Culture unfuckable hate nerds - yes, young men are losers. they deserve sympathy, not contempt.

Status
Not open for further replies.
(article) (archive)

Unfuckable Hate Nerds​

Yes, young men are losers. They deserve sympathy, not contempt.​

BY WILLIAM DERESIEWICZ
JUNE 28, 2023

“The army of unfuckable hate nerds”—Marc Maron’s term for the mass of young men who pollute the internet with their misogyny. “They play video games all day,” the comedian said on his podcast, “then they watch MMA, then they spend the evening jerking off to … porn, then they put a few hours” into attacking women online.

He’s right, of course. There are hordes of these young men (and, no doubt, of not-so-young ones). They congregate on Twitter, in comment threads, on forums and platforms like Reddit, Discord, Kiwi Farms, and 8kun, the successor to 8chan. They trade in misogyny, racism, antisemitism, and assorted other hatreds. Their words are violent and vile.

But Maron is also wrong. I mean in his response, which is that of so many: to answer hate with hate, contempt with contempt. As opposed to what? As opposed to understanding, just like we extend, at least on the left (and I am on the left), to another set of violent young men, the ones who live in inner cities. Yes, I am calling for sympathy for my brothers in the army of unfuckable hate nerds.

My brothers: I was a young man once. And since there’s now an ever-growing genre of commentary in which feminists speak, with placid condescension, like so many anthropologists (if not entomologists), on the topic of men, especially young men, I thought it might be useful to hear from someone who actually knows what it’s like to be one.

Here’s what it’s like: It sucks. Male privilege? Absolutely, in many contexts, but there are important ways in which young men are clearly underprivileged.

Women are sex objects, goes the cliché, and men are success objects. But success requires many years to achieve, if you ever achieve it at all. Young men, in that respect, are much like older women: Society has little use for them, barely deigns to notice them. I’m not talking about the advertising industry, or the entertainment industry; I’m talking about the day-to-day experience of living in the world. Young women often have a lot of social power, whereas, except for the fortunate few—the born rich, the strikingly handsome, the 6-foot-3—young men have none. Socially speaking, young men are shit, and nobody gives a shit.

Any young woman who is even moderately attractive will be courted, complimented, paid attention to, by women as well as men. Older men will buy them things. People will hang on their words even when they aren’t interesting and laugh at their jokes even when they aren’t funny. They will have entry into places—private clubs, backstage after a show—young men can only press their noses against. They will be able to advance professionally by batting their eyelashes at powerful men. Young men, meanwhile—those losers, those loners, those apes—are left to pick their psychic zits on the periphery.

There’s more. Young women can have sex whenever they want. For most young men, persuading a woman to sleep with them is like trying to crack a safe. You understand that it’s theoretically possible, but you have no idea how to do it. Which means that you’re stuck with your hard-on. Unfuckable? No one needs to tell you that. You are unfucked: unwanted, unattractive; in the most literal sense, unloved.

The mental climate of the typical young man is three parts unrelenting horniness to one part self-disgust. Young women are not the only ones who are taught to hate their bodies. So, if less intensely, are young men. Why else would they lift all those weights? What you are really working out, when you go to the gym, is your dysmorphia. Aella, the OnlyFans star and online commentator, has said that what men look for when they come to her—and her clientele is mostly young—isn’t sex per se but “sexual acceptance.” They want to be assured, in other words, that they aren’t hideous. The fact they have to pay for this says everything you need to know.

Do I sound bitter? I’m channeling my younger self. It’s all worked out for me, I have no complaints, but I am intensely aware that it could have gone a different way. Turn this dial a click to the left, turn that one a click to the right—a little less privilege, a little more emotional instability—and I could have turned into a hate nerd myself. I suspect that a lot of men sense that. What does it feel like to be a young man? It feels like you are Kafka’s cockroach, Dostoevsky’s Underground Man. It feels like you were drawn by Harvey Pekar or R. Crumb. You are an Untermensch, a particle, a stew of envies and resentments, a festering sore. You look, from below, at the happy and lovely and rich. You creep, alone, along a wall. You masturbate as if your life depended on it.

