Culture ‘Snow White’ Star Rachel Zegler Angers Conservatives and Disney Fans, Insists the Movie’s Prince ‘Stalks’ Her Character

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

‘Snow White’ Star Rachel Zegler Angers Conservatives and Disney Fans, Insists the Movie’s Prince ‘Stalks’ Her Character​

Disney’s live-action “Snow White” might not be coming out until 2024, but titular star Rachel Zegler has already made it clear that viewers need to be prepared for a very different retelling. In a recently resurfaced video of the actress speaking to Extra at the 2022 D23 Expo, Zegler said of the movie, “I mean, you know, the original cartoon came out in 1937 and very evidently so. There’s a big focus on her love story with a guy who literally stalks her.”

She then laughed and added, “Weird! Weird. We didn’t do that this time.”

Zegler also clarified, “We have a different approach to what I’m sure a lot of people will assume is a love story just because we cast a guy in the movie, Andrew Burnap, great dude. It’s one of those things that I think everyone’s going to have their assumptions about what it’s going to be, but it’s really not about the love story at all, which is really, really wonderful.”

When Zegler’s comments resurfaced this week, they predictably sent conservatives and ardent Disney fans alike into a rage. While sharing a video of the interview, right-wing author and noted transphobe Matt Walsh tweeted, “Disney is trying a really interesting marketing strategy where the star of the new Snow White spends a year before the movie’s release publicly talking about how much she despises Snow White.”
7BDE982F-17AE-4140-B73E-3CA7961E5E6A.jpeg
This isn’t the first time Zegler’s thoughts on the movie have sparked controversy and major feelings. She joined co-star Gal Gadot for an interview with Entertainment Weekly at the same event last year, and the pair covered everything from world leadership to not being saved by a prince.

As Zegler explained at the time, “The reality is that the cartoon was made 85 years ago, and, therefore, it’s extremely dated when it comes to the ideas of women being in roles of power, and what a woman is fit for in the world.”

Fascinatingly, it appears the reason conservatives are poring over year-old comments this weekend is due to Zegler’s more recent commentary about the SAG-AFTRA strike. While speaking to Entertainment Tonight earlier this month, she said, “If I’m gonna stand there 18 hours a day in the dress of an iconic Disney Princess, I deserve to be paid for every hour that it’s streamed online.”
AE931D91-6740-4DE0-929A-2701A622E263.jpeg
YouTuber Amala Ekpunobi tweeted in response, “Entitlement at its finest. What a lovely attitude for the woman meant to be playing Snow White.”
469028B8-1AB8-4AC5-BAD7-28414D4A4BDF.jpeg
TalkTV commentator Alex Armstrong also chimed in, “She has to be one of the most entitled, smug fame hungry actresses in modern Hollywood. Every interview she does makes me dislike her even more.”
922F1423-D868-418F-81EE-B9FBB3760474.jpeg
Perhaps it’s time for someone to let Armstrong know that if these interviews are anything to go off of, Zegler isn’t all that concerned about having him as a fan.
 
I give it five years before Disney puts out a movie called "Fuck You" which consists entirely of all their popular white characters being brutally executed by a light skinned black woman with bright purple hair.
 
Your movie isn't getting "backlash" because conservatives are seizing and pouncing. Your movies suck and your actors are thundercunts.

People don't hate stronk wamyn characters (look at Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Samus Aran, Red Sonja, Jill Valentine, Lara Croft, Eowyn, or Vin from Mistborn). They hate bad writing and ham-fisted propaganda.
 
Literally everything needs grievance studies insertion or preferably as the main theme. One day goyim will not even be able to open a stick of gum without george floyd looking at them from inside the wrapper "you did this to me"
 
Last time I checked, Disney's Snow White was more about the evil queen's decent into madness over her stepdaughter being prettier than she was, to the point she tried killing the girl on multiple occasions.
 
Snow Brown is in for a wild ride considering she's already cracking 7 months before release
Ya know they would be far better off short term and long term making some full on Maya/Aztec mythology inspired snow white based story called "Cocoa Caramel" or some shit which adapts the basic componants of the story to a different setting which both gets all the super-duper important and vital muhdiversity points (which can be cashed at your nearest blockbuster video rental), and also scrambles the setting in a way that may at worst be aesthetically interesting and might even have a chance of being a decent and non pozzed family flick

....but then we are talking about writers currently throwing a mass public chimpout for fear their work can be easily replaced by a fucking jumped up chatbot so its hardly surprising they went with the laziest and most retarded fucking direction
 
Around 97% of women are heterosexual and will want a male spouse or partner at some point.

Is the market for "men bad!" Shit that big? Probably not given how bad Disney had been doing lately.
 
