Bank Run Watch 2023 after Silicon Valley Bank shutdown - Over 97% of SVB's assets were not FDIC insured

this just means britbongs are so retarded they fall for paki scams. every major retailer in the states has signs by the gift cards saying "YOU CANNOT PAY YOUR UTILITY BILL WITH GIFT CARDS, ITS A SCAM".
Afraid not, old bean. The restrictions and questions have been increasingly invasive over the past 12-18 months, with withdrawal limits decreasing in limits. I'm not going to PL but I have had more and more trouble drawing out 'large' sums of money in cash. The banks don't want me to do it and throw every possible alternative to withdrawing the cash, including offering me a loan that is secured by the bank vs paying in cash.

It is getting to the point where my bank transfers from my small bank to my larger bank are being flagged as 'possible fraud' and the transaction is being cancelled. That's a transfer from one of my accounts to another. I'm transferring from my small bank to my large bank because the small bank is at risk of going under.

If you are a Brit, draw your money out of your bank and hold onto the cash.
 
Can confirm but small PL basically my faith in the UK banks is not there so what I do now is my bank only covers bills. Some banks offer only £400 a day. The british government at the moment are cagey af about inflation falling because it should be but is not. I keep my money now stowed in various locations, be a britbong live like a demented apocalyptic character.
 
Go to the ATM and pull the max out every day. Even if you limited to only 400pounds a day that still 2800 a week. 12000 a month.
Kinda a hassle but If shit goes south next month would you rather that 12000 be in your hideyhole in your house or stuck in some shuttered bank?
 
Afraid not, old bean. The restrictions and questions have been increasingly invasive over the past 12-18 months, with withdrawal limits decreasing in limits. I'm not going to PL but I have had more and more trouble drawing out 'large' sums of money in cash. The banks don't want me to do it and throw every possible alternative to withdrawing the cash, including offering me a loan that is secured by the bank vs paying in cash.

It is getting to the point where my bank transfers from my small bank to my larger bank are being flagged as 'possible fraud' and the transaction is being cancelled. That's a transfer from one of my accounts to another. I'm transferring from my small bank to my large bank because the small bank is at risk of going under.

If you are a Brit, draw your money out of your bank and hold onto the cash.
You know, the upstanding Negroes here in America don't have Bank Accounts. They insist their employers hand them a physical check that they take to the strip mall check cashing store, run by even more upstanding negroes who charge flat fees to turn their paychecks into physical cash that they then roll into huge wads and stick in their pants. Why do they do this? Well, if you were to ask the average cracker on the street, they do this because they are dumb niggers.

If you ask them directly though, they will tell you they ain't trusting their god damn money to the fucking man

You know what guys? I think the darkies are on to something.
 
If you're hiding money or other valuables in your house, maybe invest in a fireproof safe for part of it. Not all because a safe is a big target for burglars, but it'd be a shame to lose everything if disaster happened.
 
These fire chests are around 40 bux and not that hard to hide in a false wall or something.
fire safe box.jpg
 
You know, the upstanding Negroes here in America don't have Bank Accounts. They insist their employers hand them a physical check that they take to the strip mall check cashing store, run by even more upstanding negroes who charge flat fees to turn their paychecks into physical cash that they then roll into huge wads and stick in their pants. Why do they do this? Well, if you were to ask the average cracker on the street, they do this because they are dumb niggers.

If you ask them directly though, they will tell you they ain't trusting their god damn money to the fucking man

You know what guys? I think the darkies are on to something.

Sorry to burst your dreams, that is because a stripper's ass isn't accepting cards.... yet.
 
These fire chests are around 40 bux and not that hard to hide in a false wall or something.
View attachment 5133134
Having a box/safe full of money and valuables especially now is a good investment. You aren't investing in the lock, someone will just steal the whole thing. You're investing in the fire proofing and the fact you can shove it under the bed with comfort. Security comes from you and a pistol and your hiding skills.
 
Fearmongering or ?
Article states that if the US government can't pay it's debts then they might have to cut Social Security and other benefits.


America would burn to the ground without benefits. Remember the Great Depression? People lived the way they did through that time because there were no government aid programs in place yet.
Tbh not really fear mongering, eventually at some point soon that will have to happen if the Feds want the USD to survive. Raising the debt ceiling is like paying a mortgage with a credit card, those bills eventually become due and right now they are about due.
 