Yes, I made it out. I found success; I reached the fabled land of love. But many men do not; many recognize, and recognize quite early, that they never will. And I was young in the ’80s and ’90s. We know what’s happened since. Blue-collar wages have slumped. Men have lost the education race. Add to that the dating apps, which gamify sex and love and quantify desirability and value. Like everything else on the web, the distribution follows a power law curve, with a small fraction of alphas soaking up the lion’s share of female attention. Add further the misandry that has now become de rigueur wherever the liberal elite holds sway: the ritual (and often gleeful) man-hating, the pathologization of masculinity.

We also know how young men are responding. Some are opting out of manhood by becoming trans or nonbinary. Some are going the other way, reaching for an ersatz hypermasculinity and joining the army of unfuckable hate nerds. Their behavior is disgusting, it is inexcusable, but what do we think is going to make them stop? Telling them to comb their hair, to put down the Xbox, to get a life? Reminding them that they’re unlovable and worthless? They know that already; that is precisely the problem. Hate breeds hate. Revenge is not justice. The hate nerds are human, no less than you and me. We need to treat them like it.
 
Last edited:
The problem is many women haven't made themsleves more attractive too. Your claims aren't wrong, why I agree to an extent, but when the prospects are divorce, a child that hates you and 1 out of a million lottery ticket of maybe having a solid family it demotivates men to ever try to improve. Women strangleholding society demotivates and demoralizes men and creates a situation that will lead to the societies death.

Yes, some men are too blame that's not untrue, but the problem is when women are ever addressed it always gets the Jordan Peterson routine of "Well just improve yourself." Even the women who acknowledge the problem still commit to the problem because female heirarchy or however the monolith of women really works.
You're right and I agree but where I disagree is in the extremes. There are more shitty women out there than every before, but they are more easy to spot and identify than ever before.

Years ago, when there were more attractive women, the real crazies hid amongst them and it could be difficult to see who the real lunatics were until it was too late; years deep into a relationship, sometimes with a house or kid. Nowadays, the real nutters wear purple hair, an extra 4 stone/40kg/80lbs of weight, bad clothes and screech about politics.

Self-improvement should always be number 1, regardless of what's going on around you or in society. Be the best you that you can be should be the default stance. Doing the self improvement for women is setting out on a journey of failure from the first step.
 
You're right and I agree but where I disagree is in the extremes. There are more shitty women out there than every before, but they are more easy to spot and identify than ever before.

Years ago, when there were more attractive women, the real crazies hid amongst them and it could be difficult to see who the real lunatics were until it was too late; years deep into a relationship, sometimes with a house or kid. Nowadays, the real nutters wear purple hair, an extra 4 stone/40kg/80lbs of weight, bad clothes and screech about politics.

Self-improvement should always be number 1, regardless of what's going on around you or in society. Be the best you that you can be should be the default stance. Doing the self improvement for women is setting out on a journey of failure from the first step.
I mean that's true, and men should avoid the landwhale/hair dye weirdos but it's not just the insane girls anymore that are causing the problem. I agree though with the last concept. Everything should be done to self improve, but generally when I argue these stances I more mean at a societal level, even if society was more healthy some men would fail and you can only improve past a certain percentile for who will succeed. The last part I fully agree people who lift for women are being dumb. It shows a lack of self-control and only going for short term gains/etc.
 
Is there ever point where, as a man, you've done your due diligence?
You're due diligence is to yourself no one else, if you can look at yourself in the mirror and say "I've done enough and now I'm finished" then more power to you buddy, at least you put the work in unlike the others
When it's upwards of 50-80% of men the reality needs to be addressed, and no amount of "Men just focus on yourselves" will fix that issue.
Why is that my problem? Like I said, I've seen guys who at any moment can access every single "Red Pill" which is just autism trying to get laid cause they don't have the social skills so they have to A/B test the world and see what works and wanting to maintain relationships with people they're sleeping with but if they aren't going to do the work themselves why should I help them and why should I care?
 
