Not Dr. Evil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2022
I thought I saw Luca's twitter active again. Must have failed out of rehab.
Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.
- Thread starter garbage cake
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Fishmalk Observer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
Nah, they got their little catboys to do it
The ''big name'' troons know better. Kinda like Alejandro Caraballo and Keffals instructed their little troon soldiers to write up the minesota bar or professional org to get Rekieta disbarred, they themselves didn't because they are coward/they know it's a fucking dumb idea.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
Tony, quit jabbering about "hearing from my attorney", "my attorney", "my attorney".
You sound like a fifth grader talking about his uncle who works for nintendo.
Unless you already have an attorney-client relationship with a lawyer, you don't have "[your] attorney". You just sound like a rube.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2021
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2022
Here's an interview Zac did with Scripps News. He did a truly horrible job. Some quotes:
- "I see first and foremost mismatch between the policies that these legislatures, particularly those controlled by the far right are trying to pass and how out of step that what Americans actually want. Trans people in our communities often loved and accepted and we're seeing policies targeting us on unprecedented level."
- "there are statistics that we can talk about it. There's a 73% reduction in suicidality for trans youth who have access to gender-affirming care. But I also see first hand experiences. I've lost friends to suicide. I have friends who've been assaulted. Montanans, out and about, being assaulted on the streets because of policies like this. And we even heard from a family who's trans teenager attempted suicide while listening to one of these anti-trans hearings."
- "We're seen increasing escalation and it's legislative eradication."
- "As for would I change anything, when I rose up again, I was talking about real harm, that these bills bring and to apologize and or to not have said that would be to be complicit. in the policies that get my community killed. "
- "At a young age transitioning is really just social transitioning. It's going by a new name, it's letting someone to grow their hair out or to cut it short. That's where it starts, as puberty comes along if this, if people's gender dysphoria has been consistent insistent and persistent, then they say, hey, let's try puberty blockers to put a pause on this to see the child still wants to move forward. These are slow processes again with medical professionals there every step of the way. And if they continue to go on and say, yes, I'm trans then they are allowed to go on hormone placement therapy and most surgeries wait until 18 unless there's severe severe dysphoria in which case you see something like a mastectomy, which again, is something that can already happen with cisgender teenagers for various issues."
SCRIPPS >> Republicans yesterday voing to ban Rep Zooey Zephyr from the House chamber for the rest of the session after she spoke out against a ban on gender affirming care for young people. State Rep Zephyr joining us live now. I'm sure you've had a very a busy few days and a busy morning, everyone anxious to talk to kind of get your take on on what has happened there. I'm wondering if you see any parallels between what you're experiencing right now and we saw unfold in Tennessee with the lawmakers there and the issue of of gun control, obviously very different issue in Montana. But do you see any parallel between what how you're being treated and how they were treated and what you think it means for the country?
ZAC >> I do. I see first and foremost mismatch between the policies that these legislatures, particularly those controlled by the far right are trying to pass and how out of step that what Americans actually want. Trans people in our communities often loved and accepted and we're seeing policies targeting us on unprecedented level. In Tennessee when young black lawmakers are talking about the impact that gun violence has most Americans want common sense gun reform. These legislatures are not allowing it. So we're seeing young legislators rise up and say, no, we just isn't acceptable. And calling up the real harm that these policies do. And in response these legislatures are trying to shut down that discussion.
SCRIPPS >> And the policy that you are speaking out about was for lawmakers who wanted to ban gender affirming care. You said that they would have blood on their hands that they did. So you're accused of being hyperbolic and perhaps inciting a quote, unquote, riot with those words. But you're being literal. Tell us a little bit more about what you meant when you said that and what your message was in regard to the initial issue that brought you to speak out.
