Crime (Update) Arrest Made in Rape of Ohio 10-Year-Old Who Had to Travel Out of State for Abortion

Link: https://www.thedailybeast.com/colum...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll
Archive: http://archive.md/2022.07.13-203034...o-traveled-to-indiana-for-abortion?ref=scroll


2BD82FDD-0F45-461E-A597-E6E5B37D2512.jpeg

An Ohio man was arrested Tuesday for raping a 10-year-old girl who became a central figure in the debate over abortion rights after she reportedly traveled to Indiana to have an abortion when Ohio outlawed the procedure last month.

Arrest records and court records viewed by The Daily Beast confirm that Gerson Fuentes, 27, was arrested Tuesday in Franklin County on a felony charge of raping a person under 13. The Columbus Dispatch, who first reported on his arrest, attended Fuentes’ arraignment in Columbus on Wednesday.

The unidentified girl’s plight became national news when the Indianapolis Star quoted a doctor who said a 10-year-old rape victim, who was six weeks and three days pregnant, had been forced to travel from her home in Columbus to Indiana for an abortion. Her home state had a trigger law that immediately outlawed abortions after six weeks once the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

A Columbus Police detective, identified by the Dispatch as Jeffrey Huhn, testified in court Wednesday that the 10-year-old victim was impregnated and had an abortion in Indianapolis.


“The victim went out of state to have a medically terminated abortion,” he said, according to video of the arraignment.

The video showed Fuentes staring blankly during the arraignment and standing with a slouch as a translator relayed the proceedings to him in Spanish.

Court records say the alleged rape occurred on May 12. Detectives said in court that police were made aware of the girl’s pregnancy through a referral filed with the local child services’ branch by her mother on June 22. Eight days later, the girl had the abortion in Indianapolis.

The aborted fetus has since been tested for DNA and entered into evidence, Huhn said, and officials say Fuentes confessed to the rape when he was questioned.

Fuentes’ arrest comes as conservative media claimed the girl’s story was made up for political theater, something parroted by Fox News presenters as recently as Tuesday night—while Fuentes was already in custody.

But those also with egg on their face in light of the horrific crime: the top law-enforcement official in Ohio.

Indeed, state Attorney General Dave Yost spent much of the past week effectively dubbing the story a hoax, suggesting he had heard nothing about any such crime being reported.

“We have a decentralized law enforcement system in Ohio, but we have regular contact with prosecutors and local police and sheriffs,” Yost said in a Fox News segment Monday. “Not a whisper anywhere.”


Yost released a statement Wednesday afternoon that did not address his previous comments.

“My heart aches for the pain suffered by this young child,” he said. “I am grateful for the diligent work of the Columbus Police Department in securing a confession and getting a rapist off the street.”

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist who first described the rape and its aftermath to the Indy Star, previously told The Daily Beast she expected vindication.

“It will all come out in time,” she said via text message on Tuesday.


Court records show Fuentes is being held on a bond of $2 million. The judge said he was considered a flight risk and, given the brutality of the crime, a high bail was necessary to protect the child involved.

—with reporting by Pilar Melendez
 
Last edited by a moderator:
>illegal spic rapes child, no abortion

Politics bros... How are we gonna spin this to fit our narrative? I don't feel so good
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Caesare
New update. Gerson now pleads not guilty.

Man pleads not guilty to alleged rape of 10-year-old girl who later had abortion​


by Lu Ann Stoia
Monday, July 25th 2022
UserWay icon for accessibility widget

Gerson Fuentes pleaded not guilty at his arraignment for the alleged rape of a young Ohio girl who then went to Indiana for an abortion after the Supreme Court's ruling on Roe v. Wade. July 25, 2022. (WSYX)



https://abc6onyourside.com/news/loc...ed-rape-after-young-girl-impregnated-?photo=2
1658802063491.png
1658802077645.png
1658802086141.png
1658802095431.png



Gerson Fuentes pleaded not guilty at his arraignment for the alleged rape of a young Ohio girl who then went to Indiana for an abortion after the Supreme Court's ruling on Roe v. Wade. July 25, 2022. (WSYX)
Facebook Share IconTwitter Share IconEmail Share Icon

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WSYX) — A case that has created a flash point in the national abortion debate was back in Franklin County Court on Monday.
Undocumented immigrant Gerson Fuentes who allegedly impregnated a girl when she was nine years old was arraigned by video from jail. Fuentes, through an interpreter, entered not guilty pleas to two counts of rape.
The case has become a lightning rod over abortion rights.

