Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
That sounds like it's teetering on the brink of some delicious tortoise interference.

This had me puzzling for a good 30 seconds. Tortoise interference? Has Rekieta developed a fetish for reptiles with shells? How would he get his dick into the thing? Or does it work the other way around like the whole Pet Shop Boy/gerbil fetish?

Then it gradually dawned on me. It's a spell checker/autocorrect thing. You were writing tortuous interference and your phone sabotaged you.

I'm a bit disappointed now. The idea that the tortoise interference was 'delicious' was just the icing on the cake.
 
This had me puzzling for a good 30 seconds. Tortoise interference? Has Rekieta developed a fetish for reptiles with shells? How would he get his dick into the thing? Or does it work the other way around like the whole Pet Shop Boy/gerbil fetish?

Then it gradually dawned on me. It's a spell checker/autocorrect thing. You were writing tortuous interference and your phone sabotaged you.

I'm a bit disappointed now. The idea that the tortoise interference was 'delicious' was just the icing on the cake.
I feel like the tortoise interference is either a weebwars or Farms joke going back to weebwars. One of the things Vic was trying to sue those weirdos on was tortious interference (which tbf, they did by phoning conventions to get him removed), and it got miswritten or said as tortoise.
Edit: Per AnOminous (and dictionary), fixed spelling.
 
Last edited:
Now it's my turn to be autistic. Tortuous means twisted - the adjective derived from torture is torturous. Both tort and torture derive from the same Latin word as tortuous, though, as metaphorical extensions the idea of twisting.
I think there's a general rule that any time you autistically correct someone about some language thing, you commit your own word crime in the process. Thanks for the correction to my correction.
 
He has managed to have negative run-ins with both Monty's lawyer and with the judge, who Nick claims to have told off for not realizing he was working pro bono on one of his last cases, I guess in an elevator after sentencing or something.
This begs the question. Was Nick's all-in move to being a youtuber have to do with him ruining his reputation to the judges locally? It is much harder to get a criminal client off or a better plea deal if the judge hates you and the prosecutor knows this.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kopasea
This begs the question. Was Nick's all-in move to being a youtuber have to do with him ruining his reputation to the judges locally? It is much harder to get a criminal client off or a better plea deal if the judge hates you and the prosecutor knows this.
I don't see any evidence of thought. He just reacted to the judge (out of court) because "muh ODD" (aka he's an asshole), and he's the sort of douche who feels he needs to get the last word in.
 
This begs the question. Was Nick's all-in move to being a youtuber have to do with him ruining his reputation to the judges locally? It is much harder to get a criminal client off or a better plea deal if the judge hates you and the prosecutor knows this.
That would require substantially greater self awareness than Rekieta has been evidenced to possess. He probably believed that everyone in the legal community loved him. He appears to have been genuinely confused and outraged that Schneider still harbored negative opinions about him half a decade after the fact (according to Spectre, anyway).

I believe the incident with the judge happened in 2021, which would mean it was after he was already a full time YouTuber.
 
That would require substantially greater self awareness than Rekieta has been evidenced to possess. He probably believed that everyone in the legal community loved him. He appears to have been genuinely confused and outraged that Schneider still harbored negative opinions about him half a decade after the fact (according to Spectre, anyway).

I believe the incident with the judge happened in 2021, which would mean it was after he was already a full time YouTuber.
Plus he's only been a licensed attorney since 2015 and probably reduced his legal practice in ~2017 after his channel took off. Making enough of a negative impression on enough judges in that short a timeframe would be difficult unless he was actively trying to antagonize them.

IMO the better explanation is that he disliked being an attorney and doing YouTube full time let him get away from that without needing to move or cut back on his lifestyle.
 
Making enough of a negative impression on enough judges in that short a timeframe would be difficult unless he was actively trying to antagonize them.
Apparently he's so socially retarded he can't even pull back on his belligerent retarded spastic knee-jerk fuck you dad responses to any possible authority figure enough not to alienate someone who might have ruled in his favor.

He's a goddamn idiot.
 
Apparently he's so socially retarded he can't even pull back on his belligerent retarded spastic knee-jerk fuck you dad responses to any possible authority figure enough not to alienate someone who might have ruled in his favor.

He's a goddamn idiot.
It’s sad. He had an enviable job of being a mouthy jerk online and explaining legal matters to a lay audience. His coverage and roping in of specialist lawyers made the show really informative.

He’s covered plenty of people who should have taken their lawyer’s advice and shut up so it’s especially ironic that he’s getting sued (and will likely lose the suit) because he couldn’t take his own good advice.

A lot of people that hate his guts from earlier shows must be loving this mess of a lawsuit.
 
We are about 7 weeks out from the hearing and Nick is getting antsy. He appears to earnestly believe that this is a totally frivolous case and may be puzzled why it hasn't been dismissed yet.
We're reaching the point of troon levels of delusion. His utter inability to comprehend not only certain facets of reality in general but the fucking legal system, of all things, is so hopeless it beggars description.

When he inevitably loses this case part of the penalty should include being made to wear a pair of pants with his opponent's footprint dyed onto the seat.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Kosher Salt
Ah, Montagraph, the master of hypocrisy and twisty turns! This fella managed to take the gold medal in the Olympic sport of contradiction. Rumor has it that he was accused sucking little boy peens! But wait, hold your horses, because Montagraph wasn't about to let that accusation cramp his style. Oh no, sir! He promptly did a 180-degree spin and pointed his finger at someone else, claiming they are a pedophile. Now, that's some next-level audacity! It's like accusing someone of eating all the chocolate pudding while you've got chocolate poo poo smeared all over your face. Montagraph, you've taken hypocrisy to new heights. Bravo! Or should I say, "Brav-Oh no, you didn't!"
 
Ah, Montagraph, the master of hypocrisy and twisty turns! This fella managed to take the gold medal in the Olympic sport of contradiction. Rumor has it that he was accused sucking little boy peens! But wait, hold your horses, because Montagraph wasn't about to let that accusation cramp his style. Oh no, sir! He promptly did a 180-degree spin and pointed his finger at someone else, claiming they are a pedophile. Now, that's some next-level audacity! It's like accusing someone of eating all the chocolate pudding while you've got chocolate poo poo smeared all over your face. Montagraph, you've taken hypocrisy to new heights. Bravo! Or should I say, "Brav-Oh no, you didn't!"
Brilliant job, Monty.
 
Back