What a bunch of mental cases. Literal insane ban reasons from these microcephalic retards.
Are there seriously retards on rpg.net so dumb they don't realize it's a fag haven without the ugliest goddamn pride flag I've ever seen?
He also managed to butcher the meaning of the phrase. "Next time there'll be no next time" means that after the next time you're dead, no more second chances. "Next time... well, there will be no next time" means he should be dead already, it should be a perma-ban message.
Trust an rpg.net failmod to try to sound like a badass and sound like a gigantic faggot instead. That's almost a Bush-ism.
It has nothing to do with being a haven for faggots. It's about showing everyone how Safe and Inclusive(tm) they are... now that everyone who disagrees with them has been banned.
Telling that the last admin is someone using a Ginyu avatar. A character who can swap into other people's bodies. Between that and their post I can fairly assume they are fat and wish they could claim the body of a non-fatty.
It's like a window into how dysfunctional a society of moviebobs would be....
A professor who identifies as Nigerian-American (so is therefore almost certainly born in American and trying to stand out) and another who claims that the only reason the Third World countries are poor is because da evil colonisers took their resources...failing to address why those countries were not at an equivalent or greater level of technological development as those occupiers. Truly the greatest sources
Idiots! "third world" is a left over from the cold war where you had capitalism vs communism as the first two parts of the world, and then everybody not involved in the conflict as "the third world."
It's the condescending attitude that really makes it.
These dumb fuckers unironically think that Africa would look like Wakanda if not for European colonization, and ignore all the evidence otherwise. To really push the punchline, a lot of the Natives are so fucking stupid that they destroyed Colonial-Era infrastructure for a quick buck, and they still insist that their poverty is entirely because somebody gathered resources they never bothered to gather before.
It really depends on the colonizing power. Say what you like about the English Empire, but almost all the countries that were colonized by them were better off for it in the long run, to the point they even kept things like the legal system and infrastructure they got. One exception would be Rhodesia, which turned into absolute shit because they had to be perverse idiots and throw away the baby with the bathwater, get rid of all the white people (you know the ones who were growing the food), etc.