The girl, now ten years old, obtained an abortion through an Indiana doctor after her family said she was unable to obtain one in Ohio.

Police said Fuentes had confessed to raping the girl at least twice. Ohio’s “heartbeat law” bans abortions after the heartbeat is found, normally after about six weeks of pregnancy. The victim was reportedly just a few days past the six-week mark when she traveled to Indiana to terminate her pregnancy.

Defense attorney Bryan Bowen said even though police report that Fuentes confessed to the rapes, through discovery he will examine police reports, body cam footage and other documents to see if they should challenge the legitimacy of the confession.
“There are certainly rules governing when a statement to a police officer is admissible and when it is not. My immediate concern is Mr. Fuentes's lack of fluency in English and whether that may impact what he is supposed to have said or not said,” Bowen said.

“I certainly do think it is a shame that this situation has turned into a political football that is being kicked around by a lot of people for their own benefit, rather than focusing on the facts of what may or may not have happened here,” said Bowen.
Anti-abortion activists and some politicians raised doubts about the legitimacy of the case and whether there was a 10-year old who had an abortion. President Biden also mentioned the case in an attempt to underscore the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“It’s really too early to say. Certainly, this is an issue that is a flashpoint in our society and I don’t think it can help but have some impact, but I think it is too early to judge what that is going to be. Certainly, it is something I am concerned about,” Bowen said.
No bond was set for Fuentes, something Bowen said he plans to fight.

“I believe everyone here is entitled to as the Constitution states a presumption of innocence and I think it is important we fight for our clients. It’s important that we demonstrate to them and to everyone else that this is someone who is presumed innocent and is deserving of a bond,” Bowen said. “I suspect the Immigration enforcement agency has issued an immigration holder in his case. Which means even if he were able to post a bond he would not be released.”
“Criminal cases are best litigated in courtrooms, rather than TV screens,” said Bowen.
 
I'm being a lazy butt and skipping pictures. I skipped all the random other articles being injected into this one at least.

Gerson Fuentes, man accused of raping 10-year-old girl who got abortion, held without bond​

The Columbus Dispatch
Published 10:28 a.m. ET July 28, 2022
Updated 12:08 p.m. ET July 28, 2022

The man accused of raping and impregnating a 10-year-old girl will be held without bond pending his trial.

Gerson Fuentes, 27, is facing two counts of rape of a child under the age of 13. If convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of life in prison without any possibility for parole.

Columbus police Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified about the case before Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge Julie Lynch on Thursday morning, saying the child had identified Fuentes as the man who assaulted her and providing a clearer timeline of the investigation into the case.

Officer: DNA shows '99.99 % probability' Fuentes fathered 10-year-old girl's fetus​

Huhn said preliminary DNA testing shows that there's a "99.99% probability" that Fuentes is the biological father of the "product of conception."

Huhn testified that Franklin County Children Services received a referral on June 22 regarding the child being pregnant and made a report to Columbus police. The girl underwent a forensic interview on June 23, at which point she did not acknowledge being assaulted or identify an alleged perpetrator.

The girl's mother sought a consultation in the Columbus area for a potential abortion, Huhn testified, but because of the estimated gestational age, the procedure could not be performed in Ohio. A call was made to Indianapolis and the girl traveled there on June 29.

Huhn testified that after a consultation in Indianapolis, the girl had to wait 18 hours before the procedure, which was done through medication, took place on June 30.

Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court on June 24, Ohio implemented a law barring abortion procedures after fetal cardiac activity is detected, which usually occurs around six weeks. There are no exceptions in Ohio's law for rape or incest.

On July 6, a second interview was done with the girl at her home, where Huhn said Fuentes was present and had been living. The girl acknowledged, nonverbally, that Fuentes assaulted her, and Fuentes provided a DNA sample on that day, according to the testimony on Thursday morning.

A second DNA sample was obtained through a search warrant on July 12 and an interview was done, during which an interpreter was used and Fuentes admitted to sexually assaulting the girl on at least two occasions while she was 9 years old.

Fuentes' immigration status: No evidence that Guatemala native is in U.S. legally​

Huhn testified that Fuentes was not able to be found in any law enforcement databases or any footprint of his being in the country legally.
"It’s hard to move around as an adult without a footprint," Huhn testified.

Assistant Franklin County Prosecutor Dan Meyer said that Fuentes should be held without bond because of the potential risk Fuentes poses to the community, as well as his likelihood of appearing at future hearings.

