Retard uprising in the "Mad at the Internet" thread over being told women should be considered in far-right politics

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Don't Tread on Me

I've always liked to play with fire
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Josh's takes on women are by far his dumbest. Yes, we should not encourage pedo retards, and yes lowering the age of consent will not fix birth rates. But there is no institution or structure by which you can deliver any sort of massive social message or pressure to women to make them understand that they must have children or there is no future. It does not exist. Religion has been completely destroyed, no one goes to churches and the people who do go to churches are not respected. There is no public square, no sense of community, everyone stays inside and ignores everyone else.

A united front between men and women requires both men and women to not be retarded and Josh puts the onus on men to stop being retards, completely convinced that women will stop being retards when men stop being retards. No. Women are worthless, disgusting trash. They are disloyal, they are dishonest, they are cowardly and they are weak.

Just because Fuentes doesn't have the answer doesn't mean Josh does either. There is no answer. We have no future, we are all doomed. The powers that be have won.
 
i think you should try coming up with alternatives for gamer words for example opie and anthony instead of saying nigger would say brothermen or sam hyde says sillybillys instead of faggots then you can do the racism segment on odysee or rumble
I always liked 'jogger' as a stand-in for nig. And here we call ciggarettes 'fags' so 'cig' could work for 'fag' and 'ciggie' could work for 'faggot'

Just because Fuentes doesn't have the answer doesn't mean Josh does either. There is no answer. We have no future, we are all doomed. The powers that be have won.
What's this "we" shit? You might not have a future but that's your shit luck, mate! If you feel so doomed then neck yourself so the rest of us doesn't have to listen to your whingy bullshit, you limp-wristed faggot.
 
Josh's takes on women are by far his dumbest. Yes, we should not encourage pedo retards, and yes lowering the age of consent will not fix birth rates. But there is no institution or structure by which you can deliver any sort of massive social message or pressure to women to make them understand that they must have children or there is no future. It does not exist. Religion has been completely destroyed, no one goes to churches and the people who do go to churches are not respected. There is no public square, no sense of community, everyone stays inside and ignores everyone else.

A united front between men and women requires both men and women to not be retarded and Josh puts the onus on men to stop being retards, completely convinced that women will stop being retards when men stop being retards. No. Women are worthless, disgusting trash. They are disloyal, they are dishonest, they are cowardly and they are weak.

Just because Fuentes doesn't have the answer doesn't mean Josh does either. There is no answer. We have no future, we are all doomed. The powers that be have won.
Funny how it's always "women are braindead cattle who take on the politics of any dude who sticks his dick in them" until it comes to saving the whuite race and suddenly it's all "helpies mommy I need you to do all the work while I jerk off to anime girls".

If you want women to have more kids and get married you need to make that attractive to them. Currently it is not and a large part of the reason for that is that big old manbabies like you expect women to do everything for them. Why should a woman want to have a family with a man who is as weak and pornsick as 99% of men are nowadays? Women are expected to go to work and contribute as equal partners to the household bills, while also doing 90% of the chores and childcare. Having children is already a full time job and of course women don't want to do that ON TOP of already having a full time job. But very few men can afford for their wife to be a SAHM + have multiple children in the current economy. Even if they can afford it, it's still a huge risk for a woman to take considering how many marriages end in divorce due to infidelity (mostly on the man's side btw) and then the woman is left with nothing and no job prospects. Despite what redpill incels are telling you, it's actually really rare to get alimony.

Plus men nowadays are undatable and expect a woman to basically act like a mother who babies them as they eat nuggies, and watch hardcore pornography instead of being respectable strong leaders. From what other women I know tell me it's hard to find a man who even knows how to wash his ass properly. Women would absolutely follow suit if men got off their ass and stopped being so utterly pathetic. The prospect of being a full time caretaker and bangmaid for some redditor who collects funkopops is just not good enough.
 
