US BREAKING: Tucker Carlson leaves Fox News as they 'agree to part ways' - Fox News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways.

Source

NEW YORK — April 24, 2023 — FOX News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways. We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor.

Mr. Carlson’s last program was Friday April 21st. Fox News Tonight will air live at 8 PM/ET starting this evening as an interim show helmed by rotating FOX News personalities until a new host is named.

FOX News Media operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Digital, FOX News Audio, FOX News Books, the direct-to-consumer streaming services FOX Nation and FOX News International and the free ad-supported television service FOX Weather. Currently the number one network in all of cable, FNC has also been the most watched television news channel for more than 21 consecutive years, while FBN ranks among the top business channels on cable. Owned by Fox Corporation, FOX News Media reaches nearly 200 million people each month.

 

[Big Miss Steak]

Still stunned and baffled by this decision. The only reason Fox would axe their main breadwinner (that I can see) is if the settlement with Dominion stipulated somehow what Tucker be canned. But I'm not even sure if they could do that.

 

[Mothra1988]

They've been hating Tucker for ages and couldn't get regular ads for his show due to lib companies boycotting him. He mostly acted as a good draw to try and help with ratings for other shows rather than his own, which may not seem that valuable to Fox News in comparison to just plugging some other random jackass into the time slot.

Though I've heard he was the main draw for Fox's streaming service, so I'm more curious what will happen with that. They already lowered the fee for it due to lack of popularity and now did away with the major podcast that was getting people on that service.

Like others said, Tucker was the bridge from the old neocon bullshit from the O'Reilly period to what the conservative base actually now believes and wants. If they treat him like shit, they're going to lose that audience because Fox will be written off as traitors to the left (which they would be imo). Coming to some kind of compromise would at least allow Fox to save some face and work on a better transition to the future. They may have lost ads, but they're still number one on cable news. Throwing that in the garbage for like the one or two advertisers that would come crawling back is not worth tanking the entire brand.

 

[derpherp2]

Or the Indian and Chinese threat. China is obvious. But people never talk about how much power Indians have with their control of Big Tech. You'd think they'd direct some of their ire at Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, a company that has done such blatant evil and social engineering as to be ubiquitous now. Or the former CEO of Twitter and that Vajayjay legal bitch who fucked everything us. The fucking CEO of Starbucks is Indian. I can't think of a culture more removed from Judaism than Indian. But once the Indians go woke, shit gets fucked up big time.

Exactly it's not about religious bullshit or whatever. It's nepotism and other incestual power-mongering bullshit.

 

[George Lucas]

"So, there is this website called /pol/ and..."

I already made her a kiwifarms.net account but she lost the password.

 

[Wendy Wheelchair]

Exactly it's not about religious bullshit or whatever. It's nepotism and other incestual power-mongering bullshit.

Well and the thing /pol/ sperg anti-Semites can never understand is that atheist Jews hate religious Jews and vice versa. Hasidic Jews will not stick their neck out for non-Hasids. How many faggot-dyke atheist Jews are at the forefront of the pro-Palestine, "anti-apartheid", "pinkwashing", BDS movements? A shitton. If anything, maybe some Jews are the progenitors of modern atheism. But WASPs and others have added to that as well. The enemy is an ideology. And that ideology is only nepotistic to those with full obedience, no matter what.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

It's always the jews. If you don't think the kosher nepo spawn are overrepresented in American institutions then you're being disingenuous.

Note the issue is whether it's by happenstance or a grand Rothschild conspiracy with Freemasons to take over the world and turn the goyim into branded mystery meat cattle to fulfill a rabbinic prophecy dictated by Lucifer himself so ymmv.

Mothra1488 is an alog who follows me around like a lost yet extremely retarded puppy. Pay it no mind.

Still stunned and baffled by this decision. The only reason Fox would axe their main breadwinner (that I can see) is if the settlement with Dominion stipulated somehow what Tucker be canned. But I'm not even sure if they could do that.

It all depends on what the terms of the settlement entail. At a minimum it provides cover to can him if they can claim having him employed on their network is a high risk of liability.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

I want to meet the Dixie feminist Hillary Clinton. It sounds arousing.

