why do people on this forum defend the unibomber

There are 3 camps for ted enthusiasts. Edgelords, rightists, and anprims. Edgelords obviously want to look cool and edgy and gravitated around the man who got bamboozled the FBI long enough that they conceded and let his manifesto get published in the Washington post. Rightists love him because of his detailed analysis of leftism (aka the new-left), academia, oversocialization, and a few other minor bits in his works, that and rightists tend to idolize domestic terrorists and the like adding to ted's streetcred in their eyes. However in atleast one letter he wrote ted expressed disdain for ethnonationalism and the like, in a twist of irony one of their idols would be abhorred by their ideals. Ultimately though his analysis of the aforementioned is worth the read. Anprims are just retarded and subscribe to the other sections of his works that rightists ignore, I wont even waste my time trying to describe the incalculable amount of suffering and death that trying and actually achieving that goal would look like so ill just give you this instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_Pot

For all intents and purposes his bombing campaign served a sole purpose, an advertising vehicle for his manifesto. In the end that goal was achieved, im not sure if ted actually thought he could take down society with a few bombs he made out of scrap but im not going to lie, like terry A davis he was a genius that could accomplish impossible things who was completely deluded.
The real problem with Kaczynski is that his fans like to talk about how technology is being used to control people and crackdown on freedoms. But his own actions caused this. The world really changed a lot after Kaczynski did his acts of domestic terrorism and the federal building in Oklahoma got bombed by McVeigh. The third biggest change to the world would come after 9/11 and I guess you could say the fourth was the election of Donald Trump. Ted Kaczynski is why they started X-raying packages at the US postal service or all places really. He was kind of the one who got the whole domestic terrorist ball rolling. Ultimately Kaczynski caused some of the same issues he railed against. It caused new security measures to be put in place.
 
The real problem with Kaczynski is that his fans like to talk about how technology is being used to control people and crackdown on freedoms. But his own actions caused this. The world really changed a lot after Kaczynski did his acts of domestic terrorism and the federal building in Oklahoma got bombed by McVeigh. The third biggest change to the world would come after 9/11 and I guess you could say the fourth was the election of Donald Trump. Ted Kaczynski is why they started X-raying packages at the US postal service or all places really. He was kind of the one who got the whole domestic terrorist ball rolling. Ultimately Kaczynski caused some of the same issues he railed against. It caused new security measures to be put in place.
However, these activists are unhappy with how things are in the *now* and want the squeeze on most people in hopes they rebel too. But it never works that way. These people see life through their own prism and don't understand how little other people care.
 
However, these activists are unhappy with how things are in the *now* and want the squeeze on most people in hopes they rebel too. But it never works that way. These people see life through their own prism and don't understand how little other people care.
Most people are pacifistic and long suffering. They aren't going to do anything till something impacts their life. It would have to be something pretty big. Until then people will just sit back and tell themselves it won't happen to me. Then some take the Boomer head in the sand kind of response. Stick your head in the sand and pretend nothing bad is happening.

Accelerationist will never get what they want. It's another form of failure like wignats LARPing in the streets like 80's or 90's era Neo Nazis.
 
He was kind of the one who got the whole domestic terrorist ball rolling.
American Revolutionists were the first domestic terrorists. America has always been authoritarian, America is built on protest and rebellion, violent acts of societal rejection has been here since conception.

biggest change to the world would come after 9/11
Nah, the biggest change in the world was the quick availability of information thanks to the rising giants known as Social Media. The war triggered by 9/11 was based on a lie, weapons of mass destruction that did not exist, much like the Trump and Russia ties investigation. With the readily and uncensored spread of real time news made CIA and FBI Tactics harder; like cover ups.

One person can not change the world without the assistance or guidance of others. If Ted was not cut from the same unethical experimentation as Manson, I would be a little more on the side of "fuck Ted." Yes, it was an individual committing atrocities, however, who is to say that wasn't the intention in the first place? I'm assuming MK Ultra was a smaller pool of test subjects and the percentile of lunatics created might be high for the study.



Start tinfoilhat;

If I was in the CIA and wanted to continue MKUltra-esq tests, it is easier than ever. Just go to any Democrat run city and you have a pool of the worst of the worst to run tests on. California, you got a bio diverse crop of test subjects the homeless, the ultra-wealthy (idiot inheritors and new wealth), the "middle class". Do people think 10 missing homeless people are going to be noticed? Probably, but more than likely noticed by other homeless people which the majority of society believe are drug addicted crazies.

