Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 98 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 159 40.5%

  • Total voters
    393
@Strix454 your posts in respect of Nick's lawsuit have always been a model of illumination for me. They stood out back then as nuanced and informed by a combination of both the law and an understanding local practice. They've never been anything less than an unalloyed pleasure for me to read, and I always learn stuff as a consequence.
Thanks. And I'll give shout-outs to Owlbear, AnOminous, Joggin Noggin and yourself in the same general way. And there are probably a bunch of other people I'm not mentioning who deserve to be mentioned too.

 
I'd like to take a moment to remind the thread we are currently placing bets on the next orbiter who is most likely to join the Audience Caravan of Detractors, initially started here. Some initial rainbows are always tbe when specific bets are placed, but it seems with Kurt's recent commentary, we have started down the road of potential.

I've had time to catch up on the Kurt commentary and I agree with others that Kurt for the moment is at least a topic of interest for our focus. I rated Branca as my #1 which firmly places me in the losing category as he seems to have disappeared with his Jewcash (as far as Nick is concerned), probably to Twitter, and as such is not a likely candidate for our delectable entertainment. I thought his antisocial traits could suit him and become an asset in his journey towards a detractorship, but it appears to have taken him the other direction in this case.

This puts @♂CANAM productions♂ in the lead and on the mark, currently. However things can change at any moment:
The ones I'm hoping for to become mainline detractors (Rainbow rating time):
  • Uncivil (My top bet). Remember, his happiness is inversely correlated with that of everyone else and he stands by what he says so far, aside from being a copyright cuck.
  • Jack Goldman Murphy. Hetroflexible jewish swinger brothers unite? I can't wait to see the Marx-Engles relationship.
  • Coomalot for the Brokeback Mountain angst line
  • Brittany Venti (*cough* remember the Dallas bar drink that Nick can't recall?)
  • DSP since they are so similar

I wonder if Nick will have the balls to go on Kurt's show, or if he will spin his tale privately? I do not think there will be an open rift. Kurt does not have too many friends. He will keep his opinions to himself.
I had him pegged at #2 in mind likely to detract, but that a meltdown would occur upon audience disapproval. I know a lawyer very similar to Kurt irl. Both are socially awkward, lack self-awareness which gives rises to tantrums over very petty matters. Both are sticklers for principles, frequently counter to matters of hypocrisy and immensely crave to be seen for being stewards of truth. Both are also obsessed about finding the perfectly submissive waifu. It's been interesting to compare the two, tbfh. There is always room for disagreement where principles are concerned with this personality type and Kurt seems to fit the bill. He did state he had no interest in reading Nick's thread, so there is that. Credit to him, actually. Massively important for boundaries to remain between Creators. We don't want Suns to collide!

I normally treat statements such as this with a massive grain of salt, but in Kurt's case, it's easier to expect he'd stick to his guns outside of circumstances he might think direct knowledge of the thing would be better for his interests. I could be wrong though!... a live reading of this thread by Kurt could be record breaking for his channel. More so than Nick coming on his show, I would think.
 
Last edited:
This video is astonishing.

I couldn't believe how little self-awareness he demonstrated as he continued on and on.

He is going to be pissed off when he realises what a fool he has made of himself with this rant.
Nick's argument is probably that he is not a government. He is ranting against the Sam Hyde 'government enforced homosexuality'.

He will claim an exception for private business becuase he is not a government or monopoly in his sector.
Now Nick is sued in a state that AGREES with the notion that anti-SLAPP is unconstitutional, yet is fighting like hell to force an anti-SLAPP regime on said state.

What changed? Nick is now the defendant in a defamation case. That's it. That's all that changed.

Nick doesn't have principles. At least not ones that he's willing to apply to himself equally. His grift is incompatible with such rigidity.

Say what you want about Kurt, but at least he seems to get that much. I am not sure the same can be said about anybody else in Lawtube. Kurt might act like a little bitch at times, but he's at least intellectually honest. I have to give him that much.
I don't really consider it too big of a flaw to make a disingenuous argument in a legal battle. The whole profession is slimy and everyone cheats how they can.

Not to say that I do not find it morally bankrupt to engage in this behaviour, but it is unsurprising. With as much money on the line as he has, I suppose most would be sorely tempted to do the same.

