Chris's incest charge is dismissed

Status
Not open for further replies.
And if it’s OJ he’ll lose because there’s a reasonable basis for saying it notwithstanding a not guilty verdict.

Chris is a motherfucker who fucked his mother.
Oh was a host of issues but some of the jury selection was hilarious. Somehow ojs lawyer selected a jury full of old black women . Whom he then got permission to take to ojs house “ the scene of the crime” where he had pre planted a fucking bible in every room lol.

It’s pretty wild lol

We missed out on heilberg making infamous “ if the bent dick doesn’t fit you must acquit” defence
 
He was sent there because he was mentally incompetent to stand trial...that's really, really far gone.

I don't think anybody can call two years in jail "getting away with it" - he would have basically served that sentence if convicted. All this really did was help him dodge an RSO requirement which would guarantee homelessness.
Well it also seemingly helped him dodge a sex offender designation lol
 
Well it also seemingly helped him dodge a sex offender designation lol
Exactly what his lawyer wanted with the deferred disposition. If Chris ended up a RSO he couldn't be placed in a group home or would be kicked out.
 
Oh was a host of issues but some of the jury selection was hilarious. Somehow ojs lawyer selected a jury full of old black women . Whom he then got permission to take to ojs house “ the scene of the crime” where he had pre planted a fucking bible in every room lol.
Ito let the defense (and the defendant) get away with literal murder. That said, the prosecution was pathetic. Philip Vannatter was an arrogant joke who basically admitted he left blood samples in his car unattended on a hot day, was like "what's it to ya bitch," and admitted the chain of custody was broken.

Then you had Fuhrman swearing on a stack of Bibles that he'd never said the word "nigger" in his life despite having a nigger-laden rant on video of him not only repeatedly niggering but even talking about how to frame a nigger. And that retarded faggot was their star witness.

Just by itself that's literally reasonable doubt. If I were a juror and saw that shit, I would be bound by conscience to find not guilty, even if I felt in my heart (as I do) that that nigger murdered his wife and her boyfriend.

I would still call him a murderer afterwards, though.
 
Ito let the defense (and the defendant) get away with literal murder. That said, the prosecution was pathetic. Philip Vannatter was an arrogant joke who basically admitted he left blood samples in his car unattended on a hot day, was like "what's it to ya bitch," and admitted the chain of custody was broken.

Then you had Fuhrman swearing on a stack of Bibles that he'd never said the word "nigger" in his life despite having a nigger-laden rant on video of him not only repeatedly niggering but even talking about how to frame a nigger. And that retarded faggot was their star witness.

Just by itself that's literally reasonable doubt. If I were a juror and saw that shit, I would be bound by conscience to find not guilty, even if I felt in my heart (as I do) that that nigger murdered his wife and her boyfriend.

I would still call him a murderer afterwards, though.

Yep, but that’s the pitfall of a legal system. If the court finds them not guilty, then not guilty they are.
That’s the difference between not guilty and innocent.

Likewise here with Chris. The case was eventually dismissed after a whole bunch of wrangling and legal processes.

Doesn’t make him innocent of motherfucking.
Just too much of a headache for the prison system, court system, and the wider implications.

Better just to run out clocks on potential sentencing and then quietly hide him in a tard home, in the hope he doesn’t fuck it up down the line.
 
He was so aggressively a-logged that he became legally bulletproof
 
Ito let the defense (and the defendant) get away with literal murder. That said, the prosecution was pathetic. Philip Vannatter was an arrogant joke who basically admitted he left blood samples in his car unattended on a hot day, was like "what's it to ya bitch," and admitted the chain of custody was broken.

Then you had Fuhrman swearing on a stack of Bibles that he'd never said the word "nigger" in his life despite having a nigger-laden rant on video of him not only repeatedly niggering but even talking about how to frame a nigger. And that retarded faggot was their star witness.

Just by itself that's literally reasonable doubt. If I were a juror and saw that shit, I would be bound by conscience to find not guilty, even if I felt in my heart (as I do) that that nigger murdered his wife and her boyfriend.

I would still call him a murderer afterwards, though.
The OJ murders, the McMartin Preschool case, and the Ramparts police-corruption brouhaha. The L.A. District Attorney's office has a history of blowing seemingly airtight cases against obvious scumbags. At least OJ got reamed in civil court.

EDIT: As for Chris-Chan? I can only guess that the court thought it was better to just give him credit for time served, and dump the whole mess, rather than build a case on the testimonies of two obviously deranged people that could quickly become a circus for every ween and weirdo in North America.
 
Last edited:
Barb be at home like

1693365898289.png
 
Oh was a host of issues but some of the jury selection was hilarious. Somehow ojs lawyer selected a jury full of old black women . Whom he then got permission to take to ojs house “ the scene of the crime” where he had pre planted a fucking bible in every room lol.