ZAC >> They are, when it comes to gender affirming care and the bans in place. it's important to note that they're banning health care that is approved every major medical association in our country. And there are statistics that we can talk about it. There's a 73% reduction in suicidality for trans youth who have access to gender-affirming care. But I also see first hand experiences. I've lost friends to suicide. I have friends who've been assaulted. Montanans, out and about, being assaulted on the streets because of policies like this. And we even heard from a family who's trans teenager attempted suicide while listening to one of these anti-trans hearings. So I see the way these bills bring real harm. And when I spoke, what I was doing is holding the Legislature accountable for the policies that they were bringing forward.
SCRIPPS >> Big picture here for a second. Just reading some recent reporting, across the country transgender rights have emerged this year as the defining legislative issue with Republicans in acting sweeping new restrictions in states they control. Legislature's in dozens of states have introduced more than 400 bills targeting trans people since January. At least 29 have become law, more than the total number of such bills passed in all of 2022 in the U.S. why do you think this is such a lightning rod issue in our country? And what do you think we're seeing such swift legislative action and tough response to it?
ZAC >> So I think they're looking, the Republican controlled Legislatures are looking for a community that they can other to drum up support for their voter base. But I think that they're missing the part because again, trans people are loved and accepted in our communities. And as we're seeing, you talk about the increase in legislation, it's important to note that a couple years ago we were not seeing that. But when they got their foot in the door with bans on trans athletes, that was never their goal. Their goal was to continue to escalate. And that's why we're seeing youth health care bans. Missouri, which had it's adult health care ban which thankfully now has temporary stay by the courts. Florida passing legislation to allow people to remove children if their parent is trans or remove a trans child from their parents. We're seen increasing escalation and it's legislative eradication.
SCRIPPS >> And I have a sort of 2 part question for you. Republicans in the Montana Freedom Caucus appear to be continually and purposefully misgendering you. I want to know what goes through your mind when that happens, especially given that this word decorum has been thrown around a lot in all of these debates, including the one in Tennessee. If the use of the word decorum, decorum could be translated as synonymous with the word decency in some ways. Would you, do you believe that you are being treated by the representatives indecently. And in turn do you think you could have done something differently to avoided being barred from the floor or was this only path you saw forward?
ZAC >> So it's hypocritical of them to call for decorum at the same time they've repeatedly and intentionally misgender me. But this is also coming from the same caucus that advocates very limited government while using government to take away health care from people who need it. And that's what we've seen this legislative session is an unequal and undemocratic application of the fuzzy concept of decorum. When the speaker is an agreement, there's a lot of leeway given. People claim that my very existence is somehow sexualizing children. We objected, but we moved on and that was allowed to go forward. As for would I change anything, when I rose up again, I was talking about real harm, that these bills bring and to apologize and or to not have said that would be to be complicit. in the policies that get my community killed. That's not what my constituents sent me here to do. They sent me here to speak truth.
SCRIPPS >> And on the issue of decorum, I don't remember the same Republicans having a such a strong reaction when the media was being called the enemy of the American people or and being told, fight like h***, you're not have a country left anymore, or if you indict me that there could be death and destruction in the country. As long as we're adding discussion on decorum, let's not forget the larger context and other comments that have been made and what they've led to. Let me get down, though, to this question because at the heart of the issue in Tennessee, was gun control. And the heart of this issue is this gender affirming care. and that includes you know, hormones, or cross sex hormones. Puberty, blockers, surgery. Those who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. On the issue again, beyond your own political situation. Help folks who don't understand or don't agree with the idea that perhaps those kinds of treatments seem severe or intense for folks of a young age. The argument being that aren't kids too young to undergo those kind of procedures when they haven't had a chance to fully grow, perhaps and realize who they are and what they want to be. I'm just playing devil's advocate for a second to talk about the actual issue that's that's on the table. Talk about gender affirming care and, why you think it's appropriate for while people are young and still growing and developing and discovering themselves.
