Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 71 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 161 40.3%

  • Total voters
    400
I think people are mixing shut up on why Schneider and the Judge (supposedly) hate Nick.

From what I remember it all comes down to a client Nick had who embezzled funds or something either from a church group or a church within the community. I think Schneider gave him shit for his decorum in the court room and Nick didn’t understand that it’s an experienced lawyer basically telling you to stop being a cunt.

The Judge hated Nick because the person basically was a huge cunt and the Judge dressed down Nick in court for his defense. Then Nick spilled spaghetti how he was defending the woman pro se in the elevator after his loss.

I think Nick talked about these as the case was going on and it’s on Elissa’s channel, but the long story short is that Nick acted like Rodney Dangerfield without any of the charisma or self-deprecation.

You have alot of the details right, but not the overall story.

- There was a case where Nick represented the wife of a church minister who embezzled money as a bookkeeper from local businesses. She embezzled the money (according to her) because her husband had gone gay and she wanted to win him back by spending money on him. It didn't work.
- At the sentencing, Nick recommended no prison time and the judge gave her the maximum. Nick was upset.
- There was a thing about how she could afford an attorney that led to nick explaining how he was representing her. There was something with the judge in an elevator.
- As far as I know, none of that stuff involved Schneider
- The judge in the case is the judge in his current case.

There is legendary stuff people will talk about in terms of Schneider and Nick having some sort of legal encounter at some point, but never in enough details to confirm it.
 
Welcome to every appellate lawyer conversation lol. Kurt out of all of them is one of the smartest which is why he gets the most shit.


The amount of "Copesplaining The Interwebs" done last night... so many Kiwi topics he covered.

Here's a list off the top of my head:
  • His law school not being "the best"
  • How he wasn't the best student and had everything handed to him
  • Clarifying his whole "if you pay for it, you should get the good grade" --- where he really clarified nothing
  • Clips being "taken down" because of him --- the Hey Clip This video explains it was taken down BY YOUTUBE for harassment for what NICK said in the clip about Monty
  • Consistently brings up who he's going to bring on the show --- Basically goes through the running list a while back of all the people Kiwi said was avoiding him
    • Most notably he had to bring on Andrea who we said was avoiding him like the plague
  • How everyone hates Camelot
  • Kiwi has made fun of him for hating The Beatles --- Now he is "all about the technology" with The Beatles and how they recorded? Ummmm okay
  • How "life happens" when he has to cancel his show and how he doesn't always blame his kids
Those are just off the top of my head. Imagine when I actually sit down and write them all out!
Disagree slightly. Some criticism of his guests and lack of show regularity are regularly voiced in LOCALS. They have also been a staple of the show for years. It is just a lot worse in the last 8 months.
I think people are mixing shut up on why Schneider and the Judge (supposedly) hate Nick.

From what I remember it all comes down to a client Nick had who embezzled funds or something either from a church group or a church within the community. I think Schneider gave him shit for his decorum in the court room and Nick didn’t understand that it’s an experienced lawyer basically telling you to stop being a cunt.

The Judge hated Nick because the person basically was a huge cunt and the Judge dressed down Nick in court for his defense. Then Nick spilled spaghetti how he was defending the woman pro se in the elevator after his loss.

I think Nick talked about these as the case was going on and it’s on Elissa’s channel, but the long story short is that Nick acted like Rodney Dangerfield without any of the charisma or self-deprecation.
This is ALL almost completely wrong.

Literally everyone else had thier small piece correct except you.
 
Can we get a quick rundown on this Steve Quest guy?
Is he a lolcow?
He is an attention-seeking boomer conspiracy nut. He constantly fights with others of his kind. All of them are insane. All of them are constantly accusing each other of being either criminals or government agents. He does disgusting content seeking attention.

Its not clear what his real name is. His known background only goes back to a certain point where he had a name change and the trail goes cold.

He is a lolcow. But trouble only occurs when he strays out of conspiracy land into areas where normal people inhabit.
 
Yup! Pippa is creepy and weird, and her fans are even creepier and weirder
While I don't watch pippa mainly because of that and that I hate streams where people keep only interacting with people on chat while being edgy, I watch other phase members. Apparently the decision wasn't done by pippa but by the management, where they wanted to protect pippa image from Rekieta and pippa didn't liked it a single bit.