For Nick, I think this is more stupid pride anyway. I long ago stopped holding jom to an objective moral standard. Par for the course for Nose.
Ironically, it's been noted that Nick really hasn't mentioned Spectre by name throughout all this. And I suspect that's because even Nick knows that if he mentioned Spectre, it would elicit eyerolls and ridicule. Instead, he's said "one of my mods."
This reminds me how he refuses to this day (most recently on this morning's call-in show) to acknowledge he went to Hedonism. It seems to be a strange point that if he does not say it, detractors do not gain some power over him.

I understand that public figures' honest apologies can be twisted and used against them ruthlessly, and it is not so much disappointing as it is strange that he holds on to the thin veneer of doubt he can conjure by never acknowledging what is a 99.9% proven fact.
 
Fixed:
Rekieta's Law.jpg

(edit: minor change)
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I think Coomalot has been a worse influence on Nick's path into degeneracy than Drexel
You just notice his influence more because he started hanging out with him when he started being openly degenerate he has known his nigger bf since they were kids no way he hasn't had a bigger influence.
tl;dr coomalot is almost as much of a bitch made cuck as balldoman and they are both cucked to a nigger lmao
 
Now Nick is sued in a state that AGREES with the notion that anti-SLAPP is unconstitutional, yet is fighting like hell to force an anti-SLAPP regime on said state.

What changed? Nick is now the defendant in a defamation case. That's it. That's all that changed.
That looked like a Randazza move to me. Also I don't consider that hypocritical in particular, or at least in a way that matters to me. You're playing law, you make the legal arguments that have a chance of winning.

What I consider hypocritical is that he launched a huge moral crusade against people defaming a guy based on no evidence then turns around and does the same himself.
 
Honestly, I think Coomalot has been a worse influence on Nick's path into degeneracy than Drexel
100% and it's seems to be that Drexel isn't into any of that 'gay shit' whereas coomalot allows nick to live all his fantasies. The sexual tension between coomalot and Nick is so obvious and it can't be explain to 'bro fun' anymore.
msedge_rAqWbF2sX8.png

He tries to handwave this away with "i'm just having fun" but it's like 90% of the interaction between the two.
 
I think the underlying context here is key. Monty tried to sue a guy pro se before. He struggled to even state a claim and sued the guy in Colorado, where Monty was but not where the guy lived. The lolsuit was easily dismissed. Nick probably expected that if Monty did sue it would be the same. He should have settled as soon as Monty retained a local (to Nick) attorney.
I'm gonna be (perhaps too) generous and say that, given the mediocrity of the complaint that Schneider drafted, and the general distasteful nature of Monty, Nick wasn't wrong to offer some initial resistance after the suit was filed. He also wanted to try this hail-marry Colorado thing, and he got to do exactly that. I think it was a rather silly long-shot strategy, and I do think it shows hypocrisy, but it's his money.

All that being said, given Judge Fischer's recent decision, now might actually be a good idea to stop being an obstinate man-baby and arrange a sit-down with Schneider.

Because if you think about it, even if Monty only gets nominal damages with respect to defamation per se, Nick STILL lost to a watermelon fucker, Nick is STILL out a metric fuckton of money to Randazza, and Nick's not exactly pulling in the money he used to.

But Nick is "ODD," so... I ain't holding my breath here. I just can't help but shake the feeling that a less "bombastic" defendant, with similar means to Rekieta, would have probably picked up the phone after he got the bad news on Tuesday.

I had him pegged at #2 in mind likely to detract, but that a meltdown would occur upon audience disapproval.
I can't speak to how bad Kurt would meltdown, but he WILL get shit from the Rekieta camp. Of that you can be certain.

The major consolation I could offer him is that I think he would get considerably less shit than he would have gotten not even a year ago. Rekieta doesn't seem to have the support base he once had. His detractors used to be mainly lefty types, but now these critics are considerably more diverse. A fair number of people are seeing the same thing Kurt is seeing. This thread is partially proof of that

He'll catch some snide comments from the mouth breathing idiots on Locals, and Spectre might threaten to call the Pentagon and order that a 2.000lb JDAM be dropped on his domicile, but I'd really like to believe even somebody like Kurt could weather such a pathetic storm. I'd question how he even made it this far in LIFE if he couldn't.

You just notice his influence more because he started hanging out with him when he started being openly degenerate he has known his nigger bf since they were kids no way he hasn't had a bigger influence.
tl;dr coomalot is almost as much of a bitch made cuck as balldoman and they are both cucked to a nigger lmao
There's two competing theories here. One is that Nick became degenerate post-fame. The other is that Nick just hid his degeneracy very well.