I don't think men should instantly lower their standards dramatically
I think people are looking at the wrong things when they talk about lowering their standards as well. All this ‘she’s a ten’ nonsense.
If you are hugely attracted to tall athletic blondes, then fine, it’s normal, but say you meet a girl who’s of average height , brunette and skinny and she is just fabulous in all other ways and you live happily ever after - that’s not really lowering your standards, it’s just accepting that there’s an ideal that may not be what is actually the best person overall for you looks like,
Most of us have a thing we find ‘most attractive.’ The issue is if we only and exclusively demand all suitors are that thing. Many women find tall men attractive, just like many men find big tits and blonde hair attractive. That’s only an issue if you say you’ll only and exclusively date over a set height, or only date tall busty blondes then complain you can’t find anyone. You’ll find many people happily married to people who aren’t their physical ideal,
Lowering your standards truly is about the more fundamental stuff. Dating a drug addict, wife beater, ex con, or BPD nightmare. Someone who is actively harmful for you is lowering your standards. But being a bum isn’t the same as being five foot eleven rather than six two.
 
It requires women to finally woman the fuck up overthrow their animalistic hardwiring which I know they can and act like humans instead of dogs rutting in heat.
There was one Philosopher (can't think of the name) who said that women are inherently more connected to their sexuality. That if men can compartmentalize their sexual nature. Their libido, woman can't as it is inherently tied in every day life. We can assume that due to this if man is a creature between beast and god then women lean towards beast. Just something to think about.

But anyways, I think its neither that men or women need to improve themselves but that instead we have lost any collective spirit, community, culture, and such have been decayed. In this sense progressives confused social decay with social progress. Younger generations have been increasingly isolated and atomized. At one point people found love within in their local communities or in similar cultures. As they have shared traits that each could find value in each other. Hyper-individualism has eroded this cultural net.

Edit: Also, maybe men are suffering some form of internet induced autism? Just an idea.
 
There was one Philosopher (can't think of the name) who said that women where inherently more connected to their sexuality. That if men can compartmentalize their sexual nature. Their libido, woman can't as it is inherently tied in every day life. We can assume that due to this if man is a creature between beast and god then women lean towards beast. Just something to think about.
There are a lot of philosophers that said stuff about women that'd get them labeled misogynists. I remember one being autistic enough to use the actual placement (inside and outside) of our genitals to make the same point.
 
You're due diligence is to yourself no one else, if you can look at yourself in the mirror and say "I've done enough and now I'm finished" then more power to you buddy, at least you put the work in unlike the others

Why is that my problem? Like I said, I've seen guys who at any moment can access every single "Red Pill" which is just autism trying to get laid cause they don't have the social skills so they have to A/B test the world and see what works and wanting to maintain relationships with people they're sleeping with but if they aren't going to do the work themselves why should I help them and why should I care?
It's not even about the men at this point. If men are doing everything this derelicts the woman to any responsibility. In that case long term men will start treating women as they do with irresponsible men, the problem with women is they are not doing that, and the world being produced from that is obvious when one walks out of their house.

No one is saying women out of the dating pool are responsible for this and those are the few I see agreeing with women needing to stop this attack on men. The problem lays bare at younger women and the women pushing the "monolithic behavior" causing these atrocities.

A lot of ladies are ok with it for now because it gains benefits, but what happens when men start diverging towards mistreatement, many women fear for women's future in that regard, but few are actively outspoken about it, the girl who I am the closest too has often spoke out to other women to hear them yell back "Why are you siding with the enemy" "are you really a woman" and more. Women don't get this war ends only one way, and not with their victory.
I think people are looking at the wrong things when they talk about lowering their standards as well. All this ‘she’s a ten’ nonsense.
If you are hugely attracted to tall athletic blondes, then fine, it’s normal, but say you meet a girl who’s of average height , brunette and skinny and she is just fabulous in all other ways and you live happily ever after - that’s not really lowering your standards, it’s just accepting that there’s an ideal that may not be what is actually the best person overall for you looks like,
Most of us have a thing we find ‘most attractive.’ The issue is if we only and exclusively demand all suitors are that thing. Many women find tall men attractive, just like many men find big tits and blonde hair attractive. That’s only an issue if you say you’ll only and exclusively date over a set height, or only date tall busty blondes then complain you can’t find anyone. You’ll find many people happily married to people who aren’t their physical ideal,
Lowering your standards truly is about the more fundamental stuff. Dating a drug addict, wife beater, ex con, or BPD nightmare. Someone who is actively harmful for you is lowering your standards. But being a bum isn’t the same as being five foot eleven rather than six two.
Well when I say this I mean screwing or having sex with any girl willing to spread her legs. I have charisma boosted some ladies I've known who were less attractive to where they weren't afraid to talk to men, and more and can understand not everyone gets the genetic lottery.