How many more of these will Disney makes until they realize it isn't profitable?
Considering the first live-action movies didn't really raceswap and were successes even if they were considered bland by most people, probably a few.
Disney Adults will go see this piece of shit, but to be fair, Disney Adults aren't people.
Then they'll complain about it because it's not animated.
 
Snow Bland and the Zero Fucks.

No one is going to see this piece of shit.
There'll be some news about how it topped the charts opening weekend. but it'll still fail to make a profit or its budget back. Little Mermaid was like $300 million budget w/o marketing. Snow White will probably be the same or less. $150-250 million budget w/o marketing.
 
There'll be some news about how it topped the charts opening weekend. but it'll still fail to make a profit or its budget back. Little Mermaid was like $300 million budget w/o marketing. Snow White will probably be the same or less. $150-250 million budget w/o marketing.
They are claiming TLM made over 550m worldwide but I do not believe it. Disney absolutely cooks the books on budget and take.

Remember the empty theaters of Captain Marvel.
 
You could set the story in any culture.
Beautiful girl, jealous stepmother, 7 magical helpers, handsome prince. It would work anywhere. Set it in Namibia and have seven magical ostriches and a jealous first tribal wife. It’d work, becasue it’s a universal trope (stepmothers jealous of stepdaughters.) it’s type 709 of folk tale format, that’s how universal it is.
But what DOESNT work is calling it Snow White, casting a girl who is not ‘skin as white as the driven snow, hair as black as the raven’ and not using dwarves and not making it about a handsome prince and a beautiful girl and an evil stepmother
You either go full into another cultural setting and keep the story format or you stay true to the original tale. No in between, and no deliberate casting of a girl who looks like this with no dwarves. This is just cultural destruction.
I mean, you know, the original cartoon came out in 1937 and very evidently so.
It’s hundreds of years old you stupid girl. It was written down a couple of hundred years ago but the format is ancient.
The sheer stupidity of these people. The disregard for history and culture and narrative and what it means
 
You could set the story in any culture.
Beautiful girl, jealous stepmother, 7 magical helpers, handsome prince. It would work anywhere. Set it in Namibia and have seven magical ostriches and a jealous first tribal wife. It’d work, becasue it’s a universal trope (stepmothers jealous of stepdaughters.) it’s type 709 of folk tale format, that’s how universal it is.
But what DOESNT work is calling it Snow White, casting a girl who is not ‘skin as white as the driven snow, hair as black as the raven’ and not using dwarves and not making it about a handsome prince and a beautiful girl and an evil stepmother
You either go full into another cultural setting and keep the story format or you stay true to the original tale. No in between, and no deliberate casting of a girl who looks like this with no dwarves. This is just cultural destruction.

It’s hundreds of years old you stupid girl. It was written down a couple of hundred years ago but the format is ancient.
The sheer stupidity of these people. The disregard for history and culture and narrative and what it means
The original is a fairy tale. It was written with intention to be read out loud by a family to entertain the parents but also the children. And as time went on fairy tales became associated as stories for kids. And children know that they're weak, that they can't fight off bigger people which is why they run to their parents for safety. So Snow White runs away to be helped by others. And the message that Snow White gives is that goodness triumphs over vanity. The wicked Queen dies and Snow White lives happily ever after.

But these movies aren't made anymore for children, they're made for millennial/zoomer adults. Who Hollywood's marketing has determined needs constant validation that they're girl bosses.
 
Last edited:
You could set the story in any culture.
Beautiful girl, jealous stepmother, 7 magical helpers, handsome prince. It would work anywhere. Set it in Namibia and have seven magical ostriches and a jealous first tribal wife. It’d work, becasue it’s a universal trope (stepmothers jealous of stepdaughters.) it’s type 709 of folk tale format, that’s how universal it is.
But what DOESNT work is calling it Snow White, casting a girl who is not ‘skin as white as the driven snow, hair as black as the raven’ and not using dwarves and not making it about a handsome prince and a beautiful girl and an evil stepmother
You either go full into another cultural setting and keep the story format or you stay true to the original tale. No in between, and no deliberate casting of a girl who looks like this with no dwarves. This is just cultural destruction.

It’s hundreds of years old you stupid girl. It was written down a couple of hundred years ago but the format is ancient.
The sheer stupidity of these people. The disregard for history and culture and narrative and what it means
It's not just that.

It's Disney.

Snow White was the first feature length animated movie shown in cinema. And it was the movie that established the Walt Disney company as the animated company in the world.

The intellectual property she is very loudly declaring to the word as being complete trash garbage is not just the most historically significant property in the entire Disney catalogue, it's the foundation stone of THE COMPANY.

If I was an investor in Disney right now I would cut my losses like a motherfucker.
 
Back
Top Bottom