If you subscribe to the latter theory (as I tend to), Coomalot is less of a factor than somebody like Drexel.

However, it's also possible to hybrid the two and suppose that Coomalot made Nick more degenerate.
 
Last edited:
I'm starting to get the impression that Kurt may be regretting his choice to throw his lot in with the lawtube sphere instead of sticking with the liberal Leonard French sphere. Lest we forget that Kurt has a history of networking with Internet lawyers pre-balldo man
ive been in kurts streams plenty of times, never a single mention of nick rekieta.
he's carved out his own little space.
kurt keeps his content serious and focused on law stuff.
once in a while he'll do a collab stream but with more serious lawtubers like lawgic. or in the big stream where rekieta isnt the center of attention but he does attend.
 
100% and it's seems to be that Drexel isn't into any of that 'gay shit' whereas coomalot allows nick to live all his fantasies. The sexual tension between coomalot and Nick is so obvious and it can't be explain to 'bro fun' anymore.
View attachment 5210983

He tries to handwave this away with "i'm just having fun" but it's like 90% of the interaction between the two.
That's cool and all but Drex and balldo man literally became male cheerleader (bottoms) so they could perv on and touch women irl which is objectively much worse.

There's two competing theories here. One is that Nick became degenerate post-fame. The other is that Nick just hid his degeneracy very well.

If you subscribe to the latter theory (as I tend to), Coomalot is less of a factor than somebody like Drexel.

However, it's also possible to hybrid the two and suppose that Coomalot made Nick more degenerate.
@Captain Manning
Hasn't it been known for a while that balldoman had a problem with porn? Also pretended to be gay, thot stream, "blackout" drunk episodes, his favorite anime is an anime full of rape and shit, the signs have been there
 
Last edited:
I'd like to take a moment to remind the thread we are currently placing bets on the next orbiter who is most likely to join the Audience Caravan of Detractors,

I made a post in the Steve Quest Lolcow LLC thread this afternoon that Andrea Burkhart was on Kurt's channel today reviewing SCOTUS stuff re: the "I was just joking" defense wrt verbal threats.


She either slyly or inadvertently called Nick out.


And the other thing this reminds me of is in the defamation context, you don't get to be like "That guy is a pedo" but then be like "That's just my opinion". You saying it doesn't make it the case, you know. If you are making an assertion of fact, it's not your opinion here. Your little disclaimer here doesn't give you any legal protection. You did the thing, now you pay the consequences.

Honestly, I think Coomalot has been a worse influence on Nick's path into degeneracy than Drexel

About a year ago when Nick's trad dad image was still intact, Drex made a comment live on someone like Mindset's stream that he and Nick were essentially the same person off-camera wrt sexual degeneracy.

So Drex at the very least knew the whole time that Nick's public image was a fraud.

But I'd argue that it wasn't Drex in the end who tipped the scales.
 
I made a post in the Steve Quest Lolcow LLC thread this afternoon that Andrea Burkhart was on Kurt's channel today reviewing SCOTUS stuff re: the "I was just joking" defense wrt verbal threats.


She either slyly or inadvertently called Nick out.






About a year ago when Nick's trad dad image was still intact, Drex made a comment live on someone like Mindset's stream that he and Nick were essentially the same person off-camera wrt sexual degeneracy.

So Drex at the very least knew the whole time that Nick's public image was a fraud.

But I'd argue that it wasn't Drex in the end who tipped the scales.
Was going to reply and say that YT allows you to put a timestamp in your URL, but I caught this in the chat, so you are partially forgiven:

1689371523165.png


P.S. Put the timestamp in the URL.

He'll catch some snide comments from the mouth breathing idiots on Locals, and Spectre might threaten to call the Pentagon and order that a 2.000lb JDAM be dropped on his domicile, but I'd really like to believe even somebody like Kurt could weather such a pathetic storm. I'd question how he even made it this far in LIFE if he couldn't.

I think Kurt is fine based on the above.

That sounds like some pure, distilled cope. Why have the clippers not gotten to this yet? I am so, so disappointed in Elissa and not-Faran.
I figured they would get to it. I wanted to flag it down for them. I know they watch this thread.
 
That looked like a Randazza move to me. Also I don't consider that hypocritical in particular, or at least in a way that matters to me. You're playing law, you make the legal arguments that have a chance of winning.
It was a Randazza idea that Nick signed off on and extolled as genius.