The last part of what you said is what I mean by lowering standards. The problem is that only goes one way, and men are good at adopting and copying mannerisms of the opposite sex where this idea we both disagree with is becoming more dominant.
There was one Philosopher (can't think of the name) who said that women are inherently more connected to their sexuality. That if men can compartmentalize their sexual nature. Their libido, woman can't as it is inherently tied in every day life. We can assume that due to this if man is a creature between beast and god then women lean towards beast. Just something to think about.

But anyways, I think its neither that men or women need to improve themselves but that instead we have lost any collective spirit, community, culture, and such have been decayed. In this sense progressives confused social decay with social progress. Younger generations have been increasingly isolated and atomized. At one point people found love within in their local communities or in similar cultures. As they have shared traits that each could find value in each other. Hyper-individualism has eroded this cultural net.
I don't the issue is hypothetically women being more animalistic or "nature bound" overall, more that just as men have had to overwrite hard wiring some aspects women should fight to overcome in hard wiring.

I agree that "hyper individualism" and ignoring "unity/community" has destroyed what we once had, but I don't think that net can fully be brought back at this point.
 
then why are you recommending it?
Because Self Improvement is the right way forward. I mean if you want to self-improve to chase skanks, you're not improving for yourself, you're doing it for women. Let the dog (self improvement) wag the tail (become more attractive).

I mean that's true, and men should avoid the landwhale/hair dye weirdos but it's not just the insane girls anymore that are causing the problem. I agree though with the last concept. Everything should be done to self improve, but generally when I argue these stances I more mean at a societal level, even if society was more healthy some men would fail and you can only improve past a certain percentile for who will succeed. The last part I fully agree people who lift for women are being dumb. It shows a lack of self-control and only going for short term gains/etc.
Some of this comes down to how people view society and it usually breaks down into the left vs right, as in, the left believe a society grows strong when the group becomes strong, the right believe a society grows strong when the individual is strong (Correct me if I'm wrong, I may well be, this is just how I see it).

There will always be lazy, feckless lay abouts, which is good, because as men and humans fighting over finite resources, we want less competition. However, there are a group of people who have fallen through the cracks. Those who should be successful, attractive, contributing members of society who are now terminally-online, depressed, down-beaten. That group are more often than not men, as women usually find a man to help her survive.

As you can see with this thread, some people and some men, don't want help. They want an excuse to keep going with their infantile life. That's fine, each to their own. However, they don't want help, they want mommy to comfort them and tell them everything is OK because they've been failed by a society too soft. "Man the fuck up" is really sound advice that some don't want to hear because it jars them out of their comfort zone.
 
Because Self Improvement is the right way forward. I mean if you want to self-improve to chase skanks, you're not improving for yourself, you're doing it for women. Let the dog (self improvement) wag the tail (become more attractive).
Then it's self improvement for self improvement's sake: egotistical masturbation.
 
The problem lays bare at younger women and the women pushing the "monolithic behavior"
A lot of ladies are ok with it for now because it gains benefits, but what happens when men start diverging towards mistreatment, many women fear for women's future in that regard, but few are actively outspoken about it, the girl who I am the closest too has often spoke out to other women to hear them yell back "Why are you siding with the enemy" "are you really a woman" and more. Women don't get this war ends only one way, and not with their victory.
Man, that sucks, not my problem. Women are human beings who are capable of making their own decisions, You can make the ones you're closest to feel heard but you can't convince Women as a whole because they aren't a monolith their human beings with hopes, dreams and fears just like you and I, seeking something to fill the god shaped hole.

So I ask again why should I care? because something that benefited someone who's not me is now going away, oh no, how's that my problem? "They're yelling at her mean things" How's that my problem? Why should I care?
but what happens when men start diverging towards mistreatment
Nothing will happen. The women who want relationships will get into them with men who want them, there won't be this mass update to Men™️ that will make them start "mistreating" women they'll just be indifferent. They'll retreat to their bread and circuses content with the life they've been handed, not a bang, not a whisper but a passing sigh.
 
