Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Chibitzen]

I'm telling you, this circles back to Vito. Nick is taking this position because Masterson will have a cow if he doesn't.

Does he really believe it? I dunno. I feel like he wants to leave some wiggle room with the whole "I'm not sure" thing, and is hoping what he said is just enough to keep Dick off his back. To me, that shows a lack of backbone though.

Another vacation should take care of that. He can just disappear. His audience theoretically could one day regain consciousness and maybe even be bold enough to dump him for his poor work record. I doubt it, though.

By the way, when did Nick join the YT mafia? Is it really necessary to be so beholden to another Creator? Will Dick knock out his kneecaps if he doesn't comply? Or will he let him keep those for tax purposes? Can't write off his knee pads without knees to put them in.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

Clean log again last night. Did better on rumble($20 than yt($134) but almost half of the rants come from one person. I am bit sus on the viewer count as it peaked at 2am central. Trying to see if i can get away with more resolution in the future.

I didn't really pay attention too much but during the adam and sitch stream, one of them would note about how little the amount of SCs Nick is getting in 2 separate occasions. Nick copesplained it away but I'm not sure on the exact details. Anyone who watched the whole stream can confirm it for me?

 

[Retink Retunk]

I didn't really pay attention too much but during the adam and sitch stream, one of them would note about how little the amount of SCs Nick is getting in 2 separate occasions. Nick copesplained it away but I'm not sure on the exact details. Anyone who watched the whole stream can confirm it for me?

If Nick is struggling with super chat revenue, maybe he can join a corpo that will design and sell merch for him as well as set up other means of advertisement. He just needs to avoid all of those black companies he's always having nightmares about.

 

[Captain Manning]

I dunno, this is literally happening right now.
SDCC is a sprawling convention with millions of attendees. If you are willing to pay for a room or a table, they'll have you. AM though will pay for you to attend and fluff your ego as if you were a real big time celeb. As opposed to SDCC, where nameless parasites like "CAMELOT331" and "Chrissy Mayr" are completely free to attend but will have to do it on their own dime and must compete for attention against people who actually enjoy and are involved with comics/manga/pop culture. Which I imagine is the real difference.

Perhaps I should clarify what I mean by "guest."

Back in my day, at least, there were different classes of badge holders. I imagine it's much the same now. We differentiated "attendees paying for space" (like artist alley) and "guests" (sometimes "guests of honor"). The former group would either be given a normal guest badge, or maybe an exhibitor one. I'm not saying any of them couldn't attend SDCC and pay to do something extra there. Just that... like you say... they're not gonna be treated like the guests that convention pays for and promotes as a draw.

Circling back to what I said earlier, I can't see any of the people AM is treating as guests being treated the same manner at a lot of other cons. That's my point.

He thinks that people with those thoughts need to take measures to keep themselves away from children.

Which, again, is pretty much Masterson's position. Remember what he said to Null back in 2020?

(Timestamped to 15:10)

He starts by saying how he draws a line between thought and action. He then goes on to say it's hard for pedos to control their addiction, but they need to be treated with kindness while being kept away from children. He even mentions the Nick would be doing the "Christian thing" by adopting this stance.

Null's counter-position is a bit more... brutal... unforgiving.

Dollars to donuts Nick is adopting the stance he is because of Dick. It might be a some generic MAP sympathetic position as well, but it's one Dick has held for a long time now.

I took it as the lolbert NAP take on the issue.

It's a silly position in general, but I think it's a particularly dangerous one if you have kids.

By the way, when did Nick join the YT mafia?

He's been in it for a while now. You're probably noticing it more now because a lot of the participants are experiencing a downtrend in popularity. Nick's numbers are flagging. Dick's numbers have been flagging for even longer. Ralph got kicked off another platform. Etc. They seem to be banding together for mutual support in their trying times.

 

[AnOminous]

If Nick is struggling with super chat revenue, maybe he can join a corpo that will design and sell merch for him as well as set up other means of advertisement. He just needs to avoid all of those black companies he's always having nightmares about.

Maybe he can get an anime avatar and work for Phase.

 

[Chibitzen]

Maybe he can get an anime avatar and work for Phase.

