Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
My mind has a very hard time wrapping itself around irrationality (which made the summer of 2020 very difficult for me). I'm really struggling with all these videos or Reddit posts asserting that troons won't be "allowed to exist." Other than a deranged game of "telephone," where are these people getting this idea? To them, what does their existence entail? Does existence mean telling every child they meet all about them being a troon and that the children they meet are as well? Is it just a demented (and failed) attempt at emotional blackmail? Is it just the current thing?

I mean, I'm really not understanding all of this "not being allowed to exist" twaddle. (Not that I'm against it, mind you.)

One cannot argue with crazy.

It's pure sentimentality. "Let us do whatever we want or we're not being allowed to exist" is the same kind of hyperbolics you might also see presented as "GENOCIDE!". Or, put another way, the rational explanation is it's emotionally manipulative, playing off of the constructed identity of trans-as-perma-victims.
 
We've circled right back to conversion therapy
That’s exactly what it is, it’s the exact same reason the Iranians do it. It’s not just gigahon pressuring lesbians, it’s also deranged bpd hoes tearing down and gaslighting gay men. I think many parents do it to their kids too because to them it’s better to have a castrated “straight” child than a homosexual one. It’s not to say poor fags uwu stop homomisia you guys, I don’t think being a fag is great, it’s just still way better than a troon.
 
The only reason they demand access to the women's toilets is so that they can raid the sanitary bins.

Who fucking knew? If they'd just said that from the beginning then we'd have just dumped our tampons and pads in bins outside ffs.
You kid but I wonder how well I can keep a straight face when I tell my handmaiden coworkers in all seriousness that this is the next step in being a good ally. I'm talking Toys for Tots Christmas collection bins.
 
We've circled right back to conversion therapy and affirmation over telling the truth and getting these people the correct help.
I'm really struggling with all these videos or Reddit posts asserting that troons won't be "allowed to exist." Other than a deranged game of "telephone," where are these people getting this idea?
These are the eye-opening comments my retarded brain needed to read. They've mastered the art of sick and twisted wordplay, making it tough to counter their arguments. They cleverly toss around terms like 'affirmation' and 'life-saving' to paint you as the villain if you dare disagree. Sure, I'm a colossal jerk, but not for that reason. Thanks for loading me up with ammo, truly grateful.

Does existence mean telling every child they meet all about them being a troon and that the children they meet are as well?
Call me a schizo but we've got to go up a level of abstraction or two. Instead of viewing the troon as acting independently on the child, consider that they're under the sway of a semi-autonomous mindset, hungry to spread like a virus. This infectious thought pattern eagerly infiltrates other minds to broaden its reach, and innocent kids make the perfect targets

Introducing a new perspective on ethics, focusing on the ongoing struggle between values that care about well-being and happiness (consciousness) and those that only care about making more copies of themselves (pure replicators). Both consciousness and pure replicators are not physical entities; they are mental phenomena.

Like consciousness, pure replicators exist solely within the minds of living beings. A pure replicator is an amoral mental process, indifferent to the feelings of the being it has influenced and those of others. Its sole purpose is to survive and replicate itself, even if it causes suffering. Since pure replicators are mental phenomena, their influence is felt through the words, actions, and decisions of the beings they've affected, rather than through direct physical interactions.

Our genes may act as pure replicators, but as thinking beings who understand the importance of our feelings and those of others, we are not completely controlled by these replicating forces. However, they still exert tremendous influence over our decision-making, driving us to ensure the survival and reproduction of our species.

In some cases, pure replicators can have a strong hold over their hosts, leading to extreme behaviors, such as those found in certain activist groups. Replicators will use any tool to their advantage, including niche philosophy, empathetic language, emotional manipulation, emotional blackmail, and preying on the immature. This influence can create conflicts between the individual's conscious values, which prioritize well-being and happiness, and the goals of pure replicators, which focus on survival and replication.

In summary, there are instances where a pure replicator infiltrates a person's mind, often inadvertently, and influences their consciousness, turning them into an advocate for a cause that may not align with their own well-being. This can lead to the adoption of confusing but seemingly kind language, extreme reactions to opposition, and pushing the limits of physical and mental integrity. In some cases, this can even drive the individual to self-destructive behavior, which other replicators may exploit for their own survival and replication.

So, when encountering unusual behavior in any group, it's essential to ask: "Am I hearing this person's consciousness, or is a replicator using them?"

