Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 109 25.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 178 40.8%

  • Total voters
    436
I'm actually going to defend Rekeita here, because I completely get what he's saying.

He's saying that he enjoys that Josh is autistic enough to be knowledgeable about very esoteric topics to the point that he can engage in in-depth discussions. He's not calling Josh a retard in the Chris Chan sense, he's calling Josh a retard in the "autistic enough to care to read" sense.
Then why not just call Null an autist? It would be easier to say than "down syndrome" and would be more on-brand for KF, but instead Nick opts for comparing him with someone with down syndrome. It wasn't a slip of the tongue either, because Nick used that to add to the comparison by saying Null also has a negative attitude (not like intelligent and fun-loving Nick).

I'm more inclined to think that this is Nick's ego at work when talking to someone he disagrees with. Nick will diplomatically say that he appreciates a "different perspective" and then later calls them retarded. When Nick realizes he's said too much about something he can always adopt his usual "I'm joking except when I'm not, but I'm just being me either way" defense until people get bored of the topic.

Nick and Null don't have to actually like/hate each other, but watching how Nick pretends to respect Null considering what's happened the last number of months has been revealing. Recommend being economical when giving Nick the benefit of the doubt, especially if the problem behavior fits an established pattern.

Edit to avoid double post: The painting being discussed above shows Michael Myers. If Jason Voorhees is on there, he's not visible.
 
Last edited:
Today's word is: Kitsch.

I see the paintings Rekieta bought as being similar to the "Velvet Elvis" paintings that were popular among Tijuana tourists in the 1970s. There's even a Wikipedia article on this.

1689795637958.png

Nick is the wrong generation for a Velvet Elvis, but these paintings he bought are almost like updated versions of that. Of course, a Tijuana Velvet Elvis would have cost a hell of a lot less than what Nick is buying. Even adjusting for inflation. @Spaded Dave might be onto something with the tax write-off thing, but either way, kitsch artwork is defined as being in bad taste and unrefined.

someone who's good at the economy please help me budget this. my family is dying.
If it's any consolation, you have to have more money than brains to have Rekieta's purchasing habits.
 
He claims to have a venue for Nashville almost locked in, and he just has to sign the contract and send the down payment. He does not want to name it because he is afraid of being cancelled if people bully the venue.

Is Nick pretending his detractors are using/are actually tranny and SJW tactics?

Then why not just call Null an autist? It would be easier to say than "down syndrome" and would be more on-brand for KF, but instead Nick opts for comparing him with someone with down syndrome

Nick's other recent use of Down syndrome was insulting David Schneider's disabled child on stage at his Vegas meetup.
 
Nah, that was in 2019. He took a lump on that, but he recovered really well by going on to do Rittenhouse and Amber Heard. The numbers suggest that was his most profitable period. His high watermark. Not Vic.

@Joggin Noggin is correct here. Something happened afterwards. Circa 2022, or so. It might have been the appeal (not trial) failing. That happened in the later half of 2022 (August?). It lines up better with the timeline. Although even then, I think people noticed cracks in the façade much earlier in the year.
As an anime hater I didn't really pay much attention to all that, but I definitely don't think that's the cause. As you note, there were very noticeable cracks before then (the "worst day" personal issues early in summer 2022, just after the Depp trial).

I'm pretty sure that was around when Nick's drinking on stream started to pick up to the point where he sometimes seemed visibly intoxicated in a way he typically wasn't before. It's also around when he began talking about using drugs other than alcohol - though I think at this point it was just edibles; other substances came later.

If there was any trepidation about the Vic case, I have a feeling it was that he didn't want to talk about it because how embarrassing it was that the lawyer he recommended to Vic, who had been the executor for the estate of Rekieta's very, very wealthy grandfather, fumbled the ball in a very visible way.

I don't think there was any impropriety there at all in that recommendation, by the way. It might have just been "this is the only lawyer in Texas I know enough to be able to recommend", but obviously the optics of it are very bad, because it makes the entire case look silly to begin with.
 
Last edited:
I'm amazed Rekieta leaves his expensive artwork on the floor, surely one of his younger kids could easily be running around and accidentally put their foot through it.
I wasn't under the impression his family was very physically active given Mr. Heat Allergy takes the "entire family" to chiropractor appointments on Our Wife's insistence. A heavy indicator of Sitting On My Ass disease.