Now for the ultrawealthy, it's very clear, Pfizer and Moderna are tied with the government but what of the smaller biomedical studies and companies that aren't publicly traded on the stock market? Well, they wouldn't exist to the general populace, they would only exist for the ones who know. Where is the money coming from to fund research, what _are_ they researching, etc. we wouldn't know unless they release a statement. A perfect avenue for some cash to slide into the right pockets and allow clandestine experiments to continue without knowledge.

If you need further examples, that our government as it stands today doesn't care about its people, look no further than the Covid 19 vaccine. A new way to approach vaccination, untested technology, was allowed to be used on the world. Worst of all, it became a matter of you'll lose your career if you don't join the guinea pig pool. Look at Public schools, they don't teach in schools anymore they force you to memorize text from a textbook written by some loony Marx cock sucker. Public schools softens a developing mind to be more susceptible and subservient to the government and authority. Blindly following directions in the hopes that one day you'll make it into Brown University. It's all a farce. Core scholastic in College is repackaged High School classes at the personal cost of $5k a month. Even if you get a good degree, that'll cost you $200K and for the next 50 years of your life, they will be repaid. Repaid without consideration of all the new expenses one has as an independent adult as well as outside influence such as political climate and economy. College, is not a good deal anymore. It'll continue to be harder and harder to pay off those loans; but hey, at least you have those new Jordan's. It is no wonder why the birthrate has decreased, no one, can afford to have children anymore.

There has been a concerted and slow effort to strip away the allure of old independent freedom fighters of the American Revolutionaries. The idea of individualism has had a knife chopping away at limbs for years and now it is merely a torso worm left to wiggle on the ground posing no threat. Collectivism rules the land; why else was there such a broad sensation felt throughout the system when Queen Clinton lost to Donald Trump? An individual pierced through the collective veil and the system is trying its hardest to push the breach out.

TLDR: The Establishment, the global homos didn't realize what depths they had descended to. Now they have realized their error and are attempting everything within its power to keep the walls from imploding while slowly ascending.

End;
 
@Absurdist Laughter

The Americans fighting in the Revolutionary War were fighting against a foreign power. They were not fighting against their own government.

I was speaking more to the encroachment of peoples freedoms and rights by the government when I was talking about the biggest change to the world.
 
Imagine how much that faggot would have accomplished for the world if he had the balls to let his views get out there, challenged and fought for them rather than hiding and seething.
If I understand it correctly, Ted K's views were heavily based on Jacques Ellul's work. Nobody who isn't in academic circles knows who that is. I don't know who he is (beyond being French philosopher and professor). I know who Ted K is. Normalfags know who Ted K is. They even vaguely understand his ideology.

Rightists love him because of his detailed analysis of leftism (aka the new-left), academia, oversocialization, and a few other minor bits in his works, that and rightists tend to idolize domestic terrorists and the like adding to ted's streetcred in their eyes. However in atleast one letter he wrote ted expressed disdain for ethnonationalism and the like, in a twist of irony one of their idols would be abhorred by their ideals.

An extract:
“The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.”
 
Because the inverse implication, that college professors have some sort of intrinsic value in society, is exceptionally dubious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
He wrote down some interesting ideas but he was also mentally ill and autogynephilic, and went on to murder people because he simply wanted to murder people and his brother did the right thing by snitching on him. For myself, I occasionally larp as a big fan of his for teh epic lols. I'm glad he ended up dying in prison and wish he wasn't such a fucking maniac. His writings, however, should be assessed as separate from his faggy personality and actions. He wrote some very based things about conservatives and why they're fucking useless at conserving anything.
 
