You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.
I really wanna know how fucking sexpests like this end up in state legislature in conservative states like Montana
Are people just voting (D) and (R) and not even checking to see if their candidate is a man in a wig? can parties elect fucking farm animals to congresses now? can our next president just be a horse so we can stop pretending this democracy charade is anything but a reflection of what the elite want to see?
This was the first thing I saw when I opened Twitter today. Every day’s a blast on Trans Twitter, I swear to God
By the way, he also threatened a lawsuit against another reporter, repeating the same thing.
And as I just added that image into the post, more was added to the thread with Carl!
I’m gonna be honest, I don’t even care about the “convicted drug felon” thing, it’s irrelevant to me. I’m just here to satiate my Twitter Troon News Reporting urge.
"trollish but at times sophisticated" - the author figured out that all stinkditck posters wear a monocle and sip a vintage merlot while laughing a Tony's gap teeth and lego block earings.
I truly and honestly do not understand why everybody calls this a Nazi site. It’s such a strange thing to stick to our reputation, because it’s so far from the truth. Actual Nazi beliefs are not the focus of this website, laughing at people online is. We actually have a pretty diverse userbase, with people of all races from around the world, with different political and religious beliefs.
But I guess since it’s trendy to call people you disagree with “Nazis”, that’s why it stuck.
Anyways… here’s another press photo retweeted by Erin.
I wonder what’s on the phone. We can’t see the screen, but I cropped and rotated it some.
This has actually been a fun, low-profile happening. I enjoy reporting on what Erin says. As far as I’m concerned, this is also kinda the Rep. Zooey Zephyr thread too, so that is why I include press photos of him. I just hate this mf Erin for getting me invested in state legislature. Yet another incident of Kiwifarms teaching me things I didn’t know
I really wanna know how fucking sexpests like this end up in state legislature in conservative states like Montana
Are people just voting (D) and (R) and not even checking to see if their candidate is a man in a wig? can parties elect fucking farm animals to congresses now? can our next president just be a horse so we can stop pretending this democracy charade is anything but a reflection of what the elite want to see?
Oh hi Null, didn’t expect to see you here. As for your pitch for a horse being president, I think it could happen, because Rep Zooey Zephyr actually does look like a horse, now that I think about it. Hair is always brushed over his shoulder on one side, it kinda looks like a mane.
Erin asks for a retraction. Aaron tells him to send a response to add to the article and or speak on his talk show. Erin/Tone responds by saying "thank you for retracting, Aaron"...
Erin asks for a retraction. Aaron tells him to send a response to add to the article and or speak on his talk show. Erin/Tone responds by saying "thank you for retracting, Aaron"...
Erin asks for a retraction. Aaron tells him to send a response to add to the article and or speak on his talk show. Erin/Tone responds by saying "thank you for retracing, AARON"
If he's openly trying to refute things and this guy is reading the forum, you might want to post the court documents that back up whatever you claim. Like every claim that could ostensibly come from the forum that you have something to evidence, throw it into posts. You know he wants to refute the ex wife's clothings in particular, so where does that come from?
I really wanna know how fucking sexpests like this end up in state legislature in conservative states like Montana
Are people just voting (D) and (R) and not even checking to see if their candidate is a man in a wig? can parties elect fucking farm animals to congresses now? can our next president just be a horse so we can stop pretending this democracy charade is anything but a reflection of what the elite want to see?
Some people would vote for a turd as long as it had the right letter next to its name. Or had the right colour rosette on.
It's a farce, most people don't have a clue when they go and vote.
I really wanna know how fucking sexpests like this end up in state legislature in conservative states like Montana
Are people just voting (D) and (R) and not even checking to see if their candidate is a man in a wig? can parties elect fucking farm animals to congresses now? can our next president just be a horse so we can stop pretending this democracy charade is anything but a reflection of what the elite want to see?
the district zac ran in was a free dem win. like 1200 people turned out total and most of those went straight down the list dem. they could've ran anyone or anything, and they chose this monstrosity.
also please don't put us through the feature zomvies dear feeder
We all know the answer to that, the average person doesn't give a single fuck about local politics. They just want to come home after a hard day of work (plus a quick diversion to bang a coworker in a motel) and then watch a rerun of COPS in front of the TV as they fall asleep.
If he's openly trying to refute things and this guy is reading the forum, you might want to post the court documents that back up whatever you claim. Like every claim that could ostensibly come from the forum that you have something to evidence, throw it into posts. You know he wants to refute the ex wife's clothings in particular, so where does that come from?
