French Protests 2023 - Unified Yellow Jacket, Pension Unrest, and Nahel Riots.

IMG_1354.jpeg
IMG_1355.jpeg

IMG_1356.jpegIMG_1357.jpegIMG_1358.jpeg


IMG_1359.jpegIMG_1360.jpegIMG_1361.jpegIMG_1363.jpegIMG_1364.jpegIMG_1365.jpegIMG_1368.jpegIMG_1369.jpegIMG_1370.jpegIMG_1371.jpegIMG_1372.jpegIMG_1373.jpeg
 
Or maybe they're just inherently violent. White people need to stop projecting their own thought process onto these "people"

I was reading a study on personality types. Which put Sub Saharan-Africans in the most aggressive personality type, and put East Asian as the most submissive personality type, while sitting "Whites" somewhere in the middle. So it looks like yes, we Humans are just like Dog breeds.
 
Fisted by Foucault has a very interesting article about the involvement of a US-State-Dept-trained professional activist (Rokhaya Diallo; third-world ancestry of course) in all this: https://niccolo.substack.com/p/us-state-department-trained-french
This stood out to me:
In 2010, the U.S. State Department invited French politicians and activists to a leadership program to help them strengthen the voice and representation of ethnic groups that have been excluded from government. Rokhaya Diallo attended, which many of her critics still use as evidence that she is a trained proselytizer of American social-justice propaganda. (In 2017, under pressure from both the left and the right, Macron’s government asked for her removal—as Diallo put it to me, it “canceled” her—from a government advisory council, seemingly on the grounds that race- and religious-based political organizing contradicts key principles of French republicanism and secularism, or laïcité.)

But in a classified memo published on WikiLeaks, former U.S. Ambassador Charles H. Rivkin laid out the pragmatic, self-interested rationale for the program, part of what was called a “Minority Engagement Strategy”:
French institutions have not proven themselves flexible enough to adjust to an increasingly heterodox demography. We believe that if France, over the long run, does not successfully increase opportunity and provide genuine political representation for its minority populations, France could become a weaker, more divided country, perhaps more crisis-prone and inward-looking, and consequently a less capable ally.
What do you call a person who goes to a foreign country to receive training from them in how to exacerbate divisions back at home? Anyway….

Here is the key bit one more time:
In 2010, the U.S. State Department invited French politicians and activists to a leadership program to help them strengthen the voice and representation of ethnic groups that have been excluded from government. Rokhaya Diallo attended, which many of her critics still use as evidence that she is a trained proselytizer of American social-justice propaganda.
They thought this would make France more stable?
 
Last edited:
They thought this would make France more stable?
"Increased stability" is a fiction for press releases. The actual goal is to make the country less stable and therefore more dependent on American political and economic support.

Although I would not put it past some American elites to have been cloistered away from the fruits of diversity for so long that they really, truly, fervently believe that diversity is a strength.
 
"Increased stability" is a fiction for press releases. The actual goal is to make the country less stable and therefore more dependent on American political and economic support.

Although I would not put it past some American elites to have been cloistered away from the fruits of diversity for so long that they really, truly, fervently believe that diversity is a strength.
This was a classified memo. I think they really are that out of touch...which is a lot more worrying.
 
Women are increasingly entering academia and the workforce which is dependent on higher learning, whilst the male enrollment rate in higher education is steadily declining — it would seem that men in general don't have the same incentives as before to invest in themselves. The technical and interpersonal sectors of the economy will soon be manned by a majority of women, who aren't too keen on dating, much less having children with their male counterparts — why go through the troubles of childbirth and rearing a child when you can live the life of Carrie Bradshaw? The population growth in the developed western world is close to zero, and so immigration in the only sensible choice if we want our societies to continue running. White women don't want to fuck you (you and the other users who complain about supposed dooming ITT in particular), and men either choose to be pathetic incels or to walk out of the dating scene completely, whilst simultaneously settling for blue-collar jobs which don't pay as well as the jobs in the tertiary sector of the economy, but which more importantly also don't get the ladies' panties' moist.

Add to this the modern gender gap, which details how women increasingly vote for leftist bullshit and men vote in accordance with more conservative values. Throw in a little sprinkling of 3rd and 4th wave feminism and the disparity between men and women outlines itself greatly. We won't unite, and we won't look past our own hedonistic and individualistic desires.

And in the midst of this, what are you and the other losers doing? Posting sexlessly on various forums about how "t-t-things will totally get better if you aren't w-w-w-weak pussies you guys!". Your dream of this mass exodus of niggers in our countries, and for "us" to "take back" society, presumably by fucking and manning it with white people, is pathetic. There will be no white army of fed-up people trampling over uppity joggers. Whilst all this is happening, globohomo and social-media faggot-conditioning is only intensifying.
My own personal schizo theory that incel forums being shut down led to an influx of socially maladjusted losers flooding into right-wing online spheres seems more accurate each day.
 
This is a reminder to pay no attention to the cries of "colonialism" from the Muslims and their liberal enablers. It's just a run of the mill manipulation tactic they pull out because their sad some countries kicked in their teeth for a while. They want to pretend like they were better somehow for doing far worse things.

The whole of North Africa used to be filled to the brim with slaver nations known as the Barbary States.