"This is a 10-year-old child who didn’t ask for any of this, who was raped by this man who was providing for her and her mother and her family," he said.

Bryan Bowen, Fuentes' attorney, said Fuentes had no criminal history and while he is a native of Guatemala, Fuentes has lived in Columbus for seven years and his mother lives in the area as well.

Lynch was not swayed, however.

"This court would assume if there were documentation proving this defendant was in this country legally, it would have been presented here today," she said. "This man lives in the home with this child. To allow him to return him to that home, the traumatic and psychological impact would be undeserving to the alleged victim."

Lynch also noted the impact that having this case become a national talking point on both sides of the political spectrum is likely to have an impact on the girl.

For a no bond decision to be issued by a judge, they must consider the nature of the alleged crimes, the weight of the evidence in the case, the ties to the community the defendant might have, as well as the safety of the public and the likelihood of the defendant to appear at future hearings.

The next step in the case will be for a trial date to be set.

bbruner@dispatch.com
@bethany_bruner
I noticed:
  • No date given for the next step
  • Abortion was done via pills, not the C&D the random YouTuber was crying for. Look, even a little 10 year old girl can handle the pill. Grow up YTer.
  • Allegedly, the DNA evidence is in the bag. I'm still worried about how many ways that could be tampered with our thrown out, however. Is 99.99% a realistic result though? It sounds too good to be true and like it's just a number meant to impress.
  • Fuentes' mother lives in the area. I wonder if she's friends of the family. I hope el Telemundo goes to knock on her door too.
  • I think I questioned an earlier article saying she "indicated" or "referenced" Fuentes instead of "pointing out" or "identifying" him. It turns out the weird word choice was because she responded non-verbally. I wonder what that looks like, if she like pointed at his picture of if detectives asked leading questions and she just nodded. This might be a point for the scapegoat to remove the egg from the DA's face theory.
  • I keep questioning one article that said that the girl's siblings were DNA tested. I question the purpose, and I question if the siblings exist, because only one publication even mentioned them. This is now a second source that indicates they exist. It doesn't say she has siblings but it does say that Fuentes is "this man who was providing for her and her mother and her family" which is a real thunkful.
  • "Lynch also noted the impact that having this case become a national talking point on both sides of the political spectrum is likely to have an impact on the girl." - well no shit Sherlock. It's almost like the people who went to the media instead of the authorities, and the authorities that only acted because of the media, none of those people really cared about the girl.
 
The girl's mother sought a consultation in the Columbus area for a potential abortion, Huhn testified, but because of the estimated gestational age, the procedure could not be performed in Ohio. A call was made to Indianapolis and the girl traveled there on June 29.

Huhn testified that after a consultation in Indianapolis, the girl had to wait 18 hours before the procedure, which was done through medication, took place on June 30.
This is the part where political theater comes into play imo. There is absolutely no way that EVERY SINGLE abortion "doctor" in Columbus does not know the abortion law line by line, remember this is still prior to RoevWade thrown out which means Ohio's Heartbeat law hasn't gone into effect yet. Even if the "doctors" hadn't read through the heartbeat law, (just in case because the axe was dropping sooner rather than later on Roe) they should have been willing to perform all the last minute abortions that they could handle.

Keep in mind, that the poor victim in all of this is STILL UNDER 6 WEEKS PREGNANT. We know that she was 6 weeks and 6 days when she bravely crossed state lines to get an abortion because that is the whole basis of the original article. So I write once again, the waiting 8 WHOLE DAYS TO CROSS STATE LINES for the abortion is all political theater and it become cruel punishment for the victim.
 
Sorry for the mostly necro, but you know, the whole thing about how the left stfu about the story after they were forced to shift from abortions to rape and systemic protection of pedophiles. Which was then followed up by KF downtime... And I'm fucking 🧩 about this saga.

So, I've been trying to - in the absence of "journalistic coverage" - follow the story by periodically looking up his case information. Nothing happened after his arraignment so I was concerned that he had been quietly released because a certain psychopathic subpopulation seems to want rapists to go free in order to give them an excuse to get more abortions.

I don't remember when I last looked up the case, but I legitimately feel like the Franklin County Case Information website went a few weeks with no updates, I was afraid when the arraignment date passed and there were no reports of a follow-up date and there was absolutely no case activity either. But now there's a bunch in August and some in September? Either I'm dumb or impatient or the system was backlogged or (tinfoil hat) the information was deliberately delayed to get people to lose interest.