Shouldn't be hard to pick up a new audience from his favorite scene (gay bars). I've said previously, he could always troon out. Imagine the new niche he'd created for himself if he lawyered left of Emily. As a Vtuber, he wouldn't have to worry about going bald or shaking on stream. The panels could be comedy gold for all the wrong reasons. TIC would have to find a new catchphrase, that poor clown.

 

[feral cat #6385]

Shouldn't be hard to pick up a new audience from his favorite scene (gay bars). I've said previously, he could always troon out. Imagine the new niche he'd created for himself if he lawyered left of Emily. As a Vtuber, he wouldn't have to worry about going bald or shaking on stream. The panels could be comedy gold for all the wrong reasons. TIC would have to find a new catchphrase, that poor clown.

That would be perfect. He could dialate with his balldo. Well I guess it would be her balldo.

 

[AnOminous]

Shouldn't be hard to pick up a new audience from his favorite scene (gay bars). I've said previously, he could always troon out.

That's kind of what I meant, move on from his troonstream where he dressed in drag to just openly admitting he's a fag and just trooning out and becoming what a lolyer does when he becomes some animu thing. Maybe a rat? Or some other rodent?

 

[Captain Manning]

Maybe he can get an anime avatar and work for Phase.

I don't think he'd troon out, but I could totally envision a scenario when he adopts a bishounen avatar in an attempt to reignite the deluge of ass-thong pics on his Locals.

One issue with that: Not all female weebs are hawt costhots. In fact, most aren't.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Remember what he said to Null back in 2020?

Every time I rewatch this video my respect for Null grows a little bit. I still love how Null saying that people who watch loli are pedos sent Masterson into such a tism that he brought up lesbian porn as a retort.

 

[Lone Outsider]

Nick being best friends with Drexel really tells you all you need to know about Nick. With the shit Drexel is willing to say in public, I don't even want to imagine the kind of fucked up shit he says in private. And Nick lets this guy hang out with his young children, some of which are daughters. Disgusting.

Woman-hating incels like Drexel are almost always pedophiles btw, because adult women see right through them and want nothing to do with these losers. They have to go for young immature girls who don't have the life exprience to see all the red flags this pathetic melinated manchild gives off.

Pedophiles projecting their own degeneracy onto children and therefore thinking children are being "seductive" or "kinky/degenerate" or whatever is also typical for these disgusting fucks. Young girls are totally unaware of how adult predators look at them and what is "sexy" to those predators. If a child is TRULY acting hypersexual (not just as projected from the dirty mind of a man) then it is because that child is already being sexually abused.

Which is why I can't stand them, children really don't know about sex or can handle stuff like that and any that do should never have known about sex until they got older, it doesn't matter if it's light exposure or being outright abuse, kids acting or knowing about anything sexual is not normal. I often find that when somebody need to insult the other gender it speaks to how insecure one really is about finding a partner and how lacking they are as partner material.

Saying shit like this when you got Daughters is where I think Drexel and Nick are a legit danger to their own because such behavior really would make them insecure about their own gender and having fathers that bash women like that will only make them seek other men for comfort. It's ironic that it's one of the core tenants of the manosphere that good fathers makes sure their daughter is protected and grows up to be respectable and yet these soy filled faggots can't even do that, it's hypocrisy at it's finest. If they practiced what they preached and took away their petty misogyny they would have women respect them and even a stable relationship but knowing them, they are too far up their own asses to care.

And speaking them going after young women instead of fully grown women, it's pretty apparent that all that talk they have about the wall unironically refers to them not being able to climb up and get actually ladies but focus on children, it's almost a dog whistle for people who want women that are 21 or less.

