Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Someone posted an article to Hacker News about Canada's auto theft crisis.
HN's response: if nobody drives cars then nobody can steal cars:
View attachment 5168671
Source (Archive)
Los Angeles and many other cities all around the globe have all had pretty well known records for stolen bikes. Some of them even turned them into memes. So I guess you shouldn't use bikes either.
I'm amazed to what an echo-chamber does to an exceptional individual, as well as the length they are willing to go to defend this dystopic movement. They should really uninstall their web browser and stop being so terminally online on social medias, it rots their brain into thinking that removing privately owned cars will solve everything. Even kindergarten kids can figure out that the issue isn't just one lol
 
Los Angeles and many other cities all around the globe have all had pretty well known records for stolen bikes. Some of them even turned them into memes. So I guess you shouldn't use bikes either.
Good point, except you get to the next stage of cope: Just ignore it and get a new bike, because bikes are cheaper. Basically like the guy in the bike cuck comic:
bikecuck.jpg
Meanwhile in reality, what people who aren't insane urbanists actually do in cities like NYC is to scuff up their bike to make it look like a piece of shit not worth stealing.
 
Good point, except you get to the next stage of cope: Just ignore it and get a new bike, because bikes are cheaper. Basically like the guy in the bike cuck comic:
View attachment 5168927
Meanwhile in reality, what people who aren't insane urbanists actually do in cities like NYC is to scuff up their bike to make it look like a piece of shit not worth stealing.
The guy getting the bike is going to chop it up and sell the parts to buy drugs. So presumably he will be happy for a little while, until he has to steal the next bike or overdoses.

Even Meth Americans are smart enough not to ride the nice bikes they steal. They'll ride the crappy ones though.
 
Good point, except you get to the next stage of cope: Just ignore it and get a new bike, because bikes are cheaper. Basically like the guy in the bike cuck comic: Meanwhile in reality, what people who aren't insane urbanists actually do in cities like NYC is to scuff up their bike to make it look like a piece of shit not worth stealing.
If there's one behavior of the modern bugman that fills me with rage, it's the "well the thief is probably a human too..." meme. No motherfucker, I do not have to view people that steal from me as humans. And it is not "just property bro". I paid money for my car/bike/boat, money that I acquired by spending my finite time working. If I catch you with my property, I should unironically have the right to string you up outside a window until I get tired of your screams. And these "its just property bro" cucks are exactly the sort of people to defend junkies and thieves because "NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST DEFEND YOUR PROPERTY ISNT THE LIFE OF A JUNKIE WORTH AS MUCH AS ANY OF OURS?"

No motherfucker, no it isn't. The notion of not shooting thieves dead on the spot is actually a fairly new one.
 
If there's one behavior of the modern bugman that fills me with rage, it's the "well the thief is probably a human too..." meme. No motherfucker, I do not have to view people that steal from me as humans. And it is not "just property bro". I paid money for my car/bike/boat, money that I acquired by spending my finite time working. If I catch you with my property, I should unironically have the right to string you up outside a window until I get tired of your screams. And these "its just property bro" cucks are exactly the sort of people to defend junkies and thieves because "NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST DEFEND YOUR PROPERTY ISNT THE LIFE OF A JUNKIE WORTH AS MUCH AS ANY OF OURS?"

No motherfucker, no it isn't. The notion of not shooting thieves dead on the spot is actually a fairly new one.
If they don't want consequences to happen to them, why don't they just not steal shit?
 
Slightly related, but I've somewhat been looking into the theft issue that's been going around lately and it looks like they're all being stolen one of two ways either using a signal booster to boost the signal of the wireless key fob to trick the remote start function, or by using a computer that connects to the OBD port that locksmiths and dealers use to reprogram keys. Or they take the VIN to the dealer and have them reprogram a new key for the car.

So far I've seen the cheapest effective method is using an old fashioned kill switch (provided you don't put it somewhere obvious) by connecting it to the fuel pump or ignition wire. I've even seen some creative methods like people incorporating some of the accessory buttons on the vehicle.
 
CityNerd visited Charlotte, NC for a Strong Towns conference. Charlotte, like all Democrat run cities, is trying to implement urbanist policies, but that doesn't stop this incredibly dry guy from complaining at every turn
Charlotte had this happen a couple weeks ago on a bus...