Perhaps there was a reason for all the elderly people being left to die in nursing homes during Covid...

...and all the autistic kids (on SSI) being encouraged to sterilize themselves with transgender treatments.
Currently I think the unfunded liabilities for all the welfare programs and social secruity is at 170 trillion dollars. So they better hope for a boomercaust.
 
Perhaps there was a reason for all the elderly people being left to die in nursing homes during Covid...

...and all the autistic kids (on SSI) being encouraged to sterilize themselves with transgender treatments.
Gotta make room for the infinite amount of brown people they're importing that will be put into the system, plus the Basketball American Hordes that are almost universally net negatives on the system.
 
Fearmongering or ?
Article states that if the US government can't pay it's debts then they might have to cut Social Security and other benefits.
God forbid the U.S. Govt would ever touch the public union servant retirement bennies. Instead decide to fuck the untouchable third rail that the Democrats counted on as an permanent voting block ever since FDR got it enacted almost a century ago.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Matt Damon
Something will have to give eventually. The US Government could get away with spending more then it took in because its "immortal". Us simple mortals have to worry about ceasing to exist one day. If we rack up too much debt in our lifetimes, then our estates become worthless when we die. The next generation gets nothing. Since the government cannot "die", the debt can literally be pushed far into the future, where eventually the magic of inflation renders it worthless to the holders of it. Its one of the dark arts of inflationary monetary policy.

The problem is when the debt increases too quickly. When your future horizon moves from 50 years to 2 years, you got a serious problem on your hands. The debt doesn't inflate away into the ether fast enough. The cost of servicing it increases greater then the income coming in. The only way to "inflate it away" quicker is to print more money to pay existing liabilities. Which causes inflation to spike higher.

This has two huge problems. Problem 1 is with how the US funds its liabilities. Especially the BIG ones like Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Section 8 housing, Food Stamps/WIC, and Veterans Benefits. These are tied by statute to the rate of inflation. Which means even if the government starts to inflate the currency to mitigate the debt, the amount of their liabilities increase with the rate of inflation. They have to pay more! This is why they've become so creative at defining what the rate of inflation is, leaving out things like food and oil. Its so they don't have to meet the statutory requirements of their benefit programs.

Problem 2 though is even worse. As the currency becomes less valuable, profit margins at the corporate level shrink and income levels at the citizen level shrink too. While people are making more money then they were 20 years ago, its not going anywhere. A Candybar that was 49 cents in 2000 is worth 1.99 today. This has a choking effect on the economy, reducing everything from sales taxes to earned income taxes. Corporations have to write off more and more as business expenses, reducing what they have to pay in taxes as well.

So while liabilities are increasing in value, the governments net tax intake is decreasing.

The only real way to break the cycle is to crash the economy deliberately, like what Paul Volker did. The issue though, as I keep harping on, was that the time to do this was in 2008. Now its too late. 2008 may have resulted in a lost decade and shitty time for all economically, but the recovery would have happened on the back end. Now? If the Fed tried to throttle the engine its more likely to explode complete with little hope of immediate recovery. Because DEFLATION is the only thing that can restore the ship. Deflation would essentially reset the clock backwards, getting the economy back down to earth after it had been taken to dizzying heights.

Which would be an absolute catastrophe for the way the economy is set up. Deflation means no more consumer debt. It means more frugal spending by consumers. The entire international economic order will collapse as it would essentially mean an end to entitlements as the government would be insolvent, the banks would all fail, donkeys will walk up skyscrapers and start flying, the roosters will crow at midnight and the first trumpet will sound.

Needless to say, TPTB are doing everything they can to stave off the apocalypse. And as a last resort they absolutely will end entitlements.
 
Last edited:
I just saw this screenshot of a tweet from the FDIC. Sadly, because of Musk I cannot verify the authenticity of the image.
1690205349145900.jpg
However, the webpage linked in the tweet is, in fact, real.

Estimated Uninsured Deposits Reporting Expectations
(archive)

Bros, words cannot describe how big of a red flag this is. Banks are suddenly unwilling/unable to give correct information to the FDIC? Well, let us see what games the banks are playing...
For example, some institutions incorrectly reduced the amount reported to the extent that the uninsured deposits are collateralized by pledged assets
Additionally, some institutions incorrectly reduced the amount reported on Schedule RC-O by excluding intercompany deposit balances of subsidiaries.
I think it wont be long before this thread becomes active again.
 
Back