I find surprising how Kirsche, Pippa, Lia and other vtubers can be stupid to fall for lolcow tricks more than once and ignoring that everyone else is saying not interact and block them and after shit hits the fan they get surprised why no one warned them
 
There is legendary stuff people will talk about in terms of Schneider and Nick having some sort of legal encounter at some point, but never in enough details to confirm it.
I recall a situation where one of Nick's clients mutually agreed to "break up" and ended up going over to Schneider who "solved" the problem in a few months as opposed to the several months that Nick spent. There was some legal document that Nick was supposed to file and was late in doing so. Nick eventually stopped by his office unannounced and dropped off the document.

The story explains a little why Schneider was wary about talking to Nick off the record.

Sadly I couldn't find the information in the threads yet, but here are some posts regarding Schneider in the past
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: beautiful person
Nick really does come off as the kid who would start shit during recess only to scream for the teacher the moment he was losing.

Another partial log. $356 on yt, his pity party only got him up to a good weekly show.
------------------------
Total Rumbles: $ 193
Rumble Count: 12
Conversion Rate Raw: 0.16608996539792387
Peak Viewers: 7225
------------------------
Chat Messages: 1716
Muted: 1
Deleted: 0
Unknown: 1
------------------------
StreamID: 176569382
Start: 2023-07-12 22:21:01.066432297 -0500 CDT m=+361.432469385
End: 2023-07-13 01:21:01.621587238 -0500 CDT m=+11161.987624311
------------------------
He got at most $250 on rumble based on previous nights. I harp on this a lot but $180 of the $193 came from $20 donations. This really shows how dependent on pay pigs he has become. Though it may mean he has to work less it also puts him in a risky situation.

Here is a suggestion: drop the $20 rule as it was only in place because of the volume, which he no longer has, and start reading all chats in context until the volume increases. I don't think his ego will allow him to do so but it'd encourage more superchats.
 

Attachments

  • 176569382.7z
    176569382.7z
    46.3 KB · Views: 12
  • 176569382.png
    176569382.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 11
  • 176569382pigs.png
    176569382pigs.png
    38.8 KB · Views: 9
  • 176569382rants.csv
    176569382rants.csv
    2.5 KB · Views: 13
@Himedall All-seeing Waifu
I feel like Nick talked about all of this in a Hot Tub stream on Elissa channel and he is not a reliable narrator.

I’m pretty sure he at some point pissed off Montegraph’s lawyer by acting like a big shot prior to him getting his muscle car.

I feel like the thread needs to have a concise lore drop for why Nick’s lolsuit I’d so funny, but he’s talked a lot of shit while drunk in a hot tub. I don’t want to spread misinfo.
 
Last edited:
The amount of "Copesplaining The Interwebs" done last night... so many Kiwi topics he covered.
What's his angle of responding to topics talked about here? Is anybody here going to suddenly flip around and send him superchats because he engaged in shabby apologetics for some innocuous thing he did in the past?

He isn't making his show better and he hasn't apologized to his audience. Why would I care further?
He can explain anything he wants but that's still not fixing the root problems.
 
So when did nick fall off the wagon? Was he always bad and we overlooked it for vic's sake or did he just make one stupid move and hope for the best. I know nothing about the guy suing him.
 
I'm so glad he's thanking all 2k of his LOCALS supporters since they'll probably keep dwindling while he avoids the place because it's not a shiny new toy for him to play with.

A better way to thank his remaining sycophant paypigs would be to honour the promise of the 5k custom gift that he used as a hook to trick them into annual subscriptions in the first place.

What's his angle of responding to topics talked about here?

You would assume it's a mixture of lack of self-discipline because of his narcissism that he just can't help himself from responding, constantly outing his secret stewing from reading his own thread AND always trying to keep ahead of and shaping the narrative that his detractors uncover, hoodwinking his dwindling sycophant simpletons.

Edit: To not doublepost
So when did nick fall off the wagon?

Lots of debate in this thread on the exact watershed moment.

The common narrative is that Nick announced a secret-and-much-speculated "worst day of his life" event in Spring 2022 after his financial success from the Johnny Depp trial had just concluded.

Lots of speculation whether it was a revelation of his wife's infidelity, a personal medical diagnosis, being formally excommunicated from his family's oil money trust, etc.