Here you go, my musty box munching friend.

 

[moseph.jartelli]

Don't believe everything you read. Google "Carlson and Tucker" and there are pics of them at some Mar-a-Lago event when they're laughing and having a good time. Whatever he said (if he said it), Trump seems to have let go already.

Trump is Tucking into Carlson's fartbox. It's a smart business move, if not filled with tossed salads at least.

 

[Fapcop]

Sounds like the rumors of ol’ Murdoch being senile and making shit decisions, are true.

Supposedly that’s also why they settled the lawsuit: Dominion’s lawyers supposedly threatened with calling Murdoch to the stand and making him look like a fool.

Objectively speaking, exposing the fact that Fox is headed by a drooling senile halfwit these days, would probably do more to tank the share price than even firing Tucker.

 

[Jarolleon]

The tribe selects pajeets because they are very subservient thanks to being domesticated by a regressive caste system. Several decades of immigrant white collar labor has proven they aren't competent & will bungle anything if there isn't a white person managing them.

Also the Brahmin caste has an inherited skillset very suitable for the kind of information control that Western democracies use, and a historical grudge against the British Empire that makes it easy to get them on board with anti-white bullshit.

 

[Punchoboe]

The Daily Mail is great for having loads of pics with their articles. One pic in that article caught my eye, though, a picture of a young Tucker Carlson... did he not look like someone we know? Maybe they're half-brothers, even???

View attachment 5089177

I've always wanted to start a conspiracy theory that bow-tie Tucker and Fox News Tucker are two different people. The old Tucker was a preppy snotrag who happily did deeds for the neocon.

 

[Random Internet Person]

It’s Time To Burn The Ships Of Traditional Media

In 1519, the Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés arrived in the New World with a mission to conquer the Aztec Empire. He arrived with a small…

news.gab.com

It’s Time To Burn The Ships Of Traditional Media – Gab News

archived 25 Apr 2023 04:30:31 UTC

archive.ph

So Andy DOES want to talk about Tucker.

It’s Time To Burn The Ships Of Traditional Media​

APRIL 24, 2023
In 1519, the Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés arrived in the New World with a mission to conquer the Aztec Empire. He arrived with a small army of 600 men, but he faced a significant challenge. His men were afraid and they were not sure that they could succeed in their mission. To inspire his men Cortés did something radical – he burned his ships. By doing so he eliminated any possibility of retreat and forced his men to fight for victory or death. This act of burning the ships became a symbol of determination and commitment.

Fast forward to today and we face a similar challenge. We are in a battle for the truth and we are facing a media landscape dominated by a small group of powerful corporations. Traditional media is owned by an oligopoly regime that runs the United States. They control what we see, what we hear, and even what we think. They have their own agenda and it is not at all in our best interest.


Today the news broke that Tucker Carlson, one of the most prominent voices on Fox News, is leaving the network. Regardless of the reasons, his departure from Fox News is significant, and it could be seen as a death knell for traditional media.


Traditional media, including cable news networks like Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC, has long been the dominant source of news and information for many Americans. These networks have enormous influence, and they shape the way people think about current events and politics.


Over the past decade there has been a dramatic shift away from traditional media and toward alternative sources of information.


One of the reasons for this shift is the rise of the internet and social media. These platforms have given people access to a vast array of information and have allowed them to connect with others who share their interests and beliefs. This has created a new media landscape, one that is more decentralized and less reliant on traditional media outlets. Those in power quickly realized this after the 2016 election which is why they have invested billions of dollars and countless human resource hours into developing censorship and “fact checking” systems on these platforms.


That’s why we created Gab.com in 2016. We saw this happening and we knew we had to protect free speech online for all people at all costs. We paid the price heavily for it precisely because Gab is the one place that the people in power do not control.


Another reason for the shift away from traditional media is a growing sense of distrust. Many Americans feel that the mainstream media is biased and that they cannot be trusted to provide unbiased information. This distrust has only grown in recent years, as traditional media outlets have become increasingly politicized and polarized.

The departure of Tucker Carlson from Fox News is significant because he was one of the network’s most popular and influential hosts. He had a large following, and his show was consistently one of the highest-rated programs on cable news. His departure is a sign that even the most established and influential media outlets are not immune to the changing media landscape.


