Off-Topic MtFs in Women's Sports / Title IX Demolition

Stan

New York Magazine Contributor
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
MtFs have infested women’s sporting divisions like bedbugs in a flophouse. I know this forum has a few threads about some individual MtF athletes, but I didn’t see a thread about the trend in general. Pardon me if one already exists, and I should move my comments over there.

I figured we could bitch about particular athletes who enjoy an unfair advantage because they’re MtF or FtM, post links where you can publicly comment on government or official sports-organization bodies to protest the liberalization of “womens sports” to include men, so that maybe those organizations will see that most people don’t support this at all, or otherwise organize letter-writing campaigns and sit in on public Zoom sessions to show support for women :biggrin:.

My personal bugbear in regards to this issue is women’s rowing:

US Rowing (the governing body that holds qualifying races for the Olympics, as well as many other events) recently released a “transgender policy” so toothless that basically any athlete can compete as any gender if they sign a form saying they identified as that gender for 3 months prior to the season.

As proposed, US Rowing requires no medical treatment or documentation, and confidentiality is kept (so if you clock an MtF at your race and ask the officials about it, they will say she’s a true and honest woman, just like you.) NCAA, thank god, requires collegiate MtF rowers to have had 24 months of continuous HRT and testosterone below 2.5mol/L to participate, but that leaves high school and, U23 non-collegiate, and adult rowing events basically up for grabs.

Unsurprisingly, men race faster than women. I probably don’t need to go through the physiological advantages here. Not all of these advantages are going to be erased or equalized if they go through HRT later on (e.g. they’ll still be taller, still have more lung capacity.) Even if you transition them from Tanner Stage 2 (i.e. Jazz Jennings style child transition) MtF athletes may enjoy advantages over natal female athletes.

Rowing, like some other sports (e.g. golf, tennis) already has “Open” and “Mixed” divisions for teams who can’t field a boat of all men or all women (open: whatever genders you want, mixed: up to 50% natal females); so opening the women’s races to MtFs makes no sense at all. It’s like letting heavyweight rowers compete in the lightweight races.

Since US Rowing is unwilling to govern gender classification in high school racing, this potentially means transfeminine rowers (MtF) in high school can compete against natal girls; or, that transmasculine rowers (FtMs) can take T and still row with the girls’ team thru high school; and restrictions on hormone therapy would only kick in if you race on an NCAA collegiate team. If there are boys and girls doping T racing against normal, natal girls in high school; then girls lose out on opportunities for rowing scholarships in college.

Example of something you can do about this contagion:

There’s a public comment period open for the next 20 days (so, until Monday May 15 2023) on regulations.gov about the Biden administrations’ “clarification” of Title IX; I posted a comment there and encourage you to do the same if you want to. https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/ED-2022-OCR-0143-0001 You can choose to post anonymously or as a named individual. In the drop-down for “category” of your comment, choose “Civil Rights”.

If you choose to comment on this federal policy change, please start your comment by pasting this in:

“I am writing to comment on 34 CFR Part 106 [Docket ID ED-2022-OCR-0143] RIN 1870-AA19 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance: Sex-Related Eligibility Criteria for Male and Female Athletic Teams, published on April 13, 2023.”

ICONS, which is an activist group dedicated to this issue, has a longer guide on what you might choose to write here. I recommend signing up for their email newsletter if you want to get the skinny on which male athletes are sweeping the podium at women’s competitions; they cover all kinds of sports.

I think women’s sports are important for the psychological and physical benefit of girls and women. Participating on sports teams in school helps girls gain strength and confidence in their own bodies; and for me personally rowing and lifting weights gave me respect for my body and what it can do.

I want that opportunity for my kids. I’d hate to have my own daughter want to compete in middle or high school and get owned by a boy in a tennis skirt on the other side of the court, just because he feels female on the inside.