Then it's self improvement for self improvement's sake: egotistical masturbation.
You seem to be arguing against sound advice that has helped millions of people for centuries. I don't know you and I won't pass judgement, I'll just say that we seem to have opposite views. Self improvement helped me a lot.

That said, even if it was egotistical masturbation, which I don't believe it is, it would be preferred over actual masturbation as an escape and release because someone couldn't get physical intimacy.
 
Some of this comes down to how people view society and it usually breaks down into the left vs right, as in, the left believe a society grows strong when the group becomes strong, the right believe a society grows strong when the individual is strong (Correct me if I'm wrong, I may well be, this is just how I see it).

There will always be lazy, feckless lay abouts, which is good, because as men and humans fighting over finite resources, we want less competition. However, there are a group of people who have fallen through the cracks. Those who should be successful, attractive, contributing members of society who are now terminally-online, depressed, down-beaten. That group are more often than not men, as women usually find a man to help her survive.

As you can see with this thread, some people and some men, don't want help. They want an excuse to keep going with their infantile life. That's fine, each to their own. However, they don't want help, they want mommy to comfort them and tell them everything is OK because they've been failed by a society too soft. "Man the fuck up" is really sound advice that some don't want to hear because it jars them out of their comfort zone.
You'll have to bare with me as I'm not your traditional right wing/left wing person. Personally I take the stance when society is strong as a whole it's better for both regards.

In my opinion I prefer more competition because it allows me to pressure myself into improvement to become stronger and require more improvements to compete. Right now I can do bare minimum and net girls and although that sounds fun for people in a similar boat, I think long term this cuts most mens (including myself) full potential, because if I only have to put in 25% effort to succeed why would I need 50%, 75%, or even double my effort (100%) to succeed? Sure I don't want constant competition where if I fail once I lose, but I also never liked being handed victories on a silver platter.

I do agree some men do need to man up and improve and stop forgoing it for personal gains, that is true.However, many men are victims of current society and I wouldn't even call my success a good future for general men. Baby-daddy syndrome may sound good, but long term that creates dysfunction overall.

Then it's self improvement for self improvement's sake: egotistical masturbation.
Not necessarily. It's a way to gain composure, focus, discipline which are lacking in today's society. It's something that keeps people mentally sound and healthy that we've forgotten in our coomer addicted life styles. The people who do it to go "I'm more disciplined than you lol" aren't literally doing it for its own sake, similar if you are charitable and telling everyone what you did that's an egotistical masturbation effort, but say you do charity in a proper manner and help others and aren't seeking validation for it, then that can be proof you are a sound person trying to do the right thing whether it succeeds or not. More or less it's about context.

I would argue though it's a good thing it's what made me who I am, despite my upbringing. I was headed towards a path of criminality and being something far worse than I am now, so it definitely has worth and can change ones entire life.
Man, that sucks, not my problem. Women are human beings who are capable of making their own decisions, You can make the ones you're closest to feel heard but you can't convince Women as a whole because they aren't a monolith their human beings with hopes, dreams and fears just like you and I, seeking something to fill the god shaped hole.

So I ask again why should I care? because something that benefited someone who's not me is now going away, oh no, how's that my problem? "They're yelling at her mean things" How's that my problem? Why should I care?

Nothing will happen. The women who want relationships will get into them with men who want them, there won't be this mass update to Men™️ that will make them start "mistreating" women they'll just be indifferent. They'll retreat to their bread and circuses content with the life they've been handed, not a bang, not a whisper but a passing sigh.
How society is, is most certainly everyone's problem. Unless you are a hermit then you are excluded from that claim. Women do act as a monolith, even the women I associate with have prescripted responses once you get past a certain "individual" characteristic set up.

When single mothers produce criminals with no care of life, and a desensitization to killing or murdering others with no care because "nothing matters." that becomes all of our problems unless you are already a nihilist again another exception excluded from this equation.


We're already seeing it, most men want women, the treatment is what has changed and why I constantly hear complains from those same women about how men have changed, I'm not talking about the "good men" claims, but more about why they don't care about their emotional needs, why they feel so alone in their relationships now, and more. Sure some men are still good in those relationships even some unorthodox fruits like myself, but those kind of men are the shrinking minority despite what those viewing this topic want to believe. It's also why dysfunction in society is growing alongside other negative issues.
 