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WBTV) - CATS released a video

of a shooting that happened on a bus last week.

The release of the video comes days after CATS interim CEO Brent Cagle provided details of the shooting during a press conference.

Separately, video of a stabbing on a CATS Gold Line train was also released this week.

The video of the shooting released Friday shows four different viewpoints of the incident including a view of the driver, the front half of the passenger area, the back half of the bus, and an outside view.

A passenger from the rear of the bus approaches the bus driver and asks him to let him off the bus before a stop and Cagle confirmed during the press conference that is what led to the altercation.

Two other passengers are also shown in the video for a total of four people on the bus.

The driver continues on the route while the passenger argues with him, halfway through the video the man pulls out a handgun and the female passenger starts moving towards the rear doors.

The driver pulls out a handgun after the passenger did and as the man moves up toward the driver with the gun in hand the driver and the passenger exchange shots. The two other passengers take cover in the rear of the bus and the passenger who was shot crawls towards the back exit.

As the bus driver stops the bus the driver continues to point his gun at the passenger and fires an additional shot at the man.

After the passenger with the gun steps off the bus, the driver walks outside and fires one more shot before the video ends.
 
If there's one behavior of the modern bugman that fills me with rage, it's the "well the thief is probably a human too..." meme. No motherfucker, I do not have to view people that steal from me as humans. And it is not "just property bro". I paid money for my car/bike/boat, money that I acquired by spending my finite time working. If I catch you with my property, I should unironically have the right to string you up outside a window until I get tired of your screams. And these "its just property bro" cucks are exactly the sort of people to defend junkies and thieves because "NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST DEFEND YOUR PROPERTY ISNT THE LIFE OF A JUNKIE WORTH AS MUCH AS ANY OF OURS?"

No motherfucker, no it isn't. The notion of not shooting thieves dead on the spot is actually a fairly new one.

Horse theft was a hanging offense in the old days.

If bicycle thieves were treated the same way, I guarantee shoplifting, public defecation, and drug overdoses would also see sharp declines.
 
Los Angeles and many other cities all around the globe have all had pretty well known records for stolen bikes. Some of them even turned them into memes. So I guess you shouldn't use bikes either.
shit LA is famous for niggers killing niggers for there damn Nike™ (NiggerKike™) shoes, so walking is out, also

fuckcars should get all riled up about how if you're a PoCC (person of color, carrying) you can't leave your gun in your car because you walked or rode your bike ahahaha anti-gun laws are racist af
 
Proof that, once again, even Europe is not enough for urbanists, and they must live out their fantasies in Cities Skylines 2:
cs2carcentric.png

source (a)
View attachment 5145943
Furfag talks about how much he hated living in provo, how sterile it all was, while presenting a photo of enormous houses, and a beautiful view of Mt Timpanogos.
Yes, you read that correctly, he prefers Chicago.
This same furfag apparently participated in a bicycle protest and hates it when people clock that he's a tranny on social media.
ketualbrechtprotest.png
protest1.jpg
protest2.jpg
source (a)

For some reason I sincerely doubt that the problem with biking in Chicago is that the infrastructure is unsafe.
 
Why didn't they ride on the fully segregated bike path next to Lake Shore Drive?
Michigan Avenue doesn't have bike lanes, but it has incredibly wide sidewalks and is possibly the most popular street for pedestrians in the entire city as it's where a lot of the tourist stuff and high-end shopping in Chicago is located.

They're complaining about cities that have already done what they claim to want.
 
If there's one behavior of the modern bugman that fills me with rage, it's the "well the thief is probably a human too..." meme. No motherfucker, I do not have to view people that steal from me as humans. And it is not "just property bro". I paid money for my car/bike/boat, money that I acquired by spending my finite time working. If I catch you with my property, I should unironically have the right to string you up outside a window until I get tired of your screams. And these "its just property bro" cucks are exactly the sort of people to defend junkies and thieves because "NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST DEFEND YOUR PROPERTY ISNT THE LIFE OF A JUNKIE WORTH AS MUCH AS ANY OF OURS?"