ZAC >> So it's important to understand underpinning all of this is trans people when we are allowed to transition come into ourselves and live lives full of joy in a way that would not have been possible prior to transition. I couldn't do the work I do for the people of Montana had I not transitioned and been able to stand tall in who I am. When it comes to gender affirming care for youth it's important to note that these decisions are being made in conjunction with parents with endocrinologists, with their health care providers, in accordance with every major medical association's guidelines. At a young age transitioning is really just social transitioning. It's going by a new name, it's letting someone to grow their hair out or to cut it short. That's where it starts, as puberty comes along if this, if people's gender dysphoria has been consistent insistent and persistent, then they say, hey, let's try puberty blockers to put a pause on this to see the child still wants to move forward. These are slow processes again with medical professionals there every step of the way. And if they continue to go on and say, yes, I'm trans then they are allowed to go on hormone placement therapy and most surgeries wait until 18 unless there's severe severe dysphoria in which case you see something like a mastectomy, which again, is something that can already happen with cisgender teenagers for various issues.
SCRIPPS >> So what comes next for you at the very least and also regarding these bills. You are still allowed to cast votes during House proceedings for the remainder of the session. But that ends next week, May 5th. So what comes next for you? What kind of work do you plan to do moving especially now that this national spotlight has been brought to Montana?
ZAC>> So I was elected by my constituents to represent their interests in the people's house. I left yesterday with my head held high and walked in this morning with my head held high. That said it's important to note in this last week as we see major housing bills as we see the state's budget come forward, there are still 11,000 Montanans whose voices are not represented in that debate. My heart is set on doing what I can to make sure voices are heard.
ZAC >> I do. I see first and foremost mismatch between the policies that these legislatures, particularly those controlled by the far right are trying to pass and how out of step that what Americans actually want. Trans people in our communities often loved and accepted and we're seeing policies targeting us on unprecedented level. In Tennessee when young black lawmakers are talking about the impact that gun violence has most Americans want common sense gun reform. These legislatures are not allowing it. So we're seeing young legislators rise up and say, no, we just isn't acceptable. And calling up the real harm that these policies do. And in response these legislatures are trying to shut down that discussion.
SCRIPPS >> And the policy that you are speaking out about was for lawmakers who wanted to ban gender affirming care. You said that they would have blood on their hands that they did. So you're accused of being hyperbolic and perhaps inciting a quote, unquote, riot with those words. But you're being literal. Tell us a little bit more about what you meant when you said that and what your message was in regard to the initial issue that brought you to speak out.
ZAC >> They are, when it comes to gender affirming care and the bans in place. it's important to note that they're banning health care that is approved every major medical association in our country. And there are statistics that we can talk about it. There's a 73% reduction in suicidality for trans youth who have access to gender-affirming care. But I also see first hand experiences. I've lost friends to suicide. I have friends who've been assaulted. Montanans, out and about, being assaulted on the streets because of policies like this. And we even heard from a family who's trans teenager attempted suicide while listening to one of these anti-trans hearings. So I see the way these bills bring real harm. And when I spoke, what I was doing is holding the Legislature accountable for the policies that they were bringing forward.
SCRIPPS >> Big picture here for a second. Just reading some recent reporting, across the country transgender rights have emerged this year as the defining legislative issue with Republicans in acting sweeping new restrictions in states they control. Legislature's in dozens of states have introduced more than 400 bills targeting trans people since January. At least 29 have become law, more than the total number of such bills passed in all of 2022 in the U.S. why do you think this is such a lightning rod issue in our country? And what do you think we're seeing such swift legislative action and tough response to it?
ZAC >> So I think they're looking, the Republican controlled Legislatures are looking for a community that they can other to drum up support for their voter base. But I think that they're missing the part because again, trans people are loved and accepted in our communities. And as we're seeing, you talk about the increase in legislation, it's important to note that a couple years ago we were not seeing that. But when they got their foot in the door with bans on trans athletes, that was never their goal. Their goal was to continue to escalate. And that's why we're seeing youth health care bans. Missouri, which had it's adult health care ban which thankfully now has temporary stay by the courts. Florida passing legislation to allow people to remove children if their parent is trans or remove a trans child from their parents. We're seen increasing escalation and it's legislative eradication.