Disclaimer on my position about trans people:

I’m not against trans rights or seeking to limit the freedom of trans people in any way. I don’t hate trans people, or want to limit their access to care, or otherwise harm them. I believe adults have a right to the pursuit of happiness and to be who they choose, and that teenagers have a right to try and figure out who they are, with certain limitations. I’ll respect anyone’s preferred name and pronouns. I don’t believe trans kids should be banned from playing sports in general, but I’m opposed to them doing so if it confers an unfair advantage. My purpose is to ensure equal rights between all genders and fairness for cis women.
 
I'm all for eliminating sex-segregated sport divisions or leagues. Since the "reputable" "studies" say that there's no advantage whatsoever by being born, growing up, and going through puberty and adolescence as male, then let em all compete against each other. The wimmin's, being more than half of the population, will naturally win more than half of the championships.

Right?
 
The wimmin's, being more than half of the population, will naturally win more than half of the championships.
...sadly no. While you could get an edge case where a butch lady can take down a male reference librarian, matched studies show that men have greater physical prowess than women. Which isn't to say there's no benefit from coed sports, especially if you're just playing for fun.

But I do think girls deserve to compete against other girls in middle and high school; especially if there's scholarship opportunities or even just an important race on the line. Getting a medal/trophy for something you've worked really hard for is a really important experience for teens.

As for trans girls who want to play sports... I would say, play against your natal sex or in coed intramural. Yes, I'm sorry, it's a little unfair. But so would letting them compete against natal females.
 
Finally a real woman shows those cis bitches who’s the lady boss. Note the name used by The Telegraph’s subbie in the headline.

IMG_0814.jpeg

In what has been described as a "Lia Thomas moment" for cycling, Austin Killips, a 27-year-old transgender rider, has won first prize for women at the Tour of the Gila, the premier road race in New Mexico.

It marked the most significant result yet for Killips, a trans-identifying biological male from Chicago, who also won a medal in women's cyclocross at the US National Championships and who is now tipped to challenge for a place at the Tour de France Femmes and at next summer's Paris Olympics.

This year's running of the Tour of the Gila marked the first time in the event's 36-year history that equal prize money had been offered, with a total purse of $35,350 (£28,145) in both the men's and women's races. Killips, who only took up cycling in 2019 before starting on hormone replacement therapy, earned almost £8,000 for finishing top of the women's general classification, plus an £800 bonus as "Queen of the Mountains".

"Austin is cycling's equivalent of Lia Thomas," Inga Thompson, a three-time US Olympian and five-time national road race champion, told The Telegraph. Thomas won a US women's collegiate title in swimming last year, in the 200-yard freestyle, having been ranked 554th in the country in the equivalent male category.

"This really highlights the issues that are happening to women in cycling," Thompson said. "We have more than 50 transgender women in the sport. And what's going on in the background is that women are just quietly walking away. They think, 'Why bother, if it's not fair?'"

Killips' name first came to wider attention in March, after being cited by former cyclocross champion Hannah Arensman in a Supreme Court filing explaining why she was retiring from the sport at 24. Arensman had lost out on a podium place to Killips in the national finals in December, later accusing her transgender opponent of repeatedly shoving her during the race – a claim Killips denied.

"I have decided to end my cycling career," Arensman said. "My sister and family sobbed as they watched a man finish in front of me, having witnessed several physical interactions with him during the race. I feel for young girls learning to compete, who no longer have a fair chance at being the new record-holders and champions in cycling because men want to compete in our division."

Amid the Killips controversy, Thompson, who came third at the women's Tour de France in 1986 and 1989, argued that the pattern was becoming more common. "These women are young, and there's a lot of bullying," she said. "They get cancelled, they get silenced, their jobs are threatened. They get put on the TERF [trans-exclusionary radical feminist] list. If they say anything, they are eviscerated. And so, instead of fighting this, they just walk away."

