2023-09-23 - Nitasha Tiku: conversationMedia request for comment from The Washington Post

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

-Benjamin Franklin

These people would give up freedom of speech over the feelings of a few mentally ill people, whats even worse is they would give up YOUR freedom of speech, for the feelings of these mentally ill people. Fuck these people, they don't deserve safety or freedom.
I don't have Semper Fi, so please take my flaccid, green checkmark.

First amendment rights precede everything. Yes, they can try to dawks "unmask" and shame us, but the moment the existence of our benign platform is put at risk from established powers, they have infringed upon our primary right from the US Constitution: the right to say "Trannies are fat and I will not have sex with them."
 
Somehow we can kill anyone we want, but not the people publicly admitting to causing serious issues for us. This is the Putin Paradox all over again. He is simultaneously all powerful and incredibly weak, his state of being depending on what US media is focused on (bad thing happens - Putin all powerful; good thing happens - Putin very weak). Either we have the Death Note, or not. It's that simple.
In Russia it's called "The Enemy Image Paradox" ("Парадокс образа врага") - a problem which any propaganda piece inevitably faces when trying to create a convincing image of the enemy. It goes like this: the enemy must be dangerous, cunning and powerful to be a credible threat. But at the same time, dumb and weak enough to be relatively safely fought against. If you go too far with the exaltation of the enemy, the struggle will seem hopeless. If you go too far with the humiliation, it will seem unnecessary.

An inept propagandist simply lumps all the cliches into one pile, which inevitably ends up collecting a bunch of mutually exclusive items, and as a result, the enemy turns out to be a strange creature - both powerful and insignificant, horrific and pathetic, cunning and childishly naive, all at the same time. We are about to fall apart - but we are also about to kill them all. We are all dumb neo-Nazi incels living in our moms' basement - but we are also in control of US government policies and have the power to execute any Person of Gender just by saying "lol fag". Pretty funny how it works.
 
Were I the fearless leader of this forum, I would reply to each and every one of these journos with the following:

"I would be glad to offer you a comment, but first I must insist on having a quote or two from you on your imminent lolcow thread on KiwiFarms.

Quid pro quo, Clarice."
 
I've seen people using the name Washington ComPost, but nobody has used the other name that scurrilous screed was known by back in the day. Pravda on the Potomac. It kept up a pretense of some impartiality until the late Washington Star folded. Then the ComPost was free to wallow in its own crapulence, and has done so to an extraordinary degree. Once Bradlee left, The degeneration accelerated, and now you have something that makes even the NY Times look good.

IIRC, there were bumper stickers in the DC metro area that said,"I don't believe the Washington Post." No idea if they are still around.

For those who do not want to pay Jeff Bezos for the privilege of reading the misinformation, disinformation, and outright lies his newspaper publishes, there is this little extension for the firefox browser. Since the Tor browser is firefox based, it works there too, or did. https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypas...s/latest/download/bypass-paywalls-firefox.xpi For the fools who use Chrome or, ahem, Edge, there's this https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome (apologies if already posted.) It may work with Brave. No idea.
 
man those comments are like the most "govern me harder daddy" posts I have ever seen. One woman even named herself the educated liberal woman. I cant believe they have the balls to say this while boasting democracy dies in the darkness on the front of their page. But what do you expect. I dont see any single self respecting person with a brain cell giving a dollar to the nyt just to prove others wrong in the comments. Maybe its just me but itd feel like giving a dollar to an onlyfans whore just to send her family what shes doing wrong in her life.
 
Some factual articles that could have been written instead:

"Info Documented on Kiwifarms Leads to Deeply Abused Autistic Boy Being Removed from Care of Mother With Munchausen's-By-Proxy"

"Info Documented on Kiwifarms Leads to Maryland Parents No Longer Being Able to Monetize the Abuse of their Kids on YouTube"

"Kiwifarms Unmasks Racist Author Who Lied About Being Indigenous for Tumblr Credibility and Book Deal"

"Kiwifarms Owner Donates Money, Resources to Autistic Transwoman After House Fire"

"Kiwifarms Owner Seeks Justice for Autistic Transwoman After Abuse, Blackmail, Coercion by Cis White Incels"

"Kiwifarms Users Form Online Coalition to Protect Autistic Transwoman From Harmful Trolls"

but "kiwifarms kills all trannies" is what they go for, every time
Don't forget "kiwifarms puts literal shit-eating pedo in prison for most of his life". I kind of feel like if that got out among the more right-wing people who were going to see Sound of Freedom and protesting pedos in school that we would earn a lot of goodwill among them. Shit eating is gross, pedos deserve the rope, and this horrible person is locked away safely far away from children.

... Maybe not stressing the shit stuff so much because normies, but a story about the sleuths here using their power for good? Well, it would warm my shriveled, black heart. I hope Nick is having consent accidents on a regular basis in prison. Hopefully with no air conditioning either. (Sorry for the a-log)

All of those stories are too much like actual investigative journalism though, so they'll never see the light of day.
 