SCRIPPS >> And I have a sort of 2 part question for you. Republicans in the Montana Freedom Caucus appear to be continually and purposefully misgendering you. I want to know what goes through your mind when that happens, especially given that this word decorum has been thrown around a lot in all of these debates, including the one in Tennessee. If the use of the word decorum, decorum could be translated as synonymous with the word decency in some ways. Would you, do you believe that you are being treated by the representatives indecently. And in turn do you think you could have done something differently to avoided being barred from the floor or was this only path you saw forward?
ZAC >> So it's hypocritical of them to call for decorum at the same time they've repeatedly and intentionally misgender me. But this is also coming from the same caucus that advocates very limited government while using government to take away health care from people who need it. And that's what we've seen this legislative session is an unequal and undemocratic application of the fuzzy concept of decorum. When the speaker is an agreement, there's a lot of leeway given. People claim that my very existence is somehow sexualizing children. We objected, but we moved on and that was allowed to go forward. As for would I change anything, when I rose up again, I was talking about real harm, that these bills bring and to apologize and or to not have said that would be to be complicit. in the policies that get my community killed. That's not what my constituents sent me here to do. They sent me here to speak truth.
SCRIPPS >> And on the issue of decorum, I don't remember the same Republicans having a such a strong reaction when the media was being called the enemy of the American people or and being told, fight like h***, you're not have a country left anymore, or if you indict me that there could be death and destruction in the country. As long as we're adding discussion on decorum, let's not forget the larger context and other comments that have been made and what they've led to. Let me get down, though, to this question because at the heart of the issue in Tennessee, was gun control. And the heart of this issue is this gender affirming care. and that includes you know, hormones, or cross sex hormones. Puberty, blockers, surgery. Those who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. On the issue again, beyond your own political situation. Help folks who don't understand or don't agree with the idea that perhaps those kinds of treatments seem severe or intense for folks of a young age. The argument being that aren't kids too young to undergo those kind of procedures when they haven't had a chance to fully grow, perhaps and realize who they are and what they want to be. I'm just playing devil's advocate for a second to talk about the actual issue that's that's on the table. Talk about gender affirming care and, why you think it's appropriate for while people are young and still growing and developing and discovering themselves.
ZAC >> So it's important to understand underpinning all of this is trans people when we are allowed to transition come into ourselves and live lives full of joy in a way that would not have been possible prior to transition. I couldn't do the work I do for the people of Montana had I not transitioned and been able to stand tall in who I am. When it comes to gender affirming care for youth it's important to note that these decisions are being made in conjunction with parents with endocrinologists, with their health care providers, in accordance with every major medical association's guidelines. At a young age transitioning is really just social transitioning. It's going by a new name, it's letting someone to grow their hair out or to cut it short. That's where it starts, as puberty comes along if this, if people's gender dysphoria has been consistent insistent and persistent, then they say, hey, let's try puberty blockers to put a pause on this to see the child still wants to move forward. These are slow processes again with medical professionals there every step of the way. And if they continue to go on and say, yes, I'm trans then they are allowed to go on hormone placement therapy and most surgeries wait until 18 unless there's severe severe dysphoria in which case you see something like a mastectomy, which again, is something that can already happen with cisgender teenagers for various issues.
SCRIPPS >> So what comes next for you at the very least and also regarding these bills. You are still allowed to cast votes during House proceedings for the remainder of the session. But that ends next week, May 5th. So what comes next for you? What kind of work do you plan to do moving especially now that this national spotlight has been brought to Montana?
ZAC>> So I was elected by my constituents to represent their interests in the people's house. I left yesterday with my head held high and walked in this morning with my head held high. That said it's important to note in this last week as we see major housing bills as we see the state's budget come forward, there are still 11,000 Montanans whose voices are not represented in that debate. My heart is set on doing what I can to make sure voices are heard.
