Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 105 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 76 18.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.9%

  • Total voters
    416
Apologies if I'm very late for saying this, but I wonder if Vic avoiding this guy directly during KickVic was because he knew crazy when he saw it. Then again, I vaguely remember Vic saying he didn't want to drag others into it or incriminate himself online in the heat of the moment. I certainly remember it was when Nick first lost his cool, he did not Vic Mignogna's rejection to a live stream well. Can I get away with saying that Vic-Kun ignoring Nicky was the start of his descent into drug dependence, or is that just when the descent became noticeable?
 
I've commented before on the parallels between Balldoman and Lowtax (PBUH).
Sausage fixation.
Another parallel between Rackets and Lowtax now! For Lowtax, on SA it was 10bux/forever. For grifter Nicky the Nose Rekieta, on Locals it's 5bux/month, and pay that forever.
The grift.

I guess artwork on the floor is another one. Although looking again at the Lowtax sausage pic, he finally did get that Last Supper painting up on the wall, shortly before offing himself. Might be something to watch out for with Rackets. If the artwork ever goes up, it could be a harbinger of doom to coom.
 
Apologies if I'm very late for saying this, but I wonder if Vic avoiding this guy directly during KickVic was because he knew crazy when he saw it. Then again, I vaguely remember Vic saying he didn't want to drag others into it or incriminate himself online in the heat of the moment. I certainly remember it was when Nick first lost his cool, he did not Vic Mignogna's rejection to a live stream well. Can I get away with saying that Vic-Kun ignoring Nicky was the start of his descent into drug dependence, or is that just when the descent became noticeable?
It's more likely that Vic didn't want to piss anyone off at all, and when he saw that Nick had an abrasive side to him that Vic steered clear for the most part as to not get lumped in more than needed.

Nick's growing alcohol and drug use didn't start until roughly a year or so ago. His drinking had increased a bit throughout the years, but not to the point of noticeably impacting his content on a routine basis. At least not to me personally
 
I'm really conflicted since I think this is almost alogging territory, but I'm temped to learn how to audio/video edit just to parody Nose and his confidants.
Because Swingers of the Caribbean, Cucked and Curious ,or Minnesota Gay Swinger 3: Balldo Eater sounds too funny to not make.
Why audio edit when you can AI?


Channel has a few more.
 
- He wants to do a show with Elijah Schaeffer. They talked recently.

- Nick will have Xia on again. He defended the fact that she has an OF as a married woman.

Xia is a whore and doesn't hide it. His friendship with Elijah Schaeffer and having him on the show is the actual hypocritical thing. Elijah is the one who gets gropey with co-workers and supposedly sexually assaulted at least 2 co-workers and had an affair. When Nick ignored all of this after Elijah's firing Nick stated he didn't do drama and wouldn't comment on it because it was Elijah's business. lol.
 
Apologies if I'm very late for saying this, but I wonder if Vic avoiding this guy directly during KickVic was because he knew crazy when he saw it. Then again, I vaguely remember Vic saying he didn't want to drag others into it or incriminate himself online in the heat of the moment. I certainly remember it was when Nick first lost his cool, he did not Vic Mignogna's rejection to a live stream well. Can I get away with saying that Vic-Kun ignoring Nicky was the start of his descent into drug dependence, or is that just when the descent became noticeable?
I suppose it's possible Vic might have seen Rekieta's true darker side before a lot of other people did. After all, he was pretty close to Rekieta, and they talked in person. However, it's also true you're not supposed to talk about litigation when you're in litigation. You're supposed to lie low and keep your mouth shut. Vic's discourse during that court case seemed to largely consist of him thanking his fans. Not going on ANY livestream... even one hosted by a paragon of sanity... is a rational decision to make under the circumstances.

Nick getting pissy about Vic not coming on his show was silly in general. A lot of people point back to that as proof that he treated Vic more as a grift than somebody he wanted to genuinely help. I recall even a lot of Weebwarriors at the time thought Rekieta was out of line for being critical of Vic there.
 