While traditional media is not dead yet, the departure of Tucker Carlson from Fox News is a clear signal that it is on the decline. The rise of alternative media sources and the growing sense of distrust in traditional media outlets have created a new media landscape that is more diverse and decentralized. This new media landscape is not without its challenges, as Gab knows all too well—but it offers opportunities for new voices and perspectives to be heard.


Burning the ships of traditional media means that we must abandon the old ways of consuming news and information.We must stop watching the same news channels, reading the same newspapers, and listening to the same radio stations. We must break away from the status quo and embrace a new way of thinking.


We must also turn off traditional media for good. We must stop supporting the oligopoly regime that controls our media landscape. We must stop giving them our attention, our money, and our trust. We must turn to new media platforms like Gab and others as well as independent journalism, and we must support them with our time, our money, and our trust.
Turning off traditional media for good does not mean that we should ignore the news altogether. It means that we should seek out alternative sources of information and take an active role in seeking the truth. We should read independent blogs, watch independent news channels, use independent platforms, and listen to independent podcasts. We should engage in discussions, share our views, and challenge our own biases.


Burning the ships of traditional media and turning it off for good is not an easy task. It requires courage, determination, and a willingness to challenge the status quo. However, it is necessary if we want to create a media landscape that serves the interests of the people, not the oligopoly regime. We must embrace new media and independent journalism, and most importantly we must take an active role in seeking the truth.


By doing so, we can create a better future for ourselves and for generations to come.


Andrew Torba
CEO, Gab.com
Jesus Christ is King of kings

 

[Random Internet Person]

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Well and the thing /pol/ sperg anti-Semites can never understand is that atheist Jews hate religious Jews and vice versa. Hasidic Jews will not stick their neck out for non-Hasids. How many faggot-dyke atheist Jews are at the forefront of the pro-Palestine, "anti-apartheid", "pinkwashing", BDS movements?

While he does remind me of an ugly dyke, this jewish faggot was part of the organized move to take down a lawfully elected sitting President, simply because the President refused to go along with the jewish neocon agenda Everyone, from Nuland to Sherman to Blinken are neocon jews promoting their cronies and their warmongering agenda, whether in Syria or the Ukraine. Carlson didn't come out and say this, but he didn't have to. If pointing this out is antisemitic or upsets certain people, then whatever but its the truth. If instead they were a cabal of Episcopalians then it would be right to point that out too.

Hasidim are traditionalist religious jews who consider the Reform absolutely heretical, of course they aren't going to support their liberal garbage.

 

[kickingstones]

Tucker was just getting started creating a massive shitstorm with his one J 6 security footage coverage show that effortless debunking the official narrative around the gayop event organized by the washigton deep state. But Tucker was only allowed to air the first episode of a planned three episode crusade.

I always wondered why Tucker was stopped from going ahead with the last other two episodes. I know Chuck schumer in the thinnest of veiled guises threatened Rupert Murdoch.

Now I always wondered how Chuck Schumer was going to be able to accomplish this. It's not in Tucker's disposition to quietly back off the j6 show without serious coercion.

I think Chuck threatened the Murdoch's with an unrelenting amount of lawsuits until they fully cucked Tucker.

 

[frozen_runner]

My boomer mom called and asked why she can’t find Tucker on the television anymore. What should I tell her?

"Fox News is neocon controlled opposition. All corporate news is terrible for you. Cut it all off. Instead, find and listen to YouTubers and podcasts like the No Agenda Show for a healthy news diet."

Not even kidding.

 

[Antenna7]

Still stunned and baffled by this decision. The only reason Fox would axe their main breadwinner (that I can see) is if the settlement with Dominion stipulated somehow what Tucker be canned. But I'm not even sure if they could do that.

Cable news isn't about breadwinning. It's about delivering a narrative to the public. To get them to go along with whatever. Glen Beck stepped out of line doing things like bringing awareness of the Federal Reserve, how it operates and it's creation. Then he's gone from FOX. Tucker stepped out of line bringing awareness of countless actual issues. Now he's gone from FOX.

Who are the longtime people in cable news? The people that followed the script. You follow the script, you get rewarded.