Law and Crime claims there will be a trial October 13th (next Thursday) (archive). After the date of the trial was announced, the only changes to the case description were MEDIA PERMISSION (x6), COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE FILED, SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY.

"Gerson Fuentes" might not bring up any new news articles anymore, but if the case update descriptions are meant to be taken at face value, there are still people with eyes on the case. Now, whether they publish or not will probably depend on their agenda and how the day goes...

Disclaimer that I am a lazy tard and I did not read the pdfs associated with the case yet. I also have not archived them because it's behind a click wall when I just try to bookmark the page to return to either, I don't think it'll play well with archives.
 
Sorry for the mostly necro, but you know, the whole thing about how the left stfu about the story after they were forced to shift from abortions to rape and systemic protection of pedophiles. Which was then followed up by KF downtime... And I'm fucking 🧩 about this saga.

So, I've been trying to - in the absence of "journalistic coverage" - follow the story by periodically looking up his case information. Nothing happened after his arraignment so I was concerned that he had been quietly released because a certain psychopathic subpopulation seems to want rapists to go free in order to give them an excuse to get more abortions.

I don't remember when I last looked up the case, but I legitimately feel like the Franklin County Case Information website went a few weeks with no updates, I was afraid when the arraignment date passed and there were no reports of a follow-up date and there was absolutely no case activity either. But now there's a bunch in August and some in September? Either I'm dumb or impatient or the system was backlogged or (tinfoil hat) the information was deliberately delayed to get people to lose interest.

Law and Crime claims there will be a trial October 13th (next Thursday) (archive). After the date of the trial was announced, the only changes to the case description were MEDIA PERMISSION (x6), COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE FILED, SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY.

"Gerson Fuentes" might not bring up any new news articles anymore, but if the case update descriptions are meant to be taken at face value, there are still people with eyes on the case. Now, whether they publish or not will probably depend on their agenda and how the day goes...

Disclaimer that I am a lazy tard and I did not read the pdfs associated with the case yet. I also have not archived them because it's behind a click wall when I just try to bookmark the page to return to either, I don't think it'll play well with archives.
You can upload PDFs to KF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
Sorry for the mostly necro, but you know, the whole thing about how the left stfu about the story after they were forced to shift from abortions to rape and systemic protection of pedophiles. Which was then followed up by KF downtime... And I'm fucking 🧩 about this saga.

So, I've been trying to - in the absence of "journalistic coverage" - follow the story by periodically looking up his case information. Nothing happened after his arraignment so I was concerned that he had been quietly released because a certain psychopathic subpopulation seems to want rapists to go free in order to give them an excuse to get more abortions.

I don't remember when I last looked up the case, but I legitimately feel like the Franklin County Case Information website went a few weeks with no updates, I was afraid when the arraignment date passed and there were no reports of a follow-up date and there was absolutely no case activity either. But now there's a bunch in August and some in September? Either I'm dumb or impatient or the system was backlogged or (tinfoil hat) the information was deliberately delayed to get people to lose interest.
There is no conspiracy here. It is a problem even for police officers to get up to date warrant and court information. Most court systems are still using 1980's mainframes, if not paper systems still.
Law and Crime claims there will be a trial October 13th (next Thursday) (archive). After the date of the trial was announced, the only changes to the case description were MEDIA PERMISSION (x6), COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE FILED, SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY.

"Gerson Fuentes" might not bring up any new news articles anymore, but if the case update descriptions are meant to be taken at face value, there are still people with eyes on the case. Now, whether they publish or not will probably depend on their agenda and how the day goes...

Disclaimer that I am a lazy tard and I did not read the pdfs associated with the case yet. I also have not archived them because it's behind a click wall when I just try to bookmark the page to return to either, I don't think it'll play well with archives.
 
It wouldn't necessarily be abnormal to see weeks of nothing, following a few cases over the years filings tend to bunch up near deadlines resulting in what seems like flurries of activity between long dead periods.

Court moves a lot slower than most people think it will.

I would expect that even if nothing exciting happened for years, it would at least be like the Mercedes Carrera thread where things get continually scheduled and postponed. I would have been satisfied/not paranoid if the waiver to a speedy trial were back in July and someone reported "OK because of <reasons>, both parties have agreed to put the case on hold until today next year. If you're autistic enough to still care at that time, check back then."

I'm not surprised by procrastination, and trying to draw things out to the deadline, but I was freaked out because as far as I could tell they didn't define a deadline in the first place and then the case went silent. I wanted at least a deadline for the judge to define the next deadline.

