Science ‘Scientist’ Neil deGrasse Tyson claims biology is ‘insufficient’ during unhinged rant defending radical trans agenda - "Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, I feel 80 percent female, 20 percent male."

6f61640ca73a669bfbb6ff3b73b0d5d9.jpg

Libby Emmons
Aug 1, 2023

Astrophysicist and noted science personality Neil deGrasse Tyson spoke out in favor of gender ideology and the ability of a person to actually change their sex. He made the remarks on the Stephen A Smith podcast "K[no]w Mercy."

"Apparenly the XX/XY chromosomes," he said with obvious derision, "are insufficient because when we wake up in the morning, we exaggerate whatever feature we want to portray the gender of our choice. Either the one you're assigned, the one you choose to be—whatever it is!"

1690981569142.png
Tweet (Archive)

"And so now," he went on as though swapping sex was the most obvious thing in the world, "just to tie a bow on this, I say to you, somewhere I read— somewhere, I think I read— that the United States was a land where we have the pursuit of happiness. Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, I feel 80 percent female, 20 percent male. Now I'm gonna, I'm gonna put on makeup. Tomorrow, I might feel 80 percent male. I'll remove the makeup and I'll wear a muscle shirt. Why do you care? What businesses is it of yours to require that I fill your inability to think of gender on a spectrum?"

Detransitioner Chloe Cole took issue with Tyson, noting that in his assessment, he conflates appearance and cosmetics with biology, as though a person's external presentation has an effect on their biological reality.

1690981587518.png
Tweet (Archive)

"How about we stop confusing basic human biology with cosmetics?" Cole said. "Like what a weird jump. I don't wear makeup most days, if I leave the house without makeup on, does that make me like 70 male?"

"If it were only truly about aesthetics," she continued, "nobody would care. It's my business. Because we're using 1950s gender stereotypes to justify an ideology that leads to the sterilization and mastectomy is of 15-year-old girls who just don't fit in— girls like me."

Cold pointed out that despite Tyson's assertions, he was not exhibiting the same stereotypes that he espoused defines males and females. "I wonder what gender he was when he recorded this," she said. "He doesn't have a muscle shirt on, right? No spray tan, no falsies. He's probably like 50 percent male," she guessed.

"Because the only thing that you've established in this video," she said, "is that men wear trousers and tank tops, but women, they wear lipstick and dresses. The idea that people can be percentages of either male or female just further reinforces the fact that biological sex is a binary. There's only two. There may only be two sexes, but there are an infinite number of personalities. I mean, it really doesn't take a degree in astrophysics to understand that."

Cole has been outspoken about her gender transition experience, which she underwent in her early teen years. Now 19, she began transition with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones before having her breasts surgically removed by doctors at the age of 15. These "cures" did not solve her problems, and she has found herself entirely dismayed at the speed with which her body was dismembered in service to a lie.

She recently testified before Congress to express her concern at the rise in this so-called treatment for minors.

Source (Archive)

Full Interview:
 
But Pluto has to have certain requirements to be called a planet? GFY
Motherfucker couldn't even make the concise explanation of why Pluto isn't a planet. Simple version is that Pluto and Charon are a dual body system that orbit a mutual center of gravity, which disqualifies Pluto from planethood.
 
Pop science man adheres to liberal orthodoxy when it comes into conflict with hard science? Well I never!
this is a much larger trend i see with the left. they look back in history and see people who stood up to the cultural, religious, or scientific orthodoxy of their time and the left says 'that's literally me'. this guy probably sees himself as galileo saying no to the catholic church whereas he is bending over backwards to conform to the current cultural religion of troonism.

the left loves to say 'i woudl totally be that person who said slavery is wrong in the 1600s' or 'i would totally be the guy who says the earth isnt the center of the universe in 1540' the thing is though in their lives in 2023 these same leftists are the most hardocre defenders of the current system and attack anyone who differs from it. they would be the same exact way in the past as well. so rather than being on teh side of galileo these leftists would be the exact people calling for him to be tourtured to death for promoting fake news and not trusting the science.
what the fuck does it mean to feel female or male, I have never had any of these troons explain it to me.
as the example of black sicence man shows, it is if you like the traditional 'girly' things more than the traditional boy things. do you like wearing make up, dresses, and the color pink? well then you feel female. let's ignore all arguments which these same leftist were pushing 15 years ago that these things arnt inherently female. funny enough it is the troons and their supporters who push the most hardcore 1950s style gender norms while saying how terrible it is that in the 50s there were gender norms.

He rebooted Cosmos with updated graphics, but unlike reboots of today he added a couple of episodes, made it look better than the 70's animations and graphics and didn't change anything else. And he did it on Netflix when it was at it's peak.
he was famous before that. the internet sucked his dick before cosmos. it is why i never bothered to watch it because by then i was already sick of this faggot by the time that was announced. the original question that people have about where this man came form still stands. how did he get popular on the internet pre cosmos?
 