Nick's other recent use of Down syndrome was insulting David Schneider's disabled child on stage at his Vegas meetup.
It must be projection if he thinks that is an adequate way to verbally "take someone down". Makes one wonder if his own permanent record must hide some nasty secrets. Feelings of inadequacy returning for you, Creator? The wounds must still be fresh. He knows he can't very well call people pedos so this is the natural step after.

I don't think it is a coincidence in the least that he makes references towards Null and Down Syndrome pretext given how Null reacted to the Montagraph pedo accusation. Show us your school records, Nick!
 
Last edited:
Is Nick pretending his detractors are using/are actually tranny and SJW tactics?
It depends on who he's talking about. Nick has different sets of detractors. He's got people like those in this thread right now (who are mostly good bois), but he's also got the older set from 2019 that filed a gorillion complaints to the Minnesota OLPR trying to get his law license stripped away from him (example that Null talked about back in 2019). They likely haven't gone away, and they are insane people.

Whereas Nick's detractors used to be mainly concentrated on the left, now it is a far more diverse crowd. He's not entirely wrong to express concern about his older SJW enemies, who would absolutely try and fuck with him again. That said, you are correct that he probably has little to fear from the KF crowd.
 
As others have mentioned, it is odd that he does not hang or display them more prominently. I understand the 'muh kids' excuse, but thr you gest has got to getting near 6 or 7, and leaving it there makes it seem like he is being gauche about collecting expensive thing like his autos, paintings, and lavish holidays.
It reminds me of that shitty painting Lowtax had and also never made it to a wall before he an heroed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beautiful person
That said, you are correct that he probably has little to fear from the KF crowd.
The most Rackets has to fear from the farms is the truth, which he seems to have a rather tenuous relationship with these days, especially with regards to expressing truth to his audience. I suppose in that way, the farms is interfering with his business (of lying to his audience).

Edit: And perhaps he lies to his audience, because he is also lying to himself. (See: the drinking, the drugs, the perv'ing, the muh bidness plan, the social media expertise... the list goes on.)
 
On Nina Infinity's stream...

Nina: So there's this chick on the whatever podcast. She's a lawyer...she has OnlyFans...she's very naked all over twitter. I've already seen all she's got to offer.
Nick: I'm very jealous of her now.

How many times do you have to joke about being a faggot until people decides it's not a joke?
 
Paying that much for any painting of a celebrity is just a form of haute consoom.
Or money laundering. Maybe his "art" consumption is just to conceal his true level of MDMA addiction and Balldo trafficking.
How many times do you have to joke about being a faggot until people decides it's not a joke?
Ask Vito Gesualdi a similar question.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Bowl of Ramen
Oy vey how dare you try and make me try and talk about free speech and the platform that's paying me!

nickger1.PNG


nickger2.PNG


Had this been like 2-3 years ago, I would've actually looked forward to this. Just about everyone involved is a huge colossal faggot and it would've been nice to have someone call it out. People like Vito who are trying to make it out like Rumble endorsed or sponsored Fuentes' speech are lying lowlives. Also that side is strictly made up of pedophiles and pedophile enablers like Dick Masterson and MrGirl who all should be shot.

Then you have people like Quartering and Viva Frei who have active contracts with Rumble which is fine and are actively defending the company from smears from fat pedos which is fine as well. However, they then also turn around and say that it's totally fine to censor Fuentes. It's really fucking annoying from Frei who goes on and on about how Rumble is the most pro free speech site there is. He also actively wrote the TOS so he's actively disingenuous.

If this were 2-3 years ago maybe Nick could've been one to call out the flagrant hypocrisy on both sides or at least serve as a meeting ground for both. But he's the opposite of intellectually curious now and is only interested in watching his wife getting railed by black men.

How is it so hard to say something like, "I don't agree with what Fuentes says and he should have the right to say it but the reality is that Rumble has to watch itself to keep payment processors on the site. This isn't an indictment or endorsement of what he says but rather the powers that be that actively prohibit offensive but legal speech. Also actively editing footage of his speech to try and trick people into thinking it's Rumble endorsed is fucking gay."
 
How is it so hard to say something like, "I don't agree with what Fuentes says and he should have the right to say it but the reality is that Rumble has to watch itself to keep payment processors on the site. This isn't an indictment or endorsement of what he says but rather the powers that be that actively prohibit offensive but legal speech. Also actively editing footage of his speech to try and trick people into thinking it's Rumble endorsed is fucking gay."
Really hard if you're an absolutely worthless faggot like Nick Rekieta, who lacks a single testicle.
 
Back