Tony has a drug felony on his record, openly talked about dealing acid, gave Xanax to his customers having bad trips, and actively encouraged them to call HIM instead of medical professionals:
It is now six months later, and Anthony Reed is serving 24 months on felony probation. Although the MDMA charges were eventually dropped when the lab’s toxicology test confirmed he was in possession of an “unscheduled compound,” since Florida does not have an Analogue law, he was convicted of (get this) "sale of a counterfeit controlled substance." That’s like getting a felony for selling someone a dime bag of drywall. He has lost his Americorps post. He can no longer apply to graduate school because his conviction made him ineligible for financial aid, and he can no longer go to medical school ever because he has a drug conviction.
Anthony had “enormous” trouble finding a job because he was forced to tell prospective employers that he is a convicted felon. Not an honors student, not a scholarship winner, not an Americorps volunteer, not even a “decent law-abiding citizen.” He’s now struggling to get by as a car salesman during the worst recession in 70 years, working to pay off thousands in fines and court costs, lawyer fees, drug tests, and more.
Hahahahahah holy fuck that article is amazing. It starts off kinda garbage with a lot of SEO speak but the dude actually just goes fucking ham. Even brings up Super Smash Bros connection to child grooming that's insane.
Also love how they are attacking the dude for having done the research and not just having repeated the talking points. The reply to the demand for retraction by doing the absolute minimum and instead holding their ground on the facts is also amazing. My man doing actual journalism in 2023 that's insane.
The editor has updated his notes in the article with Reed's responses that dispute that there was no court order to stop wearing his ex-wifes clothes. Erin once again thanks the guy for retracting. i don't know if I'm missing something or if he doesn't know what retraction means.
edit: these 2 lines were removed from the article: but the note still references & links what was removed & says Erin disputes them.
He had to be ordered by a court not to wear his ex-wife’s clothes.
A former convicted felon drug dealer, he was known for administering sedatives (namely Xanax) to “cure” his customers coming down from “bad trip” so that they would not go to the police, as he recounted on a reddit forum before he embraced his trans identity.
Erin asks for a retraction. Aaron tells him to send a response to add to the article and or speak on his talk show. Erin/Tone responds by saying "thank you for retracting, Aaron"...
If he's openly trying to refute things and this guy is reading the forum, you might want to post the court documents that back up whatever you claim. Like every claim that could ostensibly come from the forum that you have something to evidence, throw it into posts. You know he wants to refute the ex wife's clothings in particular, so where does that come from?
"trollish but at times sophisticated" - the author figured out that all stinkditck posters wear a monocle and sip a vintage merlot while laughing a Tony's gap teeth and lego block earings.
If he's openly trying to refute things and this guy is reading the forum, you might want to post the court documents that back up whatever you claim. Like every claim that could ostensibly come from the forum that you have something to evidence, throw it into posts. You know he wants to refute the ex wife's clothings in particular, so where does that come from?
The editor has updated his notes in the article with Reed's responses that dispute that there was no court order to stop wearing his ex-wifes clothes. Erin once again thanks the guy for retracting. i don't know if I'm missing something or if he doesn't know what retraction means.
It could be he is too retarded to understand what a retraction is. Or it could be he really thinks just saying that is enough to make people tune out and ignore everything else.
I have noticed this in a lot of political extremists and lolcow types adhere to a type of argumentative reasoning and logic where they will ignore large swathes of debate or argument or body of evidence to hyperfocus on ONE THING they can attack and use it to try and imply you should ignore everything else. Basically Anthony thinks that because he can say "this detail is wrong" it means all the other stuff about his sex pest degeneracy and insanity and autogynephylia magically goes away.
Also: Aaron and Carl, if you are stalking the thread to report on this lunatic troon remember to stand your ground. Don't give a inch, don't let the screeching mentally ill people scare you. Stick to your guns. The truth is a lion, set it free and it will defend itself.
It could be he is too retarded to understand what a retraction is. Or it could be he really thinks just saying that is enough to make people tune out and ignore everything else.
How is it not a retraction? He removed the statements Tony asked him to from the article narrative and added a note explaining he did so because Tony disputes them.
I really wanna know how fucking sexpests like this end up in state legislature in conservative states like Montana
Are people just voting (D) and (R) and not even checking to see if their candidate is a man in a wig? can parties elect fucking farm animals to congresses now? can our next president just be a horse so we can stop pretending this democracy charade is anything but a reflection of what the elite want to see?
That is, technically the two of them agreed to this. I guess more accurately you could say the ex-wife required he not wear any of her clothes in their marital settlement agreement.
