Opinion To understand biological sex, look at the brain, not the body - Some copium to start a new month with

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1682951362360.png

There they are, in their Chevrolet Colorado, five dudes bouncing up and down as the truck grinds through the rugged American high country. Two guys up front, three in the back. Shania Twain is blasting. The fellow in the middle is singing along. “Oh, I want to be free, yeah, to feel the way I feel. Man, I feel like a woman!”

The other guys look deeply worried. But the person in the back just keeps happily singing away, even as the dude next to him moves his leg away. Just to be on the safe side.

This commercial aired back in 2004, and even now it’s not clear to me if it’s offensive or empowering, hilarious or infuriating. Twain says she wrote “Man! I Feel Like a Woman” after working at a resort where some drag queens were performing. “That song started with the title,” she said. “Then it kind of wrote itself.”

It’s a fun tune, and I admit I kind of loved seeing that commercial. But at its heart is an issue central to our current political moment.

When someone says they feel like a woman, what exactly does that mean?

Across the country, conservatives are insisting that — and legislating as if — “feeling” like a woman, or a man, is irrelevant. What matters most, they say, is the immutable truth of biology. Missouri’s attorney general, Andrew Bailey, wants to restrict gender-affirming health care for all transgender people, including adults. A new dress code at the Texas Agriculture Department commands that employees wear clothing “in a manner consistent with their biological gender.” In Florida, a law signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) keeps “biological males” from playing on the women’s sports teams in public schools.

This term, “biological males,” is everywhere now. And it’s not used only by right-wing politicians. People of good faith are also wrestling with the way trans people complicate a world they thought was binary. They’re uncertain about when, and how, sex matters, and just how biological it is. Some want to draw a bright line in areas where maleness and femaleness might matter most — in sports, or locker rooms, or prisons. Others are trying to blur lines that used to be clearer. At Wellesley College last month, for instance, a nonbinding student referendum called for the admission of trans men to a school that traditionally has been a women’s college. The president of the college, Paula Johnson, pushed back.

So what, then, is a biological male, or female? What determines this supposedly simple truth? It’s about chromosomes, right?

Well, not entirely. Because not every person with a Y chromosome is male, and not every person with a double X is female. The world is full of people with other combinations: XXY (or Klinefelter Syndrome), XXX (or Trisomy X), XXXY, and so on. There’s even something called Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, a condition that keeps the brains of people with a Y from absorbing the information in that chromosome. Most of these people develop as female, and may not even know about their condition until puberty — or even later.

How can this be, if sex is only about a gene?

Some people respond by saying that sex is about something else, then — ovaries, or testicles (two structures that begin their existence in the womb as the same thing).

What do we do then, with the millions of women who’ve have hysterectomies? Have they become men? What about women who’ve had mastectomies? Or men with gynecomastia, or enlarged breasts?

Are these people not who they think they are?

It may be that what’s in your pants is less important than what’s between your ears.

In the past decade, there has been some fascinating research on the brains of transgender people. What is most remarkable about this work is not that trans women’s brains have been found to resemble those of cisgender women, or that trans men’s brains resemble those of cis men. What the research has found is that the brains of trans people are unique: neither female nor male, exactly, but something distinct.

But what does that mean, a male brain, or a female brain, or even a transgender one? It’s a fraught topic, because brains are a collection of characteristics, rather than a binary classification of either/or. There are researchers who would tell you that brains are not more gendered than, say, kidneys or lungs. Gina Rippon, in her 2019 book “The Gendered Brain,” warns against bunk science that declares brains to be male or female — it’s “neurosexism,” a fancy way of justifying the belief that women’s brains are inferior to men’s.

And yet scientists continue to study the brain in hopes of understanding whether a sense of the gendered self can, at least in part, be the result of neurology. A study described by author Francine Russo in Scientific American examined the brains of 39 prepubertal and 41 adolescent boys and girls with gender dysphoria. The experiment examined how these children responded to androstadienone, a pungent substance similar to pheromones, that is known to cause a different response in the brains of men and women. The study found that adolescent boys and girls who described themselves as trans responded like the peers of their perceived gender. (The results were less clear with prepubescent children.)

This kind of testing is important, said one of the researchers Russo quoted, “because sex differences in responding to odors cannot be influenced by training or environment.” A similar study was done in measuring the responses of trans boys and girls to echolike sounds produced in the inner ear. “Boys with gender dysphoria responded more like typical females, who have a stronger response to these sounds.”

