Business National Geographic lays off its last remaining staff writers - The magazine, which remains among the most read in the U.S., has struggled in the digital era to command the kind of resources that fueled the deep reporting it became known for

By Paul Farhi
June 28, 2023 at 5:03 p.m. EDT

2fb587d5ae08b7a8acfc14b0f38a577c.jpg
A bookstore owner in Islamabad shows off a copy of one of National Geographic's most famous covers, featuring Afghan refugee Sharbat Gulla in 1984. (B.K. Bangash/AP)

Like one of the endangered species whose impending extinction it has chronicled, National Geographic magazine has been on a relentlessly downward path, struggling for vibrancy in an increasingly unforgiving ecosystem.

On Wednesday, the Washington-based magazine that has surveyed science and the natural world for 135 years reached another difficult passage when it laid off all of its last remaining staff writers.

The cutback — the latest in a series under owner Walt Disney Co. — involves some 19 editorial staffers in all, who were notified in April that these terminations were coming. Article assignments will henceforth be contracted out to freelancers or pieced together by editors. The cuts also eliminated the magazine’s small audio department.

The layoffs were the second over the past nine months, and the fourth since a series of ownership changes began in 2015. In September, Disney removed six top editors in an extraordinary reorganization of the magazine’s editorial operations.

Departing staffers said Wednesday the magazine has curtailed photo contracts that enabled photographers to spend months in the field producing the publication’s iconic images.

In a further cost-cutting move, copies of the famous bright-yellow-bordered print publication will no longer be sold on newsstands in the United States starting next year, the company said in an internal announcement last month.

National Geographic writer Craig Welch noted the moment in a tweet on Wednesday: “My new National Geographic just arrived, which includes my latest feature — my 16th, and my last as a senior writer. … I’ve been so lucky. I got to work w/incredible journalists and tell important, global stories. It’s been an honor.”

The magazine’s current trajectory has been years in the making, set in motion primarily by the epochal decline of print and ascent of digital news and information. In the light-speed world of digital media, National Geographic has remained an almost artisanal product — a monthly magazine whose photos, graphics and articles were sometimes the result of months of research and reporting.

At its peak in the late 1980s, National Geographic reached 12 million subscribers in the United States, and millions more overseas. Many of its devotees so savored its illumination of other worlds — space, the depths of the ocean, little-seen parts of the planet — that they stacked old issues into piles that cluttered attics and basements.

It remains among the most widely read magazines in America, at a time when magazines are no longer widely read. At the end of 2022, it had just under 1.8 million subscribers, according to the authoritative Alliance for Audited Media.

National Geographic was launched by Washington’s National Geographic Society, a foundation formed by 33 academics, scientists and would-be adventurers, including Alexander Graham Bell. The magazine was initially sold to the public as a perk for joining the society. It grew into a stand-alone publication slowly but steadily, reaching 1 million subscribers by the 1930s.

The magazine was eventually surpassed for profits and attention by the society’s video operations, including its flagship National Geographic cable channel and Nat Geo Wild, a channel focused on animals. While they produced documentaries equal in quality to the magazine’s rigorous reporting, the channels — managed by Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox — also aired pseudoscientific entertainment programming about UFOs and reality series like “Sharks vs. Tunas” at odds with the society’s original high-minded vision.

The magazine’s place of honor continued to dim through a series of corporate reshufflings that began in 2015 when the Society agreed to form a for-profit partnership with 21st Century Fox, which took majority control in exchange for $725 million. The partnership came under the Disney banner in 2019 as part of a massive $71 billion deal between Fox and Disney.

Among those who lost their jobs in the latest layoff was Debra Adams Simmons, who only last September was promoted to vice president of diversity, equity and inclusion at National Geographic Media, the entity that oversees the magazine and website.

At the time, David Miller, executive vice president of National Geographic Media, said the magazine was “realigning key departments to help deepen engagement with our readers while also nurturing existing business models and developing new lines of revenue.”

In an email to The Post on Wednesday, National Geographic spokesperson Chris Albert said staffing changes will not affect the company’s plans to continue publishing a monthly magazine “but rather give us more flexibility to tell different stories and meet our audiences where they are across our many platforms.”