I would like to say that the "MKULTRA" thing reeks of bullshit to me. There's no indication Kaczynski was ever drugged and subject to any of the actual techniques of the program, he just had a thesis harshly criticized by professors. Even then, it didn't justify blowing up office workers because some of the trees near his shitty shack were cut, and the central thesis that humanity should do live in primitive conditions focusing solely on survival is patently insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Crawler
He wrote down some interesting ideas but he was also mentally ill and autogynephilic, and went on to murder people because he simply wanted to murder people and his brother did the right thing by snitching on him. For myself, I occasionally larp as a big fan of his for teh epic lols. I'm glad he ended up dying in prison and wish he wasn't such a fucking maniac. His writings, however, should be assessed as separate from his faggy personality and actions. He wrote some very based things about conservatives and why they're fucking useless at conserving anything.
No, there was nothing of any real value involving Kaczynski. Nothing he wrote in his manifesto was worth making a big deal about. More people know about Hitler and Mein kampf than they do Kaczynski and his manifesto. If you want to freak the normies out just look up some Mein Kampf qoutes online some where. Read a few of them and go around claiming you read mein kampf and qouting it all the time. Say that you agreed with it. That will have way more of an impact than any unabomber fan LARPing. Most people under the age 40 don't even remember Kaczynski or his unabomber actions.
 
No, there was nothing of any real value involving Kaczynski. Nothing he wrote in his manifesto was worth making a big deal about. More people know about Hitler and Mein kampf than they do Kaczynski and his manifesto. If you want to freak the normies out just look up some Mein Kampf qoutes online some where. Read a few of them and go around claiming you read mein kampf and qouting it all the time. Say that you agreed with it. That will have way more of an impact than any unabomber fan LARPing. Most people under the age 40 don't even remember Kaczynski or his unabomber actions.
Mein Kampf is too verboten. I would pretty much have to spell it out for the normies because none of them will have any clue that I'm quoting it. Replacing "Jew" with something else might render good results, though. Also, don't tell me how to sneed, nigguh.
 
I would like to say that the "MKULTRA" thing reeks of bullshit to me. There's no indication Kaczynski was ever drugged and subject to any of the actual techniques of the program, he just had a thesis harshly criticized by professors. Even then, it didn't justify blowing up office workers because some of the trees near his shitty shack were cut, and the central thesis that humanity should do live in primitive conditions focusing solely on survival is patently insane.
It wasn't criticism from professors, it was very explicitly regular interviews with a researcher for a psychological experiment. Don't know whether it was MKUltra but it was definitely some fuckery.
 
For the murders, it's lulz and bantz. For the actual ideology, I guess because it has tangents or truths to other people's view of the world (whether its on the human condition or else). Although there would be those who believe in his orthodox views or would acknowledge to find agreement in some exceptional/seperate parts, there's also people who believe in a synthesis (even though this would be a middle ground fallacy to assume that thesis and an anthesis would negate each other to a supreme answer). This isn't exclusive to Kaczynski's ideas but also other people too.
 
Ted taught a lot of people about how our relationship with technology is like a balance between technological progress and freedom, while one rises, the other lowers. It also has the effect of giving more power to people in power compared to your average joe disproportionately. While the latter gets a new phone every other day of his life, the ones at the top get more and more advanced technologies and people that are very expensive, creating a barrier of entry that only they can cross. Tech progress will eventually destroy all freedoms, even the ones that are at the top of the pyramid, according to him. It is no surprise that a lot of Kiwis are Ted fans.

I find it funny that at some point he considered trooning out way back when. People like him today are more or less that one autistic STEM troon.
 
He mostly killed and severely injured a bunch of no body wagies. He never really attacked anyone of any importance. Like the kind of people that were actually causing the issues he claimed in his manifesto. So a bunch of low level worker drones got injured and killed. What a total badass. /sarcasm
I'd love to figure out exactly what the fuck he thought he was doing blowing up wagies.

The FBI has a bunch of correspondence between him and his family locked up in their vaults. Release it, cowards.
 
I'd love to figure out exactly what the fuck he thought he was doing blowing up wagies.
He was crazy and they were easy targets compared to the people he would actually need to kill in order to make the world the way he wanted it. It's how you can go from wanting to murder a bunch of people at an immigration center to save the white race to making a detour towards a grocery store after checking in on the latest Martha Speaks porn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: std::string
What do you mean by defend? The man bombed and killed people, that was wrong. One of his bombs went off in a home with children, that was wrong. Letter bombs are uncontrolled and that’s wrong too. If you’re going to kill someone do it precisely and face to face
What he wrote was interesting and he was right about a lot of stuff.
Zoomers can’t handle the fact that people are strange and complicated and that you can agree with some of someone’s opinions while disagreeing strongly with others. They need to put everyone in the total goodie or total baddie box.
Kaczinsky was a complex person who did some bad stuff and wrote some interesting stuff that was more right than wrong.
Is that defending him?
 
Back