EU Swedish Prime Minister: “Massive Immigration Just Doesn’t Work” - SWEDEN NO!


Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson has acknowledged that “massive immigration just doesn’t work” as he announced changes to the country’s border control policy that would make it the strictest in the European Union.

Kristersson made the comments to mark the National Day of Sweden as he insisted that it was too easy for migrants who can’t even speak Swedish to obtain citizenship. “Let me be clear: Massive immigration and poor integration just doesn’t work,” wrote Kristersson. “That is why we are now changing Sweden’s migration policy and making it the strictest in the EU.” The leader of the center-right Moderate Party said new measures would be introduced to ensure migrants had not committed crimes in their home countries and also tests to ensure they respect Swedish culture and heritage. “A ‘no’ to asylum means ‘no’ and you have to leave the country. That should be obvious, but it’s not,” said the PM. “Equally important, a ‘yes’ should mean that you really get involved in Swedish society.”

Kristersson said citizenship was not just about obtaining a passport and should be a “social contract and that social contract contains both rights and obligations.” He added that up until now “there has been absolutely no expectation that anyone who comes to Sweden will really learn our language,” which is the “glue that binds us together.” The measures are being introduced thanks to political lobbying from the right-wing Sweden Democrats party, which is now the second-largest party in the Riksdag and is keeping Kristersson in power via a confidence and supply agreement. As we previously highlighted, even Kristersson’s predecessor, left-winger Magdalena Andersson, vowed to abolish ethnic ghettos, asserting that she didn’t want to see the emergence of “Somali-towns” in the Scandinavian country.

Following ethnic riots that left over 100 police officers injured, Andersson warned that, “Segregation has gone so far that we have parallel societies in Sweden. We live in the same country, but different realities.” Having been one of the safest countries in Europe 20 years ago before mass uncontrolled immigration, Sweden is now the continent’s second most dangerous in terms of gun crime behind only Croatia. In 2021, Germany’s Bild newspaper ran the headline: ‘Sweden is the most dangerous country in Europe.’ Last year, Ukrainian refugees expressed the desire to avoid being sent to Sweden, feeling that it was too unsafe. Sweden is finally learning the lesson that diversity is in fact not a strength, but with native Swedes set to become a minority within a few decades, is it too late?

________________________________________________________________________
Klaus angry.jpg

"ZAT DOES NOT SOUND VIKE OWNING NUFFINK AND BEING HAPPY TO ME!"

But for real though, too little, too late, Ulf.
 
(literally irreversibly, what are you gonna do? Deport the millions immigrants destroying your country? Yeah good fucking luck lmao)
Have Denmark do it. Call on them to return to their roots and promise them at least one mountain of territory in return for their actions.
 
The reality is America is fucking huge, the majority of Americans do not see the effects of illegal immigration firsthand and the ones that do either support it (blue shitholes) or are limited in their capacity to do much about it (border states).
I live a shitty place there are mexican, and Punjab people here. you can go about 20 minutes north and its basically farming villages with mexicans and fuck even filopino. (okay asians are cheating)

100 years ago you d have little italy where the old Italian grandma could live in a bubble of a few city blocks and survive with out a lick of english.

America is just really really big and we could just tell the rest of the world to fuck off and go back to dealing with the shit we have on our continent.

The result of boarder states bussing people to NY and other places is interseting kinda sad people are being used to a make a point.

but back to sweden yes importing a group of people who have a different value than you creates problems
 
Took them long enough. and all it took was the rise of the "far right" (yeah fucking right) Sweden Democrats who have kept saying that for years. But hey over 300 grenade attacks a few years ago by September wasn't enough now was it? Just shows you what happens when a woman is in charge (mind you the Danes had a woman in charge and Denamrk now has one of the strictest asylum policiies in the whole EU. Heck they weant to break up "migrant zones" now) And the EU now has finally decide to sharpen asylum rules (it was basically everyone against Germany) Though I fear it is way, waaaay too late.
 
I want to believe, but until the massive immigration problem is solved with massive deportations, this is all talk.
Look over history and you will see any number of moments where a society continued along one course, seemingly unable to turn at all, until suddenly it went in a completely different direction. You can examine all of the events leading up to that inflection point and see all of the influences and undercurrents, and subtle shifts of belief that led to it, and say "it actually started all the way back here", but to a cursory or casual examination, it seems to happen abruptly and out of nowhere. Certainly, to the people experiencing it at the time, it would be night and day: society just collectively shrugged and changed course, overnight, for no obvious reason.