What does it mean, to respond to the world in this way? For me, it has meant having a sense of myself as a woman, a sense that no matter how comfortable I was with the fact of being feminine, I was never at ease with not being female. When I was young, I tried to talk myself out of it, telling myself, in short, to “get over it.”

But I never got over it.

I compare it to a sense of homesickness for a place you’ve never been. The moment you stepped onto those supposedly unfamiliar shores, though, you’d have a sense of overwhelming gratitude, and solace, and joy. Home, you might think. I’m finally home.

The years to come will, perhaps, continue to shed light on the mysteries of the brain, and to what degree our sense of ourselves as gendered beings has its origins there. But there’s a problem with using neurology as an argument for trans acceptance — it suggests that, on some level, there is something wrong with transgender people, that we are who we are as a result of a sickness or a biological hiccup.

But trans people are not broken. And, in fact, trying to open people’s hearts by saying “Check out my brain!” can do more harm than good, because this line of argument delegitimizes the experiences of many trans folks. It suggests that there’s only one way to be trans — to feel trapped in the wrong body, to go through transition, and to wind up, when all is said and done, on the opposite-gender pole. It suggests that the quest trans people go on can only be considered successful if it ends with fitting into the very society that rejected us in the first place.

All the science tells us, in the end, is that a biological male — or female — is not any one thing, but a collection of possibilities.

No one who embarks upon a life as a trans person in this country is doing so out of caprice, or a whim, or a delusion. We are living these wondrous and perilous lives for one reason only — because our hearts demand it. Given the tremendous courage it takes to come out, given the fact that even now trans people can still lose everything — family, friends, jobs, even our lives — what we need now is not new legislation to make things harder. What we need now is understanding, not cruelty. What we need now is not hatred, but love.

When the person in that Chevy ad sings, Oh, I want to be free … to feel the way I feel. Man, I feel like a woman!, the important thing is not that they feel like a woman, or a man, or something else. What matters most is the plaintive desire, to be free to feel the way I feel.

Surely this is not a desire unique to trans people. Tell me: Is there anyone who has never struggled to live up to the hard truths of their own heart?

Man! I feel like a human.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/05/01/transgender-biology-brain-science-freedom/ (Archive)
 
The world is full of people with other combinations: XXY (or Klinefelter Syndrome), XXX (or Trisomy X), XXXY, and so on.
And they are not separate sexes. So what’s your point? They’re errors in sexual development. All of them are either male or female. No other combination of male plus female can create a baby, which is what a sex IS. A sex is a mating type. Humans only have two - male and female.
 
No one who embarks upon a life as a trans person in this country is doing so out of caprice, or a whim, or a delusion. We are living these wondrous and perilous lives for one reason only — because our hearts demand it. Given the tremendous courage it takes to come out, given the fact that even now trans people can still lose everything — family, friends, jobs, even our lives — what we need now is not new legislation to make things harder. What we need now is understanding, not cruelty. What we need now is not hatred, but love.

When the person in that Chevy ad sings, Oh, I want to be free … to feel the way I feel. Man, I feel like a woman!, the important thing is not that they feel like a woman, or a man, or something else. What matters most is the plaintive desire, to be free to feel the way I feel.

In other words, you value Feels over Reals.
 
In the past decade, there has been some fascinating research on the brains of transgender people. What is most remarkable about this work is not that trans women’s brains have been found to resemble those of cisgender women, or that trans men’s brains resemble those of cis men. What the research has found is that the brains of trans people are unique: neither female nor male, exactly, but something distinct.
People with schizophrenia and OCD also have brain features distinguished from those of the "normal" male or female.
 
And they are not separate sexes. So what’s your point? They’re errors in sexual development. All of them are either male or female. No other combination of male plus female can create a baby, which is what a sex IS. A sex is a mating type. Humans only have two - male and female.
Nobody's allowed to just be a freak anymore. We're not allowed to say to these people "No, having XXXY doesn't make you a third sex, it makes you (and the two other people on the planet with the same disorder) a fucking freak of nature" and have that be the end of it.

I miss freaks.
 
The trajectory of trans-shit has been:
“Yeah, I’m a biological man but I have a female soul!” to “Yeah, I have the body of a man, but I have a female brain!” to “Actually I am a biological woman, you just don’t trust the science™️” and now I suspect the powers that be want to go back to the “female brain” nonsense.

To that I say: good fucking luck trying to wrangle troons into even a slightly less insane and nonsensical position. Those lunatics are mentally broken beyond belief.
 