TL;DR Troons are possessed by demons
 
My mind has a very hard time wrapping itself around irrationality (which made the summer of 2020 very difficult for me). I'm really struggling with all these videos or Reddit posts asserting that troons won't be "allowed to exist." Other than a deranged game of "telephone," where are these people getting this idea? To them, what does their existence entail? Does existence mean telling every child they meet all about them being a troon and that the children they meet are as well? Is it just a demented (and failed) attempt at emotional blackmail? Is it just the current thing?

I mean, I'm really not understanding all of this "not being allowed to exist" twaddle. (Not that I'm against it, mind you.)
1683015138339.png


Felt appropriate. I don't get it either.

1683015300416.png

This girl is..a mess to say the least. Also /r/TwoXSex is for women talking sex with other women. But no twansphobia, whoever says they're a lady is a lady!!!

iboqzct1ylfa1.jpg
36hdvf53ylfa1.jpg
ng0bjae4ylfa1.jpg
un2uhan5ylfa1.jpg
aw28vub6ylfa1.jpg
vf5xlyd7ylfa1.jpg
archive
 
Last edited:
View attachment 5096709
View attachment 5096715
If Taylor Swift was a ftm. Newflash, this twink didn't feel a spark because he wanted to get railed in the ass and you are a woman with nothing to do it with. Also "Communication is important to me!" but you didn't tell the dude you were trans upfront (Not that he couldn't tell immediately probably). But, yeah, real important.

The faggot can't win here, he was trying to avoid the drama of being accused of transphobia by letting her down in the gentlest and most vague way possible, and now she's accusing him of being a poor communicator.

Look, Gayden, you can't make someone be attracted to you. The chemistry is there or it's not. And given that he just wants to get his guts ploughed by a cock you don't have, it was always going to be a tall order.
 
If you had a rotting hole inside your crotch (or a rotting flesh sausage sewn onto it) would you  want to look or touch anywhere near that thing? Or would you just silently sob and dream in your head of it just magically all going away?

Notice how infantile their language is. They call it "junk." They spent God knows how much money on getting castrated and mutilated to their heart's content and they still can't use more mature terms for their body parts that they apparently care so much about.

Tl;dr fucking troons, man. Mentally ill retards


no, they call it "junk" because it doesnt work anymore!

Late AF, but I'd like to attempt to explain a hot topic that was prominent within the first few pages.

The reason why you see "lesbians" (and often honestly straight women) "fetishizing" gay men has more to do with giving up on men IRL while idealizing them in drawings than it does with a gay fetish. I've been aware for a very long time now that more and more women are choosing to remain single or go faux lesbian because their choices in men are so bleak, but I only recently discovered how high those numbers are and looked into how they're likely even higher than that. These women are physically attracted to male bodies, but not to any male personality even skirting on the average 80%, and they're right to feel that way, IME/FMO. These women are creating fictional men who are all heart, mind and soul with lust just being an incidental byproduct of these things lining up romantically. I'm not saying that all female yaoi consumers or creators fall into this category, but enough of them are to explain the glaring differences between yaoi and yuri.

This is the exact opposite and counterpart of the coomer guys who portray lesbians and chicks in general as though they're the same brainless, soulless, lust-fueled creatures they themselves are. The male yuri consumers just want mindless sex, while the female yaoi consumers want love and romance that make sex seem desirable and worthwhile. Again: I'm not saying that all female yaoi consumers or creators fall into this category.


its like how straight women LOVE romance novels whereas gay dudes are much more visual about their love of males
 
My mind has a very hard time wrapping itself around irrationality (which made the summer of 2020 very difficult for me). I'm really struggling with all these videos or Reddit posts asserting that troons won't be "allowed to exist." Other than a deranged game of "telephone," where are these people getting this idea? To them, what does their existence entail? Does existence mean telling every child they meet all about them being a troon and that the children they meet are as well? Is it just a demented (and failed) attempt at emotional blackmail? Is it just the current thing?

I mean, I'm really not understanding all of this "not being allowed to exist" twaddle. (Not that I'm against it, mind you.)
Transgenderism is an inherently far-left movement. For the far left, existing = being able to publicly speak about x identity with affirmation from others and without backlash. If you can't publicly talk about some aspect of yourself, if you are pressured into being silent about some aspect of yourself, you are not making that aspect visible. Therefore, invisibility/not being allowed to exist. The big point they seem to be missing is that validation from other people is not required to exist, and there are aspects of all of us that should be kept out of the public eye. "If you don't want to listen to me and accommodate my desires, then you are denying my existence." It's logically unsound but there it is, and the alphabet people take this to the extreme.