I thought it was a "clear the orbit" thing: Pluto is in the Kuiper Belt, which is why Ceres isn't considered a planet either.
From an article on why Pluto is oppressed and not a planet anymore:
The International Astronomical Union (IAU) downgraded the status of Pluto to that of a dwarf planet because it did not meet the three criteria the IAU uses to define a full-sized planet. Essentially Pluto meets all the criteria except one—it “has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.”
In August 2006 the International Astronomical Union (IAU) downgraded the status of Pluto to that of “dwarf planet.” This means that from now on only the rocky worlds of the inner Solar System and the gas giants of the outer system will be designated as planets. The “inner Solar System” is the region of space that is smaller than the radius of Jupiter’s orbit around the sun. It contains the asteroid belt as well as the terrestrial planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. The “gas giants” of course are Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus. So now we have eight planets instead of the nine we used to have.
A “dwarf planet,” as defined by the IAU, is a celestial body in direct orbit of the Sun that is massive enough that its shape is controlled by gravitational forces rather than mechanical forces (and is thus ellipsoid in shape), but has not cleared its neighboring region of other objects.

So, the three criteria of the IAU for a full-sized planet are:
  1. It is in orbit around the Sun.
  2. It has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape).
  3. It has “cleared the neighborhood” around its orbit.
Pluto meets only two of these criteria, losing out on the third. In all the billions of years it has lived there, it has not managed to clear its neighborhood. You may wonder what that means, “not clearing its neighboring region of other objects?” Sounds like a minesweeper in space! This means that the planet has become gravitationally dominant — there are no other bodies of comparable size other than its own satellites or those otherwise under its gravitational influence, in its vicinity in space.

So any large body that does not meet these criteria is now classed as a “dwarf planet,” and that includes Pluto, which shares its orbital neighborhood with Kuiper belt objects such as the plutinos.

Basically it wasn't antisocial enough to be a "real" heavenly body.
 
Last edited:
I don't remember how he rose to prominence (was it the "watch out we got a badass over here" meme?) but it was almost as if he was thrusted into the spotlight 15 years ago and the 9gaggers and pRedditors gobbled him up.
He jumped on the atheism bandwagon in the 2000's.
A lot of idiots rose to prominence back then just because they could refute basic religious arguments.
Just like a lot of idiots today rise to prominence just because they can refute basic woke arguments.
Things never change.
 
he was famous before that. the internet sucked his dick before cosmos
Because he wasn't actually behaving like a twat in public back then and was funny when he was just discussing how good or bad the physics was in beer commercials.

Simple version is that Pluto and Charon are a dual body system that orbit a mutual center of gravity, which disqualifies Pluto from planethood.
The ones trying to push that definition are struggling with the fact that it disqualifies Earth from being a planet as well, since the Moon is particularly large for a planet the size of Earth. The proponents of it are having to try to reclassify Earth+Moon as a binary planet with its own (arbitrary) rules to qualify.

this guy probably sees himself as galileo saying no to the catholic church
Galileo wasn't even persecuted by the church, they were paying for all of his research and experiments, pretty much. Galileo sperged out in a book for reasons no one has ever been able to explain reasonably by writing a book with a totally fictional Pope who totally wasn't his benefactor and friend making him out to be retarded. He was given a lot of chances to stop until they finally had to do something in a place where most people did believe the Pope was the voice of God on earth. Even then his punishment was incredibly tame for the time. The church was as much a part of the Renaissance as the rest of the educated classes and did want a better understanding of the universe and how it works.

It's like Galileo discovered a fedora orbiting with Jupiter's moons at a time when fedora were really out of fashion. The behavior of Black Science Guy and Galileo really do line up in a lot of ways, the environment they're doing it in is just way different.
 
I thought it was a "clear the orbit" thing: Pluto is in the Kuiper Belt, which is why Ceres isn't considered a planet either.
I think the "clear it's own orbit" thing is about the body must be massive enough to be the primary gravitational influence in the area and orbiting a barycenter with your nearest partner would contradict that.

I know the barycenter of the Earth and the Moon isn't literally the center of the Earth but I'm reasonably certain that the point is still within the Earth's boundary.
 
But Pluto has to have certain requirements to be called a planet? GFY
So guys today I feel like 80% that I’m clearing all debris in my path ok, so put me right back on that planet list m’kay? I’m just not identifying as a dwarf planet today
As a scientist (sorry) , I find the proliferation of this kind of thing quite depressing. Science is supposed to be a method to find out what is more likely to be the truth. It’s supposed to ask questions and rely on objective data. You objectively cannot change sex. Gender is a made up word to describe the set of behaviours. Wear whatever you like Niel, but you can’t change sex and you KNOW that. Everyone does, and yet they parrot this nonsense. It’s like a mass delusion.
To say that an objective state at the macro level is a matter of how you feel about it is about as far from the scientific method as you can get.
I can’t think of a modern ‘science explainer’ figure who is actually good at explaining things or doesn’t hold views that are at odds with reality. They used to exist, but I think they’re generally not allowed to now.
Perhaps it’s a mild autist trait but you know that feeling that some things are wrong and wrongness makes you feel bad? This makes me feel bad.
 
Back