 

[Local Wordmason]

I think Nick lying about the painting's price because he wanted to seem wealthy is the most likely option. As funny as it would be for it to be drug trafficking or he just wants to troll us. It seems like one of those things that he probably can't afford to actually spend that much on paintings without being irresponsible so he goes for the next best thing and buys somewhat expensive paintings and lies about their value. Which is why he just leaves them around, its just a prop he probably wrote off on taxes shortly after he got them. His wife is probably an idiot and got a painting commissioned because her smooth brain thought he actually appreciated art. It feels like a rich kid cope. You grow up surrounded by nice things, and when you grow up, you still aren't as wealthy as your parents so you have to do your best to pretend you are.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

He starts by saying how he draws a line between thought and action. He then goes on to say it's hard for pedos to control their addiction, but they need to be treated with kindness while being kept away from children. He even mentions the Nick would be doing the "Christian thing" by adopting this stance.

Null's counter-position is a bit more... brutal... unforgiving.

Dollars to donuts Nick is adopting the stance he is because of Dick. It might be a some generic MAP sympathetic position as well, but it's one Dick has held for a long time now.

At first glance, Dick might come off as the empathetic one, but he is twisting the religious angle via a guilt trip to add credence to his own side.

However, he combines a lax interpretation of Divine forgiveness and modern addiction psychology to reach a conclusion that upon cursory inspection seems compassionate, but actually horrifyingly offers nothing beyond a lifetime of unrelenting suffering.

Spoiler: Religious and Addiction Philosophy Sperging

First, Jesus always helped people physically and then forgave them. However, he also told them to go and, 'I do not condemn you. Go and sin no more'. [Modern Translation: 'I love you, mate, but cut that shite out!]

That means they they COULD stop. They were not doomed to be stuck forever in an irredeemable state. The idea undermines a very fundamental idea of Grace and Redemption in many sects: the empowerment to transcend our mortal limitations by Divine intercession.

Pivoting into modern medical/psychology: Dick and many paedo apologists buy into the 'once an addict, always an addict' idea. This pervades much of modern addiction therapy treatment that hooks people on programmes, drugs, or other resources that get insurance companies paid. I am not saying it is intentionally a racket, but why sell a cure once when you can sell it 100 times...

I think Nick lying about the painting's price because he wanted to seem wealthy is the most likely option. As funny as it would be for it to be drug trafficking or he just wants to troll us. It seems like one of those things that he probably can't afford to actually spend that much on paintings without being irresponsible so he goes for the next best thing and buys somewhat expensive paintings and lies about their value. Which is why he just leaves them around, its just a prop he probably wrote off on taxes shortly after he got them. His wife is probably an idiot and got a painting commissioned because her smooth brain thought he actually appreciated art. It feels like a rich kid cope. You grow up surrounded by nice things, and when you grow up, you still aren't as wealthy as your parents so you have to do

As far as I know, Nick's parents came into money later in life, and his grandparents were the ones that had the real money until they passed on.

Nick's father worked a full-time technical job, and all the accounts he has shared about growing up exaggerate his 'poorness' but if you look deeper, paint a picture of comfortable upper middle-class living.

Definitely not high-class, at least as a child. I am sure he got hand-ups after secondary school and law school.

 

[Sam Losco]

Then that's not him sending a "4". That indicates that 4 people in the Discord server reacted with laughing emojis to the message. Not the one I would have chosen, to be honest.

lol right you are. I was looking at it before on my phone and not close enough apparently. Turns out I am way off.

 

[Swole McPole]

Tangentially speaking here, but why is it even remotely relevant what one pays anyway for art? Is the piece not enjoyable in its own right? Isn't that the actual f***ing point?

Because there's a market in art. People don't JUST buy it for enjoyment, but they also buy it as an investment. If you're just buying for enjoyment, just buy the print. You won't spend much, but you won't lose much either.

Alternatively, you might see yourself as a patron of the arts. You think that the work an artist is doing is important, and you want to support them so that they can continue to create more of that work. That's between you and the artist, but the price you're paying in those circumstances bears no relation to the market value of the art.

But most people buying art feel the same way that they do when they buy anything else. They want to pay a fair market price. That's generally determined by the resale value of the work. If you buy the work of an important artist from the gallery that represents them, should you wish to resell it, the gallery will often buy it back at something very close to the price that you paid. They do this because they manage the market in the works of the artists they represent very carefully, and they expect them to hold their value or even increase in value.