These people are deeply mentally ill and common sense and logic don't apply to them. Most of them do not recognize that they are being driven by a fetish (and imo more and more aren't, and are instead being gaslit into thinking they are trans). The vast majority of them do not think they are a danger to kids; they don't think they are grooming kids, they actually do believe kids are aware of their sexual identity much earlier.

FtM are usually just as gross as MtF but until you can find me a headline of a FtM beating the shit out of a cis male who misgendered her in the bathroom, I will continue to believe MtF are worse.
 
Always makes me laugh when people do that.
You see it on YouTube when someone can't think of a comeback other than "yeah but you watched/subscribed to..."
Not that the Forum is immune to that sort of homosexuality, I've seen people here using join dates like its some kind of W, as if a join date tells you anything other than the date that particular account was made, which when you think how many people lost access to their old accounts during the Great Troon War, (or the time before that, or the time before that, or the time...) means next to nothing. I've see posts here I'm almost certain are from old users (or longtime lurkers I guess) with accounts a week old, and some of the most cringe can't read a room shit from accounts with join dates years old, but that type of profile stalking faggotry is something I've mostly seen on YouTube (I don't use reddit).


@OrsonZedd where are you?
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
A FTM did kill a classroom of 8 year olds just last month.
FtMs have violent outbursts due to roid rage combined with being histrionic women, MtFs are smug creeps with rape tendencies who like to prey on children and biological women. You can't really pick one over the other, both are a scourge upon society.
 
>being treated as a man
>life as a man
>living as a man vs woman

No, you're not being treated as a man. You'll never know what it's like to be a man because step one is being born male and step two is being socialized as male. You're navigating your self made hell as a mentally ill woman poorly in disguise and that is how most if not all other people see you. People avoid you because they can literally smell the instability. One of them mentioned that a woman she tried to ask out looked at her with disgust mixed with pity. This is how everyone looks at Aidens.
I don't regret it! I love being trans! I don't regret it! I don't regret ruining my life! I love the fact that I used to be a hot girl who got loads of male attention but now I'm a five foot nothing pubebeard whose dating pool is now deviant bisexual men and straight men who are using me for pussy! I don't regret any of this! I swear!
I want to feel bad but this is all self inflicted.
 
My mind has a very hard time wrapping itself around irrationality (which made the summer of 2020 very difficult for me). I'm really struggling with all these videos or Reddit posts asserting that troons won't be "allowed to exist." Other than a deranged game of "telephone," where are these people getting this idea? To them, what does their existence entail? Does existence mean telling every child they meet all about them being a troon and that the children they meet are as well? Is it just a demented (and failed) attempt at emotional blackmail? Is it just the current thing?
If you simply disagree with them, they accuse you of wanting them dead. They are so insanely fragile and at the same time narcissistic as all hell.
And when they say "safe" they mean people using their preferred pronouns, because words are literal violence.
 
A FTM did kill a classroom of 8 year olds just last month.
Yes. Children. Not someone of her own weightclass. She couldn't have beat up Tyler1 if she wanted to, that's why she grabbed firearms and targeted literal children. MTFs are still more dangerous, with or without guns.

Not that that excuses Aubrey Hale's disgusting attack on literal children.
 
I usually hate the phrase, but that 4chan really needs to man up and save the confused tomboy.
Admitting to suicide attempts is usually a relationship red flag, but it's more than understandable if the girl was gang raped by socially-privileged people she trusted.
It's a joke around here, but a stalwart boyfriend could actually save her life.


As for Heightism, it's one of the biggest forms of discrimination, and also the least talked about. We ignore manlets shortarses midgets vertically-challenged men's complaints, because we ourselves subconsciously take them less seriously. If a tiny incel wanted to transition, I wouldn't be sure it would make his life worse. As short ugly women can still still get male sexual attention.

Have to disagree, she's obviously a mentally ill burden even without the rape. She will be a needy emotional vampire. No one is obligated to be someone's "rescuer", and when they are, those relationships usually turn to shit anyway because of the dynamic.

He ought to be a good friend though, while making it clear they're not together.

Agree about heightism though. In addition, small penis jokes. I think the problem is, on average, men themselves have no desire to fix these prejudices, and actually participate, because small men and small penis men are statistical minorities, and sneering at them allows the average man to feel superior.

As for women's role, it's a guaranteed way to hurt, and have a semblance of rare and precious social power over some men. Usually, it's men who wield the power with body shaming, and this and maybe baldness is the only way it works the other way round, and unfortunately some women relish it.
 
Last edited:
Back