Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 26.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
I wish people would stop making retards internet famous purely because they share slightly similar Politics/websites they browse.

Having used 4Chan should instantly deny you any sort of internet career, not for moral reasons just because everyone who's touched that website is a retard, a pedophile or doesn't know how to shut the fuck up.
 
Juju and Vito just talk about fucking kids. Their speech is constitutionally protected and they've suffered no institutional backlash for what they've said. People just hate them now. Nick appears to believe that is injustice.
Right, because at the beginning and ending of every day, Nick’s first internet job was “internet henchman for Dick Masterson”.
 
Nick is like 15 years behind the curve when it come to this. He's at that point where he just assumes that everything is "ironic" or trolling, after all that's the secret that experienced Internet users know. He wouldn't want to be the newfag that falls for an "obvious" troll now.

I've been here long enough to know that assuming that the dipshit sperging out is a genuine retard is a far safer bet. Vito can wink wink, nudge nudge all day long but I'd rather just take him at face value. If he doesn't like that and just so happens to not be a pedo then he can drop the act, until then Vito is a pedo.

The fact that Nick can't see that or more importantly can't see how it shouldn't matter to him just shows that he is really stupid. The truth is that is doesn't matter what Vito, Dick or Drexel are, only how they act and how that impacts him and his business.

I understand that Nick doesn't want to burn bridges and I think that's a fine attitude to take but there's has to be a limit to how much shit you are willing to take for defending some asshole on the Internet. Drexel is a bit different as they are irl friends but the same logic applies here imo.

As for free speech, who gives a fuck? No one is censoring Vito or Dick, they are just taking their words at face value. The fact that there's blow back from that isn't anyone's problem but theirs.
 
your children will hear about the balldo some day, why the fuck would you want that? The fuck is wrong with you.
Well, you don't have to wonder, as Nick has helpfully explained months ago that he would very much like it if that happens. See the video at the end of the quoted post.
Your use of the word "If" here is puzzling. An increasing number of his fans are turning on him because Nick has already done these things to varying degrees.

A few examples for your consideration:

Calling repeatedly calling KF incel faggots while imagining himself to be their internet daddy. Constantly referring to how much he doesn't care about KF.

View attachment 4208350
View attachment 4208352

Getting angry at chat for bringing up how his children might one day see clips of him talking about degenerate subject matter and his response is an emphatic "Good! GOOD!".

View attachment 4208343

Then there's also his persona to consider. Now he's all about going to gay bars and swinger resorts in addition to recreational drug use and forsaking his kids Christmas events for having sex on a beach.

By all means, you can hope for the best for Nick, but it seems you have some catching up to do.
Transcript of the video:
"All these people, uh, "(in a faggy voice) Er, your kids are gonna see this," Good. GOOD. If my kids see, if my kids learn that I enjoy having sex with their mom and that they should do a bunch of fun shit with their spouses, fucking good. Like, Jesus Christ."

So you see, talking about his kids having sex isn't anything new to ol' Balldoman.
 
I thought this was a point of contention between Nick and Null? Nick was against it and Null was for it or something? Am I misremembering?
You are remembering correctly. He's dancing all over the place on the death penalty.

If I can try to decipher Nicklish it goes like this:
  • He's a defense lawyer so he's against capital punishment on principle. He also acknowledges that historically in America it's often been wielded in a highly racist way against innocent parties.
  • Moreover, Nick does not think we should bestow the State with this power.
  • That tracks with the Null debate. Null likely flippantly said that he doesn't care if a few innocent people die if we can rid the world of pedos. Null's is a rough take but defensible position because: 1) He's not a lawyer. 2) He's young. 3) Much of his work is watching how these people behave and he's genuinely repulsed and horrified.
  • Meanwhile, Nick backtracks on his anti-capital punishment stand with BUT BUT BUT if we're gonna have the death penalty ANYWAY we should expand it to include pedos because raping a child basically kills their souls forever.
  • Then he says there's no point fighting for the death penalty for pedos (FL law) because SCOTUS will strike it down.
.... and then he takes to X/Twitter to defend an alleged pedo and comedy about raping kids.
 
Last edited:
Well, you don't have to wonder, as Nick has helpfully explained months ago that he would very much like it if that happens. See the video at the end of the quoted post.

