Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
My primary concern with an Orion-drive generation ship would be how in the fuck they're expecting to have functional atomic devices 200+ years after departure. Nukes, especially their trigger assemblies, decay within decades and would need constant re-manufacturing to stay reliable. You can't just stock up with enough to last the journey and call it good, you're going to need a substantial amount of industry and technical know-how, handed down from generation to generation, or you are not going to have the nukes you need to slow down. I haven't read his shit book, but lots of generation ship stories have as one of their central conceits a degradation of technological capability and technical knowledge as the journey goes on, century after century.
 
My proposal for Pat's new religion is Stalker Children of God
You fool, that's an MP5 season reference, not a P90 season.

On the religion you're all thinking too hard. He's a no imagination hack who'd probably do something like Patolicism but IN SPACE which of course would be mocked right away as Fatolicism because it's low hanging fruit, leaving him to seethe nonetheless.
 
I’m sorry I just can’t let it go, it sounds like the text you get from that one jealous ex boyfriend of your early 20s that you ran into at the bar while you were with your new man.

Dan doesn’t have a penis. I. Do. Come get this dick. Dan’s a loser anyway!

A man in his forties sent that text and I just can’t let it go lol
 
Javier clearly hasn't heard of the internationally renown online threat hunter known as jackie singh. No evidence? Nonsense, child.

Part of me is disappointed that Pat doesn't actually enjoy writing. I feel like we're missing out on a really bad sci-fi legal drama about a corrupt judge IN SPACE that any other writer cow would be fervently shitting out.
 
If he cow crossovers with Ethan Ralph, it would be Stalker Children of the Corn.
They're both so dumb they'd get stuck in an endless loop of "Those are your delusions again stalker" and "That's nawt troo!", putting an end to all the fun forever or at least until either one's heart gives out. If my math checks out their respective mass combining would also collapse the entire solar system into a singularity of fat, which is about as bad as it sounds.
 
Last edited:
Pat reaching out to Javier for his media tour and accidentally getting the one reporter who actually bothers to ask questions is an amazing own-goal. His deranged motion making it into the podcast episode is perfect.

I think Javier may have been nervous about the Pests bothering him after talking to Pat and now realizes that they're not going to.

Javier came off as massively credulous in that podcast, he believed almost everything that fell out of Pat's mouth uncritically, and teed up the whole narrative absolutely perfectly for him. the whole intent of the first three episodes was obviously to present Pat as an innocent victim being cruelly tormented by insane online stalkers. the impression I got was that Javier's expectations did not begin to turn until Owen A. Forrems - who he did believe to be some kind of crazed stalker death cult per Pat - "hacked patreon" (lmao) and reposted it on their site, at which point he received nothing more than an e-mail from Quasi asking for a chance to respond, which he replied to out of curiosity. his resultant interactions with Quasi and Dan seem to have turned his head, but I think it also confused and frustrated him a bit as he wasn't sure who to believe, or where to stick his annoying moralizing about how "nobody deserves this level of harassment" into the narrative. however, this surprise ep 5 sounded suspiciously like he's becoming patpilled, which really makes me laugh, as he could not possibly have been more sympathetic in the beginning. Pat's ability to turn people against him is amazing, like some kind of perverted superpower.
 
"We're being HUNTED FOR SPORT! We've had to talk to police officers multiple times! I get a lot of mean texts! People call me fat on Twitter! It's a living nightmare!!!"

It's also funny how insistent Fat is that his "family" is being targeted. His family is only him and Nikki, and really the one being targeted is him. I've never seen anyone on either forum claim to have contacted Nikki, and why would they? She's not hilarious to fuck with like porky is. I guess she's had to deal with the cop calls, but the real fallout on her is just having to deal with Fatrick's reaction to it, and she's the one who chooses to stay with him. This "my FAMILY" shit is just another part of the breathless, hysterical way he frames all of this, see also "terrorists and criminals". It's not very dignified to admit you're being trolled and cyberbullied as an adult, so this lunatic gangstalking narrative is in Fat's grease-clogged brain the masculine and cool alternative. He probably thinks he sounds like an action movie hero with this "you came after MY FAMILY!" horseshit.
Let's be fair, the Pests did go through a phase of trying to fuck with Nikki's "business" by posing as her on various woke people's contact forms and leaving them spicy messages in her name. That's all I recall though.

