Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Referencing the Tyre Extinguishers post again, I believe many of these so called "activists" are just vandals looking to cloak their desire to destroy things with environmentalism.

Case in point, the suggestion is made that the SUV is vandalized due to the deaths of two pedestrians. However, the SUV targeted seems to be a newer model that has more advanced safety measures designed to reduced or even eliminate pedestrian collisions.

Automated Emergency Braking

While one can suggest these systems don't work as well as intended, that is better than nothing. Now, as they also complain about the environment being negatively impacted by SUVs (either hybrid or electric) we need to explore the alternatives.

If such a person were to just buy a new car as opposed to owning their SUV for 10+ years, as the environmental impact is massive as it's production cost is resource / carbon intensive.

A response might be to buy used sedans to mitigate the environmental impact but then you have middle to upper class people buying these cars for asking price to near asking price and reducing the supply as well.

This does multiple things. First, it hinders working class people from replacing their even older less efficient cars with more efficient / safer used cars. Second, as the older cars have less automated safety features it increases the chances that a collision will occur with both other vehicles and pedestrians.

See unintended consequences:

I suppose people could take public transit but in many places it's not practical for persons working full time, have kids, or live at home.

Is the cost of housing not a concern that these fuck talk about? Imagine this, a person lives at home but drives to a metro area for work.

Now, the Tyre Extinguishers want this cubical dweller to live closer to their job but rent in such 40% of said persons income. So now instead of saving for a proper home they have to rent a cube then (as they have stated) waste even more of their money getting liquor or less healthy food from a fucking third place.

Sounds like peak consumerism and "You'll own nothing and be happy."

I am not even addressing the lack of equity from not having real estate and the lack of potential investment due to living like a fucking bug men.





The conclusion I have reached is they these fuckers should be shot with some soft tipped .308 or 30.06. I have seen what such a round does to deer so I want to see the exit wounds on these soy faggots.
 
A lot of the comments are based, as they usually are outside of urbanist echo chambers:
1689896077069.png
1689896023100.png
1689896094595.png
1689896256557.png
1689896119800.png
1689896266301.png
1689896279178.png
1689896165094.png
1689896182133.png
1689896231957.png
1689896295706.png
1689896301066.png
 
Usually even thieves don't hit the same target twice... usually (if aren't retarded and want to live) because they know the owner will be ready the next time. However knowing these dumbasses I wouldn't be surprised if they they didn't think this far ahead and try the same shit twice on the same car.
 
I can't find any of it now, but there were proto-urbanists singing the praises of kowloon around the time it was being demolished. They thought it should be replicated with modern building tecyhniques, because more dense = more betterer, I guess.
Kowloon's main attraction to urbanists and general losers was the dirt-cheap rent, at around the equivalent of $5 a month.

The problem is that doesn't buy much, you're buying into a tiny room with almost no amenities (no bathrooms, probably not even running water), very little insulation (sound and temperature issues), probably very little in the way of climate control, and the roof was basically an open-air garbage dump.

If you account for those changes, especially with big city permits for every goddamn thing, you aren't going to get cheap apartments.
 
There's something poetic about all this that's difficult to describe. Fuckcars isn't doing something creative or productive they're just occupying space and being a nuisance for the sake of being a nuisance. yes I understand the original thing about the parking lot was to make a statement about parking lots irl using a lot of space, but this is the second year they're doing the same thing. At first it might have been somewhat creative as an idea but now it's just laziness.

Also go Argentina!
 
Kowloon's main attraction to urbanists and general losers was the dirt-cheap rent, at around the equivalent of $5 a month.

The problem is that doesn't buy much, you're buying into a tiny room with almost no amenities (no bathrooms, probably not even running water), very little insulation (sound and temperature issues), probably very little in the way of climate control, and the roof was basically an open-air garbage dump.

If you account for those changes, especially with big city permits for every goddamn thing, you aren't going to get cheap apartments.
I wouldn't ever want to live there, but I can't help but feel drawn to it because there's never been anything else like it. A true libertarian paradise of no building regulations, almost something straight out of Blade Runner.
It really does tick all of the urbanist checkboxes: ultra-high density (the most densely populated place in human history in fact), mixed use, walkable, "close-knit community" and probably full of non-church third places. Yeah, yeah, Triads running everything, exposed wiring everywhere, zero insulation, abject poverty and a complete lack of hygiene, but those are just minor roadblocks in the quest for the urbanist's sardine-can dream. I'm sure they would love to make a Ritz-y version of Kowloon and replace all city centers with them.

And I think it's hard for most to deny there's a certain perverse charm to it, even someone like me who thinks urbanists and hyper-dense living is terrible. I wouldn't want anyone to live there IRL, but I'd love to see it in a movie.
 
When I see all the suburbia hate, I can't help but think of this photo.

dcLkKg--RFA.jpg


As someone who lived in multiple places that looked just like the picture above, I can attest that moving from a large personal living space with your own garden into a stone box won't immediately turn your life into sunshine and rainbows. Not everyone can live in that fancy building in the walkable city center, most city people will have to dwell in an ugly concrete hive on the outskirts, and, in my opinion, that's way more depressing than your own house in a suburbia. Whether or not you reside in a good living space just depends on how much money does the city have, and a lot of them simply can't provide the infrastructure.
 