Transcript of the video:
"All these people, uh, "(in a faggy voice) Er, your kids are gonna see this," Good. GOOD. If my kids see, if my kids learn that I enjoy having sex with their mom and that they should do a bunch of fun shit with their spouses, fucking good. Like, Jesus Christ."

So you see, talking about his kids having sex isn't anything new to ol' Balldoman.
Nick thinking his kids are going to hear about his nasty sexcapades and go, " wow so that's what a healthy relationship looks like, mom and dad must really love each other. My outlook on sex is much healthier now." is fucking insane.
 
Last edited:
So you see, talking about his kids having sex isn't anything new to ol' Balldoman.
kids growing up, finding a partner and having sex is a part of life, but I have never met a single parent that will talk or bring the topic of their small kids having sex in the future, fuck, most of them even avoid completely the topic even if their sons and daughters are married, I don't think it's normal for a dad to talk about their daughters having sex, am I wrong on this? is that a normal thing?
 
We effectively have the system working. Juju and Vito have made themselves untouchables because they can't stop fantasizing about children in public. It's not even like they're "cancelled" - Dick has his personal website, patreon, rumble account, podcast RSS feds, and Vito has all that plus a verified YouTube channel that makes residual income for him from his old shitty Soywars reviews.

They're not deplatformed. They're not cancelled. They're not cut off from anything a person should not be cut off from. They're just maligned by almost everyone for utterly reprehensible statements that basically the entire world considers toxic to the brand - statements that they were not compelled to make and repeatedly doubled down on for over two years, and only just recently started publicly regretting. The Kiwi Farms is less brand toxic than Vito and Juju at this point.

Why is also completely different. The Kiwi Farms is properly cancelled and deplatformed because we've pissed off people with constitutionally protected speech which genuinely criticizes and ridicules, among everyone else, a specific protected demographic. That's why you can play devil's advocate for the forum and not piss off everyone except the most deranged gender freaks.

Juju and Vito just talk about fucking kids. Their speech is constitutionally protected and they've suffered no institutional backlash for what they've said. People just hate them now. Nick appears to believe that is injustice.
I see people like Vito, Dick, Mr. Girl, etc, as a necessary evil. If the absolute bottom of the barrel guys can exercise their rights as much as I can, even and especially if it’s gross, that means our right to speech is working. Gross creeps will always exist, and they by necessity have the same rights everyone else has. That’s the only way to do freedom of speech properly, else it becomes “freedom of speech but…
There’s a difference, however, between the legal rights we have and the extralegal tactics being used against people to deplatform and silence, which is a problem that the forum is well aware of.
 
This is not a legal question at all, it's a question of "why is this fucking idiot so desperate to touch, lick, bump and grind against the third wire?"

I thankfully never knew Vito before he introduced himself to the Internet by talking about his lust for children as a 35-year-old man pretending to be a professional comedian.

However, with Dick and Nick, I specifically outlined to them in language a child could understand what they were doing and what the consequences of that would be. I have experienced this shit first hand. If you look at Drexel begging for receipts to go NUCLEAR with, what he gets is the same shit from Blockland. I am turning 31 in December and in the next year the oldest drama on Blockland will be older than I was when it happened. I have lived an entire third of my life under the shadow of things said when I was a teenager. Soon, it will be half my life. I still get people (both random a-logs and #DropKiwiFarms) calling me a pedophile for talking to teenagers as a teenager as if it happened yesterday.

So Vito groveling, "it was two years ago! I learned my lesson!", too bad, retard. You're going to see those tweets for the rest of your life. Even if the Kiwi Farms and all the archives were deleted forever, it would still not go away. Juju, Vito, and now Nick will literally never live to see a day where this Cuties shit is not brought up.

Nick and Juju think that it's like the blackface lawyer or his misogynist jokes. They think it's the same, and that they already have eaten as much shit as possible and there's no way this is any worse. There are certain sizable circles where those things do not owe explanation and the story can be funny. There is not a single group of people on this earth who think that this pedo shit is funny, and the explanation never gets easier or more fun.
 
These people don't see the real issue, that it's completely unclear whether Vito even is joking. Is him saying he wants to fuck your kids a joke? Maybe. You could definitely argue it's a bad one, but you can just as easily argue it's him flaunting his sexual desires to the world and getting away with it.