You seem to be arguing against sound advice that has helped millions of people for centuries. I don't know you and I won't pass judgement, I'll just say that we seem to have opposite views. Self improvement helped me a lot.

That said, even if it was egotistical masturbation, which I don't believe it is, it would be preferred over actual masturbation as an escape and release because someone couldn't get physical intimacy.
If you think millions of people for the past centuries were concerned about what passes for the modern idea of bettering yourself, I'm not sure what to tell you. They were mostly concerned with staying alive. That gave them purpose. That and caring for their families. We don't need to worry about staying alive and we don't have families anymore. Put two and two together.
Not necessarily. It's a way to gain composure, focus, discipline which are lacking in today's society. It's something that keeps people mentally sound and healthy that we've forgotten in our coomer addicted life styles. The people who do it to go "I'm more disciplined than you lol" aren't literally doing it for its own sake, similar if you are charitable and telling everyone what you did that's an egotistical masturbation effort, but say you do charity in a proper manner and help others and aren't seeking validation for it, then that can be proof you are a sound person trying to do the right thing whether it succeeds or not. More or less it's about context.
Those all have nothing to do with self-improvement. That's just a matter of character. Even your analogy is more about character than it is about being a better person. Composure, focus, and discipline are a choice. This idea of improving yourself to gain them is flawed. It's egotistical masturbation because it views them as something that can be eternally gained rather than something you achieve.
 
@Cool Dog Returns the site won't allow me to quote you so I'll be brief, 30+ year olds with little baggage are not common so I can see why older dudes like to go for 20s women.

The Asian guy is into redheads mostly, and hates other Asians, especially the female variety.

Paying a hooker for sex seems like you're telling yourself that you're not good enough for a woman who would actually want to have sex with you. Plus there's the pimping and human trafficking angle, for those who have morals.

And yeah I can't believe how many guys go for the "male feminist" approach in order to try to get laid. They're predators who don't have the balls to tell a woman they're interested so they resort to stupid trickery they see in teen sex comedies or whatever. It's worse than pretending to support wokeshit just for the hopes of getting laid.

Not to mention those are likely the types who are the most promiscuous and have all the social diseases.

I just straight up tell my date that politicians are the scum of the earth if the question ever arises. If she leaves then oh well she wasn't for me anyway. So many guys try to get laid with as many women as possible, but I take pride in being for the select few, if anything at all.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Mewtwo_Rain
You'll have to bare with me as I'm not your traditional right wing/left wing person. Personally I take the stance when society is strong as a whole it's better for both regards.

In my opinion I prefer more competition because it allows me to pressure myself into improvement to become stronger and require more improvements to compete. Right now I can do bare minimum and net girls and although that sounds fun for people in a similar boat, I think long term this cuts most mens (including myself) full potential, because if I only have to put in 25% effort to succeed why would I need 50%, 75%, or even double my effort (100%) to succeed? Sure I don't want constant competition where if I fail once I lose, but I also never liked being handed victories on a silver platter.

I do agree some men do need to man up and improve and stop forgoing it for personal gains, that is true.However, many men are victims of current society and I wouldn't even call my success a good future for general men. Baby-daddy syndrome may sound good, but long term that creates dysfunction overall.
I agree with all of this. I'm not a right/left person I was just using it as the easier way to describe how I see the split between society is strong vs individual makes strong society.

That's a good point. if you don't need to put in a lot of effort you lose out on pushing yourself. In my experience, men in their 30's have been abandoned and fallen between the cracks of the new way of thinking and the old, traditional style. Leaving is with very role-models or people to look upto/push ourselves against. We have no-one to emulate or to guide, only those who wish to hold us back and push us down. Again, in my experience.



If you think millions of people for the past centuries were concerned about what passes for the modern idea of bettering yourself, I'm not sure what to tell you. They were mostly concerned with staying alive. That gave them purpose. That and caring for their families. We don't need to worry about staying alive and we don't have families anymore. Put two and two together.
Chivalry, honour, decency, Godliness. were these not virtues men lived up to? Or are we only concentrating on the down-trodden serfs?
 