>Look at the brain, not the body.

Welp mind-body problem time. Trans advocacy is primarily based around the proliferation that the brain itself is supreme, and neglecting the role to which the body plays. WHO we are (mentally) is fundamentally different to what our bodies are, and the view that we have to push a select brain type is absurd. The question being of how they interact with each other becomes crucial with the nonsense to which is sprouted whereby we are willing to butcher our own bodies to make our mind happy. Which, is only short term when the mind doesn't get any of the sweet hormone releases from jacking off if you get the axe wound.
 
Why does the Washington Post allow a tranny to write this garbage in their paper?

The trannies always bring up intersex, hysterectomies. and other nonsense that doesn't make sense to anyone who thinks about the logic for more than a minute.

If they want us to look at their brains and not their bodies, lets do it. Lets examine all of their brains. And throw them in the dump when we're finished.
 
Why would we have to redefine male or female aside of reproductive capabilities? Nobody cares to assess every person based on some brain activity and reaction to sounds or whatever to determine their gendered soul, it really does not matter and does not cancel out the bodily reality. Nobody cares how masculine or feminine you feel, it does not make you less male or female.
 
It is more obvious when he's standing next to a biological female..,
1682954207672.png
Lol...Man, please stop, it's not working, you'll never be a woman. Because you're a man.

Why is it always the most obviously male ones? What is happening to their broken brains?
 
Why does the Washington Post allow a tranny to write this garbage in their paper?
Remember the "Austere Religious Scholar" headline?

WaPo will engage in apologia for anyone, including mass murderers, if they think it'll somehow Own the Chuds.

And their comments section is more belligerent and insane than Reddit or Twitter put together. WaPo radicalized me more than Trump or 4chan or Tucker ever could have.
 
I think there is some merit to the idea, but not how this arctile thinks about it.

The differences between male and female brains are so big that we need an extra chessleague for females. this would help alot in groups that dont have visible differences between the sexes like asians.
 
It is more obvious when he's standing next to a biological female..,
View attachment 5105199
Lol...Man, please stop, it's not working, you'll never be a woman. Because you're a man.

Why is it always the most obviously male ones? What is happening to their broken brains?
Why is it always the ultra masculine square jawed potential Chad's who troon out?
 
Why is it always the ultra masculine square jawed potential Chad's who troon out?

It's a fetish, is why. Most modern MTF troons are AGP fetishists who are sexually obsessed with the idea of themselves "as a woman". It's a targeting error in the brain. So it's aggressively sexual high-T males who are most likely to be so overwhelmed by their fetish that they can't control it and make their entire lives about the coom.

SPERGING, I know I'm preaching to the choir, but it drives me nuts how these people live in a world where for instance the food they eat is made possible by an extremely clear understanding that there are organisms that produce male gametes, organisms that produce female gametes, and organisms with some type of disorder. There is no spectrum of chicken sex. There is no spectrum of wheat sex. Suddenly it's all extremely clear. It's only with humans that I'm meant to be bamboozled in this way. I hate them so much.
 
Well, not entirely. Because not every person with a Y chromosome is male, and not every person with a double X is female. The world is full of people with other combinations: XXY (or Klinefelter Syndrome), XXX (or Trisomy X), XXXY, and so on. There’s even something called Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, a condition that keeps the brains of people with a Y from absorbing the information in that chromosome. Most of these people develop as female, and may not even know about their condition until puberty — or even later.
And yet these occurrences are few and far between, and we see them as a mishap in development; not something to be like "Yup, totally normal."

What do we do then, with the millions of women who’ve have hysterectomies? Have they become men? What about women who’ve had mastectomies? Or men with gynecomastia, or enlarged breasts?
These are the questions the fedora-tippers on r/athiesm come up with; those things developed based on what you are, your body still holds to code to develop said parts, just because you cut them off doesn't mean you've become something else. Anyone who's not an euphoric should be able to logic this through.
 
It is more obvious when he's standing next to a biological female..,
View attachment 5105199
Lol...Man, please stop, it's not working, you'll never be a woman. Because you're a man.

Why is it always the most obviously male ones? What is happening to their broken brains?
On the right, nature's creation. On the left, a weirdo who got indoctrinated into playing pretend because they were either bored, lonely or simply saw the woman's easy street and wanted to walk it. Also they have to actually work to even imitate the one on the right and it fails.

This whole troon trend definitely is related to the very anti-male and anti-family stance the west has taken.
 
Back