However what is much less credible is Pat's repeated claim that his parents have been Swatted. There are no dox of his parents either here, at OnA, or anywhere else that I am aware of. I've never seen anyone even attempt to find out where they live, nor show any interest in doing so. If anyone did Swat his parents, it wasn't anyone here or at OnA. I'd say Pat was psychopathic enough to Swat his own parents to try to get on TV, but he's only mentioned it a couple of times. If it was true, he'd be making a much bigger deal of it. I'd certainly kick up a stink if my elderly parents were dragged out of their beds by armed Police because someone took exception to my Twitter posts. But Pat's half-hearted assertion that it happened and failure to present any evidence means it's almost certainly yet more lies.

But ultimately, I suspect what he really means by "targeted my family" is that his in-laws had to bail him out and now they hate him even more than they already do (they must hate Pat because they have presumably spoken to him at some point and that's generally all it takes, plus they crop him out of family photos). In his mind that means that Quasi "targeted his family" because Pat is the hero of his own stupid book and plays his own self-insert in real life rather than accept reality.
 
Wars could have been averted with his power.
Sit Churchill, Hitler and Stalin in a room with Patrick, and they leave it an hour later with the common ground that everyone hates Patrick, and that they might be not so different. Peace in our time ensues.

Only problem with that is that his niggeroni would give hitler and Stalin ideas.

I suppose at least Holodomor would have been averted, one way or the other.

If anyone did Swat his parents, it wasn't anyone here or at OnA. I'd say Pat was psychopathic enough to Swat his own parents to try to get on TV, but he's only mentioned it a couple of times. If it was true, he'd be making a much bigger deal of it.

IF it happened, I doubt it was an actual Swating.
It was probably nothing more than the police coming to the door over a trivial matter.
Police coming to the door being unusual enough for Mama Raven and Papa Bozo to mention it to Pat, he again took two and two and came up with seven.

If he has only mentioned it a couple of times, then he might have finally realized it was no big deal, so rather than retract, he is probably just hoping people forget or don’t ask follow up questions.
 
I really do hope he tries to sue Quasi again and fails so miserably that he runs himself into bankruptcy. They should get some fat guy with a gopro to go and scrape paintings off his wall to pawn them for court fees while Fatrick screams 'No, stalker judge, you are not going to repo everything that isn't nailed down. Enjoy prison.'
 
this may be a question better suited for the literary subforum here but this talk about sci-fi got the noggin joggin'.

these days, what is sci-fi to most people? i've surmised over my life that sci-fi was initially a "what-if", and it was written by knowledgable folks who knew their fields, and the science was plausible. these days it seems to have been spiritualized and refined into anything that has cool pew pew lasers and space ships and aliens and there's not much in the way of philosophy or meticulous thinking about humans in extreme, unusual conditions.
It doesn't have any one definition to me other than the very broad "a story in a setting where the technology is different to ours" it doesn't have to be more advanced, it doesn't have to be in space even, I Robot is SciFi, or Detroit:Become Human for some modern examples.

Its also broadly divided into:
Hard SciFi, where the tech, though advanced, still obeys the laws of physics and things that we know today, so no handwaving faster than light travel (Hard SciFi can still be advanced, Baxters Xeelee Sequence novels are Hard SciFi, just crazy advanced, it just has to be "realistic" for want of a better word, to obey the specific rules in its Universe) artificial gravity using "graviton emitters" and such.
Hard SciFi is hard to write well but when done well, like Clarke or Baxter, its great.

Soft SciFi, where things like Warp Drive, Anti-Gravity Fields etc are hand waved for the sake of plot convenience and either "explained" with technobabble like Star Trek or its otherwise just taken for granted that annoying issues like the Laws of Relativity have been "solved" at some point. Soft SciFi includes things like Star Trek, Frank Herberts Dune novels, Battlestar Galactica etc

And then there's Science Fantasy, where the technology is completely handwaved in preference to story, such as Rodger Cormans Battle Beyond the Stars or more famously Star Wars where you can have things like Light Sabers, or "Space Magic" like the Force. Sci Fantasy has some of the best and most entertaining stories, and also some of the worst. Its probably the easiest to write, but a lot harder to write well. You don't have the rigid rules that Hard SciFi does, but that means a lot of bad writers are attracted to this genre and try use that as a crutch.
I don't know if these are the dictionary definitions, but its how I've always categorized it.
 
Last edited:
Fatrick woke up at 3 AM and couldn't get back to sleep until he counted 18 stalker childs enjoying prison. Almost all of these tweets are one of the standard copypaste responses, so I won't post them, but I found these two exchanges kinda funny.
1693651126511.png1693651776709.png
 
Back