I wouldn't ever want to live there, but I can't help but feel drawn to it because there's never been anything else like it. A true libertarian paradise of no building regulations, almost something straight out of Blade Runner.
It really does tick all of the urbanist checkboxes: ultra-high density (the most densely populated place in human history in fact), mixed use, walkable, "close-knit community" and probably full of non-church third places. Yeah, yeah, Triads running everything, exposed wiring everywhere, zero insulation, abject poverty and a complete lack of hygiene, but those are just minor roadblocks in the quest for the urbanist's sardine-can dream. I'm sure they would love to make a Ritz-y version of Kowloon and replace all city centers with them.

And I think it's hard for most to deny there's a certain perverse charm to it, even someone like me who thinks urbanists and hyper-dense living is terrible. I wouldn't want anyone to live there IRL, but I'd love to see it in a movie.
I like the KWC alot, I think it has a really cool aesthetic and is highly illustrative what people would do rather than live under communism, but would I want to live there? No, but it would've been cool to visit.
 
I wouldn't ever want to live there, but I can't help but feel drawn to it because there's never been anything else like it. A true libertarian paradise of no building regulations, almost something straight out of Blade Runner.
It really does tick all of the urbanist checkboxes: ultra-high density (the most densely populated place in human history in fact), mixed use, walkable, "close-knit community" and probably full of non-church third places. Yeah, yeah, Triads running everything, exposed wiring everywhere, zero insulation, abject poverty and a complete lack of hygiene, but those are just minor roadblocks in the quest for the urbanist's sardine-can dream. I'm sure they would love to make a Ritz-y version of Kowloon and replace all city centers with them.

And I think it's hard for most to deny there's a certain perverse charm to it, even someone like me who thinks urbanists and hyper-dense living is terrible. I wouldn't want anyone to live there IRL, but I'd love to see it in a movie.
I like the KWC alot, I think it has a really cool aesthetic and is highly illustrative what people would do rather than live under communism, but would I want to live there? No, but it would've been cool to visit.
Oh yeah, totally. It's a fascinating example of order growing out of complete anarchy. Very interesting. I would've liked to have visited it before they tore it down. And yeah, nah, wouldn't want to live there, but just to observe how people managed to make literal anarcho capitalism work in person would've been neat.
Off-topic but I finally made a Road Guy Rob appreciation thread (sneed) (onion) so posting about him can go there instead of here, unless it involves urbanists hating him (which can go in either thread).
Btw, if you make links that are just the path portion of the URL, it should work consistently in both onion and sneed.

1690138717847.png

Edit: Well fuck me, nevermind, doesn't work. It generates the sneed link in onion.
 

Attachments

  • 1690138678768.png
    1690138678768.png
    27.8 KB · Views: 11
Edit: Well fuck me, nevermind, doesn't work. It generates the sneed link in onion.
Yeah that's what I tried doing too, but the forum always rewrites the post with the domain inserted, and if there's no domain the link isn't clickable, and, separately, there seems to be a redirect implemented if links go to a different domain, but it only sometimes works and I'm not sure why.

The domain rewrite even interferes if I do multiple links to the same domain but I found it won't rewrite if I use bbcode instead.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Marvin
Yeah that's what I tried doing too, but the forum always rewrites the post with the domain inserted, and if there's no domain the link isn't clickable, and, separately, there seems to be a redirect implemented if links go to a different domain, but it only sometimes works and I'm not sure why.

The domain rewrite even interferes if I do multiple links to the same domain but I found it won't rewrite if I use bbcode instead.
Weird. I could've sworn it let me do it in another post. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Buddy, you're lucky he didn't come out with a shotgun. Pussy for doing it in the middle of the night. And you wonder why these criminal autists hate guns
The conclusion I have reached is they these fuckers should be shot with some soft tipped .308 or 30.06. I have seen what such a round does to deer so I want to see the exit wounds on these soy faggots.
Got a 180 grain soft tip of 300 win mag waiting to vaporize their balls if they ever walked onto MY PROPERTY and touched MY CAR
 
/r/fuckcars showcases how beautiful event infrastructure can be without cars:
1690166876039.png
0canvjbtopdb1.jpg
Don't worry if your bike gets stolen, you can buy a "new" one off of a junkie for less than €20.
1690167039221.png
Put another way, 3.5% of all Dutch bikes are stolen in the Netherlands every year. That's a horrible stat, not something to be proud of. For comparison around 800,000 cars were stolen in the US in 2020 out of 263.6 million cars registered, or less than 1/10 as often as the Dutch bike theft rate.

Moron using average commuter occupancy as average event occupancy:
1690167543211.png
At events, the average number of people per car is much higher as entire families/friend groups take one car.
Source (Archive)

Made a meme:
7tj3e5.jpg
 
Back