Business National Geographic lays off its last remaining staff writers - The magazine, which remains among the most read in the U.S., has struggled in the digital era to command the kind of resources that fueled the deep reporting it became known for

By Paul Farhi
June 28, 2023 at 5:03 p.m. EDT

2fb587d5ae08b7a8acfc14b0f38a577c.jpg
A bookstore owner in Islamabad shows off a copy of one of National Geographic's most famous covers, featuring Afghan refugee Sharbat Gulla in 1984. (B.K. Bangash/AP)

Like one of the endangered species whose impending extinction it has chronicled, National Geographic magazine has been on a relentlessly downward path, struggling for vibrancy in an increasingly unforgiving ecosystem.

On Wednesday, the Washington-based magazine that has surveyed science and the natural world for 135 years reached another difficult passage when it laid off all of its last remaining staff writers.

The cutback — the latest in a series under owner Walt Disney Co. — involves some 19 editorial staffers in all, who were notified in April that these terminations were coming. Article assignments will henceforth be contracted out to freelancers or pieced together by editors. The cuts also eliminated the magazine’s small audio department.

The layoffs were the second over the past nine months, and the fourth since a series of ownership changes began in 2015. In September, Disney removed six top editors in an extraordinary reorganization of the magazine’s editorial operations.

Departing staffers said Wednesday the magazine has curtailed photo contracts that enabled photographers to spend months in the field producing the publication’s iconic images.

In a further cost-cutting move, copies of the famous bright-yellow-bordered print publication will no longer be sold on newsstands in the United States starting next year, the company said in an internal announcement last month.

National Geographic writer Craig Welch noted the moment in a tweet on Wednesday: “My new National Geographic just arrived, which includes my latest feature — my 16th, and my last as a senior writer. … I’ve been so lucky. I got to work w/incredible journalists and tell important, global stories. It’s been an honor.”

The magazine’s current trajectory has been years in the making, set in motion primarily by the epochal decline of print and ascent of digital news and information. In the light-speed world of digital media, National Geographic has remained an almost artisanal product — a monthly magazine whose photos, graphics and articles were sometimes the result of months of research and reporting.

At its peak in the late 1980s, National Geographic reached 12 million subscribers in the United States, and millions more overseas. Many of its devotees so savored its illumination of other worlds — space, the depths of the ocean, little-seen parts of the planet — that they stacked old issues into piles that cluttered attics and basements.

It remains among the most widely read magazines in America, at a time when magazines are no longer widely read. At the end of 2022, it had just under 1.8 million subscribers, according to the authoritative Alliance for Audited Media.

National Geographic was launched by Washington’s National Geographic Society, a foundation formed by 33 academics, scientists and would-be adventurers, including Alexander Graham Bell. The magazine was initially sold to the public as a perk for joining the society. It grew into a stand-alone publication slowly but steadily, reaching 1 million subscribers by the 1930s.

The magazine was eventually surpassed for profits and attention by the society’s video operations, including its flagship National Geographic cable channel and Nat Geo Wild, a channel focused on animals. While they produced documentaries equal in quality to the magazine’s rigorous reporting, the channels — managed by Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox — also aired pseudoscientific entertainment programming about UFOs and reality series like “Sharks vs. Tunas” at odds with the society’s original high-minded vision.

The magazine’s place of honor continued to dim through a series of corporate reshufflings that began in 2015 when the Society agreed to form a for-profit partnership with 21st Century Fox, which took majority control in exchange for $725 million. The partnership came under the Disney banner in 2019 as part of a massive $71 billion deal between Fox and Disney.

Among those who lost their jobs in the latest layoff was Debra Adams Simmons, who only last September was promoted to vice president of diversity, equity and inclusion at National Geographic Media, the entity that oversees the magazine and website.

At the time, David Miller, executive vice president of National Geographic Media, said the magazine was “realigning key departments to help deepen engagement with our readers while also nurturing existing business models and developing new lines of revenue.”

In an email to The Post on Wednesday, National Geographic spokesperson Chris Albert said staffing changes will not affect the company’s plans to continue publishing a monthly magazine “but rather give us more flexibility to tell different stories and meet our audiences where they are across our many platforms.”

