PC responds by saying that Nick never addressed the concerns directly and that he just dismissed it as out of context without providing any context himself. She goes on to explain how people knew it was her that Nick was talking about and that they started sending her clips.
PC reiterates the same points about how she was misrepresented and how Nick was still being sexual with his fans (meaning whatever changes Nick was thinking of in December, that wasn't one of them).
PC brings up the "Do You Know Mandy?" clip as an example, says it was inappropriate, makes Nick come across as sexually frustrated.
PC also corrects Nick's reiteration of events in the Rekieta v Everyone clip, pointing out an objective lie (that he asked her which parasocial relationship was correct) and provides proof that Nick considered her a friend and appreciated her counsel while she didn't make any such claim (yet another lie). Apparently, this is also the second time Nick has talked about their discussion. PC doesn't care that she was unnamed (as it came back to her anyway).
PC then goes to bat for Kalea being demodded by Nick for light teasing about an Instagram account he follows (Hedonism II employee Energii_king), and rightly calls it an overreaction and a sign of weakness to his trolls. PC also details why this prompted her to share the dms so long after the fact: Nick said Kalea should have come to him directly. This is what PC did, and it just allowed Nick to control the narrative, lie about what happened, and use her for content while also using her to pit the new audience against the old.
PC (correctly) deems Nick's "I'm sorry you feel that way" apologies as non-apologies and that if Nick was really sorry he would apologize for lying about her (doesn't have to be public) and stop talking about interactions with her. She then calls bs on Nick's claims to be who he presented himself as in the past, saying that the "real" Nick isn't someone she would ever be interested in knowing/trusting.
PC calls out Nick for treating his fans with contempt and disrespect (likely referring to Nick's GTFO rants when he started getting criticized in late 2022 and the like) and expresses disbelief in Nick wishing her well in anything.
A follow-up message from PC has her explaining why people were/are angry with Nick. If I were to sum it up in a word: hypocrisy (unsurprisingly).
Nick gave others crap for doing what he was doing (or even less than that) and took it a step further by seeking validation from his audience and encouraging them (via attention from him) to post lewd photos.
The audience he garnered with his "bring back shame" and bullying of degenerates did what they always do gave ridiculed/criticized Nick, and his response was that of the degenerates (calling them PRUDES & INCELS!).
To top it off Kalea is brought up as a prime example of Nick's ingratitude toward a supporter over mild teasing (hence, Nick appearing to want yes-men).
Nick responds minutes later saying it was impossible for him to know discussing their dms would identify her. Then, in a spectacular display of Costanzian logic, says that he didn't lie because his memory isn't perfect.
Nick also says that the relationship was parasocial because PC said it was (not remembering that he was the only one calling what they had a friendship). He also disagrees (but doesn't elaborate) on what constitutes mild ribbing (re: Kalea).
PC responds by saying that Nick still said something that wasn't true (a lie) and applauds Nick's mental gymnastics before reminding Nick that he defined her as a friend to her and others and not as parasocial.
PC then
appears to confirm that she identified the relationship as parasocial to get an easy out because she didn't want to know the real Nick.
Nick responds by saying he didn't ignore PC's advice and criticism and has in fact changed "a shitload" of things because of her advice before addressing Mandy...
Nick calls it a "bad couple of minutes" (as if this was an isolated incident) and says it was especially hard on
our his wife. Nick claims to make no excuses (after having made several already). He then oddly states that "no one cares when you try to be better".
Nick attempts to address his hypocrisy:
1. Kayla doesn't have an Onlyfans where she sells nudes (she only teased nudes on Locals before posting lewds there for free).
2. They are STILL MONOGAMOUS, therefore better than Jack Murphy, ergo not a hypocrite. Better than Jack Murphy is good enough in Nick's books. Still curious how Nick defines monogamy...
Nick admits to talking about sex and engaging in various *adulterous* adventurous behavior as a pushback against "gay shit about women and marriage from the right".
Nick calls out
Drexel Redpillbros who tell everyone that marriage and relationships are dead-end for men, women over 30 are useless, etc. as an example. Nick's solution?
Degenerate adventurous behavior also advocated by Drexel (swinger clubs/vacations and the like). Nick's pretext for degenerate behavior is sounding more and more flimsy as it sounds like he just wants to coom.
Nick claims that he wanted "discussion" about sexuality, but fails to understand how he has personally involved himself in that discussion. Nick then thinks that it was the mere "discussion" that made Nick and Kayla appear degenerate, tactfully omitting the lewdposting and other degenerate behavior documented on KF (and occaisionally celebrated by Nick himself).
Nick defaults to saying that he can't disprove a lie. PC seems to have had no problems in this area, but Nick (as a lawyer) continues to struggle with the concept of proving one's innocence, much less a working knowledge of patterned behavior or addressing smoke/fire reasoning..
In practice, Nick operates like this when it comes to "lies":
If one speculates on what Nick is doing and he will claim he can't do anything about it and be generally dismissive.
If one points out something that there is evidence for (Hedo II trips or following Energii_king) and it's either a ban or a game of wordplay.
Also, the lewds were like 8 months ago, bro. It's not like Nick has
implied involving Mandy_K in his "monogamy" followed Hedo II employees on IG done anything embarrassing since then. I'm sure the boudoir photo Kayla posted in for the locals fans on her birthday doesn't count either.
Moving on, cue Nick's lengthy take on parasocial relationships. Nick accuses PC of failing to consider what was/wasn't inappropriate in a parasocial relationship and asserts that PC should thereby assume Nick's other parasocial relationships were as appropriate as the one with PC.
According to Nick (as a married man) flirting with others in public is okay because it wasn't done privately (especially if that's the "energy" he's given).
Nick says PC is still a friend, but not on the level of Drexel, Camelot, or Anna (content creators). Because Nick has closer friends than PC, he thinks that means he is justified in calling her parasocial and backpedaling on calling PC a friend... whose counsel he appreciates to the point of making "a shitload" of changes on his show. Funny stuff.
Nick, a self-identifying degenerate, then says that him being a degenerate is the result of being fictionalized by others. He goes on to muddy the waters by saying that he uses the term "degenerate" seriously, sarcastically, and endearingly (like the way he uses the term "grift" endearingly?).
Nick says Redo of a Healer is degenerate but hilarious. He implies that people are trying to convince him that monogamous sex within a marriage is degenerate (just like going to a "bar", going on "dates"... or how Drexel is head of a "group"?).
Nick claims that the claims of degeneracy have never been clear to him and is "STILL NOT SURE" what PC thinks the ongoing problem is, and asks her to just tell him what it is.
Nick is also under the impression that people think he is embroiled in "some ultra-villain head game" as opposed to him just being an idiot. It seems even Nick's projections of his detractors think he's a genius (lol).
...and then blocks PC. Right after asking for a response. Funny stuff.
