A bunch of stupid faggots derail my thread about pedophiles in America First - Android Raptor spergery containment

Most likely he was saying something to the line of consent not being the only moral factor when it comes to a sex act, that there are many sexual acts which are consensual but evil, which is true.
Unless you're talking about some Armin Meiwes-type shit, as long as everyone is a consenting adult and it's taking place somewhere where only consenting adults can see, a sex act isn't evil.

Children, including teens, cannot consent to sex with adults. That's the issue here. Creepy gross failures like AF pedos want to fuck kids/teens because they're pedos and because grown adults know to avoid them like the plague. They think the only way they can get laid is by grooming and taking advantage of a child whose brain isn't fully developed.
 
I don't even knows what this means. "Consent should be based on consent, not morality". That is complete gibberish. You're gonna have to give the context for that. Most likely he was saying something to the line of consent not being the only moral factor when it comes to a sex act, that there are many sexual acts which are consensual but evil, which is true.
P.S. if you feel like continuing, make a thread in Mass Debates so we won't shit up the thread anymore.
It is clearly an argument against age of consent and statutory rape and you know this, you are just pretending to be retarded.
 
P.S. if you feel like continuing, make a thread in Mass Debates so we won't shit up the thread anymore.
I don't care. I did not make this thread. @Null made this thread because he was triggered that I don't support his dumb feminist view on age of consent. For the record, I don't approve of the homophobic title. Null wrote "A bunch of stupid faggots..." not me.
 
Do not tag me.
Then don't spam my timeline with your childish games and put words in my mouth. I didn't write this title.

1689877720858.png
 
We need a woodchipper react for @BoxerShorts47 and like-minded exceptional individuals.
It is clearly an argument against age of consent and statutory rape and you know this, you are just pretending to be retarded.
Matt Walsh also defended Josh Duggar and his parents when it came out that Josh molested his sisters and his parents covered it up and protected him (and not their daughters)

To say nothing of him thinking 12 year olds should be forced to gestate incest rape embryos
Walsh12yoVictim.png
MAP Walsh deserves a thread tbh
 
Last edited:
All you had to do was document the paedo shit in AF. Instead, blah blah blah essays on BS for who knows what. This is why we have Mass Debates, for all the damn baiting. Mass debaitin. Masterbaters.
 
Conservatives are up to their eyeballs in child rape and always have been.
That's literally liberals' open desire; it's you libtards who want to push for "MAP" tolerance (their term there btw), and have groups like NAMBLA and Prostasia, plus all the sexualization of kids in school and pride parades and drag queen story hour, etc.

Project harder.
 
That's literally liberals' open desire; it's you libtards who want to push for "MAP" tolerance (their term there btw), and have groups like NAMBLA and Prostasia, plus all the sexualization of kids in school and pride parades and drag queen story hour, etc.

Project harder.
Can we just all agree on the real problem here?

Untitled.png
 
That's literally liberals' open desire; it's you libtards who want to push for "MAP" tolerance (their term there btw), and have groups like NAMBLA and Prostasia, plus all the sexualization of kids in school and pride parades and drag queen story hour, etc.

Project harder.
No, we don't. Not a vast majority of us anyway. NAMBLA tried to ride the coattails of the LGBTQ movement and was rightfully told to GTFO. Protasia isn't something most lefties have even heard of, and most would be disgusted by it.

Drag queens are a non-issue for the most part, since drag is as adult or kid-friendly as you make it and aside from shit everyone thinks is gross like Desmondisamazing, drag events for kids are G-rated (plus with Desmond it's his mom that's the driving force behind making him do gross shit). I strongly suspect Right wingers are moral panicking about them to try and distract normies from noncey shit they've been getting up to recently, like trying to force 10 year-olds to gestate rape embryos and the ongoing SBC sex abuse scandal.

I also side-eye the fuck out of people clutching pearls about kids getting comprehensive, age-appropriate sex ed especially since sex ed for young children means important anti-abuse stuff like proper names for body parts and good touch/bad touch. Family members are very frequently the perpetrators of CSA, especially in more conservative/religious subcultures, and many kids didn't realize they were being abused until they were taught at school or some other outside event what was happening to them and how to get help.

Not that there are 0 gay pedos or school pedos or w/e, but it's absolutely a moral panic RN and the people clutching pearls the most are suspiciously quiet about the rampant noncery amongst their own (including republican politicians openly defending child marriage and forced child pregnancy).
 
I guess I am then. You are not going to convince any normal people to join your party if your politics are child marriage and abolishing women's rights and turning them back into powerless breeding machines to do nothing but as soon as men deem them ready for sex while men get to abuse, rape and cheat on them with zero repercussions. This is why conservatives will never be in power again, your politics are alienating half of the population. The only people who want this reality are incels who see forced child marriage as the only chance at a relationship because you know you are too repulsive for natural selection.
Conservatives don't want any of that, just because BoxerSharts calls himself one doesn't make him one
 
Can we just all agree on the real problem here?

View attachment 5222982
And circa 50% of all abused children are male, despite gays making up only 2% of the population.
They’re called Pederasts (that’s a man who fucks little boys) composing themselves of church leaders, politicians, gang leaders, and of the lowest forms of scumbags. If anything we should focus on getting them away from positions of power which is the leading cause of how most of them get access to children in the first place.
 
They’re called Pederasts (that’s a man who fucks little boys) composing themselves of church leaders, politicians, gang leaders, and of the lowest forms of scumbags. If anything we should focus on getting them away from positions of power which is the leading cause of how most of them get access to children in the first place.
Also a good chunk of them don't identify as gay or are involved in the LGBTQ community, and many abuse girls as well. For example, Warren Jeffs.

Attraction to children can't really be compared to attraction to adults of any sex either. Male and female children are fundamentally different than adults and attraction to them is a dangerous paraphilia.
 
Back