The tweet about "underestimating how many 'normal men' could become aroused by a minor under particular circumstances" is hard to see as anything but an honest opinion though, so good luck calling that a joke.
This has been my issue with retards falling on the sword to defend Vito. Can in some circumstances jokes about pedo shit be funny? Maybe, probably due to the shock factor. But Vito doesn't appear to be making any jokes. He appears to be acting just like an honest open pedo who then says "it's a joke" as a way of deflecting criticism. If you only ironically act like a pedo as a joke and no one gets you're joking, you're just acting like a pedo
 
Nick is under the impression that we and Josh are autistic and have missed the obvious cues that Vito is doing a bit and we are being trolled. I don't mind the occasional self-deprecating joke or even jokes about paedophilia. That last part might be unpopular but a singular joke no matter how poor taste it might be isn't a big deal. Vito on the other hand has been obsessed with the "joke" for years now. I say joke but I'm still waiting for the pay off.

I'm not really sure what social clues I'm supposed to have missed here? It's not funny and he's been saying it for years, what else am I supposed to take from that? Nick needs to understand that we don't live in his head, we don't know what he's thinking or believes. I have my thoughts and he has his, I see the world differently from Nick and in my opinion Vito is a pedo.
 
So Vito groveling, "it was two years ago! I learned my lesson!", too bad, retard. You're going to see those tweets for the rest of your life. Even if the Kiwi Farms and all the archives were deleted forever, it would still not go away. Juju, Vito, and now Nick will literally never live to see a day where this Cuties shit is not brought up.
And now Nick particularly, a man who was known for his "if you are even close to pedophilia you should be killed" stance is making his own child abuse/pedophile jokes that will haunt him forever too, and I don't know if it is to own you Null, because Dick ad Vito are his friends, because "muh freeze peach" or his alleged ODD.
 
This is not a legal question at all, it's a question of "why is this fucking idiot so desperate to touch, lick, bump and grind against the third wire?"

I thankfully never knew Vito before he introduced himself to the Internet by talking about his lust for children as a 35-year-old man pretending to be a professional comedian.

However, with Dick and Nick, I specifically outlined to them in language a child could understand what they were doing and what the consequences of that would be. I have experienced this shit first hand. If you look at Drexel begging for receipts to go NUCLEAR with, what he gets is the same shit from Blockland. I am turning 31 in December and in the next year the oldest drama on Blockland will be older than I was when it happened. I have lived an entire third of my life under the shadow of things said when I was a teenager. Soon, it will be half my life. I still get people (both random a-logs and #DropKiwiFarms) calling me a pedophile for talking to teenagers as a teenager as if it happened yesterday.

So Vito groveling, "it was two years ago! I learned my lesson!", too bad, retard. You're going to see those tweets for the rest of your life. Even if the Kiwi Farms and all the archives were deleted forever, it would still not go away. Juju, Vito, and now Nick will literally never live to see a day where this Cuties shit is not brought up.

Nick and Juju think that it's like the blackface lawyer or his misogynist jokes. They think it's the same, and that they already have eaten as much shit as possible and there's no way this is any worse. There are certain sizable circles where those things do not owe explanation and the story can be funny. There is not a single group of people on this earth who think that this pedo shit is funny, and the explanation never gets easier or more fun.
That’s why I trust your opinion on these topics, you probably have more experience with this than anyone else I can name off the top of my head.
Shame that people don’t listen when they should tbh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
Nick and Juju think that it's like the blackface lawyer or his misogynist jokes. They think it's the same, and that they already have eaten as much shit as possible and there's no way this is any worse. There are certain sizable circles where those things do not owe explanation and the story can be funny. There is not a single group of people on this earth who think that this pedo shit is funny, and the explanation never gets easier or more fun.
The problem with Nick is that he just assumes that everyone holds his values. He talks about autism and social cues but his attitude is pretty autistic itself. He thinks he can explain the joke and he'll try it all day, every day. Nick lacks that part of his brain that asks "am I in the one out of touch?", no he'll go on and on about it until you get tired of it which allows him to brush off the criticism as "you just don't get it".
 
If my kids see, if my kids learn that I enjoy having sex with their mom and that they should do a bunch of fun shit with their spouses, fucking good. Like, Jesus Christ
That sounds good in his mind, but the way his kids are most likely to find out, is by other kids at their school finding it and showing it to them, then making fun of them for it, and then they will hate him because his coomer ways are ruining their social life..
 
Back