Killips is a candidate to make the US Olympic women's cycling team in Paris next summer, should the UCI, the global governing body, maintain its policy of allowing transgender riders to compete so long as they suppress their testosterone levels below 2.5 nanomoles per litre over a two-year period. The average testosterone level for women is between 0.5 and 2.4 nmol/l, while the British Journal of Sports Medicine has suggested that trans women are stronger and maintain better heart and lung capacity than women, even 14 years after taking hormone therapy.

"I expect Austin to win the Joe Martin Stage Race [in Arkansas] this month, then potentially to go on to the Tour de France Femmes and the Paris Olympics," Thompson said. "That's just common sense. After all the UCI races, the national championships, why not? The Olympics just aren't spoken about yet, because there would be a really big backlash."

With results rapidly improving, Killips is allowed to compete as a consequence of the UCI's liberal transgender policy, which stands starkly at odds with World Athletics' approach of banning all post-puberty males from the female category. It also comes in spite of sustained lobbying by female riders for an outright ban: last year: Marion Clignet, France's triple world champion, presented the UCI with a survey showing that 92 per cent did not agree with trans athletes racing in the women's peloton.

link (subscribers only)
 
I look in with curiosity how transgendered athletes in womens' sports eventually plays out.

There is an American university currently being sued over its decision to drop sports for budgetary reasons. The plaintiffs want at least one women's sport reinstated on the basis of Title IX. That in the surface seems typical.

However, a newspaper article about the suit was eye opening. Apparently, women who play multiple sports are counted once per sport. For example, a woman playing both volleyball and softball is reported twice: once for each sport. That seems reasonable but critics contend it inflates participation numbers needed to gauge Title IX compliance.

The bigger eye-opener was that males who make up a practice squad that scrimmages against the women's team also get counted on the women's side of the ledger. That was surprising to read and, if true, makes for some peculiar reporting.

However, it raises another question. If the NCAA recognizes MTF transgender athletes as women, what's to keep schools from filling open women's team positions with transgendered athletes so they can say, "See, we got more women on our teams now. So, we comply with Title IX" without actually awarding any of those sports - or scholarships - to natal women.

It just shows how farcical this has become and how sports and politics trump academia in the NCAA's larger division(s) and schools.
 
I think that the solution to this issue should be relatively straightforward although it will still receive pushback from trans activists and generate cries of double-standards and “separate but equal” gripes.

I have no issue with both FTMs and MTFs competing with men if they so choose as they are at a fundamental disadvantage, but would not allow them to compete against women. I think the real solution is simply forming two separate divisions for FTMs and MTFs respectively to compete against one another. If trans issues really are becoming more popular and are here to stay, there shouldn’t be any issue building these divisions up over time to where there is enough competition to keep them alive.

Of course this solution will not be supported specifically by MTFs as they see the most obvious advantages in competing against women and will find such a policy to be exclusionary and invalidating to their personal identity. I myself am skeptical that MTFs in sports (and perhaps in general) are acting in good faith, rather they want affirmation that they are somehow better than other people and love validating the idea that they are generally better at being women than women are. That sentiment aside, the only viable solution is the creation of separate divisions, which to me feels incredibly obvious and fair to all involved.
 
A while ago on twitter I remember people going "you say mtf trannies have an unfair advantage over women? well guess what transphobes, black people have an unfair advantage over white people and we don't segregate them." Leaving aside whether or not that last part is true, it still got me thinking. If innate biological advantages based on sex don't matter, then why do we even have gender segregated sports? imo lets follow this through to its logical conclusion and get rid of womens sports and have everything be coed. Would twitter trannies be able to give a single good argument for why we shouldn't do that? After all it's not like they are arguing that we should bring back the Negro leagues. If sports can't discriminate based on race, why discriminate based on gender? Is there a single good reason that isn't rooted in sexual dimorphism? Which we are apparently ignoring now anyway in favor of preferred pronouns.
 