 

[Big Miss Steak]

Cable news isn't about breadwinning. It's about delivering a narrative to the public. To get them to go along with whatever. Glen Beck stepped out of line doing things like bringing awareness of the Federal Reserve, how it operates and it's creation. Then he's gone from FOX. Tucker stepped out of line bringing awareness of countless actual issues. Now he's gone from FOX.

Who are the longtime people in cable news? The people that followed the script. You follow the script, you get rewarded.

Fox is controlled opposition. "J6/COVID-19/the 2020 election are kinda fishy" isn't a super bold or narrative-crumbling take to me, maybe I'm just jaded. I see it as giving people just a little crumb of truth to keep them pacified and swallowing the other BS. Plus Tucker had writers, unless he was consistently going off-script (and maybe he was). Having Tucker on Fox made normie conservatives trust the rest of the network by extension so even if you don't factor in viewer numbers or profitability, seems worth it to keep Tucker around.

 

[Antenna7]

Fox is controlled opposition. "J6/COVID-19/the 2020 election are kinda fishy" isn't a super bold or narrative-crumbling take to me, maybe I'm just jaded. I see it as giving people just a little crumb of truth to keep them pacified and swallowing the other BS. Plus Tucker had writers, unless he was consistently going off-script (and maybe he was). Having Tucker on Fox made normie conservatives trust the rest of the network by extension so even if you don't factor in viewer numbers or profitability, seems worth it to keep Tucker around.

I think you have to be aware of the Cable News overton window. What you or I think of as lukewarm takes, at the Cable news level, are actually "conspiracy theories, dangerous to democracy"

 

[Lone Outsider]

Klaus Schwab also isn't Jewish for that matter, in fact the Schwab family did pretty well for themselves under Hitler. It's black-and-white thinking. They can't understand the world except in the simplest of us vs. them terms, so anything that doesn't fit the mold is either disregarded or subverted into another extension of the Jewish plot.

Constructing a grand conspiracy involving the Jews provides structure and meaning for these situations that can't be explained by their rigid thinking. Schwab or Gates aren't Jewish so there must be a secret Jewish puppetmaster controlling them, as no goy would ever work to harm his fellow Gentiles.

Its more of a Neo-con thing if I have to be honest, granted I am speaking on this based on what I've heard from Ryan Dawson's cover on these people to fill the major blanks. While a lot of Jews are Neo-Cons and Zionists, not all of them are. Take someone like John Bolton, he's a raging Neo-con to the point of him being a caricature. Then you also have Zionists that are loyal to Israel and it's interests just look at the Clintons. I am sure that a lot of people are gonna think that both are one and the same but the former is a political movement that is comprised of people that are predominantly Jewish while the latter is a Jewish movement that is comprised of a few non-Jews that support Jewish interests. It's easy to use both terms interchangeably but you can argue that Neo-Cons are part of the Zionist Circles.

Saying that this is Jewish this and Jewish that without taking certain facts and points into consideration makes one look like a complete clown, you still got the old money people like the Rockefellers and the Kochs and so on. You can argue if they are the minority in the global stage on the western front but it's clear that not everyone who is high in power are Jewish. Many western people may have done business with Zionists but they don't agree with them and are more willing to go along with them as they are seemingly the dominant power in America. I'd say that Murdoch is one of them and the same with people like Elon Musk but it's hard to tell how much they are in bed with these people, how much it's business out of convenience and if they are controlled opposition.

Regardless, going back to the point of Tucker Carlson's firing. I'd say it's pretty clear that Tucker has been too uncontrollable for even Fox and he isn't a talking head that they can program, he clearly got a bit of will and that has rubs anyone in power the wrong way and also given him a legitimate following. Outside influence or not, Fox has made on critical mistake in firing Tucker Carlson and that is they failed to funnel his fanbase into Foxes and had they done so Tucker wouldn't have a leg to stand on, now he got fuck-you money and a loyal fanbase, the perfect recipe for Tucker to create his own thing and laugh as Fox goes down.

Honestly, whether or not Dominion and their leaders wanted Tucker gone or not, it's pretty clear that it's gonna bite the state media in the asses.