- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
>Thank you for confirming you haven't the first tiny silver of an idea who you're talking to.
Maybe she would've known who she was talking to if you have a blue checkmark by your name... oh wait, never mind.
Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter
- Thread starter Caverlock
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Maybe she would've known who she was talking to if you have a blue checkmark by your name... oh wait, never mind.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
If Pigman and his fart bride endure a life of forced poverty to avoid paying a minor debt, can they really consider that a win? I've read that Quasi has enough wealth to milk that pig FOREVER. I can speculate that Fatrick is obese by every medical standard if that helps you feel better.
- Joined
- May 30, 2021
Big time scoop from Tagine Enthusiast, piggy has found a new watering hole:
Not fat, child:
Not fat, child:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
At least he found a new fart chair.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Assuming all these pics are from the same day, he was that guy at the bar who everyone was afraid to sit next to out of fear of being talked to. That place looks crowded and usually a spot at the bar is prime real estate, yet the seats next to him keep changing. What a fat loser. He really needs to find some actual shithole bar full of other fat losers like him because he sticks out like a sore and very fat thumb at the bars he currently patronizes.
It also looks like he realized he was having his picture taken at some point and straightened his posture. Look at his slouch in the first few pics compared to whatever he’s doing in the latter ones.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
Who would the other cow in this crossover be? There’s lots of threads I haven’t looked at yet, but that cow sounds fun.
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
Savor your bottomless ignorance while it lasts, sweet stalker child. The great Patrick Tomlinson is second to none when it comes to urban youth-based cured and spiced meats.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
"Hey bartender, I'll have-"
"You'll have nothing, stalker."
"...I'll have another seat, please.'
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
And it didn't take long for the troll reviews to come in.
I'm all for trolling cows, just leave innocent people out of it. The owners of this bar have a business to run with employees to pay. The last thing they need is people thinking they have fat schizo vagrants wandering in and chasing off their customers.
Incel Death Note
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2023
That is the body of a marathon-runner and frequent gym goer, stalker child. Fuck, you're stupid.
You can see the light outside change and the street lights get turned on. This jobless FFwBT sat there all day playing with his phone and sweating up the place.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2022
Who wears headphones at the bar? Just drink at home, piggy. Maybe he's hiding from his second, better wife and pretending to work on "pilots" for "tv".
I wonder if this place serves meatloaf?
I wonder if this place serves meatloaf?
grapeshark77
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
I wonder if they serve a burger and fries (that Pat would accidentally order as a cold potato side) - the checkers are different colors, makes me think Pat just went to a bar and pretended to do stand-up but really drank and played on his phone.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
That would be Ethan Oliver Ralph:
Here's the hollerin' clip, it's a classic:
Ethan Ralph spergs out against Dispatch
www.youtube.com
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2017
i mean, they do have fat schizo vagrants wandering in and chasing off their chil - err, customers.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
TL;DR: It only happens because not enough people shoot back. If police knew there was a genuine risk they weren't coming home from an aggressive raid, they wouldn't conduct them unless it was genuinely necessary (spoiler: it almost never is).
It's only like this because not enough people fire shots to defend their homes, even after this SWAT shit started. Cops started this no-knock raid/swat nonsense because (so they claim) some criminals did shoot when police tried to "peacefully" arrest them or enforce a search warrant. Of course, what they don't like talking about is the fact that many more innocent people also ventilated over-eager cops and later walked, leading to police suddenly realizing "oh shit, that's right, citizens are allowed to have guns and defend themselves in this country!" and decided instead of de-escalating and reserving SWAT-style raids for situations that genuinely need them, they'd just handle everything involving any possibility of something worse than harsh language with overwhelming force, like a military might in a warzone.
