The Caroline Farrow, Adrian Harrop, and Anthony George Halliday / Stephanie Hayden Megathread

[AgendaPoster]

Where are Sunak and Suella and all the gorrillion TERF Pride World Wide chicks? This shit needs to reach the ears of higher ups in the alleged Conservative government, who has started to expel migrants, host them on boats and so on.
Why is this intrusion in the private life of a citizen that's not convicted of any crimes (am I incorrect?) allowed?
I think it's time this story makes it to the trends, to Elon and Matt Walsh's timelines. Please, if you still have Twitter, do the necessary dirty deed, tag Ian Miles Cheong, Libs of Tik Tok, Tim Pool, whatever.
Make these britbong scum famous, and let's see public pressure applied.
We cannot allow that a state bullies a law abiding citizen for nothing other than opposition to progressive dogma. Enough is enough.

 

[RACISM]

You know, I've made the joke before that an American should set up a service to sent messages quasi-anonymously for Britbongs. E.g. you want to call someone a nigger, and you just send a fiver and have an American do it for you.

Well she's been compelled to give her KF password to them once before. Had to change it after the troon downtime last year, but she will have been compelled again. I would say it is a 100% certainty that the UK pigs monitor that account. If there's any way for null to see when it was last logged into, that might well be them.

So anything you post on her wall will likely be read by them.

 

[Berrakh]

Literally every reactionary criticism of civil rights and protected classes has come to pass— we went from free speech except for obscenity toward fine national institutions to free speech except against mentally ill freaks who enjoy impunity for their insane political activity.

 

[RollingRock2]

Computer loicense: Revoked

 

[Brenda Tits]

I am not in the least pretending that Bongland is not an absolute shit hole, the police are pricks and fully captured, but there is something dubious about this. It's difficult to get these orders - a relative who has a violent husband has struggled (and failed) to get one and she has a catalogue of credible death threats sent across multiple online platforms as well as your more 'traditional' in-person stalking.

Fat Tony is capable of bending the police's ear but he hasn't got the legal weight to pull this off just by pestering the police.

You would hope the magistrate would kick it straight out of court but if CF & her solicitor are expecting it to be granted then there's some evidence of something we don't know about yet.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

If you live in Europe, especially England, I don’t see why you wouldn’t conduct yourself online as if you’re living in a totalitarian clownworld police state. Separate e mails for everything, always behind a VPN, certainly no presence on social media that could tie to your real life. The state wants you dead, it wants to subject you to kangaroo court humiliation rituals, it wants to destroy your life.

Most people are freedom larpers, Americans included, probably from decades of cold war propaganda or something. I wonder how many Jan 6 insurrectionists thought they were going to walk free with a slap on the wrist.

 

[Plague Flea]

I am not in the least pretending that Bongland is not an absolute shit hole, the police are pricks and fully captured, but there is something dubious about this. It's difficult to get these orders - a relative who has a violent husband has struggled (and failed) to get one and she has a catalogue of credible death threats sent across multiple online platforms as well as your more 'traditional' in-person stalking.

Fat Tony is capable of bending the police's ear but he hasn't got the legal weight to pull this off just by pestering the police.

You would hope the magistrate would kick it straight out of court but if CF & her solicitor are expecting it to be granted then there's some evidence of something we don't know about yet.

That’s a fair point but it’s not like the police don’t already have history of sitting on their hands when dealing with real criminals, then coming down hard on normie law-abiding citizens.

By and large they’ll take the path of least resistance. With the rapes of the underage girls by Muslim males, ignoring the victims was less bother than arresting and charging the perpetrators. Here, if they ignore Fat Tony as they should, he’ll kick up fuss. That’s more bother to them than restricting a Catholic mother from posting on the internet.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Imagine being a Western Nation and still claiming you're a democratic country and believe in human freedoms after pulling off this sort of shit.

 

[(((Obar Lazcano Kamz)))]

Enjoy your supervision you fucking snitch

 

[Trig.Point]

I think it's fairly obvious that Farrow's solicitor is either incompetent or just not interested in inconveniencing the courts or Police. Which is a major trend within the British legal profession particularly when there are less serious allegations and their client has limited means.

The Police aren't obligated to show Farrow all the evidence against her, they just have to provide it to her solicitor. What action he then takes with it is largely up to him, and in reality he doesn't even really need to pretend to follow her instructions. He was probably all charm and sympathy during his consultations, while at the same time trying to keep in with the Police, CPS and courts, because he can't afford to piss them off.

Tony knows how the legal system works, he'll have turned up to every Police interview with all his documents nicely laid out, he'll have quoted the relevant legislation, taken the officers names and afterwards fired off letters to everyone remotely connected to the case referencing those Officers. He won't have tried to 'explain' or 'make them understand' he'll have concentrated on making clear to them that the path of least resistance was to do what the fat violent sex offender, fraudster in a dress sitting in front of them wanted, and harass a mother of 5 for him.

