He already has served hard time, and if the State had carried it through to conviction, he would have gotten time served and then been tossed on the street because no group home will take in a sex pest with a hard conviction. The State probably realized this and just decided to drop it.
I know the public perception of Chris is out there. I don't blame people for being confused by that. I only know differently because I was involved in fucking with Chris for so long.
So I can see why people see Chris' public internet chumping looks so natural, and yet I know we were behind the curtain tugging the ropes.
Even just the most basic look into Chris’s history shows the problem was always other people.
When the news broke about what he’d done I assumed someone had to have put him up to it. Probably because I have been around people like him. People tend to have to pull their strings for them to do anything.
§ 19.2-303.6. Deferred disposition in a criminal case; persons with autism or intellectual disabilities.
A. In any criminal case, except a violation of § 18.2-31, an act of violence as defined in § 19.2-297.1, or any crime for which a deferred disposition is provided for by statute, upon a plea of guilty, or after a plea of not guilty, and the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, the court may, if the defendant has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist with (i) an autism spectrum disorder as defined in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association or (ii) an intellectual disability as defined in § 37.2-100 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder or disability, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, after giving due consideration to the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the views of the victim, defer further proceedings and place the accused on probation subject to terms and conditions set by the court. Upon violation of a term or condition, the court may enter an adjudication of guilt; or upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions, the court may discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against him without an adjudication of guilt. This section shall not limit the authority of any juvenile and domestic relations court granted to it in Title 16.1.
B. Deferred disposition shall be available to the defendant even though he has previously been convicted of a criminal offense, been adjudicated delinquent as a juvenile, or had proceedings deferred and dismissed under this section or under any other provision of law, unless, after having considered the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth, the views of the victims, and any evidence offered by the defendant, the court finds that deferred disposition is inconsistent with the interests of justice.
And do you guys know who introduced this bill in the VA legislature?
His last criminal defense attorney, the "wuss" Rob Bell!
He already has served hard time, and if the State had carried it through to conviction, he would have gotten time served and then been tossed on the street because no group home will take in a sex pest with a hard conviction. The State probably realized this and just decided to drop it.
They dropped it because Magi-chan took the stand and testified in Chris' favor, that's also why it wasn't broadcast; (((they))) don't want proof of the dimensional merge getting out.
I think you mean he was guilty of consentual incest with a caregiver who had groomed a slow-in-the-mind into a completely inappropriate relationship for years.
Not only should he be set free, he should be suing the state for false imprisonment.
law.lis.virginia.gov