What we're seeing is the first inklings of that. Mass deportations may well be on the agenda by the 30s, but even before that, I think we're going to see mass voluntary returns of immigrant populations, as the social structures they're current exploiting fall apart.

e: and for those of you saying it's too late: it's never too late. The best time to start was then, but the next best time to start is now.
 
Meanwhile in Japan:

Diet passes controversial bill to revise immigration law (archive)

Japan's parliament on Friday passed a bill to revise an immigration and refugee law to enable authorities to deport individuals who repeatedly apply for asylum status, despite objections from some opposition parties.

Opponents to the legislation gathered in front of the Diet building in Tokyo in the rain, demanding the bill be scrapped, while opposition lawmakers criticized the ruling camp for having "bulldozed" the bill.

The House of Councillors, or upper house, enacted the law with the support of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, led by Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, and its junior coalition partner, Komeito, as well as other relatively conservative opposition forces.

While Japan currently cannot send a foreign national whose refugee status application is being processed back to their home countries, the immigration authorities suspect many have abused the system by applying multiple times to remain in the nation.

Under the amended law, the government will aim to reduce long-term detention in immigration facilities and encourage the expulsion of foreign individuals who do not comply with deportation orders issued for overstaying.

Opponents have argued that the revised legislation could result in the repatriation of those who are at risk of persecution in their home countries, endangering their lives, and also lead to the expulsion of children who were born and brought up in Japan.

As of the end of last year, 4,233 foreign nationals had refused to return home despite being ordered to do so, according to the Immigration Services Agency of Japan.

The law will allow the government to expel individuals who fail to present reasonable grounds to be granted refugee status after their third request.

Critics, however, have raised a counterargument, pointing out that some asylum seekers had had their requests approved in the past after making three or more applications.

To provide assistance to foreigners from conflict-affected regions, the amended law offers a "quasi-refugee" status that would allow them to stay in Japan, even if they do not meet the criteria for being recognized as fully authorized refugees.

As part of efforts to prevent prolonged detention, the government will allow individuals applying for refugee status to live outside an immigration facility under the supervision of family members or supporters to avoid the risk of flight.

But opponents have cast doubt on the effectiveness of the system, saying it places a heavy burden on those monitoring the asylum seekers.

The main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, meanwhile, called for the establishment of a third-party body to screen the refugee recognition process, currently conducted by the immigration authorities, to ensure the fairness of the procedure.

The ruling bloc rejected the request and only introduced minor changes to the bill, such as training immigration officials on how to screen asylum seekers.

In a last-minute attempt to block the passage of the revision bill, the opposition party submitted a censure motion against Justice Minister Ken Saito, who is in charge of the legislation, which was eventually voted down in the upper house on Wednesday.

Outside the Diet building on Friday, dissidents held a rally, with some raising placards with phrases written in English such as "Protect refugees."

In the run-up to the vote at the plenary session of the upper house, Taiga Ishikawa of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan lambasted the legislation, saying, "This is a matter of life and death for many people."

Ishikawa also said the revised law could see asylum seekers repatriated even though they face imprisonment or torture in their home nations. The bill was finally passed, with opposition lawmakers jeering at Hidehisa Otsuji, president of the upper house.

Japan lags far behind the United States and several European countries that typically accept more than 10,000 asylum seekers annually. In 2022, the Asian nation gave refugee status to 202 people, including 147 from Afghanistan.

In 2021, the government shelved an amendment bill for the immigration law amid a growing backlash after a 33-year-old Sri Lankan woman died while being held at an immigration facility in Nagoya, central Japan that same year.

She had been complaining of stomach pain and other symptoms for a few months and ultimately died due to a lack of necessary medical care.

Earlier this year, the Kishida administration submitted to parliament the latest version of the bill, which largely retains the contents of the one that was previously withdrawn.
 
Look over history and you will see any number of moments where a society continued along one course, seemingly unable to turn at all, until suddenly it went in a completely different direction. You can examine all of the events leading up to that inflection point and see all of the influences and undercurrents, and subtle shifts of belief that led to it, and say "it actually started all the way back here", but to a cursory or casual examination, it seems to happen abruptly and out of nowhere. Certainly, to the people experiencing it at the time, it would be night and day: society just collectively shrugged and changed course, overnight, for no obvious reason.

