Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 102 34.0%

  • Total voters
    300
Another potential "worst day" is when he did that awful drunken simp-out to Mandy on a friday stream a few months ago. I got the impression by the things Nick said he was doing after that (ending the friday streams, cutting ties with camelot) that the wife probably went after him for what he did. Some of it didn't last long (I think he backtracked on Camelot within two days). But he did seem to moderate his behavior slightly for a little while.
He wasn't 'cutting ties'. He was dialing back degenracy because they went too far. (This was his 'critics were right, but still wrong becuase you can't just tell a creator to make changes and do it in a "faggot" way' rant)

You are right about the reneging.
 
Imma be real. Black comedy is funny is you hit the mark otherwise it's fucked up. Rape jokes have far less of a margin of error and Child Rape jokes? Just fucking don't.
People could in theory do black comedy about rape or other really dark topics. But what you can't EVER do as a comedian is tell "jokes" about being a rapist yourself or implying that you are a rapist. That doesn't meet any definition of a "joke".

It creates among other things an immediate poe's law situation.
There are no clues or tells in any of Vito's stuff to even slightly suggest it was a "joke" while at the same time, there is a WHOLE LOT of stuff about Vito's behavior that would lead rational people to take it really seriously.

Nick wants to say that the criticism of Vito is no different than the labeling of various people on the right as racists, woman-haters and so on. But it is very different. The people in those spaces didn't proudly go out in public and declare that they were racists as a "joke" or anything else.

Getting labeled a racist based on a strung-together theory of random things said with questionable reasoning behind the charge is very different than suffering negative stuff after going out in public and saying "I am a proud racist"
 
Tweet posted around 8:30 in the morning his time - Nick Rekieta has woken up and resumed being MATI.

awake.png
(Twitter | Archive)
 
People could in theory do black comedy about rape or other really dark topics. But what you can't EVER do as a comedian is tell "jokes" about being a rapist yourself or implying that you are a rapist. That doesn't meet any definition of a "joke".
Trying to put definitions to what counts as a 'joke' is retarded. People post TND as a joke and people laugh at TND, realizing it is a joke, is that also not acceptable to you? Don't make me side with a man I hate like Rekieta by acting like a low IQ Twitter user. The problem with Vito is that he repeatedly told in public he wasn't joking, that he was a non offending pedophile and that he didn't see a problem with movies like Cuties and any potential harm they could cause.
 
People could in theory do black comedy about rape or other really dark topics. But what you can't EVER do as a comedian is tell "jokes" about being a rapist yourself or implying that you are a rapist. That doesn't meet any definition of a "joke".

It creates among other things an immediate poe's law situation.
There are no clues or tells in any of Vito's stuff to even slightly suggest it was a "joke" while at the same time, there is a WHOLE LOT of stuff about Vito's behavior that would lead rational people to take it really seriously.

Nick wants to say that the criticism of Vito is no different than the labeling of various people on the right as racists, woman-haters and so on. But it is very different. The people in those spaces didn't proudly go out in public and declare that they were racists as a "joke" or anything else.

Getting labeled a racist based on a strung-together theory of random things said with questionable reasoning behind the charge is very different than suffering negative stuff after going out in public and saying "I am a proud racist"
The reality is that people who heavily utilize self-depreciation humor aren't really making jokes as much as they are warning you who they really are. They may try to come at it from a comedic angle, but they are really getting off at telling everyone how fucked up of human beings they really are.

The two best examples I can give are Nick Bate and Christopher Cantwell. Both are people who said outrageous things or made self-depreciation jokes about themselves online when in actuality they were guilty of everything they were saying about themselves.
 
But what you can't EVER do as a comedian is tell "jokes" about being a rapist yourself or implying that you are a rapist. That doesn't meet any definition of a "joke".
It can definitely be done but theres a difference between jokes and "we pedophiles arent that bad"

I remember a tosh.o sketch where he's naked at a park and theres children in it and afterwards he goes "ya know the hardest part about filming that in front of kids <pause> My ****" Which implies hes hard cause of the kids but the joke is the rug pull setup by the brief pause and response of the audience. You expect it to be the editing they had to do or whatever, your mind wanders in that moment. He's implying he's a pedo as a joke and it works.

So it can be done, but Vito's statement is not a joke he just said he's a pedophile and was defending pedophiles in the same breath. There's no setup, no punchline. He literally said "we pedophiles" and then talked about how they're demonized.
 
AntiCG and a childhood friend chime in.
Doug TenNapel is always ready to run into the fire to support a really bad cause. A story gets presented to him of someone who has done something horrible going through a bad time and Doug will come running to put his reputation on the line for something really stupid.
The last time I can remember him doing it was for Preston Poulter after the cuck porn stuff about Poulter came out.
Doug's general view is that just about everyone but him is going to hell anyway and its just totally wrong for evil sinners going to hell to complain about one person's sins.
Doug is the kind of guy who would do nothing and say not a word about Nick's clear alcoholism and all of his various other problems to him. But he will come running to defend Nick when Nick takes up the cause of defending a pedo.

Mike S. Miller on the other hand is just dumb.
 
Doug TenNapel is always ready to run into the fire to support a really bad cause. A story gets presented to him of someone who has done something horrible going through a bad time and Doug will come running to put his reputation on the line for something really stupid.
The last time I can remember him doing it was for Preston Poulter after the cuck porn stuff about Poulter came out.
Doug's general view is that just about everyone but him is going to hell anyway and its just totally wrong for evil sinners going to hell to complain about one person's sins.
Doug is the kind of guy who would do nothing and say not a word about Nick's clear alcoholism and all of his various other problems to him. But he will come running to defend Nick when Nick takes up the cause of defending a pedo.

Mike S. Miller on the other hand is just dumb.
to be completely fair to Doug, I feel like he would disavow Nick if he actually knew all of the things that have been causing people to stop supporting him. And I think pedoguarding is a bridge too far for anyone who makes Christianity such a huge part of their identity like Doug does. But he does do a lot of the holier-than-thou stuff about trying to paint everybody else as hypocrites.
 
Back