Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
In a twist to this story that should surprise noone that hasn't realised that troon = sex-pest, this creepy old perv is officiating at the British Summer Swimming Champs, and using the opportunity to wander around the changing rooms while the women competitors get changed. I wonder if anyone has inspected his shoe for hidden cameras. DD means daughter.

View attachment 5234526

Now it all becomes clear. He's just a pedo. He'll be excused and allowed to carry on, of course.
 
Wouldn't happen to be Jammidodger, would it? She's responsible for trooning out many girls. And she's got a book now, so she's a special author with a PhD.
Yeah that was one of them, I fucking hate google, they have to be pushing this shit in the algorithm on purpose. I wonder it's an ideological thing, a money thing, or they just have too many troon programmers. I really have to wonder how much of this is just social media algorithms in action.
 
I'm not sure where else to post this, but I was thinking recently...the new world order or globohomo or whatever you want to call them, there's no doubt in my mind that they spread the tranny virus through porn and that's why we are where we are. They made a portion of a generation of men think that either they should be women or want to fuck men who try to look like women. These people always eventually admit it all comes down to porn and I'm so tired of pretending otherwise.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but it might also be that men predisposed to seek out degenerate porn in the first place are also predisposed to troon out.

The biggest risk factor of course is autism, and we've no idea why that's exploded in recent years.
 
It's amazing how many of them have PhDs in troonology. Amazing not because of their academic acumen, but because it says so much about the shitty standards of academia nowadays that a few lazy long essays about your personal fetish makes you an 'expert' and a 'doctor' who should be quoted as always knowing the correct truth.

This was always an issue in some strands of academia, but nowhere near as bad as it is today. It's frankly embarrassing.
Funny story about her PhD. It's been discussed ITT, but I'll reiterate: Jaime got her PhD with a paper that measured sexual arousal in trans men vs surveys. That's it. She didn't actively measure their brain waves or map what images were arousing them. She just asked. Her doctoral advisor (or one of them) was none other than J. Michael Bailey, a man whose work she referenced in her paper yet admitted to NEVER reading his work. Also admitted to hating him because he was a "raging transphobe."

Other fields have PhD programs that can last years, and require a ton of research. No fucking idea how a below average retard like her got hers so quick.
 
Didn't Yaniv try something like this but not manage to pull it off? Guess he needed Citibank to sponsor it.


swim01.PNGswim03.jpgswim02.PNG
Of note:
Last Saturday of every month.

Please bear in mind that we do not currently allow cisgender parents and guardians to be in the pool or on the poolside.

If there's a way to archive Facebook, it is beyond me, sorry. Just links and screenshots. Facebook link.
 
The protest was pretty small and surprisingly (for trannies) quiet. Maybe they're finally learning that threatening violence to get what they want isn't the best way to go about things?
I know it's old, and I apologise because I'm still catching up after not being able to access KF for a while but I had to share - the dude in pigtails in that video instantly reminded me of an Aphex Twin character and I can't stop chuckling.
Screenshot 2023-07-26 133353.pngScreenshot 2023-07-26 133832.png
 
No, faggots were being jailed in the UK until about 50 years ago.

As recently as twenty years ago, England had the wise and just law "Section 28", which outlawed grooming kids in schools, until the socialists repealed it.
That law was idiotic.
It wasn't against grooming, it was against acknowledging gay people existed in any way at all which made for a hotbed of confusion and misery and homophobia for way longer than it needed to go on.

Also, yea coincidentally I watched the Windowlicker video the other day, to show someone who had never seen it, and now literally every troon just reminds me of that. Awful man's face imposed onto (would-be) girl bod. Imagine actually being Worse looking than that video - cos at least in the apex video, only the face was FUBAR.
 
Last edited:
This is pretty much universal. Lesbian women generally do not pose a threat to the sexual order per se, so they're left alone.
I think that's due to the fact that the Council of Patriarchs imagine two sexy lipsticks getting it on while they watch and maybe join in when they think of lesbian sex gays fuck the literal shithole and have proven themselves to be massive disease vectors and so trigger a disgust response, which is also believed to be the underlying subconscious force behind things like racism and embrace of authoritarianism.
 
That law was idiotic.
It wasn't against grooming, it was against acknowledging gay people existed in any way at all which made for a hotbed of confusion and misery and homophobia for way longer than it needed to go on

Maybe. But after seeing what schools have been pumping out for sex education in recent years, I'm a lot more sympathetic to Section 28 than I used to be.
 
These poor fucking women in long term relationships or marriages only to have the guy they've trusted become troons. I'd lose my fucking mind.

"She won't stop crying!! Back into the closet I go!!"

She'd be better off if you roped yourself honestly.

I feel even worse when they have kids they're trying not to "traumatize". If being a troon is so normal why are you hiding it from your family? If you haven't worry about traumatizing someone, the shit ain't normal.
 
That law was idiotic.
It wasn't against grooming, it was against acknowledging gay people existed in any way at all which made for a hotbed of confusion and misery and homophobia for way longer than it needed to go on
It was against promoting homosexuality to kids, and it was awesome. If it was still there, there'd be a lot less faggotry and pedophilia on Terf Island today. Now the law is gone, but faggots and trannies are still confused and miserable, as we see every day in this thread.



>> we do not currently allow cisgender parents and guardians

How can they tell???
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying you're wrong, but it might also be that men predisposed to seek out degenerate porn in the first place are also predisposed to troon out.

