Sunderland student in court over picture of Bart Simpson being sexually abused by Marge - The court heard a graphic description of the abuse

Article: https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news...impson-being-sexually-abused-by-marge-4164983
Archive: https://archive.ph/IZTIB
---------------------------------------------------------------
A Sunderland student ended up in court after looking at a computer-created image of child cartoon character Bart Simpson being sexually abused - by his TV animation mum Marge.

It was one of 49 cartoon-type images police found on Graham Moon’s mobile phone after they raided his home in Grindon Lane, Springwell.

His arrest was no moment of comedy for university degree holder Moon, 23, who faced up to three years behind bars and a spell on the sex offenders register for his crime.

He avoided both after a court heard no real child was involved, he had not distributed the images, his offence was committed three years ago and he had not reoffended.

District Judge Zoe Passfield told him said there were “some points of concern” highlighted in a pre-sentence report commissioned into his behaviour.

But she said they could be addressed via a 12-month community order, containing 20 days of rehabilitative work with the Probation Service – and she did not place him on the sex offender register.

Prosecutor John Garside said: “There are no sentencing guidelines for this offence.

“The circumstances are that police have executed a search warrant of the defendant’s home address.

“They seized electronic devices and over two devices were 49 images that were accessible.

“An example of one image was computer generated of a male child, effectively a cartoon. It’s one cartoon that may be known to the court.

“It’s effectively Bart Simpson."

Mr Garside gave the court a graphic description of how another cartoon character, Marge Simpson, Bart's mother, was depicted abusing the 10-year-old Bart.

“That’s effectively what these images are, they are cartoon images of children and adults," he said.

“The defendant comes before the court with no convictions or cautions. The maximum sentence is three years.”

At South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court, Moon pleaded guilty to possession of 49 prohibited images of children, between February 19, 2019, and August 4, 2020.

The court heard he gained sexual gratification from looking at the images.

Angus Westgarth, defending, said: “He has no previous convictions. He was a student at the university on his last year.

“When interviewed, he told the police that he had seen these images and they were on his machine, and he didn’t realise that it was illegal to possess them.

“These are still cartoon images, no child has been acted against. As soon as this offence was put to him, he pleaded guilty. There’s no child. What makes him tick, I’m not sure.”

Moon must pay a £114 victim surcharge. There were no court costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Ah yes, a set of images seen by everyone that ever made the mistake of going to a TGP site in the mid 2000s, now with a prison sentence rather than just a chuckle at the absurdity and shitty art. Frijoles.gif

Really my favorite detail of this was at the bottom of the website. These niggas have a "modern slavery statement" page.
 
You know, if only the British authorities cared as much about Islamic grooming gangs they wouldn't have decade long rape gangs with thousands of child victims in multiple towns.
"OI WHATS ALL DIS DEN? LOOKS LIKE THIS ADULT LAD IS A NOUNCE WITH HIS CARTOON BART GETTING A HANDI FROM MARGE, WOT. Gonna dedicate all er' resources to this outrage, we will! This MIGHT be teh' CRIME of the century, it is, if he said anything racist as well!"

*Meanwhile twenty blonde 10 year old's are being triple penetrated by paki's and no one cares.*

“The circumstances are that police have executed a search warrant of the defendant’s home address.
lol with no previous arrest history? Kinda surprising they can warrants for this but not against semi-brown households with nonstop crime history.
 
This probably is more than most women who abuse kids in the UK get.

The bongs are retarded, I can't wait for them to sink. The only good thing they have for them is that they are a nigger magnet. More for them, less for us. Thank god these fuckers are not part of the EU anymore.
 
Its far been known British police are absolute fucking cowards who can barely police any sort of crimes. Even in the most lib-retarded districts in the United States a DA would anally rape you with a taser for wasting resources over retarded cartoon porn. Also registering as a sex offender, come the fuck on.

You can barely afford fucking food and you're paying these dumb faggots to do a raid on some guy's house because he got hit with a simpson's porn image, Jesus fuck. Anglos are fucking pathetic.
 
He would have been fine if he raped a real child if only he had a tan and a love of Allah.

This is pretty typical move by failing states, they start to desperately overcompensate by hyper-focusing on what little is left that they can actually still do. In this case the UK police can't be bothered to stop any real crime so they picked some random retard with cartoon porn to pretend they are "protecting the children" like complete buffoons.
 
I don't care for anime that much but when people say they want to criminalize lolicon drawings I laugh not because I diasgree with them or anything, but because it'll open way more cases like this. Hilarious to think some places consider a badly drawn bart simpson with his dick out to be some sort of sex crime when they have shit like cuties.
 
If I am missing something, I can't find what started this series of events with the police raiding him? Only they found the cartoon image but he did not spread it.

...That's actually a really good point this shit makes no mention at all of the why he was raided or what caused the police to do it. There is 0 mention of it all.

What the hell is going on in that trash island?
 
Over all a poorly written news article, that just exists for the funny headline rather than to give a good report of what went down. Just leaves me more questions like what were the other images of or why he was raided in the first place.

“An example of one image was computer generated of a male child, effectively a cartoon. It’s one cartoon that may be known to the court.

“It’s effectively Bart Simpson."
Is this two different images, because the way the first line makes it sound is a realistic depiction of a child rather than Bart Simpson
The court heard he gained sexual gratification from looking at the images.
Is that something they proved or just something they are guessing.
 
Back