You're really annoyed by
a visual easter egg that you would have to search for in an open world superhero game?
Considering what the flag stands for, yes. It is obviously objectionable to a reasonable, sane person.
This is the equivalent of trannies being upset at GTA V over
a couple lines of dialogue that indirectly insults their way of life.
No, actually, that's a false equivalence because of the inherent differences in both. Transgenderism is bad, so if a couple lines may insult them, then
good.
A flag which represents the mutilation of children and violation of the sanctity of marriage should not be present unless absolutely necessary, and you haven't made a compelling argument for that case.
Or being upset that Far Cry 5 doesn't take
a stance with politics because it takes place in rural America.
Don't know shit about FC5, but I heard it's pretty woke. I didn't look into it though. You implying it's not is making me think it probably is.
Here is the thing though, just because it is annoying doesn't mean it makes the game itself woke.
I'm not even arguing the game isn't woke, mind you. But I don't think the flag in isolation is the thing to call the game woke.
So your threshold for something being woke is higher, you're basically the kind of person who thinks it's fine that there's an easter egg in A Hat In Time for the tranny flag, right?
That's fine I guess, but I have damn near zero tolerance for this shit. Intent matters to a certain degree, I often cite Metal Gear's inclusion of fags as a permissible type. Vamp wasn't a fag to make a statement or push an agenda, he was a weird vampire who fits as a fag.
A pride flag is an overt political statement, any game featuring it not on fire can fuck off.