Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Lincoln wanted to centralize the country sorta like a soviet state and planned to keep black people as a child race and under government control/dependence, sorta like the modern dems do.
Actually he initially wanted to ship them back to Africa, Liberia in particular, but not forcibly. He tried to sell them on the idea and didn't get many takers (although the ones who took it up promptly set up something a lot like plantation slavery in Liberia).
 
Lincoln wanted to centralize the country sorta like a soviet state and planned to keep black people as a child race and under government control/dependence, sorta like the modern dems do. Its kinda interesting pre jim crow republicans were more progressive and left wing than pre jim crow democrats, who did come up with the KKK. Idk wtf happened post jim crow and WWII that the roles completely reversed. Confederates fought mainly for property rights and anti centralization, even in this case that property referred to slaves.
Don't forget that Jim Crow and the KKK were allowed to happen under the Union and even the Union back then got government agents to infiltrate the KKK and use it as a military arm for the Democrat Party back then. Shit's pretty fucked and that's why I associate with the Confederates more than the Union, the Union caused the most problems with race and such that not even slavery could think of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright and NoReturn

Attachments

  • F0_gx4xaQAAtgyD.jpg
    F0_gx4xaQAAtgyD.jpg
    91 KB · Views: 72
Another woke tactic you've probably noticed by now: claiming any opposition to or criticism of "identity politics" is "whining" or "crying" or the like.
Don't forget: if you share a negative opinion on things about kids (in the context of sexual things pushed on them or being against transing them) you're OBSESSED with kids and sex so you're the real creep, not the 6'3" woman (male) that just wants to innocently twerk on your kindergartener.
 
This isn't worthy of being on A&N, so I thought why not post it here:

Someone is having fun.. WE MUST STOP IT! (Archive)

The projection, and hypocrisy, is strong in this one. While it's true there can be anti-fun people on the right, all we see these days is the left being "No fun allowed" because they're easily outraged and offended at everything all the time.

Here's a spoiler of the full text from the article if you don't want to click either of the links:

After all these years of watching Republicans attack everything from music, to movies to TV, to sex, to books, to comics, to amusement parks, to women, minorities and immigrants all trying to improve their lives I have come to a determination. They hate fun. Or more to the point, their idea of “fun” is skewed beyond belief.

Republicans idea of fun, is to make sure no one has any. That is what brings them joy, ruining things for everyone else. They are too lazy to take care of their own children so they expect the government to do it for them. Which is pretty funny considering how much they like the government. “Ban this book so I don't have to pay attention to what my kid is reading”. “Ban LGBTQ people so I don't have to explain to my child that not everyone is born the same and that it’s possible the book we base our life on that was written 2000 years ago, and translated hundreds of times, might have screwed up a few things”. “Ban abortion and birth control because sex is dirty and disgusting and should only be used to make babies”. “Ban porn so I don't have to monitor my kids internet use”. “Ban history so my kid doesn’t know his great great grandfather was a slave owning prick, it might upset them”. “What? No you cannot read that book, listen to that music or see that movie, because I say it’s bad for my kid.

Over the years there was always something “destroying our youth”. Dime store novels in the 40’s, comic books in the 50’s, rock and roll music in the 60’s, drugs in the 70’s video games in the 80’s, if they can’t find something new to blame for all their problems they just recycle.. drugs, music, books all making a reappearance in the 21st century as the destroyer of youth. Funny how none of those things ever “destroyed” anything. And they all have one thing in common, they are fun. Yes you can argue about drugs but the fact is they are fun, if they weren’t, people wouldn't do them.

Look at the pictures. These are our two outcomes in 2024. Right wingers “grooming” kids to say “fuck you” while standing in front of a “Fuck Biden” sign held up by 2 women in thongs. Left wingers “grooming” kids to accept that it’s ok to be different and to be nice to people. Get out and vote, unless you want to live in the least fun place on earth. Florida is already there. Don’t let it spread.
 
111.jpg

From Amazon:
For over four decades, scholars have been investigating male dominance - both symbolically and numerically -within popular music. The heavier genres of popular music, metal music in particular, have been male dominated spaces, which are difficult to navigate for women participating as fans, musicians, or both. Studies on gender inequality in metal music have convincingly demonstrated how gender dynamics shape the reception of metal music and metal scenes all over the globe. Yet, they shed relatively little light on the extent of and reasons for metal music's male domination from a production perspective. This book fills this gap, offering is a systematic and large-scale overview of gender inequality in metal music production. In other words: how many women - compared to men - are participating in metal bands and what are the causes for the differences in participation?​

Review
Drawing on the online Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives, interviews, and online materials and interviews by others, the authors investigate how many women are involved in metal music production and the extent of gender inequality in the genre, looking at longitudinal trends and cross-national differences, subgenres within metal, roles in terms of instrumentation, and the degree of recognition between female and male musicians. They develop the concept of gender as a double-edged sword, in which women attract attention for their bands but are often evaluated based on their feminine appearance rather than musical skills, by linking it to theories of tokenism and cultural/structural embeddedness, and provide a theoretical overview to explain gender inequality in metal music production by examining the practices of learning, doing, and evaluating at the levels of society, pop music, and metal. --Annotation (c)2018 "(protoview.com) "​
"Gender Inequality in Metal Music Production is a ground-breaking study and definitively proves what 'we' all already knew from anecdotal evidence and personal experience….Metal was, and still is, a male genre. Now, we have statistical proof AND some important analysis about the how and why this phenomena exists. I expect this study to be highly useful for future generations of academics and should be found in better collections, libraries and on university reading lists everywhere." --Metal Rules, 2018​