You seem to be arguing against sound advice that has helped millions of people for centuries. I don't know you and I won't pass judgement, I'll just say that we seem to have opposite views. Self improvement helped me a lot.
Well, what does self-improvement mean in this context? That might seem obvious to the point of being rhetorical, but maybe it isn't obvious to everyone, especially unfuckable hate nerds.

Does it mean to make more money? Look buff? Read classic books? Keep up with pop culture? Learn to cook? Take a comedy class? Get a new haircut?

All of those things might help, but it's not always clear where to focus, and there are only so many hours in the day. It's not always clear what things will attract women, and especially what will attract good quality women. I don't disagree with the principle of self-improvement, at all. I'm really trying in my own life, including for reasons that have nothing to do with women. But sometimes it comes off as "if women don't like you, it's obviously your own fault, figure it out".
 
Well, what does self-improvement mean in this context? That might seem obvious to the point of being rhetorical, but maybe it isn't obvious to everyone, especially unfuckable hate nerds.

Does it mean to make more money? Look buff? Read classic books? Keep up with pop culture? Learn to cook? Take a comedy class? Get a new haircut?

Excellent question. I suppose it's subjective for each person. For me, it is about improving mind, body and soul.

Body is easy - exercise. You don't have to be Arnold Schwarzenegger, just don't look like a fat slob.
Mind - be interesting and interested. If you have a hobby, no matter what is it, own it, know it, be an expert in it but don't become the hobby. Is your hobby running? Fine, but don't talk about running 24/7
Soul - Be yourself. Be grounded, well rounded and not an emotionally weak, easily rocked person. Be the buddah. Understand that people are perfect and flawed simultaneously. Listen to their story, their journey and share yours. Seek enlightment, peace and knowledge.

That's in my view. I would like to hear your idea of self-improvement though.


All of those things might help, but it's not always clear where to focus, and there are only so many hours in the day. It's not always clear what things will attract women, and especially what will attract good quality women. I don't disagree with the principle of self-improvement, at all. I'm really trying in my own life, including for reasons that have nothing to do with women. But sometimes it comes off as "if women don't like you, it's obviously your own fault, figure it out".

Unfortunately, there is a lot of "figure it out". The other problem is good advice and information is hand waved away (I was guilty of this). The Game by Neil Strauss, 12 rules for life by Jordan Peterson and Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari changed my life for the better. Not because I believed everything I read like a cultist, but because it opened a lot of doors to find the knowledge I needed to "figure it out".
 
but more about why they don't care about their emotional needs
It's cringe, every guy knows that our emotions are trying to tell us something but it's not anyone's business but that guy and any other guy he tells, you can tell women as well but their not equipped to help with such problems and won't have respect for you after crying in front of them, not because they mean it it's an evolutionary tactic. Grugette is worrying cause Grug is the one she relies on for safety and he's currently crying on the floor "Grug feel sad Grug find no berry". Meanwhile Grugette has just seen a cave bear in the treeline nearby where Grug and Gruette Jr are playing and she knows she can't fight cave bears so she takes the kids and run leaving Grug behind.

A guy friend on the other hand can still respect you after you cry in front of them and will have the decency to pick you up after you've had enough time to cry and will offer to help in a way that a girl can't. This is because a guy can see a guy's problem from a guy's perspective whereas a girl can only see a guy's problem from a girl's perspective.
why they feel so alone in their relationships now
I would say no one really knows how to maintain relationships really, everyone is just winging it. Portion of that could be attributed to how over time men have been told to man down and women to man up so both are trying to act as the other but their defective versions trying to make it work when it can't because men and women are fundamentally different.

sometimes it comes off as "if women don't like you, it's obviously your own fault, figure it out".
Technically it's true but instead of thinking it like that. Think it's not your problem that some women just have poor taste, you know how much work you've put into your life and how much fun you had doing it, you wanted to bring her along and she said no. Okay, her loss onto the next. https://realitycalc.com/ I got 17.88% of the US whamens fit my criteria which equaled 4,640,000 million this is excluding overweight women as well. You've got plenty of opportunities, get the thong out yo bussy solider we got skirts to chase
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back