I wouldn't have a problem with a situation whereby Minnesota had an anti-SLAPP and Nick used it. By all means, you play the game by the rules of the game. Even the rules you don't like. That alone is not hypocrisy.

Where it becomes dicey for me is when Minnesota doesn't have an anti-SLAPP. As is the case here. I read this more as Nick didn't want to play by the rules of the game, and wanted the adoption of new rules. Specifically one that he's railed against in the past in another venue. I see it as distinguishable from just leveraging pre-existing rules.

I also don't think he had a very good chance of ever winning that particular argument. You say "chance," and that's technically true, but it was always an extreme long-shot.

What I consider hypocritical is that he launched a huge moral crusade against people defaming a guy based on no evidence then turns around and does the same himself.
Well, there's that too.

Obviously Monty is considerably less likable than Vic, but that's a piss poor argument in favor of calling somebody a pedo without any evidence. I've noted early on that what Nick did could actually get somebody yeeted off KF. Null seems to take a dim view of it.

For some reason it's really amusing to me that even KF is like "Bro, that's out of line. Mock him for his watermelon fucking, but don't call him a pedo without evidence." LOL.
 
About a year ago when Nick's trad dad image was still intact, Drex made a comment live on someone like Mindset's stream that he and Nick were essentially the same person off-camera wrt sexual degeneracy.

So Drex at the very least knew the whole time that Nick's public image was a fraud.

But I'd argue that it wasn't Drex in the end who tipped the scales.
Correct. Drexel says they are the same person.



Ultimately Nick is responsible for his own actions. Prefer to avoid giving his peers too much credit with regard to developing Nick's character, as it is likely that Nick just found found himself in the company of like-minded people (as most people do). The only things Drexel and Camelot331 have to offer is the opportunity for Nick to express these things.

Nick is able to express these things online far more with Camelot (and share their audiences). Drexel is less successful in that regard (and now has to deal with being branded a groomer), and consequently would have more to offer Nick offline, or as filler content on Nick's show when a big case wasn't happening.

Before discounting Drexel consider the following:

The sex room/dungeon; is that a Camlot331 "wham-bam-thanky-ma'am" thing or a Drexel "made my friend's daughter my sex-slave and frequent BDSM locales like Gay90's and Sanctuary" thing? Possible that Drexel will make use of Nick's sex dungeon to "save" even more young females from the horrors of the Gay90's sex traffickers. Here's hoping Nick doesn't leave Drexel home alone with his daughters ever again.

The Hedonism II and Gay90s trips; is that a Camelot 331 "I hooked up with this girl on Tinder" thing, or Drexel "I send ladies on interracial gangbang vacations to cuck their husbands and have Nick read their messages on his show (and my mom just happens to have a travel business in her name)" thing?

TLDR: Camelot331 allows potential for more lucrative degenerate content via a shared audience. Drexel had such a comparatively inconsequential online presence that he couldn't efficiently "out" Nick even when he tried, as seen in the above clip.

Neither are responsible for Nick in a meaningful way and are mere accomplices to Nick's own degeneracy both online and at home, namely feeding Nick's fixation on "cucking".
 
Obviously Monty is considerably less likable than Vic, but that's a piss poor argument in favor of calling somebody a pedo without any evidence. I've noted early on that what Nick did could actually get somebody yeeted off KF. Null seems to take a dim view of it.

For some reason it's really amusing to me that even KF is like "Bro, that's out of line. Mock him for his watermelon fucking, but don't call him a pedo without evidence." LOL.
Didn't Nick very recently called most vtuber, anime, weebs pedophiles too? despite loving anime matsuri and going to the event? and that being a pedophile was also one of the acussations Vic faced? he is getting very comfortable calling everyone he doesn't like or agree with him a pedo.
 
Nick claimed that he had been using social media too much and it's not fair to his wife and kids and therefore will be cutting down on it...but Nick seems to be tweeting more than ever this month compared the past year.

So what social media was he using when he was using too much of it? Instagram? Is he active there?
by social media he probably means his locals, I mean is the only thing that consumes his online time and it's filled with negative things for him, he can't cut down that too much tho, since his paypigs are paying for him to appear in the chat and talk to them.
 
by social media he probably means his locals, I mean is the only thing that consumes his online time and it's filled with negative things for him, he can't cut down that too much tho, since his paypigs are paying for him to appear in the chat and talk to them.
And even they're increasingly talking shit about him and to him.
 
Back