  • missing the arraignment (it happened a day earlier than expected, I don't remember how that happened)
  • the lack of any mentioned followup date
  • the lack of any activity that could have resulted in adding a followup date
  • the left guffawing so much about how they won because they proved the abortion was real and they're little psychopaths who don't actually care about removing pedos from society
  • my distrust of government and knowledge that they are 100% willing to throw an innocent man under the bus or let a guilty man go free if either of those outcomes will help them politically

You can upload PDFs to KF.
Maybe tonight, I'm a shitty phone poster and doing a manual local archive is legitimately horrible. The pdfs all download with the exact same name so I'm going to need to replicate the web page table to explain what each file is, and I'll also need to assign each document a new name to cross-reference between the table and the attachments. All without a mouse or keyboard.

If I'm not the only person who still cares about this case however, I'm willing to do it. It might be split into a few posts because I don't think we can edit posts longterm anymore, but I can do it.
 
Last edited:
I remember when Zimmerman's story first hit not much seemed to happen and people expected it'd go away quietly since it was an obvious self defense story.

Can take a while for major developments in cases.
 
Indiana doctor defends actions in 10-year-old's abortion
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Tom Davies
2022-11-22 01:55:18GMT

bernard01.jpg
FILE - Dr. Caitlin Bernard, a reproductive health care provider, speaks during an abortion rights rally on June 25, 2022, at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapolis. (Jenna Watson/The Indianapolis Star via AP, File)

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — An Indianapolis doctor who provided abortion drugs to a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio defended her actions before a judge Monday in an episode that drew national attention in the weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Dr. Caitlin Bernard testified during the second day of a court hearing on an attempt to block Indiana’s Republican attorney general from seeking patient medical records. The attorney general’s office says it is investigating whether Bernard properly reported child abuse and possibly violated patient privacy laws by telling a newspaper reporter about the girl’s case.

The Marion County judge said she expected to issue a decision next week on whether to issue a preliminary injunction against the attorney general’s office.

Bernard treated the girl in Indianapolis in late June, as the girl was unable to have an abortion in neighboring Ohio. That’s because Ohio’s “fetal heartbeat” law took effect with the Supreme Court’s decision. Such laws ban abortions from the time cardiac activity can be detected in an embryo, which is typically around the sixth week of pregnancy.

Bernard and her lawyers maintain the girl’s abuse had already been reported to Ohio police and child protective services officials before the doctor ever saw the child. Bernard said during her nearly 90 minutes of testimony that her lawsuit was aimed at protecting the girl’s privacy.

“There is no evidence of any crime being committed … so there should be no investigation necessary,” Bernard said.

Deputy Attorney General Caryn Nieman-Szyper argued that state law still required Indiana police and child welfare officials be notified immediately about the abuse so that they could assess the child’s safety even if an investigation had already started in Ohio.

After Bernard told The Indianapolis Star about the girl seeking an abortion, some news outlets and Republican politicians suggested her account was fabricated. President Joe Biden expressed empathy for the child while signing an executive order protecting some abortion access.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita told Fox News in July that he would look into whether Bernard violated child abuse notification or abortion reporting laws. Rokita has kept the investigation going even after a 27-year-old man was charged in Columbus, Ohio, with raping the girl, and public records show Bernard met Indiana’s required three-day reporting period for an abortion performed on a girl younger than 16.

Nieman-Szyper said Bernard wouldn’t be under investigation if she had not disclosed the girl’s rape to a reporter to advance her own advocacy of abortion rights. Nieman-Szyper said Bernard had not shown she had permission from the girl’s family to discuss her care in public, exposing the child to national attention.

Bernard said she had not yet seen the girl when she told the reporter about her as an example of the impact of tighter abortion laws going into effect across the country, but did not reveal identifying information about her.

“I did say that the patient had been raped,” Bernard said. “That is how a 10-year-old becomes pregnant.”

Bernard said she told an Indiana University Health social worker that the girl would be getting abortion treatment. She said those staffers were the ones who make sure that child about reports are made to the proper authorities.

Marion County Judge Heather Welch gave lawyers a Wednesday deadline for additional court filings.
 
One thing I cannot find, and no one seems to be talking about is if any charges are going to be filed against that girls mother, who, is also pregnant by the same "rapist" In fact, the Mother lied about it, remember? and the rapist is the mothers boyfriend. I remember something about the notion that she was or may not have said anything because, she and the rapist are illegal aliens

Also, the "press" (are scum) again left out another key detai as did that "Docktor" Ohio stated they most definately would have provided abortion services to this girl, I think the activists tried to spin the abortion issue....and failed.
 