The Washington Post eagerly supports criminals. William Elliot Fong commits crimes. He commits federal felonies. He is angry that because of his own admissions of "consent accidents," he is now mainly famous as a RAPIST. He is known for RAPING PEOPLE. This RAPIST piece of shit is angry that his RAPES are public knowledge.

For some reason, a previously well respected "news" paper full-throatedly and enthusiastically supports RAPE.

Why? What is wrong with these rapists? Why do they support rape?
The alternative is to do an investigation into a transsexual LGBTQ activist. Pragmatically, they can’t do that, no publication actually can. At minimum, it would kill their young online reader demographic for a while, but realistically it would paint them as “soft bigots” and result in the death of 25-35% of their advertiser base. They would lose so much passive revenue, it’s not even worth telling the truth.

Lots of people have wacky theories about what causes all of this but it’s just not that complicated. It’s simple, there is a very loud group of activists who terrorize the fuck out of anyone who even pisses downstream from them. Even the faintest zipper touch sends them into a frenzy.

They wield fear very effectively, that’s all they understand and if you ever want to fight it, you have to start playing their game. It’s a faux pas but if half the users here tried to have girl talks with Eyes Gone’s infrastructure, these attacks would stop immediately.
 
I think the explanation for this story is pretty obvious: journalists absolutely hate other journalists who are better at journalism than them. Especially the ones not in "elite" media who don't faithfully serve The Party. The number of worthless journalism degrees from elite schools on the Kiwi Farms can probably be counted on one hand.
 
hundreds of tranny cell inflitators, depp state , journoscum , pozzed ip companies and still they cant take down one man


Capture.PNG
 
These people would give up freedom of speech over the feelings of a few mentally ill people, whats even worse is they would give up YOUR freedom of speech, for the feelings of these mentally ill people. Fuck these people, they don't deserve safety or freedom.
They deserve to water the Liberty Tree.
 
Some factual articles that could have been written instead:

"Info Documented on Kiwifarms Leads to Deeply Abused Autistic Boy Being Removed from Care of Mother With Munchausen's-By-Proxy"

"Info Documented on Kiwifarms Leads to Maryland Parents No Longer Being Able to Monetize the Abuse of their Kids on YouTube"

"Kiwifarms Unmasks Racist Author Who Lied About Being Indigenous for Tumblr Credibility and Book Deal"

"Kiwifarms Owner Donates Money, Resources to Autistic Transwoman After House Fire"

"Kiwifarms Owner Seeks Justice for Autistic Transwoman After Abuse, Blackmail, Coercion by Cis White Incels"

"Kiwifarms Users Form Online Coalition to Protect Autistic Transwoman From Harmful Trolls"

but "kiwifarms kills all trannies" is what they go for, every time
Don't forget "kiwifarms puts literal shit-eating pedo in prison for most of his life". I kind of feel like if that got out among the more right-wing people who were going to see Sound of Freedom and protesting pedos in school that we would earn a lot of goodwill among them. Shit eating is gross, pedos deserve the rope, and this horrible person is locked away safely far away from children.

... Maybe not stressing the shit stuff so much because normies, but a story about the sleuths here using their power for good? Well, it would warm my shriveled, black heart. I hope Nick is having consent accidents on a regular basis in prison. Hopefully with no air conditioning either. (Sorry for the a-log)

All of those stories are too much like actual investigative journalism though, so they'll never see the light of day.
Weird ask, but can we get threadlinks for these for people who stumble upon these posts later and don't know what you guys are talking about?
 
She should thank Lorenz for fucking up internet archives for corporations.
That's what gets me about those people

People on websites like ycombinator hacker news, also known as grown-up adults, were often of the opinion that while they did not like Kiwifarms they hated the consequences of fucking with the free internet even more.

Which, of course, is a fair and balanced take. And they arrived there due to understanding how the internet and corpos work, which isn't hard. It just demands more than five seconds of your attention, but we all know that 5 seconds spent learning how stuff works are 5 seconds wasted not playing with toys or chasing narcissistic supply on the internet.

The elites had a problem before. They didn't know how they were going to convince people on the left to support a corporate dystopia where your average billionaire can simply throw money at problems to make them disappear. The solution? They lowered the voting mental age by creating manchildren after the manner of Sauron, and then throwing them at the problem. Now, ever since that strategy worked on Occupy, society actively encourages idiots who recklessly seethe at something they don't like without counting the cost. It's madness.
 
Me thinks this "Clay" might be one of those lying faggots who claim to be an edgy site user but change and grew. They could be lying or they could be one of those people that only browsed a specific part of the website without even using other boards at all, hell they probably don't even bother understanding the site culture and are just acting like they've been apart of it the entire time.
Whatever it is, it's reeeaallly fucking obvious this person is possibly a new user who joined to infiltrate this deep-dangerous-evil website then play it off as if they know absolutely every little thing about this website without even making any effort to learning the interesting discussion this site has that would end up getting shutdown by some pissy tranny janny.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back