I like Farrow, I have a lot of respect for her but there are very clear warnings everywhere on this site about not posting identifiable information. She was warned to stop posting under her own name.

Caroline if you're reading this, get a different fucking solicitor!

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

A bloke was sent to jail for leaving bacon on a mosque door handle. He was shanked and killed in prison by pakis.

Depending on how long he got, I honestly don't think that's comparable. Putting him to prison is low tier shit: the state just handles it and moves to the next one. For Caroline, it's constant monitoring and so much bureaucracy that it almost feels personal. She has to list the devices that arent owned by her but she MIGHT be able to use. It's so intrusive it looks like parody

 

[Agent Abe Caprine]

Most people are completely oblivious that shit like this is happening. You'll see Bongs online talk about how "we have freedom of speech in this country" because they genuinely have no idea that, actually, we don't and never have.

Reminds me of an old joke.
"An American explains to a Russian that the United States is a truly free country because he can stand in front of the White House and shout “To hell with Ronald Reagan!” The Russian says that this is nonsense because he can easily stand in Red Square and shout “To hell with Ronald Reagan.”

 

[NerdShamer]

@Caroline Farrow what you're going through is essentially how we treat sex offenders in America; why would you willingly get involved with this bullshit?

 

[Marvin]

Imagine having to get Fat Tony's permission before you could post anything on social media.

Twitter archive

Mumsnet thread



View attachment 5153168View attachment 5153169View attachment 5153170View attachment 5153171

Oh, and to the Surrey police... I AM NOT MOTHER FARROW!

She's not banned from social media yet.

She says they're applying for it and we'll see if they get it tomorrow.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Tony knows how the legal system works, he'll have turned up to every Police interview with all his documents nicely laid out, he'll have quoted the relevant legislation, taken the officers names and afterwards fired off letters to everyone remotely connected to the case referencing those Officers. He won't have tried to 'explain' or 'make them understand' he'll have concentrated on making clear to them that the path of least resistance was to do what the fat violent sex offender, fraudster in a dress sitting in front of them wanted, and harass a mother of 5 for him.

I like Farrow, I have a lot of respect for her but there are very clear warnings everywhere on this site about not posting identifiable information. She was warned to stop posting under her own name.

I categorically disagree. The warnings on the site are a thing but this is no excuse for the UK Police to go absolute balls to the wall against her. There is no one to blame here but the UK government and law enforcement. They are cowards, morally bankrupt and absolutely spineless. They have no sense of honor or duty or decency. You said it yourself: They are complete drones who would rather sit on their asses and do as the sex pest tranny wants because "Oh gotta follow the Law guv'na can't stand up it's the protocol" because they KNOW that is the easy thing to do. They are just covering their own asses because they are that weak and stupid.

There is no legal precedent for doing this shit. None of it is even legal, even the anti-terrorism shit that is being used here is being used wrong because there has been no actual judicial process. The cops have willingly chosen to go above and beyond their job simply because it is better in their eyes to destroy someone's life than have to be inconvenienced by a man in a dress a bit more who will shout how he wants you dead like a schizo,.

Caroline Farrow what you're going through is essentially how we treat sex offenders in America; why would you willingly get involved with this bullshit?

Pretty sure this is actually much tighter restrictions than even sex offenders get.

 

[Generic Retard]

This can't be legal. How could this be legal?
Do Brits not have any constitutional rights?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This can't be legal. How could this be legal?
Do Brits not have any constitutional rights?

Sometimes they do. Back in 2020 there was hope because British Judges began recognizing a right to free speech, and then that crashed down really fast. I mean, they are arresting everyone now (for speech).

 

[CoolFool]

I'm not too familiar with Caroline Farrow; is she well known enough that some UK magazines/news/celebrities would read about this and bring more attention? What about that female online news site Reduxx? LibsoTikTok? Etc.

Or is she too 'extreme' that no one wants to support her? I see she has posted to KF, so I'm wondering if maybe being associated with us might be the reason she isn't getting more attention since MSM has deemed this place a hate site.

Fuck the useless UK police and government. Everything I hear about them sounds like a nightmare.

 

[AnOminous]

Or is she too 'extreme' that no one wants to support her? I see she has posted to KF, so I'm wondering if maybe being associated with us might be the reason she isn't getting more attention since MSM has deemed this place a hate site.

She's been about as "extreme" as J.K. Rowling.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

This can't be legal. How could this be legal?
Do Brits not have any constitutional rights?

They are Subjects, not Citizens. Big Difference.

Used to be the King/Queen would recognize their loyalty and pay it back with rights and privileges in the realm. In the last few decades though the Civil Servant class has eliminated that so that all belong to Westminster as assets to be used to make big line go up. Even the monarch isn't really free anymore, Charles probably can't even do anything the Royal Prerogative says he can even if he wanted.