On paper the premise is that having a pair of officers show up at someone's doorstep to serve an arrest warrant will result in the suspect escaping out the back door or the officers being gunned down where they stand, whereas showing up with a squad of heavily-armed goons will strike terror in a suspect and cause them to surrender. Never mind that the former can be handled by also placing a pair of officers behind the house to catch a fleeing suspect and the latter can be largely handled by inconspicuous body armor and a courteous demeanor (or at least any other attitude besides "come with us or we'll shoot you dead right here and now and we'll likely get away with it").
And also never mind the fact that these raids do not begin by giving the suspect the chance to surrender peacefully. Ever notice that? Even if the suspect is in the driveway, sees the cops arriving, immediately puts his hands up and cooperates, they'll still rough him up and they'll still tear through his home anyway? Usually without any recourse for damages, even if charges are dropped or he's later acquitted?
The reality is SWAT-style raids are practically never actually necessary -- at best it's a grotesque waste of money and resources (putting on a SWAT show isn't cheap) to arrest a cooperative suspect that also scares the shit out of everyone for no good reason and at worst it can result in unnecessary deaths. As you can imagine, a person is much more likely to start shooting if you threaten them with a dozen armed officers than he is to patiently and calmly cooperate with you as a dozen of your buddies stomp through crunchy broken glass (that they just broke) to "secure" his home, terrifying anyone else present as well. There's also a psychological element to it as well, as it's a way for the civilian government to signal to everyone in attendance (neighbors, news outlets, etc.) "don't fuck with us, or we'll kill you."
I'm not fedposting here -- it's a genuine concept enshrined by the Constitution and in particular the Second Amendment: the government is supposed be afraid of trying to strongarm the population, precisely because specific lawful processes are clearly laid out for the government to follow in order to enforce the law and citizens are empowered to resist (with lethal force) unlawful or inappropriately violent acts by the government. Its only permitted response to that healthy fear is to do things the lawful way rather than going in guns blazing like Rambo. Yes, there are occasions where an overwhelming display of force is necessary to apprehend a suspect, but those are astonishingly rare and there should be a similarly extraordinary standard police must rise to meet when they go before a judge to ask permission to go play army men for awhile. To justify that kind of response, you should have to prove the house has armed gunman inside who are prepared (and openly threatening) to start shooting people before a judge signs off on it.
Responding to a situation with an army larp comprising a dozen cops in tough-guy gear -- even when it's supposedly an "armed kidnapper raping a mother while holding her kid at gunpoint" situation -- is almost always an astonishingly retarded and inappropriate first response. Not just because it begs for gunplay by one or both parties, but because of the unnecessary risk of collateral damage and disproportionate escalation of force. One stray bullet is all it takes to kill an 8-year-old kid two houses down who was just sitting there watching cartoons. Any neighbor nearby who's armed and hears gunfire is very likely going to lock-and-load just in case, and even if they immediately realize "oh shit, the cops are raiding a house" and back down, it's yet another gun in play (if only briefly) and that does not make the situation safer.
I hate the ACAB and defund-the-police crowds because they're wrong (and idiots), but SWAT-style raids are fucking ridiculous and need to be stopped. Sadly the only real means left for the plebs to put a stop to it is to employ the Rittenhouse Method, and not everybody can rally that kind of national moral, legal and financial support when they re-educate a local police department about civil rights.
On paper the premise is that having a pair of officers show up at someone's doorstep to serve an arrest warrant will result in the suspect escaping out the back door or the officers being gunned down where they stand, whereas showing up with a squad of heavily-armed goons will strike terror in a suspect and cause them to surrender. Never mind that the former can be handled by also placing a pair of officers behind the house to catch a fleeing suspect and the latter can be largely handled by inconspicuous body armor and a courteous demeanor (or at least any other attitude besides "come with us or we'll shoot you dead right here and now and we'll likely get away with it").
And also never mind the fact that these raids do not begin by giving the suspect the chance to surrender peacefully. Ever notice that? Even if the suspect is in the driveway, sees the cops arriving, immediately puts his hands up and cooperates, they'll still rough him up and they'll still tear through his home anyway? Usually without any recourse for damages, even if charges are dropped or he's later acquitted?