Plus men nowadays are undatable and expect a woman to basically act like a mother who babies them as they eat nuggies, and watch hardcore pornography instead of being respectable strong leaders
Yes and the expectation is that men will become more attractive and then eventually women will change their ways after they've noticed that men have improved. And what's the incentive to that? What's your personal incentive, to improve and become better when women are just ignoring men as a whole? To help the next generation or some shit? It's a waste of time, money and energy for zero profit. If there's no benefit to improving yourself then there's no reason to bother.

Even if they can afford it, it's still a huge risk for a woman to take considering how many marriages end in divorce due to infidelity (mostly on the man's side btw) and then the woman is left with nothing and no job prospects. Despite what redpill incels are telling you, it's actually really rare to get alimony.
"Due to infidelity". That's a funny way of saying women are choosing to abandon men. Yes, 50% of marriages end in divorces and 72% of those divorces are initiated by women. And who cares about alimony when you will always have to pay child support? If women were loyal and stayed true to men then men would have reason to believe their relationships would actually last long enough to be worth pursuing. But instead, women abandon men at record rates and divorced men kill themselves at ridiculously high rates. Pursuing women will literally end your life prematurely because they will leave you over the slightest provocation. Or simply because they fell out of love with you because you aren't exciting enough and aren't pursuing them 95% of the time after you've been married 10 years.
 
Waaah waaahhh how dare women abandon a man who broke his vows?! She should not only clean up after him and raise his 6 kids without ever complaining but also accept him cheating on her on top of that! Damn, really wonder why women don't want to get married anymore.
I don't believe your precedent that infidelity is that high. And even if it is, that just proves women are picking all the wrong men because they pick men who can attract multiple other women easily and grow bored of them. Maybe that's women's fault for engaging in hypergamy all the time, when you're worth less than your partner is why would your partner stay loyal to you? If a woman wants a man who will stay loyal she should aim lower.

(And also doesn't look too good to acknowledge that so many women are willing to sleep with married men either instead of finding their own).
 
What's this "we" shit? You might not have a future but that's your shit luck, mate! If you feel so doomed then neck yourself so the rest of us doesn't have to listen to your whingy bullshit, you limp-wristed faggot.
You can bury your head in the sand but that doesn't change the fact that I'm right.
 
I don't believe your precedent that infidelity is that high. And even if it is, that just proves women are picking all the wrong men because they pick men who can attract multiple other women easily and grow bored of them. Maybe that's women's fault for engaging in hypergamy all the time, when you're worth less than your partner is why would your partner stay loyal to you? If a woman wants a man who will stay loyal she should aim lower.

(And also doesn't look too good to acknowledge that so many women are willing to sleep with married men either instead of finding their own).
Ah so you are just an incel repeating the same old tropes. Women settle for balding, fat, ugly losers all the time and still get cheated on. Look at how many redditor soyboys are married. Look at how many men troon out after being married and having a child. Look at Ethan Ralph who has been married twice. The standards for men are on the fucking floor. If anything women need to raise their standards. Also as for the "women who sleep with married men", you do know that men usually lie to the women they cheating with and pretend to be single, right?
 
Also as for the "women who sleep with married men", you do know that men usually lie to the women they cheating with and pretend to be single, right?
No, I don't. I don't associate with any men who are cheaters. Because I actually understand how men behave and act and I only tolerate and spend time around men of good character. It is not hard, by any stretch of the imagination. And yet women seem to fail at it, repeatedly.
 
The Matt Walsh thing from what I remember was when he was a mid-to-late twenties radio host talking about Romeo and Juliet Laws or some shit. I don’t think he disavowed what he said because it could be summed up as “I have no real issue with small rural communities having teenagers marry.”
Like Amish niggas do a prolonged marriage thing where they aren’t married until late teens early twenties, but are allowed to basically publicly be together. I think that’s what he was defending and brought up the whole “women are most fertile from 15-25” thing as an appeal to tradition.