About the Author
Pauwke Berkers is Associate Professor of Sociology of Art and Culture, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. He has published widely on issues of ethic/racial and gender inequality in arts and culture in, among others, Cultural Sociology, Gender and Society, Journal of Gender Studies, Metal Music Studies and Poetics. He is also a member of the International Society for Metal Music Studies.​
41fbec53836485d5c8178d03bbf9041c.jpg
Julian Schaap is a PhD candidate and lecturer at the Department of Arts and Culture Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. His research focuses on social stratification on the basis of whiteness, race-ethnicity and gender in various cultural fields. His work has been published in journals such as New Media and Society, Popular Communication, Sociologie and Metal Music Studies.​
4b5807128fb4ba16c6c46e84f88e2791.jpg
 
1689551894476.png


Lincoln wanted to centralize the country sorta like a soviet state and planned to keep black people as a child race and under government control/dependence, sorta like the modern dems do. Its kinda interesting pre jim crow republicans were more progressive and left wing than pre jim crow democrats, who did come up with the KKK. Idk wtf happened post jim crow and WWII that the roles completely reversed. Confederates fought mainly for property rights and anti centralization, even in this case that property referred to slaves.

The Confederates were not opposed to centralization. Democrats used the federal govt to force the practice of slavery on Northern States through laws like the Fugitive slave act and the Confederate state was more authoritarian and controlling than the Union during the War. Slavery supporting Dems also relied on the Andrew Jacksons Supreme Court nominations to maintain slavery.
 
Yeah I wouldn’t doubt most women would feel good in a crowd with Stripped, Raped, and Tortured or I cum blood playing. Knowing if the type of women that infiltrate different groups infiltrate metal at a larger scale it’ll be just like pop country talking about divorces and shit. Gatekeep the fuck out of metal for as long as possible.
 
View attachment 5214757



The Confederates were not opposed to centralization. Democrats used the federal govt to force the practice of slavery on Northern States through laws like the Fugitive slave act and the Confederate state was more authoritarian and controlling than the Union during the War. Slavery supporting Dems also relied on the Andrew Jacksons Supreme Court nominations to maintain slavery.
Double post but the thing I hate about the Union most is when they had the chance to change it they couldn’t due to their sheer incompetence and Lincoln idiotically having a Democrat as VP. Reconstruction failed miserably and the North decided with the limited safety and union laws of the south they pushed all their problems down there similarly how we push all of our labor and problems to other countries. Shits pretty evil and that’s why I appreciate the confederates more for trying to separate.
 
offering is a systematic and large-scale overview of gender inequality in metal music production. In other words: how many women - compared to men - are participating in metal bands
in other words: ITS FUCKING NOTHING. YOU'VE DONE NOTHING.

i cannot believe this kind of shit passes for """academia"""
>we counted the number of black niggers compared to witey and made up some bullshit about how its due to muh ebo wite supremacy
that nigga is a PDH CANDIDATE and the other guy is a fucking professor
 
I lost my shit when I saw the pictures of the authors of the article. They look like some of the softest fruits academia has to offer. Angela Gossow from Arch Enemy would probably rape them to death with a snapped off mop handle. Nobody gives a shit about the demographics of metal as long as the music is good.
 
About the Author
Pauwke Berkers is Associate Professor of Sociology of Art and Culture, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. He has published widely on issues of ethic/racial and gender inequality in arts and culture in, among others, Cultural Sociology, Gender and Society, Journal of Gender Studies, Metal Music Studies and Poetics. He is also a member of the International Society for Metal Music Studies.41fbec53836485d5c8178d03bbf9041c.jpgJulian Schaap is a PhD candidate and lecturer at the Department of Arts and Culture Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. His research focuses on social stratification on the basis of whiteness, race-ethnicity and gender in various cultural fields. His work has been published in journals such as New Media and Society, Popular Communication, Sociologie and Metal Music Studies.

metal fans can be petty, obnoxious, elitists, etc but these are the people that they are trying to gatekeep.

When these uber faggots or marketing execs co-opt your shit, its over and you are never getting it back.
 
Nobody gives a shit about the demographics of metal as long as the music is good.

Yep. Tarja Turunen was a prima donna, but a significant part of Nightwish's fans are still coping and seething HARD about her leaving the band nearly 20 years ago because, full of herself as she might be, she has one hell of a voice and the training to make full use of it. Hell, having a vocalist frontwoman is nigh-mandatory for symphonic metal bands, and I attribute a decent share of it to her success.
 
Yep. Tarja Turunen was a prima donna, but a significant part of Nightwish's fans are still coping and seething HARD about her leaving the band nearly 20 years ago because, full of herself as she might be, she has one hell of a voice and the training to make full use of it. Hell, having a vocalist frontwoman is nigh-mandatory for symphonic metal bands, and I attribute a decent share of it to her success.
I miss Tarja Nightwish
 
Back