It’s pretty wild lol

We missed out on heilberg making infamous “ if the bent dick doesn’t fit you must acquit” defence
Not exactly, it was ten women and two men, nine of them black, and pretrial research showed that black women tended to have a negative view of Nicole Simpson and would probably not like Marcia Clark. As if that didn't guarantee a Not Guilty verdict, one of the men was a former Black Panther. Why the prosecution allowed that jury make-up, I have no idea.
 
Chris would be convinced that he's destined to be male if someone made a fake audio recording of his alternate dimension self telling him he's a man and that he will never be a woman. Chris can probably be convinced of most anything at this point.

Can't decide if your an unfunny retard, or you're reading comprehension is absolute shit. Of course, no one can control your actions but you, so by all means, troll Chris and make him deteansition. But fair warning, you're more than likely going to have your own thread here just like that sand nigger who sent Chris a Quran while he was in jail, and wanted to convert him to being a Muslim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: demicolon
Did you know that legaly nothing happens if two dimentia patients have sex, legaly both can’t consent yet we don’t charge both for rape. I wonder if the same idea was applied to this case by the parties involved in the decision to drop this.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wuhan Wet Market
Did you know that legaly nothing happens if two dimentia patients have sex, legaly both can’t consent yet we don’t charge both for rape. I wonder if the same idea was applied to this case by the parties involved in the decision to drop this.

Nope. What you are talking about means that both parties are simultaneously the victim and the perpetrator.

The circumstantial evidence in this case indicates Chris planned and directed this rape situation.

I know what you mean, but it’s more to do with no one in good conscience can punish a dementia patient. If nothing else they will probably have no idea why they are being punished which will make their brief moments of lucidity terrible.

Chris just needs to be tard wrangled and Barb should just be left to live out what remains of her life.
 
Nope. What you are talking about means that both parties are simultaneously the victim and the perpetrator.

The circumstantial evidence in this case indicates Chris planned and directed this rape situation.

I know what you mean, but it’s more to do with no one in good conscience can punish a dementia patient. If nothing else they will probably have no idea why they are being punished which will make their brief moments of lucidity terrible.

Chris just needs to be tard wrangled and Barb should just be left to live out what remains of her life.
hard to say exactly

A lot of people point to Chris trying to hide the truth as understanding of the wrong he was doing. Although I have pointed out before that 8 year olds that steal still lie to conceal but are also not considered guilty in same way as adults .

Plus there is more than a little circumstantial evidence of a long running inappropriate relationship with his mom as well as egging on by external parties .

Nonetheless my take remains the same . I don’t really feel bad for barb as any way you spin it she created much of present situation. I don’t know what my take is regarding chris. I’m a little stuck on what I think is generally legally fair versus what diminished culpability I think Chris of having.

That said I’m surprised no one has mentioned how bizarre it is for him to have a drivers license . Like the guy can be trusted to drive a one tonne metal box at 60 miles an hour down the road but isn’t competent enough to be expected not to rape grannies lol
 
hard to say exactly

A lot of people point to Chris trying to hide the truth as understanding of the wrong he was doing. Although I have pointed out before that 8 year olds that steal still lie to conceal but are also not considered guilty in same way as adults .

Plus there is more than a little circumstantial evidence of a long running inappropriate relationship with his mom as well as egging on by external parties .

Nonetheless my take remains the same . I don’t really feel bad for barb as any way you spin it she created much of present situation. I don’t know what my take is regarding chris. I’m a little stuck on what I think is generally legally fair versus what diminished culpability I think Chris of having.

That said I’m surprised no one has mentioned how bizarre it is for him to have a drivers license . Like the guy can be trusted to drive a one tonne metal box at 60 miles an hour down the road but isn’t competent enough to be expected not to rape grannies lol

The point mainly was that it wasn't a situation where both parties were as diminished in capacity as two dementia sufferers.

Chris might have a "different" take on morality, but he is far beyond the undeveloped sense of morality and consequences of the average US 8-year-old.

Even if Barb and Chris's relationship has always been inappropriate and creepy, there is no firm evidence she ever actually wanted to fuck him.
I agree she created much of the situation but consciously or unconsciously she has always been the kind of woman to use sex to get men to do what she wants, women who use this tactic usually don't want to have sex with every man they use it on.
Especially not their sons!

It's been mentioned before about his driving license and even accounts of people who met him claimed that he drove like a blind old lady, going the wrong way down one way streets, not indicating, etc.
Though, the US has the driver legal age as young as 15 in some states and the test is supposed to be pretty easy to pass. Perhaps Chris just has been lucky enough not to get caught in his ridiculous dangerous driving and has never been caught drink driving or anything. It could just be his Teflon tard luck again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back