But whatever it was, Nick announced he no longer gave a fuck/cared what others that controlled him for decades thought and jumped straight into daily degeneracy.
 
Last edited:
You have alot of the details right, but not the overall story.

- There was a case where Nick represented the wife of a church minister who embezzled money as a bookkeeper from local businesses. She embezzled the money (according to her) because her husband had gone gay and she wanted to win him back by spending money on him. It didn't work.
- At the sentencing, Nick recommended no prison time and the judge gave her the maximum. Nick was upset.
- There was a thing about how she could afford an attorney that led to nick explaining how he was representing her. There was something with the judge in an elevator.
- As far as I know, none of that stuff involved Schneider
- The judge in the case is the judge in his current case.

There is legendary stuff people will talk about in terms of Schneider and Nick having some sort of legal encounter at some point, but never in enough details to confirm it.
This is what I remember as well. Specifically, the judge when handing out the sentence chastised Nick's client by remarking that she had enough money to hire an attorney. Nick retorted, either right there in the courtroom or when he encountered her later in the elevator, that "well ackchyually, I represented her pro bono!" If he said that to her in the courtroom, then he well-ackchyually'd her about something else in the elevator. Very stupid thing to do when interacting with a local judge as a(n allegedly) working lawyer in a small town. Even judges in bigger towns remember that shit. Now this judge is also aware of his Internet "shock jock" hijinks, slurs and all.
Kind of a self-own there. How about the students? I can think of at least one loser who sucks.
He tried really hard to act like education and its quality didn't matter at all to him, as though that's an admirable trait or something. But then he acted snide about his school merging with another school that had "like 40 students" as though his own school was being charitable by absorbing them.
 
Now this judge is also aware of his Internet "shock jock" hijinks, slurs and all.
I got the impression reading the memorandum that the judge is thinking "The plaintiff and the defendant are both annoying internet people but only one has committed defamation per se and I don't have a very high opinion of him to begin with"
 
@Himedall All-seeing Waifu
I feel like Nick talked about all of this in a Hot Tub stream on Elissa channel and he is not a reliable narrator.

I’m pretty sure he at some point pissed off Montegraph’s lawyer by acting like a big shot prior to him getting his muscle car.

I feel like the thread needs to have a concise lore drop for why Nick’s lolsuit I’d so funny, but he’s talked a lot of shit while drunk in a hot tub. I don’t want to spread misinfo.
You got facts wrong on most if Schneider and twisted with his case before this judge.

Look at the recent responses to Null for out of order facts--at least how Nick gave them across multiple tellings.

Whoever is behind the Clip This channels has some editing skills. I would love to see them do a concise timeline.
 
Coom Clips Incoming...

Hey Clip This Too (in place of Hey Clip This since the channel got a harassment strike, out till next week) and Elissa Clips.
Made it a spoiler since a bunch came down today...

Hey Clip This 2: https://www.youtube.com/@HeyClipThis2

(1) @RekietaLaw : 'Yes, I Have Beef With Josh Moon' ---- LOCALS stream
(2) @RekietaLaw : Deleting Videos & Conspiracies ---- LOCALS stream
(3) @RekietaLaw : 'When People Bring Up My Law School As An Insult'
(4) @Montagraph V. @RekietaLaw : 'It Was Randazza's Idea!' ---- LOCALS stream
(5) @MadattheInternet : History Behind The @Montagraph V. @RekietaLaw Lawsuit
(1) Attorney Reviews @RekietaLaw 's Denied Motion: 'Doesn't Look Good!'
(2) Lawyer Predicts @Montagraph V. @RekietaLaw Verdict
(1) MATI: @RekietaLaw Should Apologize to @Montagraph
(2) MATI: Montagraph v Rekieta Law - Case Update
(3) Montagraph v Rekieta Law: UPDATE - Motion to Dismiss (Denied) ---- LOCALS stream

EDIT: Formatting
 
So when did nick fall off the wagon? Was he always bad and we overlooked it for vic's sake or did he just make one stupid move and hope for the best. I know nothing about the guy suing him.
My perspective as something of an outsider/newcomer is that Nick "fell off the wagon" whenever he became the content (as opposed to presenting it), which Nick has done off and on. A majority of people only want Nick to present content absent Nick's personal life (including his wife and friend Drexel) which is why a good number seemed to have tuned out when that kind of thing was on. It was also where the most warning signs were present.

