- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
Kiwis in this thread literally called it. How fucking predictable do you have to be, Elliot?!
Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet
- Thread starter 0 0
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
What a pathetic, sad, person with no future.
They could use their talents for helping a ton of people but instead they've dedicated their entire life to cooming and covering up the times they shouldn't have been cooming by going after sites that document their own words.
They could use their talents for helping a ton of people but instead they've dedicated their entire life to cooming and covering up the times they shouldn't have been cooming by going after sites that document their own words.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
No Dong having to edit his own articles is so fucking hilarious.
- Joined
- May 14, 2021
It's just too obvious, this tranny is one of the most predictable persons I've ever seen online. I just hope the Wikipedia jannies think this article is as unnotable as their CEO who is covering up Elliot's rapes, and they delete the fuck out of it. I am not convinced that the Wikipedia user Love The Andes is not Elliot himself, or one of his polycule sex pest members.
But I might be slightly optimistic there, as most likely the trannyjannies will jump in and defend their favorite rapist Elliot No Dong Jones.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2022
I haven't practiced Bird Law Wikipedia bullshit in ages but i kinda figured this is their slimy way of getting a page up while skirting the shit out of Wikipedia's conflict of interest rules.
If him or anyone working there had directly put it up it could of been voted on for deletion as they are a nothing burger of a company and would be a obvious paid conflict of interest. Wiki jannies hate anyone making money editing a page.
But if you sock it up there then all you have to do is gather enough Wiki troons for it to survive the initial shit storm. And if you manage that then everyone from there can edit it and just have to say they are Non-controversial edits to clean up spam and not paid editing like they are.
If him or anyone working there had directly put it up it could of been voted on for deletion as they are a nothing burger of a company and would be a obvious paid conflict of interest. Wiki jannies hate anyone making money editing a page.
But if you sock it up there then all you have to do is gather enough Wiki troons for it to survive the initial shit storm. And if you manage that then everyone from there can edit it and just have to say they are Non-controversial edits to clean up spam and not paid editing like they are.
Temperance
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 1, 2022
I would love to see Liz explain how - within a mere 15 minutes - he magically became aware that the Honeycomb wiki page had been created. By a totally "anonymous" new editor, of course...
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Honeycomb.io&action=history
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Honeycomb.io&action=history
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
He's pretty transparent for a brick(faced chink).
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2022
Hello Elliot i see you are reading the post and already trying to create six degrees of separation from you and your obvious sock you just used to edit bypassing conflict of interest all together.
On the totally not a sock puppet account's talk page they addressed the undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic allegation and posted this wall of bullshit. Link/Archive
Also they are having a conversation on the Honeycomb talk page to totally show us they are different people. Link/Archive
On the totally not a sock puppet account's talk page they addressed the undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic allegation and posted this wall of bullshit. Link/Archive
Also they are having a conversation on the Honeycomb talk page to totally show us they are different people. Link/Archive
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2023
My post shows two things - Thwomp is directly "requesting" edits under his own well-known username and the wiki-jannies aren't {currently} pleased about this, suprisingly.
Rules-autist jannies are currently at least at 51% against stink-ditch jannies, although for kicks I'll pretend it's currently a 59%-41% split.
It will be interesting to see how this progresses.
Rules-autist jannies are currently at least at 51% against stink-ditch jannies, although for kicks I'll pretend it's currently a 59%-41% split.
It will be interesting to see how this progresses.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
Give it up Elliot, you already failed rule number one of sockpuppeting: establish a plausible history first and don't just jump directly in to sucking your own dick being the first thing the sock does.
I do wonder if wikipedos can do anything against "no I totally don't have a financial stake in this company!" or if they will just have shrug and take his word for it.
At least this conversation is realistic. Wikipedia has had many a retarded slapfight over the tiniest of spelling differences, this is quite civil in comparison.