Extremely last minute notice but there is a chance of happenings today. If anyone knows how to find if there are livestreams and likes watching them, here's a hopefully technically advance notice

Trial delayed for man accused of raping, impregnating 9-year-old girl​


by LENNY COHEN | The National Desk
Mon, January 9th 2023, 1:17 PM CST

His trial was originally slated for October and was delayed so his lawyers could gather evidence, but WSYX reports it had to be pushed back further until March 7 due to a scheduling conflict.
Extremely abbreviated from the source. Annoyingly I can't find a more recent (within the last month) source that specifies if today is still the day... Trying to look again mostly gets me other Fuenteses and other 9 year olds instead of this story.

There's also things still happening on the Caitlin Bernard side of the story, but I can't go through that right now. Just felt like I had to warn people of the trial on the off chance someone cares and knows how to track those in real time.
 
Last edited:
False alarm, it was delayed until April 19th. If we're lucky there will be updates for 4/20 day.

Originally it was set for October, but it was delayed 3 months until January. (4 days short of 3 months).
fuentes_reschedule_october.jpg

Then it was delayed 2 months until March. (2 days short of 2 months).
fuentes_reschedule_january.jpg

And now one and a half months until April (One month and 12 days).
fuentes_reschedule_march.jpg

At least the intervals are getting smaller.

E: The line above the continuances "Waiver of right to speedy trial" was included to show that that was missing this time, if that has any significance, time wise. The continuances from October and January have PDFs and the one from today doesn't, so it is more likely that there's just documents that still need to be processed.
 
Last edited:
One thing I cannot find, and no one seems to be talking about is if any charges are going to be filed against that girls mother, who, is also pregnant by the same "rapist" In fact, the Mother lied about it, remember? and the rapist is the mothers boyfriend. I remember something about the notion that she was or may not have said anything because, she and the rapist are illegal aliens

I've heard of those stories ocassionally over the years. New Boyfriend moves in and some time later starts molesting daughter. Mother is fine with it because shes just happy to have a guy around the house and shes still getting action. And it always seems to be 30-40 yr old single Mom with a daughter coming into puberty.
 
When did 10 year olds become women?

Ohio Republicans held hearings this week for multiple bills intended to block an abortion rights ballot measure from getting a statewide vote this November—probably because they know Ohioans would to pass it. It’s all a fairly transparent response to the results of last November’s elections, which saw abortion rights win in all five states that put the issue to popular vote.

At one of these hearings on Tuesday, Laura Strietmann, head of Cincinnati Right to Life, addressed the gutting case of a 10-year-old rape victim in the state who was forced to travel to Indiana for abortion last July, because Ohio’s ban doesn’t include a rape exception. “While a pregnancy might have been difficult on a 10-year-old body, a woman’s body is designed to carry life. That is a biological fact,” Strietmann said, referring to a child victim as a woman for political convenience.
This language, of course, is sadly common among anti-abortion activists and their Republican allies. They frequently adultify pregnant children, who are legally below the age of sexual consent, and refer to them as women or argue that they would make good parents—ironically, all while accusing LGBTQ people of child predation. Just earlier this year, a bill in Tennessee that would threaten rape victims who seek abortions with three years in prison for “lying” about being raped referred to child victims as young as 12 as “women.”

Streitmann followed up her heinous comments with yet more disinformation: A child’s body is “not designed to have disgusting death instruments remove her pre-born child from her womb,” she said, claiming this “is a statistical fact.” Actually, abortion is a highly safe medically procedure, whereas forcing a child or adolescent to give birth has a relatively high risk of death and severe, painful health complications like obstetric fistula.

Streitmann’s purposeful disinformation is one thing, but I’m stuck on the unique cruelty of her comments. Ohio’s abortion ban compounded the lifelong trauma inflicted upon a child rape victim by forcing her to travel across state lines for a health service she was denied in her home state—almost a year later, the child remains the center of gross lies and dehumanizing political talking points.

Streitmann further lied that Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the Indiana doctor who offered the child an abortion, “did not report the rape” (public records prove Bernard did) and said she was “sorry the mother permitted” the abortion. The Right to Life leader’s dishonesty is a consistent through-line in her testimony, which makes sense: Anti-abortion leaders have to rely on deceitful tactics to make up for the fact that the cruel policies they’re pushing are deeply unpopular with voters.

 
Back