Source (Archive)
 
Unfortunate that this is happening. I remember looking through older issues I bought, when I was younger. I even remember the TV program that aired, though it's been an age since I saw anything. I'm sure the magazine's founders are rolling in their graves; as are countless other men of greater caliber and bygone years.

They had one of the coolest openings of any documentary ever.
 
Finally a place where I can complain about this.

Got a NatGeo Tiger Plushie for my kid once. Fucking thing was held in its glossy box with plastic ties. They of course made sure to include a "Hey kids, donate to NatGeo to save the environment" notice. I hate that they will solicit donations for environmental purposes but they can't be bothered to source more environmental packaging. Its a small thing but it really pisses me off because I'm sure I can find countless articles on their site about plastic waste pollution.
 
Oh well. That's what happens when you get rid of what made the magazine interesting and worth a subscription and replace it with endless articles on climate change going to kill us all, blatant neocon war propaganda, and promotion of gender ideology and racial hatred.
That not being honest as that stuff only included 10 percent of the magazine. The other 90 percent was advertisement for watches and useless garbage that contradicted the other 10 percent.
 
I'm kind of surprised it's taken this long to happen. When my family cancelled our subscription in the mid-2000s it was because it was feeling very dumbed down, they accepted the climate change stuff as gospel, and the quality just wasn't there any more. The sagging tiddies of the Maasai women were long gone in favor of things with a broader appeal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Ya, remember reading those as a kid. Think it was the first place I saw pics of bare women's titties. Can't remember the last time I read a National Geographic.
I once inherited a few decades of these things in an attic. Spent years reading them at random and learning shit. Now they put troon shit on the cover. And there won't even be a cover soon enough because it has effectively ceased to exist. Get woke. . .
The sagging tiddies of the Maasai women were long gone in favor of things with a broader appeal.
Pretty sure they did that on purpose. Also how the fuck do you get broader appeal than bare titties?
 
My only memories of National Geographic is that you could see boobs in them. I actually thought of making a thread if them being the few common ways small children can see naked people had any social effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
That not being honest as that stuff only included 10 percent of the magazine. The other 90 percent was advertisement for watches and useless garbage that contradicted the other 10 percent.
I always liked the SUV ads right beside the articles warning how we were all dead by 2050 (they hadn't moved it up to 2030 back then) because of fossil fuel emissions.
 
I have a mountain of National Geographic magazines from the 1970s through to the 1990s that people gave me over the years, and they're still really good to go back to for a quick read. The articles about the Cold War are like time capsules. Isn't it owned by Disney these days? I wouldn't be surprised if the quality took a massive drop after that takeover.
 
The difference from even the 2000's to now is shocking. It used to have articles on archeology, animals, foreign cities they even used to have a few pages in the back dedicated to some small American town. I thumbed through one at the barber the other day and it was all troon shit, racism and climate change. Like how many things have to go tits up before people realize there isn't an audience for those topics?
 
Like one of the endangered species whose impending extinction it has chronicled...

Remind me how many animals this happened for? Oh, right -- basically none. The only animals big enough for humans to care about that have gone extinct in recent decades are not actually what we considered "species" even 50 years ago, but are specific geographic ranges of species cut apart specifically so we could declare one of the populations "nearly extinct" or extinct, to keep money flowing to endangered species charities.

Endangered species rhetoric as pushed by Nat Geo and the rest of the educational magazines was the first step toward the constant climate emergency, and used all the same techniques.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: quaawaa
Remember my mom always refusing to buy me the magazine as a kid. Now that I think about it, it was probably because of the tits. Gaming magazines with attractive women on the cover were fine, though. She was also all for sexy video game women as long as they weren't in Grand Theft Auto.
 
Unfortunate that this is happening. I remember looking through older issues I bought, when I was younger. I even remember the TV program that aired, though it's been an age since I saw anything. I'm sure the magazine's founders are rolling in their graves; as are countless other men of greater caliber and bygone years.
They had one of the coolest openings of any documentary ever.
Doot doot doo doo doo
Doot doot doo doo de doo de doo doo
 
Back