Raven Rainbow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2021
sued. sued. sued. youre all sued. none of you are free of sin
- Joined
- May 2, 2022
He should totally sue for libel. Go ahead and get all those sources listed in the official public record, Tony, that'll show all those nasty transphobes!
EDIT: Would Tony be considered a public figure at this point, given how outspoken he's been on Twitter? Because that would set the bar for proving a libel claim even higher. Certainly Zach must be one at this point, as a government official who's gone out of his way to put himself in the public eye.
EDIT 2: Tony's little plan to advance his own career by cozying up to Zach sure has blown up in his face, hasn't it?
EDIT: Would Tony be considered a public figure at this point, given how outspoken he's been on Twitter? Because that would set the bar for proving a libel claim even higher. Certainly Zach must be one at this point, as a government official who's gone out of his way to put himself in the public eye.
EDIT 2: Tony's little plan to advance his own career by cozying up to Zach sure has blown up in his face, hasn't it?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Fraudster doesn’t sound much better than drug dealer, under the circumstances.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2023
How dare you my good sire
I drink only the finest adrenochrome whilst watching my tranny slapfights. Retract your statement or else I shall sue you
Jokes aside what is tony gonna sue him for? Defamation? All they have to do is subpoena a DNA sample and confirm Erin Reed is the same convinced felon as tony reed who has his DNA on file. I'm not sure what this retards argument is here unless he believes his horse piss has altered his dna
- Joined
- May 14, 2021
Tony and Zack are such fucking idiots. People vote massively for the republicans in Montana. It's not like people who vote republican like you chopping your dick off and grooming children. This is just delusion from the both of them, they both live in places that are pozloaded enough to act like they are women, so they just expect the entire state of Montana or the US to agree with them.
This interview is fucking hilarious, it just shows how fucking out of this world they both are.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
You can book him for Public Speaking gigs & "influencer services"He should totally sue for libel. Go ahead and get all those sources listed in the official public record, Tony, that'll show all those nasty transphobes!
EDIT: Would Tony be considered a public figure at this point, given how outspoken he's been on Twitter? Because that would set the bar for proving a libel claim even higher. Certainly Zach must be one at this point, as a government official who's gone out of his way to put himself in the public eye.
EDIT 2: Tony's little plan to advance his own career by cozying up to Zach sure has blown up in his face, hasn't it?
Home
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2020
nonono you don't understsnd. nobody would ever vote in a way the dual protagonists of life, Tony and Zac don't like. clearly it's a facist dictatorship that has rooted itself in under our brave heroines noses and threatens to uh... commit facism!
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Jeremy Carl is a real American Hero and a real human bean
Raven Rainbow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2021
I really hope Jeremy is willing to deal with all the technicalities to keep poking at Erin Reed's drug history. It's obviously a huge sore spot for Erin Reed based on the way Erin Reed is jumping to legal threats in a way they've never done before and based on the fact that Erin Reed spent SEVEN STRAIGHT HOURS trying to delete fucking everything from their druggy forums account
eggnog fan #83
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 10, 2019
You know in his heart of hearts, he's resting on a technicality. A person named Erin Reed has no felony record, but some other guy (who may be "dead") named Anthony Reed II does.
(Then again, it's not like you can just change your name to wash away a criminal record.)
(Then again, it's not like you can just change your name to wash away a criminal record.)
- Joined
- May 2, 2022
You know, I'd be willing to shell out for this if nobody else is planning to or has already done so.maybe here, but it costs $24
Florida Criminal History Record Check
www.fdle.state.fl.us
Yeah, but I'm wondering if that, combined with his Twitter "activism", would be enough to consider him a public figure as opposed to a private figure for the purposes of a libel/defamation suit, since it becomes much more difficult to prove if so. This law firm's site defines private figures as "ordinary individuals who have not sought out the public spotlight or thrust themselves into the discussion of highly public and contentious issues", by which standard Tony would seem to be the very opposite of a private figure, but IANAL. Maybe one of our legal kiwis can weigh in.
