US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
In their defense, I imagine outright calls of implicit violence (or "fedposting" as KF would say) would be hard to defend as "free speech" since it involves specific threats against a specific person.
>be a Democrat celebrity
>say you thought about blowing up the White House
>then say it was a metaphor
>get off scot free


 
Judge Chutkan has lost her mind in the protective order hearing, screeching that "the Defendant's desire to... respond to his political opponents has to yield!" to her authoritah

Blomald should violate the protective order, which she is obviously going to issue, as soon as he is back in Floria and refuse to return to court until she is removed. This bitch is nuts and she made a fucky wucky admitting the real point of all this. Let her sign a warrant for his arrest and find out what happens. It's past time someone told these people, "No"
 
Last edited:
Judge Chutkan has lost her mind in the protective order hearing, screeching that Trump's "desire to respond to his political opponents... has to yield!" to her authoritah

Blomald should violate the protective order, which she is obviously going to issue, as soon as he is back in Floria and refuse to return to court until she is removed. This bitch is nuts and she made a fucky wucky admitting the real point of all this. Let her sign a warrant for his arrest and find out what happens. It's past time someone told these people, "No"
wow what the fuck does trump think he has some sort of right to free speech or something?
 
Judge Chutkan has lost her mind in the protective order hearing, screeching that "the Defendant's desire to... respond to his political opponents has to yield!" to her authoritah

Blomald should violate the protective order, which she is obviously going to issue, as soon as he is back in Floria and refuse to return to court until she is removed. This bitch is nuts and she made a fucky wucky admitting the real point of all this. Let her sign a warrant for his arrest and find out what happens. It's past time someone told these people, "No"

Protests interfere with democracy. Ordering a leading candidate to not speak about politics in public is fine.
 

Federal judge warns Trump’s right to free speech "not absolute"​

The federal judge overseeing the case involving former President Trump's alleged efforts to subvert 2020 election results agreed Friday to the defense's proposal for a more limited scope of the protective order, but argued that Trump's right to free speech is "not absolute," according to multiple reports.

Why it matters: Trump's lawyers have made a First Amendment argument central to their defense in the Jan. 6 case, saying that the former president's actions surrounding the 2020 election were protected political speech.

  • "Mr. Trump, like every American, has a First Amendment right to free speech, but that right is not absolute," U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan said during her first hearing over the case.
  • "In a criminal case such as this one, the defendant's free speech is subject to the rules."
Driving the news: Chutkan said that she plans to issue a protective order over the handling of evidence in the case, which is the subject of debate between Trump's attorneys and prosecutors.
  • Chutkan warned that without a protective order, "a party could release information that could taint the jury pool, intimidate witnesses or others involved in some aspect of the case."
  • But Chutkan rejected prosecutors' proposal to shield the "improper dissemination or use" of all evidence to the public that is turned over before the trial.
Zoom out: Chutkan also noted that Trump's presidential campaign will not have bearing on how she handles the case. "I intend to keep politics out of this," she said.

  • "If that means he can't say exactly what he wants to say about witnesses in this case, then that's how it's going to be," she added.
  • Chutkan offered a stark warning in her closing remarks, saying that the more that one party makes "inflammatory statements" that could intimidate witnesses, the "greater the urgency will be that we proceed to trial quickly."
Trump pleaded not guilty last week to four criminal charges related to his efforts to subvert 2020 election results.
  • Special counsel Jack Smith on Thursday proposed a start date of Jan. 2, 2024 for the trial, which adds to a packed courtroom schedule in the middle of Trump's presidential campaign.
Article Link
Judicial sledgehammer go smash.
 
Metrics Garland appointed David Weiss, the US Attorney in Delaware doing the Hunter investigation for the past five years, to be a special counsel.

This is done not to show fairness and impartiality in the corrupt DOJ but to make it now impossible for Congress to continue to investigate Hunter and connect him to Joepedo enough to impeach him (as if they needed even more proof).

Also what a fag Chutkin is, literally saying you can’t respond to a political opponent in a political campaign. This should be enough for SCOTUS to intervene.
 
Metrics Garland appointed David Weiss, the US Attorney in Delaware doing the Hunter investigation for the past five years, to be a special counsel.

This is done not to show fairness and impartiality in the corrupt DOJ but to make it now impossible for Congress to continue to investigate Hunter and connect him to Joepedo enough to impeach him (as if they needed even more proof).

Also what a fag Chutkin is, literally saying you can’t respond to a political opponent in a political campaign. This should be enough for SCOTUS to intervene.
614AA9BC-3830-4CE2-ABF6-DEE5AC7DA3E3.jpeg
Anyone who has any faith this Keebler elf looking stasi faggot will do anything other than make this go away is fucking retarded.

Remember, this is the United States of America. Naked corruption is safer than speaking up at your local school board meeting.
 
Metrics Garland appointed David Weiss, the US Attorney in Delaware doing the Hunter investigation for the past five years, to be a special counsel.

This is done not to show fairness and impartiality in the corrupt DOJ but to make it now impossible for Congress to continue to investigate Hunter and connect him to Joepedo enough to impeach him (as if they needed even more proof).

Also what a fag Chutkin is, literally saying you can’t respond to a political opponent in a political campaign. This should be enough for SCOTUS to intervene.
They need to just open an impeachment inquiry into Garland and cut right past all this roadblocking.
 
They need to just open an impeachment inquiry into Garland and cut right past all this roadblocking.
At this rate, it might be better to create a clone of Lee Harvey Oswald to take care of Garland.

Meanwhile, Malik Obama double down on Barack.

In a series of fiery tweets, Abon’go Malik Obama has intensified his criticisms against his half-brother Barack Obama.

Malik called Barack as “fake” and a “snake, and has made demands for the release of the marriage contract between Barack’s parents. He even went as far as suggesting that their grandfather might have had ties to the Freemasons or the Illuminati.

The two brothers, who share the same father but have different mothers, have had a tumultuous relationship over the years. While they were once photographed together during Barack’s visit to Kenya in 2015, their relationship has since soured, with Malik frequently expressing his disagreements with Barack’s failed policies and bad personal choices.


In a tweet, Malik Obama asked his X followers, “What a Transgender Woman folks?”
 
If America was a house, the walls would be covered in mold, the ceiling would’ve caved in, the floors would be soaked in feral cat piss, thieves would’ve stolen all the copper, and the appliances and cupboards would be caked in roach shit.

There are only two ways a house like that gets fixed. The first is by tearing everything down to the framework and rebuilding anew. The second is fire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back