Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

That said, having kids make molotovs is a big legal no no, that means ukraine is involved in and allowing child civilians to manufacture weapons, which makes them a valid, legal military target. Says alot about ukraine if what that guy is saying is true
No one cares about it in the end because collective cautiousness already accepted that Ukraine is heroic nation that fights tooth and nail for it's freedom, so whatever they do now is justified no matter how immoral and corrupt it is.
The kids with molotovs and not child soldiers no no, they are young patriots who help protecting freedom and justice from childhood. Yes, AFU tortured a few Russian soldiers without a good reason and shot up a few of those who were surrendering, but you must understand that these are the soldiers of a tyrannical regime and they are basically nazis, so you can do anything with them and it's morally justified. That includes their relatives and regular civilians because they are perpetuating the regime and thus do not deserve the protection.
And yes, they will recieve all these unconventional weapons because using them for the good cause is completely OK consequences be damned.

I more curious how it will all be presented once the war is over. There's no such big rug that can fit all the shit that needs to be sweeped under it.
 
That said, having kids make molotovs is a big legal no no, that means ukraine is involved in and allowing child civilians to manufacture weapons, which makes them a valid, legal military target
Perhaps, but more importantly, this means Stalin and Hitler can now be credited as brave trailblazers in the use of child alternative labor for the manufacturing of ammunition. Somebody should get the charges dropped for all those WW2 German factory owners.
 
I more curious how it will all be presented once the war is over. There's no such big rug that can fit all the shit that needs to be sweeped under it.
easy
now.jpg

see all the naive and good-natured western politicians were hoodwinked by a grifter and totalitarian dictator (martial law? undemocratic! going after churches? religious prosecution! azov? nazis!) when all they wanted was to help the poor ukrainian population out of their goodnees of their heart and protect democracy(tm) - and it would've succeeded if not for captain ukraine enriching itself rather than help his fellow slav. cue plenty of MSM hitpieces along the lines of "where's the money z-man?!" to program the niggercattle who to hate now.
 
This is a semantic niggering, but 20% losses for the first two weeks doesn't mean 20% weekly in my book. Someone with native English and over 100 IQ should confirm one way or another, because that 0.8 multiplier is the difference between our calculations.
How am I supposed to confirm one way or another? The calculation you gave was off by almost 4 orders of magnitude from the answer that you gave so the only sane conclusion is that it's all gibberish and you don't have a clue what you are doing. Also, the multiplication with 100% at the start is not exactly confidence inspiring either as it does literally nothing to multiply by 1.

English might not be my native langue, but I can do basic math. Seemingly you can do it as well as you got the answer you wanted but you clearly made a catastrophic mistake in your notation by writing the "0.9^4" term as "10%^4"as it means you are off by a factor of 6561.
 
Last edited:
Also, what's going on with that NATO summit in Vilnus? Did Ukraine get accepted or not? Media here is reporting that Zelensky has been getting bullied pretty bad
Nothing. "We will be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the alliance when allies agree and conditions are met”, they said, but promised more gibs until then. Same old, same old.

Before summit, Zelensky made a speech where he said he would demand concrete dates and a fixed roadmap to membership, but ended up doing a pretty good "forever alone" impression.
Clipboard1.jpgClipboard 2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Want to know what it's like to be under a Russian artillery barrage with drones looking for you? Ask these Colombian mercs (warning; it is loud, and that's what artillery that close sounds like, and you feel it deep into your bones and they are constantly being reminded to keep their heads down and mouths open to lessen getting their eardrums blown out)



Колумбийские наемники частично встретились с Бандерой.​
Хохлы забыли им рассказать, что Степан живёт в аду​
Google translate:​
Colombian mercenaries partially met with Bandera.​
Khokhols forgot to tell them that Stepan lives in hell​

Keep in mind the US has been arming and training paramilitaries in Colombia for the past couple of decades to fight guerrillas and criminals so these aren't redditors who think war is a capeshit flick, but their tank was blown up, they had injured and all they could do was flee with them and their useless hoholina translator. Yes artillery is terrifying but that close? Anyone who thinks they can punch through that in Ukraine isn't firing on all cylinders.

Aired on Columbian TV apparently, subtitled in Spanish, no English, a todos les pido perdon.
Link
 
Last edited:
CivDiv has more video from his commie "friends" who were larping in the security zone at the beginning of the Ukrainian Army's First Annual TM-62 Eating Contest.

https://youtu.be/nFxLhioWnio
(Not sure why the video isn't loading up. It won't load even though I downloaded it.

First, who claims "Cognac" as their callsign? He sure as fuck ain't smooth (based on this video) and the Ukrainians are too poor to drink it so it's a self-gloss and those are cringe as fuck.

Second, these fucking morons go into battle without any heavy weapons in the discounts, only a couple of .50s on the MRAPs. Not sure how helpful some AKs and an RPG will be as you fight on the Pontic Steppe. Then again these dudes volunteered to be niggercattle.....or maybe they always were niggercattle. Sounds like some existentialism we can dive into later.

The entire situation is clearly a disaster in the making:
-Drivers and VCs who don't speak the same language,
-Lack of artillery support
-Only combined arms you see is some AMX-10s passing by but you never hear from them again
 
Last edited:
Ukraine aims to sap Russia’s defenses, as U.S. urges a decisive breakthrough (archive)

This WaPo article is getting a lot of play on Twitter today. Kind of interesting, I guess. Two things caught my eye:

First:
1689695162264.png

Is this because anything we are willing to send them is obsolete, or because whatever we send them it would have problems?

Second:
1689695363287.png

There's no context to the "four brigades," as in, four EXTRA brigades. Kind of leaving me to think the article is stating that Ukraine has only 20,000 troops committed, but that makes no sense at all.
 

Ukraine: No fast results in offensive against Russia, top general says – BBC News​


"One of Ukraine's most senior military commanders has admitted its offensive is not going as fast as he'd like"

"Alexander Searski who is in charge of military operations in eastern Ukraine told the BBC that quick results were proving to be practically impossible that's because of well-prepared Russian defenses "

Some retard allowed the BBC into Ukraine's planning headquarters for Bakhmut retaking operations in which even more retarded BBC started filming all their monitors and their contents only some of which were censored:
000061.png
000062.png
000063.png

Commander of Ukraine's 57th Brigade claims they could encircle Bakhmut. Reminder, they are nowhere near close enough for that to be possible.

000064.png

000065.png

000066.png

CBS reports get no more views:
000068.png
000069.png
000067.png
 
Ukraine aims to sap Russia’s defenses, as U.S. urges a decisive breakthrough (archive)

This WaPo article is getting a lot of play on Twitter today. Kind of interesting, I guess. Two things caught my eye:

First:
View attachment 5218425
Is this because anything we are willing to send them is obsolete, or because whatever we send them it would have problems?
There is no plane on Earth that wouldn't get quickly shot down in Ukraine, especially since it would be piloted by inexperienced people who were hastily trained and immediately sent into the frying pan.

By the way this is entire offensive is why losing your mine clearing equipment is a really bad idea in modern warfare. Inching forward with sappers in the age of drones is such a retarded idea that you'd think Zaluzhny took a hit to the head and thinks he's still in WW1. But I guess the bluster about an offensive had already been made - so what else can they do? If they admit they have no hope in attacking, then they admit they've lost Eastern Ukraine and anything the Russians take on top of that.
 
Back