It's different when you're buying art for it's decorative value. Dealers and galleries that specialize in this will generally charge what they can get away with and they're never buying it back from you. If you pay $50k for a painting but none of the major auction houses are interested in offering it for sale in one of their auctions in contemporary art, you've pissed your money away. Some people are fine with that. They don't mind spending stupid money for substandard art if they think it looks nice on their living room wall.

But most people hope that their investment will appreciate in value and so try to buy accordingly.

 

[AnOminous]

Some people are fine with that. They don't mind spending stupid money for substandard art if they think it looks nice on their living room wall.

Nick is a complete faggot, though, he doesn't even bother hanging it up or selling it, just leaves it lying on the floor for cats to piss on it.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Continuing the log from Wednesday:

Chat notices the issue with Nick's friends, both new and old:

Spoiler: An uncomfortable truth for Nose-simps

Brimstoneddd​

Hoping to have an interesting conversation... It's something different... People complain when he has Camelot or Masterson on and it gets repetitive

cooon​

That’s the problem with dick and Camelot but at least they’re entertaining. He went from Drex and cucks to Camelot and Drex and some only fans thirst trapping cunt to this.

cooon​

Idk what nick is trying to do and I wish him the best but this shit ain’t fucking it m8

Pred1tor83​

I'm ok 2 times a week... some of this new shit, the missed shows is not it...

cooon​

Before anyone says oh fuq coon I genuinely like nicks content sometimes but it’s unwatchable rn and I’m not fucking joking and it’s not a crazy opinion to have it’s like watching three chat members have a discussion about random shit. Like fucking why

People are obesessed with this:

Grifty​

@RekietaLaw you promised multipage unbreaded...I need you to make these fags listen to it.

Irishjedi66​

READ DEATH SENTENCES!

Rekieta chat knows ho to kill a joke 15 times over.


This sounds like cancer:

Pred1tor83​

Nick should debate locals... way more to learn from this dribble

Wrong on population census data:

StankyLeg​

replacement rate is 2 kids to replace the parents.

JMcFarland​

Replacement rate is 2 children per 2 adults. Adults die, their 2 children 1 for 1 replace them.

It is actually closer to 2.1 to cover accidents and premature deaths.


Oh my... We progressed to the JQ

YaBoyHPLovecraft​

The problem has always been the sabbatean frankists and oriental masons (synagogue of satan) using normal jewish people as a shield

They hit abortion, guns, hate speech, and every other hot button issue. The show seems like a dumpster fire where they screamed at each other, agreed on nothing, and everyone thinks they 'won'.

 

[Captain Manning]

At first glance, Dick might come off as the empathetic one, but he is twisting the religious angle via a guilt trip to add credence to his own side.

However, he combines a lax interpretation of Divine forgiveness and modern addiction psychology to reach a conclusion that upon cursory inspection seems compassionate, but actually horrifyingly offers nothing beyond a lifetime of unrelenting suffering.

There's nothing wrong with a Christian praying for somebody who is a pedophile.

But that should be immediately followed up with "stay the fuck away from my kids, and I don't want you on my show."

Dick, for some Godforsaken reason, thinks befriending pedos and platforming them is some great sort of thing to do. I don't get it, I'll likely never get it. and I don't get that Rekieta doesn't seem to get it.

But, it is what it is. Once upon a time, I would have cared more about trying to make this case to him or somebody else. Now I just warm myself by the trashfire.

 

[Swole McPole]

eowynfaramir​

I got some free advice better than that- buy the nerdy girl in the bookstore the book she's packing around. You're welcome.

Every woman I've ever known would think that any man that did this was a social retard and they'd tell him to stick his book up his arse.

You might well be able to pick such a woman up by engaging her in an insightful and stimulating conversation about the book she's 'packing around', but without exception all the women I know would think attempting to buy her the book was presumptuous

"What makes you think I can't afford to buy my own books?

"Why would you presume that spending £10-20 on a book would make me feel obligated to talk to you or spend any time with you? Here's a clue: it doesn't."

"Now stick your book up your arse and leave me alone, creep!"

 

[AnOminous]

But that should be immediately followed up with "stay the fuck away from my kids, and I don't want you on my show."

Diddler Dax has Vito the Pedo on because he is one himself.