No motherfucker, no it isn't. The notion of not shooting thieves dead on the spot is actually a fairly new one.
A-fucking-men. One of the parts of the rittenhouse trial that annoyed me was binger pointing out that in Wisconson the law is "people over property" meaning that you legally can't use deadly force to protect property.

Like, what Motherfucker? That property is literally hours of my life I'll never get back, damned right I'll shoot your ass if you try and take it, destroy it, etc.

When future generations write about the fall of civilisation, it will be blamed on the overabundence of empathy in whites.
 
Proof that, once again, even Europe is not enough for urbanists, and they must live out their fantasies in Cities Skylines 2:
Didn't they make an expansion that allowed you to create fully walkable districts with minimal cars? Even in the base game there are policies to encourage bikes/public transportation usage and limit motor usage.

CitySkylines gave players a pretty good brush to paint with, so I'm not sure what exactly they want. Maybe Surviving Mars is there speed as everyone there lives in walkable domes.
 
Didn't they make an expansion that allowed you to create fully walkable districts with minimal cars? Even in the base game there are policies to encourage bikes/public transportation usage and limit motor usage.

CitySkylines gave players a pretty good brush to paint with, so I'm not sure what exactly they want. Maybe Surviving Mars is there speed as everyone there lives in walkable domes.
it's actually an exploit with the parks DLC thingy, you make "parks" with absurdly high entrance fees, and the sims will use them to coomute (walk/bike) paying batshit high prices each time, meaning you're infinitely in the green.
 
Meanwhile in reality, what people who aren't insane urbanists actually do in cities like NYC is to scuff up their bike to make it look like a piece of shit not worth stealing.
Or just flee the city entirely like rats leaving a sinking ship as they have been doing.
 
Why didn't they ride on the fully segregated bike path next to Lake Shore Drive?
Michigan Avenue doesn't have bike lanes, but it has incredibly wide sidewalks and is possibly the most popular street for pedestrians in the entire city as it's where a lot of the tourist stuff and high-end shopping in Chicago is located.

They're complaining about cities that have already done what they claim to want.
They don't ride on it because they want to fuck with the carbrains. That's literally it. It's the simplest answer, and bugmen are nothing if not instinctual creatures of habit. They'll fuck with you even if you have a tiny car like a Mitsubishi Mirage. Don't put it past them blocking off a road out of spite for a second
 
Jason's latest video is out. It's him angrily complaining about the "US is too big to be built like the Netherlands" argument:

The Dumbest Excuse for Bad Cities​


sddefault.jpg
Go to: https://go.nebula.tv/notjustbikes (archive) for full access to Nebula for $30 per year (plus applicable taxes).

I have no interest in making “debunking” videos, but there’s one lame excuse that is so common, so prevalent, so ubiquitous, that I was literally forced to make this video. It's true: I had no other choice. My hands were drawn to the keyboard to write this script like they were possessed by the ghosts of people killed by cars.

Patreon: https://patreon.com/notjustbikes (archive)
Mastodon: @notjustbikes@notjustbikes.com (archive)

NJB Live (my live-streaming channel): @njblive (archive)

References & Further Reading

Downtown Houston, 1912
https://hdl.handle.net/1911/62636 (archive)

Country size comparisons
https://www.thetruesize.com (archive)

Number of Vehicle Trips by Trip Distance
US Department of Transportation
https://nhts.ornl.gov/vehicle-trips (archive)

NHTS BRIEF November 2006
National Household Travel Survey - Commuting for Life
https://nhts.ornl.gov/briefs/commutin... (archive)

Urban sprawl erodes rural lands
https://www.farmprogress.com/business... (archive)

Ontario loses 175 acres of farmland to urban development a day, says farmers group
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london... (archive)

[Netherlands] Agricultural export in 2021 in excess of 100 billion euros for the first time
https://www.wur.nl/en/research-result... (archive)

Ray Hill’s Tunnel photograph (2019) by Michael Manoni
https://www.alltrails.com/members/mic... (archive)
https://www.alltrails.com/trail/us/pe... (archive)

Why did Minneapolis tear down its biggest train station?
https://www.startribune.com/why-did-m... (archive)

This video contains content licensed from Getty Images.
He seems to care a lot about the US for someone who has supposedly written it off as a lost cause.