Last edited:
Can I get away with saying that Vic-Kun ignoring Nicky was the start of his descent into drug dependence, or is that just when the descent became noticeable?
If any point would make sense as the inception of his issues it would be the infamous first hearing where the suit was shut down. Nick had spent months strongly implying that the suit would easily get past TCPA, and regardless of the judge's errors Nick still lost a massive amount of credibility when the exact opposite happened.
His meltdown over Vic not going on his show for an interview seems to me more symptomatic of him losing influence and knowing it than anything else.
 
i literally just want to see the paintings you fucking sped, I always assumed all the paintings were just gifts to him from fans. I had no idea they were charity auction items he paid a house-worth of money on.
3D42A615-C1BF-41EA-B687-CB641229CF12.jpeg

There may be a better picture after he purchased but I don’t feel like digging through the discord
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If any point would make sense as the inception of his issues it would be the infamous first hearing where the suit was shut down. Nick had spent months strongly implying that the suit would easily get past TCPA, and regardless of the judge's errors Nick still lost a massive amount of credibility when the exact opposite happened.
Nah, that was in 2019. He took a lump on that, but he recovered really well by going on to do Rittenhouse and Amber Heard. The numbers suggest that was his most profitable period. His high watermark. Not Vic.

@Joggin Noggin is correct here. Something happened afterwards. Circa 2022, or so. It might have been the appeal (not trial) failing. That happened in the later half of 2022 (August?). It lines up better with the timeline. Although even then, I think people noticed cracks in the façade much earlier in the year.
 
Last edited:
I guess artwork on the floor is another one. Although looking again at the Lowtax sausage pic, he finally did get that Last Supper painting up on the wall, shortly before offing himself. Might be something to watch out for with Rackets. If the artwork ever goes up, it could be a harbinger of doom to coom.
I'm amazed Rekieta leaves his expensive artwork on the floor, surely one of his younger kids could easily be running around and accidentally put their foot through it.
 
Is the disgusting painting on the bottom-left corner the Jason Vorhees painting?
Yes.

As others have mentioned, it is odd that he does not hang or display them more prominently. I understand the 'muh kids' excuse, but thr you gest has got to getting near 6 or 7, and leaving it there makes it seem like he is being gauche about collecting expensive thing like his autos, paintings, and lavish holidays.
 
I'm amazed Rekieta leaves his expensive artwork on the floor, surely one of his younger kids could easily be running around and accidentally put their foot through it.
He doesn't leave his expensive artwork on the floor because after he removes the MDMA from them, they are worth about as much as a used Balldo.
 
Yes.

As others have mentioned, it is odd that he does not hang or display them more prominently. I understand the 'muh kids' excuse, but thr you gest has got to getting near 6 or 7, and leaving it there makes it seem like he is being gauche about collecting expensive thing like his autos, paintings, and lavish holidays.
I can think of several reasons. The wall space in their house is already taken up with various odds and ends or Kayla doesn't like the way the paintings would look in any other room so he's forced to store them in the only space that's his in the house.

If one's less charitable, he could just be peacocking. There's only so much space to put expensive shit in his background so he settles on leaving the paintings on the ground stacked against each other.

Or it could be he bought really expensive stuff on a whim because he lacks self control and doesn't have anywhere to put that shit so he settles as using it for background noise. I've had a painting I bought at an estate sale (granted it was not that expensive) sitting in a corner of my office for half a year and only got around to hanging it up in the last two weeks.
 
Yes.

As others have mentioned, it is odd that he does not hang or display them more prominently. I understand the 'muh kids' excuse, but thr you gest has got to getting near 6 or 7, and leaving it there makes it seem like he is being gauche about collecting expensive thing like his autos, paintings, and lavish holidays.
I'll throw my hat into the ring and not only agree with @Catgirl Tyranid that he's peacocking, but I'd bet that he has them "on camera" so he can claim that they are part of his "set" and use that as an excuse for one of his many improper business write-offs. Rackets needs to fear an audit even more than he needs to fear his upcoming jury trial with the stuff he's openly discussed writing off for his "business".
 
Last edited:
I can think of several reasons. The wall space in their house is already taken up with various odds and ends or Kayla doesn't like the way the paintings would look in any other room so he's forced to store them in the only space that's his in the house.

If one's less charitable, he could just be peacocking. There's only so much space to put expensive shit in his background so he settles on leaving the paintings on the ground stacked against each other.

Or it could be he bought really expensive stuff on a whim because he lacks self control and doesn't have anywhere to put that shit so he settles as using it for background noise. I've had a painting I bought at an estate sale (granted it was not that expensive) sitting in a corner of my office for half a year and only got around to hanging it up in the last two weeks.
iirc the art will be hung whenever he gets around to building the studio/sex dungeon
 
Back