Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

What happens with double-speak like this is people will accept the nominal definition but internalize the conflicting meaning, connotation, or feelings. Then they will become a vector for spreading the idea, themselves pushing for things to be all Black while calling them "diverse" and not at all realizing the contradiction. By misusing language this way it conditions other people into doublethink, which is a learned mental behavior that becomes easier the more you do it. An entire culture can be poisoned and corrupted this way.​

- Assassin47 on SJWs calling a mostly black cast "diverse"

(source: A predominately black movie is diverse - Kotaku In Action 2)
 
IMG_20230801_230450_459.jpg

Imagine going to a country and then creating spaces specifically to AVOID the native inhabitants of said country. Basically self-segregation.
 
the French Revolution since the sentiments are similar to shit we're dealing with now
I've started calling wokeism "The Cult of Progress", which is now kind of like the Cult of Reason was during the French Revolution.

The Cult of Reason tried to replace the church in France back then, and "identity politics" is the state church of Clown World now.
 
Last edited:
annoying.png

Geeze, not this whiny, obnoxious race grifter and his group of Irish yes men on social media again.... :roll:

What do people like him have to offer except moan and bitch about imagined racism everywhere?


Translation: "REEEEEEEEE! Any opinion or person I don't agree with is racist! REEEEEEEEE!"

BTW this guy was an advocate of the proposed hate speech laws in Ireland
 
Last edited:
Not sure where this really goes under, but in the midst of a quasi-Gamergate spat over if games have to be fun by definition, the trans non-binary version of Patrick Tomlinson rears its (one of its preferred pronouns, by the way) ugly head. Please welcome Neeva Gang 2.0 (Twitter handle @PunishedGramsci). Apparently it knows we exist.

Tweet | Archive
1691023933414.png

People who want fun are mud-brained children.
Tweet | Archive
1691024047841.png

It alleges to be a chef.
Tweet | Archive
1691024176915.png

Bonus conspiracy theory. For the uninitiated, "SA" stands for "Something Awful":
Tweet | Archive
1691025689461.png
 
Last edited:
Not sure where this really goes under, but in the midst of a quasi-Gamergate spat over if games have to be fun by definition, the trans non-binary version of Patrick Tomlinson rears its (one of its preferred pronouns, by the way) ugly head. Please welcome Neeva Gang 2.0 (Twitter handle @PunishedGramsci). Apparently it knows we exist.

Tweet | Archive
View attachment 5247927

People who want fun are mud-brained children.
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 5247934

It alleges to be a chef.
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 5247941

Bonus conspiracy theory. For the uninitiated, "SA" stands for "Something Awful":
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 5247981
If your game isn't fun you have failed as a game developer.
If your food doesn't taste good you have failed as a chef.
If your lolcow isn't funny you have failed as a KiwiFarms poster.
Luckily these lolcows are pretty funny.
 
Not sure where this really goes under, but in the midst of a quasi-Gamergate spat over if games have to be fun by definition
There's something to it, for example music doesn't have to be nice sounding, and paintings don't have to be pretty, the envelope of art can be pushed in many other ways than just following what's pleasing to the senses. Most games never reach that level, the overwhelming majority are below young adult novels in terms of artistic ambition. There are some rare exceptions that use the medium to its fullest.
 
There's something to it, for example music doesn't have to be nice sounding, and paintings don't have to be pretty, the envelope of art can be pushed in many other ways than just following what's pleasing to the senses. Most games never reach that level, the overwhelming majority are below young adult novels in terms of artistic ambition. There are some rare exceptions that use the medium to its fullest.
Then you get in to the place of throwing full trash bags around a white room and calling it art that represents the struggles of Chinese dirt farmers. We call that Emperors new clothes. Some standards need to apply to it all.
I can throw a beer bottle at a wall and have it smash, the beer and glass shards flowing down the wall represent the duality of man, give me $1m now please. Am i considered an artist or just a drunk asshole who threw a bottle at the wall? With enough pretentious language i can make someones friday night sick on a street corner in to worthy of being displayed next to Picasso.
 
Then you get in to the place of throwing full trash bags around a white room and calling it art that represents the struggles of Chinese dirt farmers. We call that Emperors new clothes. Some standards need to apply to it all.
I can throw a beer bottle at a wall and have it smash, the beer and glass shards flowing down the wall represent the duality of man, give me $1m now please. Am i considered an artist or just a drunk asshole who threw a bottle at the wall? With enough pretentious language i can make someones friday night sick on a street corner in to worthy of being displayed next to Picasso.
There's a lot of room between just painting nice pictures and some kind of exaggerated deconstructionism performance art you're describing here. Not everything has to devolve into an absurd caricature, try some nuance.
 
Write another book.
9781032319872.jpg


Publisher's blurb:
Although rule breaking in Harry Potter is sometimes dismissed as a distraction from Harry’s fight against Lord Voldemort, Harry Potter and Resistance makes the case that it is central to the battle against evil. Far beyond youthful hijinks or adolescent defiance, Harry’s rebellion aims to overcome problems deeper and more widespread than a single malevolent wizard. Harry and his allies engage in a resistance movement against the corruption of the Ministry of Magic as well as against the racist social norms that gave rise to Voldemort in the first place. Dumbledore’s Army and the Order of the Phoenix employ methods echoing those utilized by World War II resistance fighters and by the U.S. Civil Rights movement. The aim of this book is to explore issues that speak to our era of heightened political awareness and resistance to intolerance. Its interdisciplinary approach draws on political science, psychology, philosophy, history, race studies, and women’s studies, as well as newer interdisciplinary fields such as resistance studies, disgust studies, and creativity studies.​
About the author.
Beth Sutton- Ramspeck, Associate Professor Emerita of English at the Ohio State University at Lima, received her doctorate in English, with a minor in Women’s Studies, from Indiana University. The author of Raising the Dust: Literary Housekeeping in the Writings of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Sarah Grand, and Mary Ward (2004), and the editor of three novels, she has published numerous articles and presented at conferences about Victorian literature and about Harry Potter.​
woke.png
Yes. Harry Potter is an area of expertise in Clown World.

One interesting comment on her Rate My Professor page.
kook.png
 
There's a lot of room between just painting nice pictures and some kind of exaggerated deconstructionism performance art you're describing here. Not everything has to devolve into an absurd caricature, try some nuance.
Is it really "deconstructionism" and "exaggerated" if it is 100% true bro? The art world has been a joke for years. It would be better off if yes, there was a hard rule that art should have high standards. Under your rules, Chris-Chans art could be defended under
U JUST DON'T GET IT!!!!!
And should be put in the louvre.
 
Is it really "deconstructionism" and "exaggerated" if it is 100% true bro? The art world has been a joke for years. It would be better off if yes, there was a hard rule that art should have high standards. Under your rules, Chris-Chans art could be defended under
U JUST DON'T GET IT!!!!!
And should be put in the louvre.
You should stop getting angry at imaginary arguments you made up in your head. The internet has fried your brain, you can only think in terms of polar extremes.

You should also read that wikipedia link you posted, it explains what the artist was getting at, and it's basically something you'd agree with, if you had the mental capacity to follow a paragraph of written text.
 
Back