The video starts off with a massive self-own where he shows that the entire country of the Netherlands is about the same size as the Seattle-Tacoma Metro area:
1687193787971.png

Next, Jason argues that because 45% of trips are less than three miles, they can easily be replaced by walking or biking.:
1687193866657.png
What he doesn't seem to realize is that the short average trip distance disproves his argument that sprawl causes people to have to travel long distances to run errands. All urbanists should have to do to be happy is bike/walk the totally reasonable (Jason's words, not mine) < 3 miles and shut up and let everyone else enjoy their houses and cars.

Jason claims the average commuting distance in the US is about 20 miles.
He neglects to mention that the average American commute time is 27.6 minutes (archive).
Meanwhile in the Netherlands:
1687194206050.png
Source (Archive)
Under urbanist logic, it's a bad thing to be able to have a short commute without living next door to work.

By the way, unsurprisingly, Jason's average American commuting distance is wrong:
The median commute of top state, Maine, is 9.8 miles, which is 72% longer than the 5.7 mile median commute in Wyoming.
1687194370389.png
Source (Archive)

He spends some time talking about how US cities used to be built around railroad lines and had streetcar tracks and how in the 1800s you could take a train anywhere:
1687194690250.png
He has no explanation for how airplanes outcompeted passenger rail for long distance travel or how buses replaced streetcars.

He then shows this map of possible high-speed rail routes for the US despite having spent the rest of the video talking about how only intra-city travel matters when talking about the size of countries:
1687194876191.png
Ironically, this map shows exactly why rail is a terrible idea compared to airport/interstates. Who wants to travel from Phoenix to Vegas by taking a detour in the wrong direction through Los Angeles? His map shows that someone wanting to travel from Pittsburg to Boston would have to stop in DC (wrong direction), Philly, and NYC. The only way to fix this would be to spend hundreds of trillions building HSR rail lines between every pair of cities (and there's a lot more cities than just the 20 shown in the map) or we could just use planes/cars instead.

He cited the example of Roman sidewalks that people have shared in this thread as an example of walkable cities existing for millennia:
1687195472516.png
Why did they need sidewalks Jason, unless there were carts driving in the road?

He then hilariously shows a clip of a massive tram with one passenger:
1687195913608.png
in that car, there's a handful of other passengers in one of the other cars. Still an inefficient use of space
and of a pedestrian blocked from crossing the street because the tram didn't yield to him:
1687195894548.png
So much for efficient transportation or walkability.

He then asks that if Netherlands is small enough for public transit and bike lanes, then why don't other similarly sized places have similar amounts of public transit and bike lanes.
1687195894517.png
Is he stupid? How does he not know about population density?

He then claims that Americans are so dumb that when a store goes out of business they just leave the building to rot instead of redeveloping it into a dense walkable neighborhood:
1687196045827.png
No Jason, the reason why that mall hasn't been redeveloped is because the city that it's in has a poor economy and therefore there is no demand to redevelop it.

He then claims, without evidence, that instead of redevelopment, new big box stores are built on empty land which causes things to be too spread out for public transit. But remember, at the beginning of the video, Jason claimed that 45% of American vehicular trips are less than three miles in length and therefore could be replaced with walking/biking trips. Which is it? You can't have it both ways.

He then says people don't cycle because it's too dangerous to bike due to all the cars while showing a road with a massive trail next to it:
1687196292237.png
His editor has to be trolling him. No one can be this dumb.

He then complains about a park-and-ride lot in Oakville, Ontario, Canada that allows thousands of suburban commuters to commute into downtown Toronto by train instead of driving all the way in:
1687196384440.png
Jason, the alternative to that lot isn't a bunch of apartment buildings, it's everyone who commutes by rail either driving in, working from home, or working at an office in a suburb instead of downtown. The former is bad for your anti-car crusade, and the latter two are bad for the economic health of the city core (but are good for the suburbs).