Also, @Null the Spanish Civil War happened because the election prior to the coup had women vote for the first time and the Right Wing Parties had surprising victory because most women voted for them. The next time there was chicanery and that’s when shit kicked off.
There was quite a bit of political violence and even a Right Wing figure was literally assassinated in Fed custody by Fed’s as retaliation for the assassination of a Left Wing figure.
Franco is someone who really doesn’t get credit for being the one “Fascist” in Europe who didn’t get into the gay philosophy side of shit and really wanted his nation to succeed and they did until the European Union encouraged them not to produce anything except olive oil.
 
i can't quote lidl drips post for some reason but hes basically blaming men for the state of child births which is just dumb he strawmans every man as FAT REDDIT LOSER INCELS and women as HEROS FIGHTING DISGUSTING MEN don't tread on me solution is wrong though the truth is in the 1960s the atheist jew hippies made faith unpopular and legalized feminism and other malarky so women now have endless partners unlike before you had church arranged marriages so lesser men could have kids now its just women banging chads and the rest being left scraps so what happens with these scraps they become depressed they watch porn they shoot up schools why did these men not exist in the 50s because men had a reason to work and women had a reason not to be a whore and now that reason is gone and people blame men and strawman them and the other guy claims that we have no solution when we do its restoring faith that would rid us of the cancer that is LGBT and rid us of incels

TLDR faith is the answer jews let women be whores

Yes and the expectation is that men will become more attractive and then eventually women will change their ways after they've noticed that men have improved. And what's the incentive to that? What's your personal incentive, to improve and become better when women are just ignoring men as a whole? To help the next generation or some shit? It's a waste of time, money and energy for zero profit. If there's no benefit to improving yourself then there's no reason to bother.


"Due to infidelity". That's a funny way of saying women are choosing to abandon men. Yes, 50% of marriages end in divorces and 72% of those divorces are initiated by women. And who cares about alimony when you will always have to pay child support? If women were loyal and stayed true to men then men would have reason to believe their relationships would actually last long enough to be worth pursuing. But instead, women abandon men at record rates and divorced men kill themselves at ridiculously high rates. Pursuing women will literally end your life prematurely because they will leave you over the slightest provocation. Or simply because they fell out of love with you because you aren't exciting enough and aren't pursuing them 95% of the time after you've been married 10 years.
this is true also i keked when he said redpill incel thats like saying neocon nazi what a retard
 
i can't quote lidl drips post for some reason but hes basically blaming men for the state of child births which is just dumb he strawmans every man as FAT REDDIT LOSER INCELS and women as HEROS FIGHTING DISGUSTING MEN don't tread on me solution is wrong though the truth is in the 1960s the atheist jew hippies made faith unpopular and legalized feminism and other malarky so women now have endless partners unlike before you had church arranged marriages so lesser men could have kids now its just women banging chads and the rest being left scraps so what happens with these scraps they become depressed they watch porn they shoot up schools why did these men not exist in the 50s because men had a reason to work and women had a reason not to be a whore and now that reason is gone and people blame men and strawman them and the other guy claims that we have no solution when we do its restoring faith that would rid us of the cancer that is LGBT and rid us of incels

TLDR faith is the answer jews let women be whores
Look if you want to post here you have to format things correctly instead of typing out run-on sentences in a hysterical screed.

In any case, you can argue for grand ideas like restoring faith but unless you have a concrete way of doing that it's not a real solution. I'm saying that is impossible.
 
Look if you want to post here you have to format things correctly instead of typing out run-on sentences in a hysterical screed.

In any case, you can argue for grand ideas like restoring faith but unless you have a concrete way of doing that it's not a real solution. I'm saying that is impossible.
i mean you do have a point but at the same time we are only another january 6th away from donald trump ruling with an iron fist thats when we will convince him all jokes aside now that you say that i have no clue how we restore faith checkmate i guess
 
Back