Source (Archive)
 
I remember NAT GEO very fondly - it was like a visual Conrad novel. Opening the glossy pages, you would be spun away to some distant steamy jungle or coral reef, with intricate maps of ruined cities, or tribal land claims, or the distribution of certain rare species. It was always fascinating. Then every once in a while I noticed pages that weren't a deeply-researched dive into something obscure that I wasn't informed on, it wasn't something that would enrich my understanding of the world. It was about someone's stupid political bugbear. Those issues became more and more common, until there was little of that raw exploration, and everything became tinged by the political lens of the perfidious laptop class. The gender revolution issue was when I put down the magazine for good. The navel-gazing self-exploration of affluent American mediocrities, mediated by a mind-numbingly vapid social media environment, is the complete opposite of what NAT GEO used to offer. I suppose I should thank Disney for using its reverse Midas touch to take Ole Yeller out behind the shed. It was long past time.
 
Last edited:
I was at someone's house a few months ago who had a collection of national geographics going back to the 1920's it was pretty cool to see. They'd inherited it from a grandfather or father or something like that. Most of them were in really good condition. Obviously the older ones were a little more run down but still in great shape for their age. I imagine the collection's going to be going up in value pretty soon.
 
Noooo! Not National Geographic! How else am I supposed to get my monthly edition of topless tribal girls!

Among those who lost their jobs in the latest layoff was Debra Adams Simmons, who only last September was promoted to vice president of diversity, equity and inclusion at National Geographic Media
Never mind, they're getting what they fucking deserve.
 
Ya, remember reading those as a kid. Think it was the first place I saw pics of bare women's titties. Can't remember the last time I read a National Geographic.
Thank god kids have smart phones now otherwise IDK how they would get along now. I remember my first African tribal titties two years before I found some weird porno mags in the woods.

Islamic this all you want people but thats how us old men had to do live back in the day.
 
Don't Worry whitey,

That Black man that vaguely threatened that womans fur baby (dog) still has a job because he's a NIGGER and was hired to do a bird show.

Christian Cooper:
Look, if you’re going to do what you want, I’m going to do what I want, but you’re not going to like it.

If that is not a threat then when the child of some SheBoon runs into you in the city, be sure to tell the mother:

Watch over your child ma'am or YOU'RE NOT GOING TO LIKE WHAT I DO.
 
Reminder that NatGeo hired the black guy that was harassing that lady and her dog in the park and called the cops on him, which sparked the whole Karen thing.
Are you talking about the black guy that was bird watching or whatever? That was cringe as fuck and I hated both of them.
 
The old National Geographic magazines, from the 1920s through the 1990s and early 2000s, had a very distinctive shape and size, a bit like Reader's Digest but sturdier with spines.

Has that long been gone? I want to say that at some point in the last 15-20 years they switched to traditional cheap magazines.
 
Are you ESL? No offense but I have no idea what you're trying to say, fren.
The nudity is just something that genuinely happens; but it just feels weird that it's basically the one of the only things that people liked about Nat Geo. It says an lot that one of the few things that makes it stands out are looking forwards to is the articles with the tribal girls, but even then I won't be surprised if another magazine had the same idea
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
The nudity is just something that genuinely happens; but it just feels weird that it's basically the one of the only things that people liked about Nat Geo. It says an lot that one of the few things that makes it stands out are looking forwards to is the articles with the tribal girls, but even then I won't be surprised if another magazine had the same idea
Bro, I love NatGeo for all the nature shit and always have but as a doofy, horny pre teen living pre internet, them titties were mesmerizing.
 
The old National Geographic magazines, from the 1920s through the 1990s and early 2000s, had a very distinctive shape and size, a bit like Reader's Digest but sturdier with spines.

Has that long been gone? I want to say that at some point in the last 15-20 years they switched to traditional cheap magazines.
Reader's Digest is really shitty now. A very, very far cry from the glory years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Unfortunate that this is happening. I remember looking through older issues I bought, when I was younger. I even remember the TV program that aired, though it's been an age since I saw anything. I'm sure the magazine's founders are rolling in their graves; as are countless other men of greater caliber and bygone years.
 
Back