Nick has pretty good cover too (arguably to this day). People who can't handle degeneracy, Drexel, VTubers and such will have missed opportunities to understand the person they've been watching for years. That said, these people are probably better off without these things in their lives anyway, and consequently, better off without Nick himself.

Even if Nick were to pivot to focusing on presenting content rather than becoming it, there's so much of Nick out there that it's hard to ignore. The more he leaned into his own life, the worse it got. Without a more "wholesome" cause to grift/attach himself to the mask slips further. Nick redefines his publicly held principles at will, and has now been around long enough to prove it.
 
So when did nick fall off the wagon?
There are different answers to that. He started to physically and mentally decay at some point around the middle of last year. He started to occasionally snake on stream. He also seemed to take a full mental step down. He just wasn't as sharp as he used to be.

I think part of it is long-term alcoholism finally catching up to him. He also started openly experimenting with a larger variety of drugs. For sure, Mushrooms. But maybe other things as well.

He abandoned church and as much as abandoned Christianity at some point during covid.

He became very openly degenerate last fall. But he may have been that way for a long time prior and just kept it hidden.

As others have said, he seemed to at some point have gained independence from his parents financially last year. That seemed to allow him to be alot more open about the things he was doing and to abandon any remaining trad christian dad persona.

Things really started falling apart last fall. He kept getting more sexually degenerate and getting more negative feedback for it. He reacted badly to the criticism and turned alot of his former supporters against him. He called everyone who suggested he was on a bad path "autistic incel prude conservatives". That made things even worse for him.

He eventually also decided that he hated all his former content (law, politics, etc) and wasn't going to do it anymore. He really thought what the audience wanted was more about him, more cringe sex stuff and his life. He also hooked up with a former gamestop employee weirdo turned streamer named "Camelot" who Nick liked, but alot of his audience didn't.

There were also wars within his fandom. His fandom became dominated by total losers and leathery wine-moms eager to share lewds with Nick.

In summary, Nick is mentally and physically decaying due to bad habits and he doesn't want to do the content that made him popular anymore. He has aliened a whole lot of people deliberately. He is in love with his own celebrity and thinks he is a charismatic genius.
 
I might be misremembering but didn't Nick say that using Colorado's anti-slapp was grade A genius and it would undoubtedly stop the lawsuit and get fucked Monty!
It's always been my understanding that the chance to make the "Colorado argument "was the reason why Randazza even took Rekieta's case. The idea was that Randazza was going to perform a legal coup by grafting Colorado's anti-SLAPP onto Minnesota's jurisprudence. In this way, Randazza could cast himself as the ultimate champion of the 1A.

Absent the opportunity to make that argument, it makes practically zero sense for Randazza to be interested in any of this. As the recent ruling lays bare, this is now going to be treated as a basic bitch defamation case under Minnesota law. Such a case is not in Randazza's wheelhouse. He's not even licensed in Minnesota. Nick could get a far cheaper local attorney for such a case with probably little to no degradation in effectiveness.

He tried really hard to act like education and its quality didn't matter at all to him, as though that's an admirable trait or something. But then he acted snide about his school merging with another school that had "like 40 students" as though his own school was being charitable by absorbing them.
During the Mignogna case Nick made it a point that one of the graduates of his Law School was former Chief Justice of the SCOTUS Warren Burger.

So he's "humble bragged" about his alma mater before. Clearly, he cares about it on some level.

But really, that's Nick, isn't it? Just like he doesn't care about Kiwi Farms, but then spends 20 minutes telling you how much he doesn't care about Kiwi Farms.
 
I don't think "Lawyers", but youtubers or e-celebs.
Does anyone here have the clip of one of Nick's lawtube friends giving a passionate speech about NEVER TALKING ABOUT YOUR CASE, and then getting a superchat asking "what about Nick talking about his case?" and the guy getting visibly uncomfortable? It could be Sean Martin, but I'm not sure.
I can think of plenty of professional lawyers who destroyed their own careers and lives because they couldn't follow the advice they used to get paid a lot of money to dole out.

For example, Rudy Giuliani.
 
Back