SJW Art and Extremes

[Inside your walls]

What the fuck does this mean. just ship a straight couple like a normal person i wish gendies didnt know about this game
View attachment 5149757

It's supposed to be a parody of this image

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

Saw this on Twitter. Surprised it wasn't fatter. Yours for a mere $80. (I wonder what AI would draw if I suggested "negress demon in combat boots with pink hair?" And could I sell it for $80? )

 

[Nut-Roaster the 2nd]

Saw this on Twitter. Surprised it wasn't fatter. Yours for a mere $80. (I wonder what AI would draw if I suggested "negress demon in combat boots with pink hair?" And could I sell it for $80? )
View attachment 5150574View attachment 5150576

It looks like a fullbody NFT.

 

[NoReturn]

It looks like a fullbody NFT.

Isn't that what adoptables are? Proto-NFTs?

 

[Yaks]

Isn't that what adoptables are? Proto-NFTs?

Except adoptables you actually own the character and have rights to them. It's already a better deal compared to 95% of NFTs.

 

[Flexo]

Except adoptables you actually own the character and have rights to them. It's already a better deal compared to 95% of NFTs.

I thought that WAS what NFTs were. How is it different?

 

[fishercat]

I thought that WAS what NFTs were. How is it different?

With NFTs all you own is the hyperlink/receipt to the image. You might have bought the rights to use it but that only lasts if you continue owning that receipt. If someone hacks your account and takes all your apes you're shit out of luck. It's really, really dumb.

 

[Urbicide]

I thought that WAS what NFTs were. How is it different?

Here's a mati segment that explains it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPFiqJdEoiw&pp=ygUXbWFkIGF0IHRoZSBpbnRlcm5ldCBuZnQ%3D

 

[mannic]

Saw this on Twitter. Surprised it wasn't fatter. Yours for a mere $80. (I wonder what AI would draw if I suggested "negress demon in combat boots with pink hair?" And could I sell it for $80? )
View attachment 5150574View attachment 5150576

Hate to say this, but ive seen really good adopts that deserve a $80 price tag than this one.. The design is lacking and it feels like it has been thrown a bunch of highlighter colors.

 

[Flexo]

With NFTs all you own is the hyperlink/receipt to the image. You might have bought the rights to use it but that only lasts if you continue owning that receipt. If someone hacks your account and takes all your apes you're shit out of luck. It's really, really dumb.

Here's a mati segment that explains it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPFiqJdEoiw&pp=ygUXbWFkIGF0IHRoZSBpbnRlcm5ldCBuZnQ%3D

Yes I understand the basics of NFTs, what that doesn't answer is how it's different from this "adoption." So far all you've really explained is that the adoption receipt is public and the NFT receipt is a secure key code.

Adopt an ape, adopt a furfag - it all just looks like claiming ownership of a jpeg.

 

[fishercat]

Yes I understand the basics of NFTs, what that doesn't answer is how it's different from this "adoption." So far all you've really explained is that the adoption receipt is public and the NFT receipt is a secure key code.

Adopt an ape, adopt a furfag - it all just looks like claiming ownership of a jpeg.

Adoptables run a lot more on the honor system than NFTs, you use regular money to buy them, and they aren't notorious for scams. That's the main difference.

 

[Shard]

Adoptables run a lot more on the honor system than NFTs, you use regular money to buy them, and they aren't notorious for scams. That's the main difference.

Can't I draw an adoptable without paying for it? Better yet, why don't I just make my own character to own? Who are these for? What do you get out of buying it?

 

[Yaks]

Adopt an ape, adopt a furfag - it all just looks like claiming ownership of a jpeg.

It is, but the majority of NFTs don't have the commercial rights attached to the design that's on the jpeg is the difference.

Can't I draw an adoptable without paying for it? Better yet, why don't I just make my own character to own? Who are these for? What do you get out of buying it?

An adoptable isn't a style, well there's a whole deep dark depth of adoptable species and shit but that's a whole different level of insanity. Some people buy the adoptables because they're bad at design and want to use them for visuals for a novel or RP or whatever. Other people essentially treat them like Pokemon cards.

 

[Shard]

Some people buy the adoptables because they're bad at design and want to use them for visuals for a novel or RP or whatever.

Just steal it. I'm sure no one will notice.

 

[Chromeo]

Just steal it. I'm sure no one will notice.

The drama when someone's adopt is "stolen" is fucking hilarious. If you go deep enough on DeviantArt you'll find 12 year olds having CAPS LOCK TODDLER FIGHTS about who stole whose character and how XYZ is a blatant ripoff, etc.

 

[Flexo]

Adoptables run a lot more on the honor system than NFTs, you use regular money to buy them, and they aren't notorious for scams. That's the main difference.

Ok so in practical matters there's no difference, it's all about their social perception. Though I'm not sure how much the honor system is less prone to scams because...

The drama when someone's adopt is "stolen" is fucking hilarious. If you go deep enough on DeviantArt you'll find 12 year olds having CAPS LOCK TODDLER FIGHTS about who stole whose character and how XYZ is a blatant ripoff, etc.

Ah yeah - there it is. Exactly what I would expect of such a system. That does sound hilarious.

So adoptables do have much more entertainment value too.

It is, but the majority of NFTs don't have the commercial rights attached to the design that's on the jpeg is the difference.

I honestly wonder how long until that's the case though. (assuming someone hasn't already done commercial rights on an NFT somewhere)

 

[NoReturn]

On this topic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTHgEV-xUSg

Hate to say this, but ive seen really good adopts that deserve a $80 price tag than this one.. The design is lacking and it feels like it has been thrown a bunch of highlighter colors.

Can you provide examples? Most of the ones I see are kind of crap and seem to be the "shovelware" of art.

Can't I draw an adoptable without paying for it? Better yet, why don't I just make my own character to own? Who are these for? What do you get out of buying it?

Asking the same questions I've had for years.

 

[Yaks]

I honestly wonder how long until that's the case though. (assuming someone hasn't already done commercial rights on an NFT somewhere)

I think the Bored Apes are, probably where the confusion comes from since they're the biggest.

 

[Kosher Snake]

What the fuck does this mean. just ship a straight couple like a normal person i wish gendies didnt know about this game
View attachment 5149757

its implying link and zelda are one of the "fluids" or whatever, aka those fuckers who believe they can just change their gender to whatever they please, whenever they please
someone told me before "its basically schizophrenia, but specifically for gender"

 

[Shard]

The drama when someone's adopt is "stolen" is fucking hilarious. If you go deep enough on DeviantArt you'll find 12 year olds having CAPS LOCK TODDLER FIGHTS about who stole whose character and how XYZ is a blatant ripoff, etc.

You just inspired me to troll the shit out of DeviantArt. Thank you.