I think that the solution to this issue should be relatively straightforward although it will still receive pushback from trans activists and generate cries of double-standards and “separate but equal” gripes.

I have no issue with both FTMs and MTFs competing with men if they so choose as they are at a fundamental disadvantage, but would not allow them to compete against women. I think the real solution is simply forming two separate divisions for FTMs and MTFs respectively to compete against one another. If trans issues really are becoming more popular and are here to stay, there shouldn’t be any issue building these divisions up over time to where there is enough competition to keep them alive.

Of course this solution will not be supported specifically by MTFs as they see the most obvious advantages in competing against women and will find such a policy to be exclusionary and invalidating to their personal identity. I myself am skeptical that MTFs in sports (and perhaps in general) are acting in good faith, rather they want affirmation that they are somehow better than other people and love validating the idea that they are generally better at being women than women are. That sentiment aside, the only viable solution is the creation of separate divisions, which to me feels incredibly obvious and fair to all involved.
The best solution to this would be all mentally sane nations boycotting winter and summer Olympics and all the other international sport competitions and simply not sending their female athletes to compete against troons.

Creating tranny divisions seems pretty insane if we consider that they only represent like 2% of the overall population. Or they could have their own Translympics and maybe some people would watch it to have a laugh.
A while ago on twitter I remember people going "you say mtf trannies have an unfair advantage over women? well guess what transphobes, black people have an unfair advantage over white people and we don't segregate them." Leaving aside whether or not that last part is true, it still got me thinking. If innate biological advantages based on sex don't matter, then why do we even have gender segregated sports? imo lets follow this through to its logical conclusion and get rid of womens sports and have everything be coed. Would twitter trannies be able to give a single good argument for why we shouldn't do that? After all it's not like they are arguing that we should bring back the Negro leagues. If sports can't discriminate based on race, why discriminate based on gender? Is there a single good reason that isn't rooted in sexual dimorphism? Which we are apparently ignoring now anyway in favor of preferred pronouns.
Well if we abolish all the segregation then Paralympics should be next in line. Then we could have men, women, troons and cripples competing against each other. Also have men fighting women in boxing and MMA.

Also while we're at it we could also abolish weight segregation in boxing, wrestling and other contact sports and have Tyson Fury fight featherweight boxers.

On a serious note, racial segregation very much exists in sports. You'll seldom if at all see black women in artistic swimming, ballet (i know it's technically not a sport but you know what I mean), ice-skating, skiing etc.
But then you'll have black women dominating running, basketball etc.

By the way, this shit is funny.

In 1932 in the US the 100m run female division was won by a Polish athlete, Stanisława Walasiewicz:
1688541479849.png

Here she is with the silver and bronze female medalists. The other two ladies also look rather manly.


1688541652340.png

1936, German olympic high jumper, Dora Rajten:

1688541865237.png
This is what's been written about her:
"On September 21, 1939, a train conductor reported that there was a man dressed as a woman in his train. Ratjen was pulled off the train and questioned by the police. He showed official papers that proved his female gender, but a doctor quickly concluded that Ratjen was a man. The German government returned Ratjen’s gold medal. As it turned out, Dora Ratjen had always thought he was a man, and eventually changed his name to Heinrich, a name he had until he passed away in 2008. "

Source

1964 Olympic Golden medalist, also Polish, 100m run, Ewa Klobukowska

1688542257959.png
I'm sure there are more of these fine sportsmen ladies.

By the way the two Polish ones turned out to be intersex.
 
womenssports1.png
womenssports2.png

This might seem controversial, but I don't need to want to personally want to watch womens sports to think that womens sports should exist. I know troons have trouble understanding empathy but I actually do want even communities that I am not a part of to be allowed to thrive. That's exactly why I don't want troons to thrive, they can never be happy as a self contained community. They can only find joy by attaching themselves to other communities and destroying them.

Though for the record I watched one game in the womens FIFA world cup and I plan on watching at least a few more.
 