Here are some excerpts from the work of the Icelandic Lutheran minister Olafur Egilsson who was taken captive by them at some point:
When the poor Icelandic people were put on land, such a huge crowd gathered that I think it was impossible to count their number. They did not come for any cruel purpose, but only to look at the poor captives. The Icelanders were separated from each other—friend from friend, children from their parents—and driven through the streets, from one house to another, to the market place where they were put up for auction as if they were sheep or cattle.
When we came to the market place, we were placed in a circle, and everyone’s hands and face were inspected. Then the King chose from this group those whom he wanted (every eighth, as I mentioned earlier). His first choice amongst the boys was my own poor son, eleven years old, whom I will never forget as long as I live because of the depth of his understanding. When he was taken from me, I asked him in God’s name not to forsake his faith nor forget his catechism. He said with great grief, “I will not, my father! They can treat my body as they will, but my soul I shall keep for my good God.”

I have to say with Job: What is my strength, that I should hope? (Job 6:11). Were one to try to weigh my misery and suffering altogether on a scale, they would be heavier than all the sand in the sea.

The other Icelanders were moved from there to another place, and one of the Turkish led two groups of ten around one stone column with loud screaming which I did not understand. I and my wife and our two younger children, a one-year-old and a one-month-old, were taken from that place up to the King’s hall, and there we sat with the children in our arms for two hours. From there, we were then taken to the King’s prison, where we spent that night. From that time on, I do not know what became of the rest of the Icelandic people. Ah! I would like to comfort and strengthen the people with my words, but I cannot. And whether I speak of such things or not, my suffering does not lessen.

That is to say nothing of the general reliance of slave soldiers by Muslims and the persecution of non-Muslim peoples with the latter still continuing to this day in some forms.
 
Last edited:
My own personal schizo theory that incel forums being shut down led to an influx of socially maladjusted losers flooding into right-wing online spheres seems more accurate each day.
The whole women don't want to have kids thing isn't even true. The average white woman in America wants to have at least 3 kids by survey, and that's in spite of the social conditioning. They just can't for a whole variety of factors outside of their control. Lack of good men, can't afford it, crime, etc.
 
People are posting videos saying "nationalists" are fighting back. But it looks more like people protecting their homes and neighborhoods from rioters.

If you don't want your country destroyed you're a nationalist now, the bar really is that low.

Also, archived video because Twitter sucks right now.


 
People are posting videos saying "nationalists" are fighting back. But it looks more like people protecting their homes and neighborhoods from rioters.

View attachment 5191168

If you don't want your country destroyed you're a nationalist now, the bar really is that low.

Also, archived video because Twitter sucks right now.


View attachment 5191197
I wonder if these will get more intense since it was said that the rioters were in possession of automatic weapons.
 
This is a reminder to pay no attention to the cries of "colonialism" from the Muslims and their liberal enablers. It's just a run of the mill manipulation tactic they pull out because their sad some countries kicked in their teeth for a while.

Wasn't there like a Muslim push into Europe in the 10th century? Looks like our own leaders are just finishing the job.

Muslim-conquest-v-Crusade-battles.jpg
 
what is popular has never been more conditional on the marketing of mass communications firms & the governments that patronise them. i don't think it has always been like this, only with the advent of radio, tv and the internet has it been possible for government to reach out and touch the minds of the public in such a way.
the problem is when the message is the opposite. it's true what you say, but it's also true that 90 years ago the german population was fine with snitching on anyone whose nose was to big, same as 3 years ago when the whole world did it to anyone who had visitors or didn't wear the facediaper.
and in their struggle to prevent the the wrong message (see all that whining about "misinformation", which over time invalidated all information, even their own) from ever going out those mass communications firms & governments become the same they were fighting against - in the end it doesn't matter if the boot on your neck has a left or right scribbled on it.

Okay, so you've imported millions of third world savages, and it gets to the point that society breaks down and the only way to restore order is to institute a brutal military dictatorship, which is presumably what you want.

And one of the first orders of business for said dictatorship who's entire legitimacy rests on the promised restoration of order...will no doubt be to put an immediate end to the importation of said third world savages, the immediate beginning of the process of revoking the refugee status and subsequent deportation of those third world savages that do not have national citizenship, the start of quick and brutal military style tribunals of those who do have citizenship who took part in the anarchy and followed swiftly by their execution, and more than likely kangaroo court show trials for everyone and anyone who might have collaborated in the anarchy - including you, the businessperson/politician/lawyer/activist who advocated for and helped facilitate the mass importation of these people that brought so much ruin to the nation.

So, what now, smart guy?
what is it with people having zero fucking clue how civil unrest works and what a violent exchange of power looks like? you think euros are peacefully voting in right-leaning governments (which they aren't allowed to, because that's "undemocratic"), which then peacefully depopulates nation because.... why?

what's gonna happen is shit gets worse, which means the savage hordes will stop coming or outright leaving when the gibs dry up. government won't be able to hold control, meaning it looses the monopoly on violence. once that happens people are gonna protect themselves in any way they can, be it guns if you're lucky to have them or band together. that's gonna go on for a while with shit getting even worse, till someone gets into power (either legit or not) promising fixes, getting the majority of the population to agree, and given how shit things are people are gonna be fine with it. your "trials" are long done away with at that point because those people either fled, bunkered down with their private security (to then cooperate with the new regime), got killed off in another riot or on purpose (look up the night of the long knives) or like most opportunistic sheep found new purpose in whatever the current direction is. the rest will just go along like they always do because that's what they always did.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't there like a Muslim push into Europe in the 10th century? Looks like our own leaders are just finishing the job.

View attachment 5191203
They more or less are doing that yes. Islam made impressive amounts of expansion as a religion from 7th to the 8th century under the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphates after Muhammad died. More minor Islamic polities aside, the Turkic peoples and Ottomans came a long time after that.

Here's a little map showing the extent of the Caliphate under Muhammad, the Rashidun and Umayyads:
1000.png

The only reason they didn't take over as much of Western Europe as they did was because in 732 the Franks beat them in the Battle of Tours (in modern day France).
 
Last edited:
Back