The biggest risk factor of course is autism, and we've no idea why that's exploded in recent years.
We do, actually. It isn't that there's more autistic people, just that the definition has changed so much that it includes way more people. I've often seen people recieve the diagnoses, either for themselves or their kid, then begin explaining away their behavior as if it's entirely caused by autism.
Think of it this way, in the 90s, over 1 million people became autistic overnight due to a redefinition. That doesn't mean 1 mil people suddenly got it, they've always had it, they just are incredibly high functioning.
 
We do, actually. It isn't that there's more autistic people, just that the definition has changed so much that it includes way more people. I've often seen people recieve the diagnoses, either for themselves or their kid, then begin explaining away their behavior as if it's entirely caused by autism.
Think of it this way, in the 90s, over 1 million people became autistic overnight due to a redefinition. That doesn't mean 1 mil people suddenly got it, they've always had it, they just are incredibly high functioning.

I think that's part of it, but I was under the impression that it's rising even when you take that into account. Hence why Wakefield was so quick to link it to the MMR jab. Maternal age is going to be part of it (see Chris).
 
I think that's part of it, but I was under the impression that it's rising even when you take that into account. Hence why Wakefield was so quick to link it to the MMR jab. Maternal age is going to be part of it (see Chris).
Probably a mix of things, I know past 30 for women, your chances go up 2x each year to concieve an autistic child, same if the man is over 35. So probably a definition change + people having children later and later because of how expensive it is to have them now, or people just wanting to be in a comfortable spot. I think I read that kids cost something crazy like 100k their first year of life? Could be off, but sounds accurate with how rediculous birthing costs are. Why are you being CHARGED for something that was going to happen regardless? I understand the epidural or c section costing money but skin to skin?!
 
Yes...a real person wrote those down, thinking troons are immune from all of that.
I find florid polysyllables, neologisms, and gnarled syntax, as brandished by Judith Butler and her disciples, more useful as tools to stop complex and critical thinking. The rise in transsexualism proves my point.

:gunt: !!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!:gunt:
:gunt: !!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!:gunt:
:gunt: !!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!:gunt:
:gunt:!!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!:gunt:
:gunt:!!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!:gunt:
:gunt: !!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!:gunt:
:gunt: !!!DAN OLSON HATES TRANNIES !!!
:gunt:


or maybe he doesn't idk
 
We do, actually. It isn't that there's more autistic people, just that the definition has changed so much that it includes way more people. I've often seen people recieve the diagnoses, either for themselves or their kid, then begin explaining away their behavior as if it's entirely caused by autism.
Think of it this way, in the 90s, over 1 million people became autistic overnight due to a redefinition. That doesn't mean 1 mil people suddenly got it, they've always had it, they just are incredibly high functioning.
I think diet plays a part too. Obesity has been skyrocketing for decades, diabetes, heart disease, fatty liver, fibromyalgia, adhd, depression, anxiety, autism - you name it and cases have been skyrocketing since the 70s. What changed in the 70s? They introduced the food pyramid, told everyone that low fat, grains, vegetable oils, and ultra processed foods were healthy. If you look at the grocery store 99% of the food is stuff our grandparents wouldn't recognize as food. Lucky Charms has trisodium phosphate in it. TSP is sold as a cleaner you use to wash your walls before you paint them. Vegetable oils, specifically ones made from seeds have high levels of omega 6 fatty acids, which are linked to inflammation. Seed oils are in literally everything because they are cheap. High fructose corn syrup is also in everything on the shelves. Fructose is processed by liver, too much leads directly to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a diagnosis practically unknown 50 years ago. And one that can be reversed by not eating foods containing fructose.

I'm not saying the study that claims the amish have no chronic diseases is correct; diabetes, cancer, heart disease, and mental illness can affect literally anyone because of how biology and genetics are super complicated. I'm saying that there might be a correlation between the types of foods we eat and chronic illnesses. I know that personally switching to a whole food, high protein and fat diet has all but cured my arthritis, fibromyalgia, and has completely gotten rid of my chronic anxiety - something even medication couldn't do - even though I haven't lost a single pound. A low carb, high protein diet also is known to put diabetes in remission, it won't put type 1 into remission but a strict low-carb diet can help a typ1 diabetic have normal blood sugar and reduce risk of complications; and I recently learned a lot of people are successfully using diet to manage serious mental illness. Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anorexia, and more controlled simply through eating more red meat, saturated fat, eggs, and dairy, and limiting grains and sugar. Basically going back to the kind of foods our grandparents ate, back when very few people were obese or chronically ill.

I don't think ultraprocessed foods will go away. I think it's more likely that we'll develop more and more of these foods and the population will get fatter, weaker, and sicker. I'm this close to believing there's a literal conspiracy between the food conglomerates and big pharma to slowly poison us all. If drug companies don't have an audience for their "innovations" then create them. We see this in troonism - SRS is expected to be a billion dollar industry soon. We've all talked about how this movement has been astroturfed by billionares and pharma. Create a life-long patient as a teenager, sterilize the unworthy/disabled, and profit all the way to the bank.

I don't know if I'm right or just another annoying quasi-religious keto evangelist. I may get nothing but dumb stickers, because this way of thinking is definately not mainstream. I can only talk about the almost miracleous affects I've seen in my own life. I think it's an avenue worth exploring, though there is an almost insurmountable uphill battle to get people to accept diet is the cause for many complaints.
 
That law was idiotic.
It wasn't against grooming, it was against acknowledging gay people existed in any way at all which made for a hotbed of confusion and misery and homophobia for way longer than it needed to go on.
Section 28 prohibited the promotion of homosexuality in schools.

Which I don't see the problem with. Schools shouldn't be promoting homosexuality.
 
Back