Last edited:
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
It's just another example of what happens when troons or their ideals actually interact with normies, which is happening more and more now. Normie contact with actual troons almost never goes well.
It doesn't affect all the control they have over institutions, but at best the conflict between institutions and normies just creates a "mom says you have to play with me!" scenario.
Do it!
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Well I decided to investigate this and I think I have the answer.
Zephyr's an activist. He's been doing LGBT activism since 2020, even testifying in front of the legislature about it. He would have worked with the local Democrats, establishing connections with them. His primary opponent, Dave Severson, was a high school civics teacher. Severson was grading papers on the weekends while Zephyr was making himself useful to the local Democrats. And so Zephyr wins his primary, 56.2% to 43.8% or 834 votes to 650 votes.
What are the other Democrats going to do in the general election? Vote Republican or Libertarian? Zephyr will vote for whatever the Democrats want for the eight year he can be in office and that's good in the eyes of the Demcratic party.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2022
Thread from Leor Sapir addressing Zac:
archive
copy paste:
Zac’s ally Big Al responds by citing an article about mental health and suicidality struggles in kids who identify as LGBT, to argue that he and Zac need to disregard the guidance the LGBT orgs put forth to talk about mental health and suicide as it affects those youth… because the HRT brained AGP coomer faggots know what’s best for confused kids!
archive
linked article
archive
copy paste:
.@ZoAndBehold's "blood on your hands" comment is not only scientifically false, it is also profoundly irresponsible. It puts the very teens Zephyr claims to be concerned about at higher risk for self-harm--a fact acknowledged by major LGBT advocacy and suicide-prevention orgs.
In 2017, @GLSEN @TrevorProject @HRC @glaad@TransLawCenter @LGBTQTaskForce @PFLAG@sageusa @amprog @afspnational@JohnsonFamFound @lgbtmap released a guidebook called "Talking About Suicide & LGBT Populations."
From the guidebook:
"DON'T attribute a suicide death to a single factor (such as bullying or discrimination) or say that a specific anti-LGBT law or policy will 'cause' suicide. Suicide deaths are almost always the result of multiple overlapping causes, including...
mental health issues that might not have been recognized or treated. Linking suicide directly to external factors like bullying, discrimination or anti-LGBT laws can normalize suicide by suggesting that it is a natural reaction to such experiences or laws. It can also...
increase suicide risk by leading at-risk individuals to identify with the experiences of those who have died by suicide."
Rep. Zephyr is putting vulnerable teens at risk, according to major LGBT advocacy and suicide prevention groups.
Here's what the 2017 guidebook recommends instead:
"DO emphasize the vital importance of resilience— not just as a factor that can help protect against suicide, but also as a crucial priority when it comes to developing emotional and psychological well-being among LGBT people."
Health authorities in other countries have recognized that comments like the one made by @ZoAndBehold are false and harmful. As Finland's top gender medicine expert said, this is "purposeful disinformation" and spreading it is "irresponsible."
An org's integrity is tested when circumstances make it politically inconvenient to defend its ideas and principles. Will LGBT orgs stand up for what they know is right, despite it being unpopular in their camp? Or will they rewrite the guidebook to reflect activist priorities?
This is the moment for the organizations that coauthored/endorsed "Talking About Suicide & LGBT Populations" to show courage & integrity.
Tell Rep. Zephyr that this messaging on suicide is false and irresponsible. Do it privately if you must, but do it.
Zac’s ally Big Al responds by citing an article about mental health and suicidality struggles in kids who identify as LGBT, to argue that he and Zac need to disregard the guidance the LGBT orgs put forth to talk about mental health and suicide as it affects those youth… because the HRT brained AGP coomer faggots know what’s best for confused kids!
archive
linked article