What we're seeing is the first inklings of that. Mass deportations may well be on the agenda by the 30s, but even before that, I think we're going to see mass voluntary returns of immigrant populations, as the social structures they're current exploiting fall apart.

e: and for those of you saying it's too late: it's never too late. The best time to start was then, but the next best time to start is now.
Most of the time in history whenever that happens it involves extreme catastrophic events like WW3
 
Its absolutely crazy how a lot of these northern countries managed to build extremely high trust, wealthy societies where people wanted for very little and had safety, security, prosperity and happiness, then literally irreversibly (literally irreversibly, what are you gonna do? Deport the millions immigrants destroying your country? Yeah good fucking luck lmao) destroyed themselves with progressive policies.
Even if Sweden was able to ship back all of the fresh off the boat immigrants (Realistically this is never going to happen) they now have to deal with the second and third generation children of migrants who won't want to leave. So they are stuck with a huge population of antisocial freeloaders who won't work, rape Swedish women and refuse to integrate to their society. They literally had the nearest thing to a utopian society and flushed it down the drain for fucking nothing. Importing hordes of Arabs accomplished not a fucking thing.
 
Even if Sweden was able to ship back all of the fresh off the boat immigrants (Realistically this is never going to happen) they now have to deal with the second and third generation children of migrants who won't want to leave.

Its pretty easy to make them want to leave. Genghiz Khan would figure something out. Its not exactly rocket science.
 
I want to believe, but until the massive immigration problem is solved with massive deportations, this is all talk.
Um sweaty, they'll just integrate as they have more kids durrrrr, now ignore that all the 1st/2nd generation Swedish born sand niggers all hold strong nationalist identities to the nations their parents/grandparents came from and not to Sweden (I see this in the US as well with all the Beaners, it's also funny watching them squirm and panic at the thought of going to the homeland they oh so love dearly, absolute lunacy).
 
Kapten Sverige, var är du?

Um sweaty, they'll just integrate as they have more kids durrrrr, now ignore that all the 1st/2nd generation Swedish born sand niggers all hold strong nationalist identities to the nations their parents/grandparents came from and not to Sweden (I see this in the US as well with all the Beaners, it's also funny watching them squirm and panic at the thought of going to the homeland they oh so love dearly, absolute lunacy).
The so called Somali refugees in my country (Norway) have zero issue going back to their country of origin for a vacation. On the taxpayers dime of course.
 
We tried to make them care about democracy and whatever other western values in their own lands through nation building. When that didn't work we invited them into our own homes to help them see our ways; to disastrous results.

Which way now, western man? Are you ready to accept that they just don't share our values and never will? Or will you continue this dance until they have taken everything from you and have nothing to show for it?
 
Even if Sweden was able to ship back all of the fresh off the boat immigrants (Realistically this is never going to happen) they now have to deal with the second and third generation children of migrants who won't want to leave. So they are stuck with a huge population of antisocial freeloaders who won't work, rape Swedish women and refuse to integrate to their society. They literally had the nearest thing to a utopian society and flushed it down the drain for fucking nothing. Importing hordes of Arabs accomplished not a fucking thing.
Turns out making a utopia is easy, the hard part is not tearing it down through sheer retardation.
 
The only way out is mass deportations if not out right genocide. Once you have them in your country you are basically fucked. But I am surprised that someone from the home of Captain Sweden said something like this. But talk is cheap.


Most of the people coming to Western countries from the third world are just excess population anyway. Their own countries don't want them and we don't want them so genocide wouldn't be that big of a deal. The other problem would be dealing with all the faggots that want them here. Like the rich fags that use them as cheap labor. They are just excess population that nobody wants. Does it really matter if they live or die if no one wants them?
Its absolutely crazy how a lot of these northern countries managed to build extremely high trust, wealthy societies where people wanted for very little and had safety, security, prosperity and happiness, then literally irreversibly (literally irreversibly, what are you gonna do? Deport the millions immigrants destroying your country? Yeah good fucking luck lmao) destroyed themselves with progressive policies.

I remember decades ago when Scandinavian countries were viewed (by both left and right) as a model for the rest of the world of what any country should aspire to be and now not even progressives can look at them with a straight face.
They could deport them. It's doable. You could also make things so terrible for them they self deport as well.
I sort of get why Scandinavian countries imported mudslime in the beginning. If you have a lot of wealth and need for nothing, then you start looking to caring for others with it. It just seems like the civilized and Christian thing to do. However, they didn't know what they were getting into importing these people and they just expected them to assimilate somehow.

I always thought Europe was weird. You can have generations never assimilating or learning the language ever. There is no attempt among the native population to even in passing learn anything about these immigrants. In the US, this is pretty unthinkable. Basically everyone is assimilated by the second generation and often by the third, there is no real working practice of the language or culture of the old country without considerable effort on the part of the individual to learn it. But in Europe there are just these weird enclaves. God forbid they learn anything from us about how to properly assimilate people.
It's probably because they make good cheap labor. That's why the US is filled up beaners.
 
Back