Also, one thing I've noticed about Jason's videos is that clips of "bad" cities have their saturation reduced while clips of "good" cities are in HDR. This has the effect of making the "bad" cities look more depressing and the "good" cities look warmer. Look at how desaturated the above picture is and compare it to Google's version:
1687199065745.png

He complains about Ontario "destroying" 175 acres of land per day in order to build more houses.
1687196622271.png
Canada has a declining native population. It only needs new houses due to the million+ immigrants it imports each year. I haven't heard Jason advocate against immigration to prevent sprawl. He's also full of crap because the GTA has a greenbelt that bans nearly all suburban construction and its cites have built an enormous number of condo and apartment buildings with little effect on housing prices due to the sheer amount of immigration.

He then shows a clip of an tram in a "good city". Shortly before doing this, he declared that all of the US looks like this:
1687197284091.png
1687197162889.png
That isn't just any tram, it's a Houston METROrail tram.
Google Maps of the location in the clip.

The second-to-last clip of the video shows a bunch of cyclists in an American city biking in the road instead of using the perfectly good bike lane:
1687197911658.png

His editor has to be trolling him.

Some YouTube comments:
1687198278292.png
1687198431665.png
Apparently YouTube highlights paypig comments:
1687198370969.png
1687198419258.png

Jason is also still using reddit to promote his videos:
1687202211116.png
Source (Archive)
So much for his boycott.
 
Last edited:
He then shows this map of possible high-speed rail routes for the US despite having spent the rest of the video talking about how only intra-city travel matters when talking about the size of countries:
1687194876191.png
Ironically, this map shows exactly why rail is a terrible idea compared to airport/interstates. Who wants to travel from Phoenix to Vegas by taking a detour in the wrong direction through Los Angeles? His map shows that someone wanting to travel from Pittsburg to Boston would have to stop in DC (wrong direction), Philly, and NYC. The only way to fix this would be to spend hundreds of trillions building HSR rail lines between every pair of cities (and there's a lot more cities than just the 20 shown in the map) or we could just use planes/cars instead.
It still really sticks out to me that Jason didn't put a single station in the Great Plains, or much of the South for that matter (not even the Old South). Couldn't even be bothered to ensure that state capitals would be in the system. Goes to show how utterly ignorant he is, or at least his outright disregard for everything outside of the big bughives.
 
He then shows this map of possible high-speed rail routes for the US despite having spent the rest of the video talking about how only intra-city travel matters when talking about the size of countries:
1687194876191.png
Ironically, this map shows exactly why rail is a terrible idea compared to airport/interstates. Who wants to travel from Phoenix to Vegas by taking a detour in the wrong direction through Los Angeles? His map shows that someone wanting to travel from Pittsburg to Boston would have to stop in DC (wrong direction), Philly, and NYC. The only way to fix this would be to spend hundreds of trillions building HSR rail lines between every pair of cities (and there's a lot more cities than just the 20 shown in the map) or we could just use planes/cars instead.
He has managed to successfully make a worse Northeast Corridor. You can already go from Boston to New York to Philadelphia to Baltimore to Washington on a high-speed train without having to make a gigantic detour through Vermont and New Hampshire.
 
Jason's latest video is out. It's him angrily complaining about the "US is too big to be built like the Netherlands" argument:
He comes very close to the reason why but fails to address it.

In the video, he talks about the US, Canada, and Australia as compared to Western Europe. Perhaps there is something about the history of these cities and world events that could explain it?

Something like many of the metro areas developing AFTER castles were in vogue and these three locations were the ones NOT ravaged by WWII.

I will be the first to admit that while I might not find smaller European accommodations to be pleasing, I certainly understand why large housing blocks in an urban core is needed after a devastating war.

Of course, the answer is that single family houses are are luxury with a small council estate apartment being a necessity.

Now, it turns out that some North Americans and perhaps even Australians like living in small low density communities instead of dense urban areas. But there Jason goes trying to transform a small suburban community into downtown metro area.

Lastly, rail did play a part in seattling the West but apart from Amtrak long distance routes our main use of rail is shipping freight. As to Amtrak, the US long distance Amtrak routes far exceed those currently operating in Europe:

24638.jpeg
Note the route in Canada is on a train called The Canadian which is serves mostly as a sightseeing luxury train.
646455-via-prestige.jpg

Prestige Class. $6,000 USD for a one way trip.

canadian-roomette1.jpg
Roommettee. $3000 USD one way.

Perfectly affordable for the average Canadian.
 
Back