Temperance
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 1, 2022
Is this a joke? So the anonymous new editor (with no conflict-of-interest, plz trust!) went quiet on May 19th after creating the Honeycomb article and editing Liz's article. But now the editor is suddenly back & doing damage control almost immediately after Kiwifarms started discussing this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...Andes&target=Love+The+Andes&offset=&limit=500
And now the editor is editing this other article...
And then commented on the Articles for Deletion page for Charity Majors (Liz's boss) to shill the new Honeycomb article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charity_Majors
Can you get any more obvious??
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.ph...Andes&target=Love+The+Andes&offset=&limit=500
And now the editor is editing this other article...
- Gartner is an American technological research and consulting firm based in Stamford, Connecticut that conducts research on technology and shares this research both through private consulting as well as executive programs and conferences.
And then commented on the Articles for Deletion page for Charity Majors (Liz's boss) to shill the new Honeycomb article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charity_Majors
Can you get any more obvious??
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2022
He Found Captain Winky
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2022
Thwomp is to lazy for that and besides then he might risk exposing himself when seethes about consent accidents or Robert Z’Dar.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
What convinced me of Elliot no-dong Fong's rape was the way he relayed the incident in third person for "reasons" and subsequent deleting of all mentions once we found out. If I was accused of rape, I would tell the accuser to take their medication and jump into the nearest lake to sleep with fish. I wouldn't cope in third person and I certainly wouldn't conjure up some ridiculous story about animal hair and call it a "consent accident".
The three layers of rape denial cope:
- justify (dog hair)
- minimise (she freaked out)
- victim blaming (it was her problem. You are here.)
Elliot Fong is a hunched back eunuchised rapist.
The three layers of rape denial cope:
- justify (dog hair)
- minimise (she freaked out)
- victim blaming (it was her problem. You are here.)
Elliot Fong is a hunched back eunuchised rapist.
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
Just my theory. He's admitted to writing software that constantly gives him live updates about if Kiwi Farms is functional or not. I would find it hard to believe that he doesn't also have software that constantly searches for his name, Honeycomb, consent accidents, etc. on all major websites which sends alerts to his phone when anything pops up. IF he's not involved with the creation of the wiki page (he probably is), then I could see it being plausible that he would be aware of its creation within 15 minutes.
Remember, he is narcissistic as fuck with a modicum of coding knowledge and googles his name constantly. He will write software that reinforces his obsessions.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2023
Another sign of puppetry.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2022
Now that Gartner has potentially entered the picture that statement/non statement on the sock puppet's talk page is starting to make me think someone there might be responsible and Elliot asked someone there to Trojan Horse a page up and are using slimy ass pr/lawyer speak to deflect.
I only copy pasted the perfectly sourced and edited Wikipedia entry Elliot sent me for my very first ever Wikipedia submission.
Researched what? They are literally a nothing company and this reads like slimy pr/lawyer speak for trust me bro.
This is where it clicked for me maybe Elliot used someone at Gartner as a Trojan horse to do it so he can claim plausible deniability. Rational conversations don't exist on Wikipedia it's like Warhammer 40k except the only game play is 100,000 rules you have to follow.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
Let us not forget this handy-dandy tool for writing similarity checking.
I'm trying to find a long enough excerpt of Liz' writing on wikipedia that doesn't contain formatting and rule citations as I think that fucks up the checking.
Edit:
This was the best match I found, but it's far from perfect:
I do like how the reference text flattened out the chin to a near block like shape though, the fucking plagarism detection computer even knows this nigga looks like a thowmp.
I'm trying to find a long enough excerpt of Liz' writing on wikipedia that doesn't contain formatting and rule citations as I think that fucks up the checking.
Edit:
This was the best match I found, but it's far from perfect:
I do like how the reference text flattened out the chin to a near block like shape though, the fucking plagarism detection computer even knows this nigga looks like a thowmp.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2019
How the fuck does No Dong, who is infinitely less well known than Chris Chan have an article and he doesn’t? They’re both sex pests, both trans, only people actually know who Chris Chan is.
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
I guess being paid $100000 to fuck off immediately by Google could be notable, but they don't like to talk about that either...