Crossposting some info I posted about MtFs sabotaging female disc golf, causing events to be rescheduled/canceled to prevent the man from suing to be allowed to compete against women, because the sport organization is actually standing their ground:
let's hear from the female disc golf players about who is "doing harm":
Emphasis:
Therefore, we the undersigned female members of the DGPT do hereby express and declare our full support for the eligibility policy of the DGPT and stand firmly alongside our representative Catrina Allen in defending the DGPT policy. We respectfully request the court uphold the policy, and urge all who care about women to join us in the battle to save women's sports.
1689427586022.png1689427622729.png
This was signed by 33 female FPO players, and was not posted publicly but was submitted to the court when asking to uphold the eligibility requirements of the FPO. (transcribed list)
Current 2023 FPDG FPO standings (archive) - 11/20 players signed the document
Kristin Tattar (signed)
Catrina Allen (signed)

Missy Gannon (didn't sign)
Holyn Handley (didn't sign) **
Ella Hansen (didn't sign) **
Kat Mertsch (signed)
Ohn Scoggins (didn't sign)
Hailey King (didn't sign) **
Jessica Weese (signed)
Sarah Hokom (signed)
Macie Velediaz (signed)

Ali Smith (didn't sign)
Paige Pierce (didn't sign) **
Emily Beach (signed)
Maria Oliva (didn't sign) **
Stacie Rawnsley (signed)
Jennifer Allen (signed)

Sai Ananda (didn't sign)
Rebecca Cox (signed)
Deann Carey (signed)

** = according to r/discgolf, player has spoken in support of Ryan

Multiple top players have been very vocal in opposing male competitors in their sport and are asking people to support the DGPT decision.
Press conference held prior to decision, after Minnesota decided in Ryan's favor:
Screenshot 2023-07-15 at 8.45.33 AM.png
archive
Your browser is not able to display this video.
1689428908821.png
Social media posts supporting DGPT decision:
1689429994445.png1689430078803.png
second screenshot is kat mersch (archive)

some of Ryan's takes from the past year:
"while I can't say for certain who filed the complaint, whoever did is certainly scared of my inevitable victory"
1689428818662.png
1689428870865.png
"My livelihood is on the line" - if forced to complete in the Mixed division he would not be competitive
1689429430339.png
archive

Ryan's participation in the lower tiers of the sport resulted in female participants not advancing:
1689429306641.png

Tony used a post on the subreddit critical of this decision to characterize the fans as supportive of Ryan competing against women, however the top voted post in the past year is from a woman stating that trans identified males should compete in the mixed division
Screenshot 2023-07-15 at 9.12.30 AM.png
archive

The court ruling that spurred the cancellation of these events in the DGPL to preserve fairness for women was in Minnesota. Used as precedent in Ryan's case against the DGPL is fat troon JayCee Cooper v USA PowerLifting.


USA Powerlifting has been ordered to cease operations until they will allow men to compete in the women's division.
1690650498775.pngScreenshot 2023-07-29 at 12.13.13 PM.png
1690650844478.png
With Ilhan Omar
1690650879811.png
Posting his Ls
1690650907881.png1690650933491.png

Absolutely pathetic displays from Handmaiden powerlifters
1690651005942.png1690651049799.png

JayCee's personal records:Screenshot 2023-07-29 at 12.20.01 PM.png
His deadlift is not impressive for a competitive female let alone male. His squat is fine for a female, better than mine, but not one that would stand out. His bench is the most competitive but not going to win him any records.

His most recent competition:
Screenshot 2023-07-29 at 12.36.10 PM.png
He is in the highest weight class and he got beat in deadlift by women of every other weight class. His squat beat in every category for women above 130lbs. His bench beat by a women under 114lbs.
When sorted by Wilks score, he came in last place for the competition.

What a disgusting fat pathetic male.
 
Last edited:
Back