The reality is SWAT-style raids are practically never actually necessary -- at best it's a grotesque waste of money and resources (putting on a SWAT show isn't cheap) to arrest a cooperative suspect that also scares the shit out of everyone for no good reason and at worst it can result in unnecessary deaths. As you can imagine, a person is much more likely to start shooting if you threaten them with a dozen armed officers than he is to patiently and calmly cooperate with you as a dozen of your buddies stomp through crunchy broken glass (that they just broke) to "secure" his home, terrifying anyone else present as well. There's also a psychological element to it as well, as it's a way for the civilian government to signal to everyone in attendance (neighbors, news outlets, etc.) "don't fuck with us, or we'll kill you."
I'm not fedposting here -- it's a genuine concept enshrined by the Constitution and in particular the Second Amendment: the government is supposed be afraid of trying to strongarm the population, precisely because specific lawful processes are clearly laid out for the government to follow in order to enforce the law and citizens are empowered to resist (with lethal force) unlawful or inappropriately violent acts by the government. Its only permitted response to that healthy fear is to do things the lawful way rather than going in guns blazing like Rambo. Yes, there are occasions where an overwhelming display of force is necessary to apprehend a suspect, but those are astonishingly rare and there should be a similarly extraordinary standard police must rise to meet when they go before a judge to ask permission to go play army men for awhile. To justify that kind of response, you should have to prove the house has armed gunman inside who are prepared (and openly threatening) to start shooting people before a judge signs off on it.
Responding to a situation with an army larp comprising a dozen cops in tough-guy gear -- even when it's supposedly an "armed kidnapper raping a mother while holding her kid at gunpoint" situation -- is almost always an astonishingly retarded and inappropriate first response. Not just because it begs for gunplay by one or both parties, but because of the unnecessary risk of collateral damage and disproportionate escalation of force. One stray bullet is all it takes to kill an 8-year-old kid two houses down who was just sitting there watching cartoons. Any neighbor nearby who's armed and hears gunfire is very likely going to lock-and-load just in case, and even if they immediately realize "oh shit, the cops are raiding a house" and back down, it's yet another gun in play (if only briefly) and that does not make the situation safer.
I hate the ACAB and defund-the-police crowds because they're wrong (and idiots), but SWAT-style raids are fucking ridiculous and need to be stopped. Sadly the only real means left for the plebs to put a stop to it is to employ the Rittenhouse Method, and not everybody can rally that kind of national moral, legal and financial support when they re-educate a local police department about civil rights.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
No, they also failed at making poutine and their prices are terrible. $13usd for some bread sticks is robbery. They do sell an okay stout.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2020
Funster Dennis Denuto from the other forum has opened the Rickipedia to catalogue all things fat and faggy. Will it remain a solid repository for all EEWU (Ever-Expanding Waistline Universe) content or will pig get it shut down? Stay tuned in to find out!
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
It's a known fact women bodies come in many types:
But I swear to God this is my first time seeing one whose type is the Victorian Ass-cage Dress:
"Not fat by any 1860 British standard child."
How can everything about this nigga be so goddamned weird??
But I swear to God this is my first time seeing one whose type is the Victorian Ass-cage Dress:
"Not fat by any 1860 British standard child."
How can everything about this nigga be so goddamned weird??
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I think this fat retard thinks it somehow sounds badass to call a car "she," but all it reminds me of is that nerd from Christine.
It serves Pat, who is even fatter than Meat Loaf.
That is some sad looking bar food. Why does this fat faggot with bitch tits feel compelled to show every shitty meal he has when it just advertises why he's so fucking fat?
But I thought he was going to spoon feed an atalker child his own teeth if he ever saw one, right before sending them to prison for life.
Guess he's just a fat pussy irl.
Last edited:
MavisBeaconTeachesSnipin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
HIS NAME IS