing all pre-2000 model school buses would lead to more than 1.3 million additional days of attendance a year.

Approximately 25 million children ride buses to school in the US each year. While it is considered the safest mode of transportation from a traffic accident perspective, concerns about levels of emissions are well documented.

The EPA set out to hasten the transition of school bus fleets to cleaner vehicles in 2012 with its School Bus Rebate Program. The program is ongoing. It provided an average of nearly $6 million annually to school districts to upgrade school buses with cleaner alternatives during the period covered by the study.
The cost of upgrading buses—about $10,000 to retrofit and between $100,000 and $300,000 to purchase new buses—puts districts in the position of using buses as long as possible.

“The average bus is on the road 16 years before it is decommissioned. That means millions of children are still riding older, highly polluting buses to school,” Adar says.

“These findings demonstrate the importance of continued funding for new, clean school buses since we saw measurable improvements in attendance when school districts update their buses,” she says. “Most importantly, we found that replacing the oldest buses will result in the largest benefits for children and their caregivers.”

Additional coauthors are from the University of Washington and the University of Michigan.

Source: University of Michigan

Original Study DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01088-7

Source (Archive)
 

Attachments

Yeah, because no one would ever make up a bullshit study to convince a bunch of moronic politicians/school boards to sell electric busses to the state that won't work half the time, require constant maintenance and replacement, and will heavily tax the already faltering energy grid. With the added bonus of doing nothing to "prevent absences" or whatever made up nonsense reason they make up in whatever made up nonsense study they did(n't) create.

Nope, no one would ever do that.
 
Don't think eliminating absences has to do with education the children.

Nope.

It's all about the school district getting the money for little Johnny and little Janey's asses in the seats.

They give two fucks about your kid's education, attendance, or welfare.

As long as they're in the seats, the school district gets money, and that is ALL that matters to these people.

Oh, that and the money they can get from the EV grift.
 
I absolutely detest when there is a transparent and obvious reason somebody or some group wants something, then presents some tangentially-related justification for it while ignoring their primary motivator or treating it as equal. The study seems to have way too many variables for us to draw any actual conclusions from, and the difference considering the number of schoolchildren in the US seems relatively minuscule.

You sound like a small child that likes computer games trying to convince his mom to buy him a new gaming computer with the reason being "schoolwork." We all know this is a global warming emissions and vehicle sales pitch, shut the hell up with your postulations and disingenuous emotional manipulation.
 
For the study, the researchers analyzed data from nearly 3,000 school districts that applied to the EPA’s school bus replacement funding program between 2012 and 2017 and compared changes in attendance rates in 383 school districts that received funding and 2,400 districts that did not.

On average, they found that districts with upgraded buses had a 0.06 percentage point higher attendance rate compared to districts not selected for the clean bus funding. In a district of 10,000 students, that change means six additional students attended school each day. In total, replacing older school buses with newer models prevented at least 350,000 absences in one year in schools across the country.
I'm sure it's totally the buses and not any other factor like the family situation of the students or leaders in the school district preferring to skim funds off the top to give themselves/their union bros raises.
 
I'm sure it's totally the buses and not any other factor like the family situation of the students or leaders in the school district preferring to skim funds off the top to give themselves/their union bros raises.
nah, the students need electric bussys instead of diesel bussys smh my head fr fr no cap STRAIGHT BUSSIN
 
0.06%. Are you fucking real.

"That's six extra students in a district of 10,000!"
And zero extra students if you are in a district of 1000, you fucking tard. I don't know if their ignorance of math or physics is more appalling.

Not a single bus company will want to get on board with this, and with good reason.
 
Just like normal public transportation school transportation is full of violent niggers being violent. I always used to walk the several mile trip to school then got picked up by a family member once school was done. When it comes to school attendance there were just days I want to veg out or because I was totally nigger fatigued when retarded nigger/wigger/beaner shit happened in my electives and normal subject class I was too retarded in to not be placed in the advanced classes. If there wasn't nigger shit going on I was subject to IRL cringe from the band kids being weird ass niggers in public and getting mad that someone dared giggle at them being a weird ass nigga in public
It's funny when band kids talk about being bullied when nobody is actively bullying them, they just think people laughing at their weird ass running on all 4's to the lunchroom is bullying then go on to develop a victim complex over it and a lot of the times never grow out of it becoming the weird ass communist trannie niggers we see today posting all sorts of dumbass nigger shit on Twitter.
 
I recall the school bus as always crowded, stinky, too rowdy, and kids could be jerks to other kids.

Also American public schools can more or less regimented like a boot camp or prison to kids. Waiting in lines, no talking out of turn, no getting up without permission, recess reminiscent of a prison exercise yard, having to always sit up straight and pay attention, etc. Then there's all the homework. And that's not even getting into the SJW indoctrination after Current Year began.

I too doubt that changing the school bus will increase attendance.
 
As a non-American the idea of school buses has always seemed like a very good one. Where I live schools (generally, there might be some exceptions) don't have buses, instead the parents have to take the kids themselves. Until about twenty years ago this meant walking there or taking a train or regular bus, but over the past twenty years or so more and more parents are driving their kids to school. This has led to the phenomenon of the school run, where twice a day the roads are completely clogged by parents taking their kids to school.

The infuriating part? Because of the way catchment areas work, most of these kids still live within walking distance. The actual distances involved haven't changed. Yet their parents now insist on taking them there in their monstrously oversized Range Rovers and BMW X5s. Although I agree with them in principle, this is the one thing that urbanist youtubers like Not Just Bikes and Adam Something are unable to account for: the general public is fucking lazy. Hordes of pale, chubby people who would sooner clog the roads than walk a quarter of a mile, and then pass that mindset onto their children. It's depressing.
 
ah yes of course. if only the bus fumes did not make me cough then i would have had perfect attendance back then. since we all know all kids love school and nothing bad happens at school ever.

but where are the fucking SEATBELTS
i remember my old school bus had to have the seatbelts removed because kids would just whack each other with them and it became an issue when kids started getting broken noses just from riding the bus.

this removal of seatbelts turned out to not be the best idea however since one of the roads my bus went on was very old and full of potholes which the bus driver liked to hit full speed. needless to say many of the taller kids ended up putting dents in the roof from their heads hitting it when the bus went over a pothole.
 
The infuriating part? Because of the way catchment areas work, most of these kids still live within walking distance. The actual distances involved haven't changed. Yet their parents now insist on taking them there in their monstrously oversized Range Rovers and BMW X5s. Although I agree with them in principle, this is the one thing that urbanist youtubers like Not Just Bikes and Adam Something are unable to account for: the general public is fucking lazy. Hordes of pale, chubby people who would sooner clog the roads than walk a quarter of a mile, and then pass that mindset onto their children. It's depressing.
TBF, the reason why parents take their children to school in this way is because of security concerns. They don't want their children to get jumped or kidnapped or wander away from home, so the only thing to do is pick them up.

Then again, the best way to make sure children are safe is to homeschool, but I guess parents would rather deal with traffic than teach their kids.
 
Back